32.5 C
Lagos
Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Home Blog Page 2125

Nigeria and need for green growth policy

In light of the fact that the green colour is rooted in Nigeria’s heritage as a nation, Adeola Adebiyi of the non-governmental organisation (NGO), Decarbonising The Next Generation, underlines the fact that developing and implementing a Green Growth Policy is critical to the country’s wellbeing

Abuja, Nigeria's federal capital city. Photo credit: northafricaculture.com
Abuja, Nigeria’s federal capital city. Photo credit: northafricaculture.com

For Nigeria, the green is rooted in its heritage as a nation. It is a symbol of national identity as represented on its national flag. Although there are about forty other countries in the world that have the color green on their flag, it can be agreed that no other country identifies with the colour green as Nigerians do. Green is also the color that represents nature and the environment, which means that the physical environment and natural resources play an important role in the geographical and social history of Nigeria.

Green being the colour associated with growth, is significant seeing that the Nigerian economy is growing at a very fast pace. Quite recently, Nigeria surpassed South Africa as the biggest economy in Africa. Blessed as it is with natural and human resources, there are predictions that the Nigerian economy will continue to grow in the coming decades. It is therefore important to understand Nigeria’s growth trajectory.

A trajectory simply means a course, a path, direction or route. Whichever way you may choose to define it, every system of economic growth has a pattern. For the rich European countries across the Atlantic, the pattern of growth was intensive industrialisation. For other countries across the pacific, specifically Asian countries, the growth pattern has been extensive development of their manufacturing sectors.

Many Nigerians are oblivious of the growth path of their economy. However, history has revealed that Nigeria is currently experiencing significant economic development, due to its great wealth of natural resources, mainly to oil and gas resources. Most of its earnings come from the direct sale of what is known as natural capital stock of fossil resources. This means that it simply extracts and sells its natural resources in the form of export.

This current pattern of economic growth is a major concern for the future of all Nigerians. Over exploitation of natural resources is unsustainable, especially when assets of commensurate value are not acquired to replace them. What usually happens is that income from exports is used to purchase imports. This is a situation, Paul Collier a renowned economist, in his book, The Plundered Planet, describes as “selling the family silver”.

Another point of major concern is that, very often, unsustainable economic systems are allied or paralleled with environmental degradation. Environmental degradation is a combination of environmental pollution, over extraction of natural resources and unproductive use of natural resources.

Environment degradation is plaguing the nation and there seems to be an unconcerned attitude towards it. Overexploitation and mismanagement of natural resources have become the norm.  For instance, the country might soon experience scarcity of ground water resources if over extraction of ground water from the uncountable use of borehole machines, across the country are not properly regulated. In addition, bad management of waste, both toxic and non-toxic into the environment can cause dangerous environmental consequences. I must also mention the incessant air pollution from fuel emissions in major cities like Lagos, and land degradation, intoxication of water bodies, gas flaring and oil spill in the Niger Delta which all remain major issues the government is yet to tackle.

The point is that Nigeria could be having good economic benefits at the expense of the environment, a condition known as “brown growth”. Brown growth is economic growth paralleled with overexploitation of natural resources and excess of carbon emissions.

One of the major causes of brown growth is lack of awareness about environmental issues. Even though environmental effects are not felt on a daily basis, they can bring about devastating impacts to human health and wellbeing. For instance, oil pollution and gas flaring in the Niger Delta also contribute to global greenhouse gas emissions hence climate change.

Nigeria must endeavor to understand that interactions with the environment are inevitable as everything necessary for survival comes from the environment. Everything is gotten from the environment, used in the environment, interacts with the environment, and is disposed of in the environment and so the need to be more conscious about the environment.

To arouse consciousness, social learning is critical. Government Institutions charged with the responsibility to protect the environment need to start stimulating social learning of environmental problems and create policies for environmental learning at all educational levels. Environmental protection involves many complex social and physical activities that need to be tackled not just by the government alone, but by every individual. Education can act as a high impact tool in this situation.

Corruption is another vice that requires a lot of attention. Corruption can jeopardise the wellbeing of the environment. In this part of the world, government projects and societal needs do not always tally. Yes, the economy must grow and yes, infrastructural development is important but some types of development are unsustainable and their impacts on the environment must be scrutinised thoroughly. Projects should be about people and their interactions with their environment and should enhance the entire wellbeing of citizens. Government officials should not take decisions that only favour project developers. Not every project is sustainable. Some projects impact the environment negatively.

The point is that the high level of environmental neglect could become a major constraint in sustaining the current and future economic growth of Nigeria which brings me back to the color green.

For a sustainable, balanced harmonious future, economic growth must be green and not brown. A green economy is one that is low in carbon emissions, low in pollution and resource efficient. In its simplest expression, “Green Growth” is growth that is environmental conscious. Achieving Green growth in Nigeria will involve developing policies that keep resource use and environmental impacts declining while the economy is growing.

Developing and implementing Green Growth policies in Nigeria is critical because the Nigerian population is projected to increase from 156 million people to 200 million by 2050. If this is an accurate projection, Nigeria may become the world’s third most populous country after India and china. The huge population already puts tremendous pressure on the environment and will lead to higher consumption of food and water and other types of resources, exerting pressure on natural resources. Increased consumption of resources will lead to increased waste and combined with inefficiency and poor management of waste will in turn cause environmental degradation and the cycle goes on and on.

What this implies, is that Nigeria needs to better value its natural resources and environment. Effort must be made to protect its natural resources strongly as not all are regenerative or renewable in nature. Do not get me wrong, Green Growth does not refer to economic stagnation. Nigeria can off course continue to use its natural resources, however with more efficiency, reducing waste and preventing environmental pollution.  The opportunities for adopting green growth policies are tremendous for instance; turning waste to electricity in Mega cities like Lagos can solve some electricity shortage problems faced in the country.

In developing green growth policies, there must be a holistic approach and an implementation plan that can be followed. It must also involve all sectors.

Green Growth In the energy sector is an opportunity to replace unrenewable carbon resources with cleaner renewable energy resources such as wind, solar and bio energy.

Green Growth in agriculture means we have to reposition our agricultural sector as the engine of growth and development. It involves ensuring food security for our nation, and at the same time-   while- yielding environmental benefits and creating employment opportunities.

Green Growth in industry involves making sure that industries adopt cleaner production processes and use resources efficiently.

Green Growth in infrastructure transportation and even in the household is also very important.

Innovation will play a major role in a green growth trajectory, instead of acquiring every type of technology from abroad, the Nigerian government could encourage science and technology institutes to understudy and adapt technologies to local context. Young Nigerians can also be encouraged to use their creativity and energy to find solutions to our unique environmental problems.

Action should not be left to the government alone, every individual and corporation must understand their responsibility towards nature. This is a very hard requirement, but through education and awareness, it can be achieved. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) implemented by organizations should also embrace environmental sustainability. It should not only be about philanthropic acts. Environmental protection responsibilities should be included in CSR activities such as appropriate resource consumption, energy management, waste minimization etc.

Even though faced with a lot challenges, leaders in Nigeria should try as much as possible to avoid short sightedness in development, and to see how the country can move towards achieving a more sustainable green economy. Economic Growth should not only be about becoming bigger but on becoming more productive. That is indeed sustainable Green Growth.

Group develops climate resilience strategy in local council

1

In partnership with Amuwo Odofin Local Government (AOLG) in Lagos State and with support from the Heinrich Boll Foundation, Community Conservation and Development Initiatives (CCDI) has produced a participatory risk reduction and management strategy. As all local governments in Lagos face climate change risks, the strategy, according to CCDI’s Director of Programmes, Kofo Adeleke, could be used as a model for all of them to build resilience.

Windstorm destroys a home in a Lagos neighbourhood
Windstorm destroys a home in a Lagos neighbourhood

According to her, it also involved an analysis of powers given to local governments compared to state government level in land use regulations and policies, using AOLG as a case study. The plan, she adds, was developed through a series of focus group multi-stakeholder and multi-disciplinary discussions, with contributions from legal practitioners, local and state government officials, local government legislators, NGOs and a diverse range of community representatives. The areas under focus were: Wetland Conservation and Restoration; Flood Shelters and Evacuation Routes; Environmental Impact Assessments; Waste Management; and Public Spaces.

She states: “Local governments need to ensure that the challenges and peculiarities of communities are addressed and locally based waste management initiatives are stepped up. Environmental Impact Assessments should be carried out on all proposed public and private projects to ensure environmental protection to communities and better standards of development, and in some cases no development at all. Proper definition must be given to the status of open spaces within local governments and constructive dialogue over responsibilities for them is required with the relevant state and federal agencies, as they are vital for health and well being as well as  disaster risk reduction plans.

“Local governments must identify existing natural wetlands and engage with state and federal government over the protection of these areas, as their natural properties to absorb rainfall are threatened by poor land use planning and rapid urbanisation. As first responders in emergencies local governments must identify the required number of shelters and places of safety and assess suitability of locations and buildings for temporary conversion to emergency shelters. Road networks and their accessibility in cases of emergency must be examined. Local governments should ensure that by-laws, which can support climate change adaptation polices, are gazetted, otherwise it means that they are therefore not judiciable, which means they are not accepted in a court of law and cannot be enforced. The delays from Lagos State government in getting them gazetted are having a negative impact on the abilities of local governments to protect the environment.

“Especially with regard to waste management, wetland restoration and open spaces there appears to be inconsistencies with the powers given to local government and state government over scope for taking action. Local government officers need more knowledge of how to use the rights and powers given to local government in land use and environmental regulation matters.

Elected representatives of communities should utilise their powers and influence at state government level to ensure that local governments can carry out functions that will protect their communities from climate change threats. Improved institutional coherence between federal, state and local levels of government on environmental matters is critical if communities are to successfully adapt to safeguard their populations and assets from climate change.”

Climate concerns rise amid growing global coal consumption

0

Global coal consumption rose three percent from 2012 to 2013, reaching over 3,800 million tons of oil equivalent (mtoe) in 2013. While the pace of growth is down from 7.1 percent in 2010, the continued increase in coal consumption and related carbon emissions is a cause for substantial concern among climate scientists. If this trend continues, attempts to keep global warming below 2 degrees Celsius will likely fail, writes Christoph von Friedeburg, a research fellow at the Worldwatch Institute.

A coal-fired power plant
A coal-fired power plant. Photo credit: bellonia.org

Looking at recent developments by region, energy-hungry emerging economies, such as China and India, have been driving the expansion in coal use since the beginning of this century. In contrast, coal consumption in the United States and the European Union (EU) is declining. These countries have been replacing part of their coal consumption with natural gas and renewable energy, although China is taking steps in the same direction.

Coal demand in China has almost tripled since 2000, rising from 683.5 mtoe to 1,933.1 mtoe in 2013-more than half of the global figure. To meet coal demand, the nation so far has been relying on its domestic production. But analysts doubt that this is sustainable for another decade or longer. As imported coal has become competitive, China’s imports have outweighed its exports since 2009.

To diversify its energy sources, the Chinese government increased its capacity, investments, and exports in renewable energy technology, making the nation a new world leader in renewable energy. Furthermore, China is looking into increased imports and domestic extraction of natural gas, all while reducing the nation´s energy intensity.

In the United States, coal consumption has been in retreat since the start of the domestic shale gas boom. These trends could change in coming years if, as some analysts predict, many of the wells for hydraulic fracturing run dry and natural gas prices rise again, or if substantial exports of liquefied natural gas begin.

Coal consumption in the EU has been on a marked downward trend since 1990.This trend is mostly attributable to the EU´s flat overall energy consumption since 1990 and to coal’s falling share in EU primary energy consumption. Policies and financial incentives that raised the share provided by renewables contribute to this shift.

The coal supply is getting “dirtier” as strong demand and lower prices create markets for coal with lower energy content. In 2012, for instance, the average heat content of coal produced in the United States was about 23.4 megajoules per kilogram (MJ/kg), down from 29.17 MJ/kg in 2005. This means that more and more coal needs to be burned to generate the same amount of heat for a desired electricity output.

If coal consumption continues to increase and no meaningful binding multilateral agreements on climate change are made, attempts to combat global climate change will likely fail. One source of hope is that the combination of decreasing energy intensity and declining costs of renewables will cause coal´s share to keep shrinking and stop the global rise in the use of the dirtiest energy source.

Malawi commits to sufficient, long-term water supply

President of Malawi, Peter Mutharika, has said that his government is geared at not only solving the water challenges in Blantyre for now, but set the Blantyre Water Board (BWB) to ably supply sufficient water for the population of year 2040.

President of Malawi, Peter Mutharika
President of Malawi, Peter Mutharika

Mutharika said this recently during the national address to the public, which was broadcast on public radio and television channels. In his 15-page document, the President said: “My fellow Malawians, I am very aware of the water challenges in Blantyre, and I assure everyone that government is determined to supply sufficient water to all residents.”

He said Blantyre Water Board’s infrastructure is aged and has out-lived its design capacity which was meant for a population of 500 000 residents up to the year 1999.

“Today BWB has over 1 million customers. Further, due to inadequate rains in the year 2012/13, the Mudi Dam which produces about 10 percent of the Board’s water production dried up by October 2014. Thirdly, electricity, which costs BWB about K270 million per month to pump water from Nkula, 40 kilometers away from the City has been another challenge,” said Mutharika.

According to Mutharika, his government embarked on a total rehabilitation of the Blantyre Water Board production facilities and replacement of pumps at Walkers Ferry and Chileka Pumping Stations, and by March 2015, the board will be able to meet all the demand of 96 000 cubic meters per day, up from the current 74 000 cubic meters production capacity.

“In addition, we will construct a water supply system from Mulanje Mountain at a cost of about $15 million, to provide an extra 8 000 cubic meters of water per day to Blantyre and surrounding areas.

By George Mhango (Water Journalists – Africa) in Blantyre, Malawi

Improving access to family planning for climate-compatibility

Policymakers and others working to slow human-caused climate change and make societies more resilient to its impacts should consider potential contributions to that effort from expanded access to family planning, a group of experts recommends.

Robert Engelman, Senior Fellow and former President of the Worldwatch Institute.
Robert Engelman, Senior Fellow and former President of the Worldwatch Institute. Photo credit: worldwatch.org

The first step is simply to open dialogues on possible connections between climate change and family planning, and the right of individuals and the services they need to decide for themselves the timing and frequency of childbearing, said the experts. The group, which explored the linkage of population dynamics and family planning to climate compatible development, was convened by Population Reference Bureau and the Worldwatch Institute. Members came from fields related both to climate change and reproductive health.

“This is a clear statement from a diverse group of climate and reproductive health experts, women and men from developing as well as developed countries,” said Robert Engelman, Senior Fellow and former President of the Worldwatch Institute. “The group strongly recommends expanding access to family planning, with one of its many benefits being that it helps support development that is compatible with a sustainable climate.”

Over the last 100 years, the world’s population has grown from around one billion people to more than seven billion people. Human activity has transformed vast areas of the Earth’s surface, altered the atmosphere, and resulted in thousands of plant and animal species extinctions. Achieving universal access to family planning throughout the world would result in fewer unintended pregnancies, improve the health and well-being of women and their families, and slow population growth-all benefits to climate compatible development.

Population and family planning have rarely been linked with climate compatible development in climate policy discussions. Research has demonstrated, however, that helping women in all countries achieve their own aspirations for planning pregnancies and family size would put the world on a path to slower population growth. This would ultimately lead to substantial reductions in future carbon dioxide emissions.

Connections within family planning-climate change connections are presented from a woman-centered and rights-based approach. When safe and effective family planning services are available to all, experience shows that average family size falls, pregnancies occur at more optimal times in women’s lives, and mothers and children are healthier and more able to contribute to their countries’ development-and are more resilient to rapid change.

Jason Bremner, Associate Vice President at the Population Reference Bureau. Photo credit: geog.ucab.edu
Jason Bremner, Associate Vice President at the Population Reference Bureau. Photo credit: geog.ucab.edu

“Family planning can be a sensitive topic, especially when linked to climate change or the environment generally,” Engelman said. “These experts are saying it’s okay to talk about, okay to support, so long as we insist that its availability is rooted in human rights and the free reproductive decisions of individual women and couples. There are many steps needed to advance climate compatible development, such as addressing unequal greenhouse gas emissions and vulnerability to climate change impacts. One of these important steps is to make sure that individuals and couples can choose safe and effective contraception to have the pregnancies they want and to avoid those they do not.”

“The work of this group of population, climate, family planning, and development experts illustrates that you can have a positive, women centred dialogue on these connections,” adds Jason Bremner, Associate Vice President at the Population Reference Bureau. “This positive conversation and the establishment of a common set of guiding principles were critical in arriving at the consensus statement and will help others interested in making these connections avoid past missteps. The action opportunities developed by this group chart a path forward for researchers, advocates, and policymakers. These actions could ensure that improved access to family planning figures among the efforts to address climate change and its impacts.”

Linking population, reproductive health, and climate change is unconventional for many policymakers. Cross-sectoral alliances and initiatives that highlight and integrate potential synergies in development plans and in climate finance programs could reap enormous benefits, especially over time, for individuals and societies as we tackle climate change.

2015: Politicians urged to mainstream sanitation into campaigns

WaterAid Nigeria wants political parties and their candidates to mainstream water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) issues into political campaigns, as the country prepares to hold  the 2015 general elections.

President Goodluck Jonathan (right) and General Muhammad Buhari will contest the 2015 presidential elections. Photo credit: naijagists.com
President Goodluck Jonathan (right) and General Muhammad Buhari will contest the 2015 presidential elections. Photo credit: naijagists.com

Towards achieving this, the UK charity in collaboration with several civil society partners including YouthWASH Nigeria and Water and Sanitation Media Network is mobilising the general public to demand political parties and aspirants to proffer solutions to Nigeria’s water and sanitation crisis in their manifestos. About 63 million people are believed to without access to safe drinking water, while about 39 million are still defecating in the open, according to WaterAid.

Speaking in Abuja last week during a workshop to sensitise journalists, bloggers and WASH activists on the ‘Vote4WASH’ campaign, Saheed  Mustapha, Advocacy and Partnership Manager, WaterAid Nigeria, called on voters to demand solutions to water and sanitation issues from political aspirants for local, state, and federal positions, saying: Water  is a developmental issues such as education, basic healthcare, and economic delivery, as such it should be in the forefront of national political discourse.”

National Coordinator of YouthWASH, Nature Obiakor, said Nigerians youths through the Vote4WASH campaign will engage with political aspirants and hold them accountable should they fail to redeem their WASH pledges, after being sworn in. “Vote4WASH campaign will not end at the conclusion of the 2015 general elections, it continues after election, because we would demand that elected public offices deliver their WASH promises,” he said.

Cross River engages stakeholders in REDD+ programme

0

Governor of Cross River State, Senator Liyel Imoke, has said that the United Nations-promoted Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (UN-REDD+) programme being implemented in the state as a pilot area is positively impacting the citizenry in the area of forest management.

Senator Liyel Imoke, Governor of Cross River State
Senator Liyel Imoke, Governor of Cross River State. Photo credit: elombah.com

Imoke, who made the disclosure on Friday in Calabar, the state capital, during the programme’s Stakeholder Engagement Forum, stated that this comes against the backdrop of the desire to continue to explore every opportunity to build on existing structures and processes.

He said: “Today, we see REDD+ beginning to have impacts in our state. Though still at the REDD+ Readiness Phase, there is already strong evidence of positive behaviour change towards the management of our forests, and coordination of all stakeholders to invest in meaningful initiatives that will benefit first our forest dependent communities, and everyone else.

“We are happy to note the advancement in REDD+ implementation in Cross River State. As stakeholders become more informed and involved in the process, we as government are waiting to receive feedback that will influence policies and processes based on evidence and with the intent on preserving our culture and wellbeing. We in Cross River State have recognised that the responsibility lies on us all to join hands and preserve our heritage and our future. We owe this to ourselves, to our children now and future generations, and the global community. With God on our side, we will succeed.”

He inaugurated the REDD+ Stakeholder Forum, comprising six stakeholder groups including forest dependent communities, government bodies, media, academia, civil society and the private sector. It will coordinate actions and responses in order to create harmony in forest governance processes.

National Coordinator, Nigeria UN-REDD+ Programme, Salisu Dahiru, who disclosed that the country has been opportuned to join the World Bank’s FCPF REDD+ family, declared that lessons from Cross River’s Stakeholder Engagement are critical.

“Nigeria’s REDD+ programme is a realistic one, not too ambitious, and designed to suit our federal structure. We are encouraged that the two-track approach of Nigeria is succeeding; we look forward to a positive scaling up of the REDD+ programme to two additional states and the entire country,” he added.

Chairman Cross River Forestry Commission (CRSFC), Odigha Odigha, said of the forum: “We are trying to establish ownership of the entire programme and the ownership should start from a process that we all designed and took part in. This is talking about establishing a community-based REDD+ platform where decisions will be taken by the committee and essentially talking about providing alternative livelihood.

“We are complying with the basic element of good governance, participatory behavior, accountability, transparency and equity. The stakeholders are truly contributing – they are not influenced into forming an opinion.”

Board member, CRSFC, Arikpo Arikpo, expressed hope that besides financial support to improve community forestry activities that have historically been constrained by limited resources, REDD+ would bring non-financial benefits including improvements in institutional capacity and human capital.

“It is hoped that better monitoring of resource extraction and greater enforcement of rules may result in improved forest carbon and livelihood outcomes. For REDD+ as a forest-based climate change mitigation strategy to succeed, it is expected that the funding for programmes would be timely, and implementation participatory,” he submitted.

Tony Atah (UN-REDD+ Stakeholder Engagement Specialist) and Ruth Akagu (South East Regional Coordinator of the Nigerian Conservation Foundation), stressed that besides the inauguration of the Stakeholder Forum, the programme would likewise implement Community Based REDD+, commence FPIC (Free, Prior and Informed Consent), develop REDD+ implementation strategy, mainstream gender strategy, and develop appropriate policies and legal instruments.

They added: “If change in climate and loss of biodiversity had no meaningful impact on humanity, nobody would care. REDD+ therefore is all about the people – promoting people-centred and people-driven development through improved natural resource management.”

After deliberations, participants underlined the need for Community Based REDD+ (CBR+) to address the issue of poverty in forest dependent communities. According to them, REDD+, through CBR+, should support communities to raise fund for community level projects through advocacies in international events.

“While youth education and capacity building to be encouraged to reduce pressure on forest, biodiversity management initiatives should include watershed management. Capacity building for rule enforcement in forest dependent communities will ensure compliance and improved forest governance,” they added.

The newly inaugurated Stakeholders Forum will, besides liaising between REDD+ and all stakeholders, ensure that the voices of communities are well documented and integrated into relevant policies.

The Forum will also: contribute into work plans and periodic progress review of REDD+; develop data base of stakeholders e.g. phone numbers to facilitate effective dissemination of information among forest dependent communities and other stakeholders; and participate in the production and dissemination of knowledge products for effective information dissemination.

Essentially, it will: create awareness; build capacity; implement CBR+ especially livelihoods component; train the media training; organise knowledge sharing meetings and strengthening the forum by holding quarterly and bi-annual meeting.

Under the Forum, the forest dependent communities are Mbe/Afi Cluster (Boki LGC), Iko/Esai Cluster (Akamkpa, Yakurr, Obubra and Etung LGCs) and Mangrove Cluster (Akpabuyo, Calabar South, Calabar Municipality, Bakassi and Odukpani LGCs).

Government bodies will have representatives from: CRSFC, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Environment, State Planning Commission, Department of International Development Cooperation, Department of Tourism Development, Department of Investment Promotion, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Lands, Ministry of Women Affairs and CRS House of Assembly.

Others include: civil society organisations (3), media (2), academia (Forestry & Wildlife Department, University of Calabar; Department of Geography & Environmental Sciences, University of Calabar; Faculty of Agriculture, Cross River University of Technology).

Private sector players are: Dansa, banks (Ecobank, Zenith Bank), Timber Association, Wilmar, OKIP, Unicem and Flour Mill Plc.

Calabar UN-REDD+ stakeholder forum in photos

0

Six broad stakeholder groups including forest dependent communities; government ministries, departments and agencies (GMDAs); media; academia; civil society organisations; and private sector players gathered for three days last week in Calabar, Cross River State (CRS), courtesy of the United Nations collaborative mechanism on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (UN-REDD+) Programme.

The REDD+ Readiness Programme in Nigeria is being implemented in Cross River as pilot state. The Stakeholder Forum is regarded as the ultimate platform to coordinate stakeholders’ participation and contribution to the strategic direction of the REDD+ Programme implementation in state. The forum likewise validated the Participatory Governance Assessment Draft Report and the Community Based REDD+ Draft Country Plan.

Nigeria is executing the REDD+ Readiness programme under an innovative, two-track approach involving the Federal Government and CRS.

Royal Fathers at the forum (L-R): Dr. Etim Ekpo (Akpabuji), Ntufam Clement Ekpe Emajip (Akamkpa), Chief Obio Aidam Eyo (Ekuri/Eko cluster), Otu Fredalin Akandu (Boki), Ovat Ewona (Obubra) and Emmanuel Oru Gomg (Etung)
Royal Fathers at the forum (L-R): Dr. Etim Ekpo (Akpabuji), Ntufam Clement Ekpe Emajip (Akamkpa), Chief Obio Aidam Eyo (Ekuri/Eko cluster), Otu Fredalin Akandu (Boki) and Ovat Ewona (Obubra)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

National Coordinator, Nigeria UN-REDD+ Programme, Salisu Dahiru, making a presentation
National Coordinator, Nigeria UN-REDD+ Programme, Salisu Dahiru, making a presentation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REDD+ Specialist, Ochuko Odibo, addressing the gathering
REDD+ Specialist, Ochuko Odibo, addressing the gathering

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UN-REDD+ Stakeholder Engagement Specialist, Tony Atah (left) with Finance & Admin. Manager, Bassey Ituen
UN-REDD+ Stakeholder Engagement Specialist, Tony Atah (right) with Finance & Admin. Manager, Bassey Ituen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Project Director, African Research Association Managing Development in Nigeria (ARADIN), James Odey (left); South East Regional Coodinator, Nigerian Conservation Foundation (NCF), Ruth Akagu; and other participants
Project Director, African Research Association Managing Development in Nigeria (ARADIN), James Odey (left); South East Regional Coodinator, Nigerian Conservation Foundation (NCF), Ruth Akagu; and other participants

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Board Member, Cross River State Forestry Commission (CRSFC), Arikpo Arikpo (left); UN-REDD+ Officer, Department of Forestry, Federal Ministry of Environment, Hauwa Umar (middlie); and Chairman, CRSFC, Odigha Odigha
Board Member, Cross River State Forestry Commission (CRSFC), Arikpo Arikpo (left); UN-REDD+ Officer, Department of Forestry, Federal Ministry of Environment, Hauwa Umar (middlie); and Chairman, CRSFC, Odigha Odigha

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Participants at the forum
Participants at the forum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Participants at the gathering
Participants at the gathering

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salisu Dahiru
Salisu Dahiru

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A view of participants
A view of participants

 

 

Researchers explore avenues to curb unsavoury Africa urbanisation

0

Following previous meetings held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in March 2013 and in Nairobi, Kenya in February 2014, the Africa Urban Research Institute (AURI) recently (November 2014) in Cape Town, South Africa convened a gathering with a thematic focus on “Urban research for reducing urban poverty” to plan for the future.

Cape Town, South Africa. Photo credit: www.tripadvisor.com
Cape Town, South Africa. Photo credit: www.tripadvisor.com

Organisers were of the belief that outcomes of the meeting could provide a basis to develop an informed and compelling research and advocacy agenda around African urbanisation and urban poverty reduction, targeting key events such as the 2015 Africities meeting and the 2016 Habitat III conference.

With financial support from the Mistra Urban Futures programme based at the African Centre for Cities, the third AURI workshop meeting was held on 20 November 2014, in Cape Town, South Africa. The meeting was intended to inform AURI members of the content of the Ford Foundation proposal and the work plan leading to the end of 2015. The workshop specifically addressed the following issues:

  • The changing purpose, nature and focus of research on urban poverty.
  • Available information sources and methods (including co-production) for researching and reducing urban poverty.
  • Changes in how urban poverty is being (and will be) addressed in policy, especially in relation to the ongoing process to develop the SDGs.
  • How African urban research centres and AURI can contribute to urban poverty reduction through policy research and advocacy.

Proceedings began with a welcome from Vanessa Watson of the African Centre for Cities (ACC), and introductions by the AURI representatives present.

ACC is part of an international network of cities (Gothenburg, Manchester, Shanghai, Kisumu and Cape Town) where efforts are underway to understand and direct urban sustainability better through innovative knowledge-sharing practices. The programme is funded and managed by Mistra Urban Futures (MUF) headquartered at Chalmers University in Gothenburg, Sweden.

In the opening presentation, James Duminy (ACC) updated partners on the activities of the AURI secretariat undertaken since February 2014. He outlined the objectives, content and work programme of the AURI proposal submitted to and approved by Ford Foundation in 2014. As part of the work programme, AURI will:

  • Commission three expert think pieces as strategic resources
  • Commission background urban reports for each Ford Foundation country office
  • Conduct a series of in-country workshops in different AURI contexts to engage civil society, government and other partners
  • Conduct an AURI workshop in 2015 to identify key issues for policy briefs
  • Develop an online knowledge platform to promote sharing and dissemination of resources and information
  • Host a policy conference at/in parallel to the Africities 2015 event

Ntombini Marrengane and Gordon Pirie (ACC) then presented on ACC’s Africa research programmes, describing how these projects have drawn upon co-production methodologies, and how they potentially link to the AURI agenda and work programme.

Adele Hosken, regional representative of Cities Alliance (CA), updated participants on the progress of the CA Africa Strategy, CA’s contributions to the SDG process, and CA’s research and programmatic agenda around urban poverty reduction. She emphasised the importance of networks such as AURI in enabling the alignment of actors and activities across different scales in order to drive system changes. She also reaffirmed that AURI remains an important strategic partner in relation to both the CA Africa Strategy and work of the CA Think Tank (to be established in 2015). CA has identified certain priority areas for their work in Africa (and Medium-Term Strategy more generally), and will be commissioning a series of discussion papers over the next year to give impetus and substantive content to the work in these areas. AURI is well placed to contribute to this process, and in particular could help to frame certain positions around informality, inclusive growth, resilience, and gender equality.

Owen Crankshaw (Department of Sociology, University of Cape Town) then presented some of his research on urban inequality, focusing on the patterns and causes of the changing class structure of South African cities and their implications for class and racial inequality (the polarisation/professionalisation debate), as well as the contemporary spatial order of cities and its implications for racial inequality (the spatial mismatch debate). His presentation provided a basis for participants to reflect upon contemporary trends in urban inequality in Africa more generally, and to sharpen their knowledge of methodologies for studying urban inequality patterns and drivers.

The discussions then switched to the topic key global policy debates, with a presentation by Susan Parnell (Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, University of Cape Town). She highlighted how the question of urban poverty is framed within global debates about cities, emphasising that what is said in global terms will be formative of how we conceptualise and operationalize ‘the urban’. Her presentation focused on the ongoing processes to develop the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the post-Habitat III development agenda, and their implications for cities. Points raised in discussions included:

  • How can AURI help to ensure that the global development norms set out by the Habitat III agenda are implemented by African governments, and according to their original objectives?
  • How should AURI seek to take and advocate positions in various debates, for example, surrounding the view of cities as ‘drivers’ or ‘sites’ of development? How should this position be framed in a way that doesn’t reproduce the false urban-rural dichotomy?

At the end of the day, participants agreed that AURI has an important advocacy role to play in relation to the SDG and Habitat III processes. However, it was recognised that AURI needs to develop its positions and arguments in a very limited timeframe. These arguments need to be regional in their scope, yet also acknowledge the diversity of urban processes and forms across the African continent. It was broadly agreed that the key arguments could centre on: the utility of co-production as an approach to knowledge production and service delivery; a view of urban areas and urbanization as ‘drivers of change rather than sites for development interventions; the need to recognise and respond to informality as a ‘normal’ feature of African cities; as well as the importance of promoting gender equality for sustainable development. It was also considered that AURI could take particular positions on what is needed more generally to promote inclusive and resilient growth in Africa.

In addition to recognising the multidimensional nature of poverty and its links to inequality, the SDG process currently reveals a shift towards seeing cities as ‘vectors’ or ‘drivers of change’, with sustainable urban development considered the key to sustainable development more generally. This is linked to an expanded emphasis from cities as specific geographic locations and sites of developmental intervention to recognising the transformative power of urbanization (as a process) and its relation to urban-rural interactions and long-term environmental issues (e.g. resource extraction, energy use, waste generation). AURI could support the idea of cities having a strong positive role as drivers of sustainable development whilst emphasising that sustainable urbanisation requires integrating and enhancing rural and urban processes. The argument could further emphasise the socio-economic development potential offered by migration and agglomeration processes.

×