25.4 C
Lagos
Tuesday, May 20, 2025
Home Blog Page 1847

Indigenous Peoples describe U.S. climate accord pull-out affront to planet, human rights

0

On Thursday, June 1 2017, President Donald Trump announced that his government would withdraw from the Paris Climate Change Agreement. The U.S. now joins Syria and Nicaragua as the only countries not party to the agreement (Nicaragua said they did not sign on because it did not go far enough).

Indigenous Peoples
U.S. Indigenous Peoples in a protest march

“This irresponsible and reckless action is consistent with his and the Republican party’s anti-environmental agenda, which threatens our sacred Mother Earth and the survival of our future generations,” says the International Indian Treaty Council (IITC) in a statement.

The group adds that, like Trump’s recent Executive Orders and Presidential memoranda fast-tracking the approvals for Dakota Access and the Keystone XL pipelines, “his latest action continues to put the interest of fossil fuel corporations above the Planet, its Peoples, and human rights.”

When the Paris Agreement was adopted by 194 States and the European Union in December 2015, some denounced it while others hailed it as an historic triumph. It is currently legally ratified by 147 countries.

“For Indigenous Peoples, who are on the frontlines of the climate crises around the world, the Paris Agreement was an incremental step forward for the recognition of our rights in international law. It also committed States to peak greenhouse gas emissions ‘as soon as possible,’ and to seek a balance between human-caused emissions and removals by carbon sinks,” stresses the IITC, an organisation of Indigenous Peoples from North, Central, South America, the Caribbean and the Pacific working for the Sovereignty and Self Determination of Indigenous Peoples and the recognition and protection of Indigenous Rights, Treaties, Traditional Cultures and Sacred Lands.

The group notes that the inclusion of “the rights of Indigenous Peoples” in the preamble of the Paris Agreement was achieved despite the consistent opposition of some countries throughout the process. “This addition remains a significant and unprecedented step forward because the preamble of a Treaty provides the context and framework for interpreting and implementing the entire document,” it declares.

The statement reads:

“Removing the U.S. from an agreement that specifically recognises the rights of Indigenous Peoples should be an additional cause for concern especially considering the recent U.S. no show at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights hearing to review the human rights impacts of the President’s Executive Orders in March of this year.

“The Paris Agreement also called up on State parties (countries) to hold “the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.” The 1.5 temperature goal was a core position not only for Indigenous Peoples, but for the Small Island Developing States in Paris. In addition, the Agreement affirms the need for a participatory, transparent, gender-sensitive approach based on science and ‘as appropriate, traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples and local knowledge systems.’

“The implementation of these decisions by State Parties remains a challenge. However, the recognition of the rights of Indigenous Peoples, the commitments to limiting temperature increases, and the recognition of traditional knowledge were core positions held firmly by Indigenous Peoples in their engagement with governments in Paris.

“Certainly, the Paris Agreement did not fulfill all the aspirations of Indigenous Peoples and fell short for many vulnerable States as well. But it provides a basis for future advocacy to ensure that all national and international programmes addressing Climate Change are carried out with respect for the rights of Indigenous Peoples as affirmed in the UN Declaration for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. These include rights to lands and resources, free prior and informed consent, subsistence, traditional knowledge and Treaty rights, among others.

“The withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, along with all the other anti-environmental actions of the U.S. President and the Republican majority should be condemned by those who seek to create a better life for all Peoples and to fulfill our sacred responsibilities to Mother Earth.”

As wildlife returns, Ivorian park may be struck off ‘danger list’

0

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has recommended withdrawing in-danger status from Comoé National Park in Côte d’Ivoire after seeing chimps and elephants return to the park.

The nature conservation body also recommends the Landscapes of Dauria in Russia and Mongolia to become a new World Heritage site. This advice is included in a set of reports for the World Heritage Committee, issued on Friday, June 2, 2017 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO).

Comoé National Park
Wildlife at the Comoé National Park in Côte d’Ivoire

Situation improving in Ivoirian site in danger

Inscribed on the Danger List since 2003, Comoé National Park in Côte d’Ivoire has been facing threats such as poaching and illegal gold mining, fuelled by political instability. Since the country’s situation stabilised in 2012, conservation efforts have succeeded in improving populations of species, including elephants and chimpanzees, which were thought to have disappeared from the park. Following a monitoring mission to confirm improvements, IUCN recommends removing the site from the Danger List.

The List of World Heritage in Danger is a mechanism designed to mobilise urgent action to tackle severe issues that can damage the outstanding values of World Heritage sites. Out of 238 sites listed for their natural values, 18 are currently listed as “in danger”. These include iconic places such as Virunga National Park in DR Congo, Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra in Indonesia and Everglades National Park in the USA.

 

Threats continue in iconic sites

A total of 55 natural World Heritage sites have been monitored for the World Heritage Committee this year by IUCN, together with UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre. The recommendations issued on Friday propose measures to tackle threats in iconic natural World Heritage sites, including the Great Barrier Reef in Australia and Białowieża Forest in Poland and Belarus. More reports are due to be released next week.

Implementation of Australia’s 2050 plan to conserve the Great Barrier Reef is progressing, but more needs to be done, according to the recommendations. The report confirms climate change continues to be the most serious threat to the site. Coral bleaching events that have impacted the reef and other coral World Heritage sites in 2016 and 2017 highlight the need for action to tackle climate change beyond the national level.

The Great Barrier Reef is the largest coral reef system on Earth, hosting many threatened species such as the dugong and the large green turtle.  A substantial report on the condition of the site is expected to be made in two years time, which the World Heritage Committee will consider in 2020.

Among the sites that are vulnerable to serious threats, eight require urgent measures, without which danger-listing could be considered in the near future.

If Poland continues to undertake wood extraction and logging in old-growth areas of Białowieża Forest, intact habitats and species will likely be disturbed, says the IUCN, adding that this could provide the basis for listing the site as “in danger” in 2018.

The European Commission recently expressed concern over the removal of 100-year and older trees from the forest, which is also a Natura 2000 site. Inscribed as a cross-border World Heritage site in Poland and Belarus, Białowieża is one of the few remaining primeval forests on the European continent.

Natural sites where IUCN’s recommendations mention possible danger-listing in 2018 also include Plitvice National Park in Croatia, where housing is fast developing to cater for increasing numbers of tourists, and Dja Faunal Reserve in Cameroon, which is affected by impacts from a dam currently being filled, as well as elephant poaching. The Sundarbans in Bangladesh, Doñana National Park in Spain, the Golden Mountains of Altai and the Natural System of Wrangel Island Reserve, both in Russia, and Coiba National Park and its Special Zone of Marine Protection in Panama are the other sites proposed by IUCN for possible danger listing in 2018, if urgent actions are not put in place.

The IUCN has also evaluated 13 proposals to inscribe new areas, or extend and modify natural areas already on the World Heritage List. In evaluation reports released on May 19, 2017, IUCN recommends inscribing three key habitats for species conservation as natural World Heritage sites in Argentina, Benin/Burkina Faso and China. On Friday, IUCN recommended one further site for inscription.

The Landscapes of Dauria constitute an outstanding example of steppe ecosystem, spread across Mongolia and Russia. The site provides key habitats for rare animal species such as the Endangered tarbagan marmot, the white-naped crane, the swan goose and millions of migratory birds. It is also the only place known in Russia where the Mongolian gazelle breeds.

The recommendations on proposed inscriptions and on action to tackle threats will be debated at the World Heritage Committee meeting, which this year takes place in Kraków, Poland, from July 2 to 12. The IUCN is the advisory body on nature under the World Heritage Convention responsible for providing technical advice. The World Heritage Committee takes the final decisions.

Nigeria earned $590bn from petroleum sector in 15 years, says transparency agency

0

The Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) has called for closer partnership with the civil society to enable it implement remedial issues contained in its reports of the oil and gas industry.

Waziri-Adio
Executive Secretary of NEITI, Waziri Adio

The Executive Secretary of NEITI, Waziri Adio, made the call in Abuja at a special workshop by Publish What You Pay, a leading civil society organisation working in the extractive sector in Nigeria.

The Executive Secretary explained that while it is the responsibility of NEITI to provide the information and data, it is the duty of the civil society to use the same information and data to hold government and companies accountable.

NEITI’s presentation at the workshop disclosed that Nigeria earned a total of $592.34 billion from the oil and gas sector from 1999 to 2014.

The Executive Secretary, who was represented by NEITI’s Director of Communications, Dr. Orji Ogbonnaya Orji, provided the breakdown of the country earnings as follows:

YEARS OIL AND GAS SECTOR ($)
1999 $ 8.07 billion
2000 $ 15.80 billion
2001 $ 15.90 billion
2002 $ 11.86 billion
2003 $ 17.08 billion
2004 $ 26.62 billion
2005 $ 28.06 billion
2006 $ 44.68 billion
2007 $43.78 billion
2008 $ 60. 36 billion
2009 $ 30.12 billion
2010 $ 44.94 billion
2011 $ 68.44 billion
2012 $ 62.99 billion
2013 $ 58.07 billion
2014 $55.5 billion
TOTAL $592.27 billion

 

On the Solid Minerals Sector, NEITI also disclosed that about N143.5 billion was earned from the sector between 2007 and 2014. The presentation gave the break as follows:

2007                        N8.19 billion
2008                        N9.58 billion
2009                        N19.42 billion
2010                        N17.38 billion
2011                        N23.67 billion
2012                        N31.44 billion
2013                        N33.86 billion
2014                        N55.82 billion
TOTAL                     N143.52 billion

 

Mr. Adio expressed concerns that despite the huge revenues earned by government over the years, there is little change in the living standards of majority of Nigerians and in the development of infrastructure.

He urged civil society groups to be more vigilant and ensure that future earnings from the sector translate to national development and support poverty reduction.

He identified the slow pace of implementing NEITI’s industry audit findings and recommendations as one of the weakest links in EITI implementation in Nigeria and tasked Publish What You Pay to lead a robust civil society activism and engagements with relevant government agencies to implement NEITI reports.

Mr. Adio described Publish What You Pay as an important global civil society organisation in a vantage position to lead advocacy for translating NEITI reports into results which is capable of bringing about the desired reforms in Nigeria’s oil, gas and mining sectors.

In her presentation, Faith Nwadishi, a member of the international EITI Board, underlined the importance of the civil society protocol in advancing civil society freedom and engagement to ensure that EITI process leads to reforms that will bring about the required impact.

Ms. Nwadishi welcomed the improved enabling environment and space for civil society activism in Nigeria and urged civil society organisations to take up the space by utilising information and data in NEITI reports for stronger advocacy.

Ms. Asmara Klein from PWYP international presented the 2016 EITI Standard and the key areas that Nigeria needs to pay attention in order to meet the global EITI standard. These include, contracts and beneficial ownership disclosure; sub-national transfers; data quality and timelines; mandatory social expenditures etc.

The National Coordinator of Publish What You Pay in Nigeria, Emeka Ononamadu gave assurance that the exposure gained from the workshop will help CSOs to push the boundaries of transparency and accountability in the management of revenue from extractive industries in Nigeria.

He commended NEITI for the quality of its work and relationship with the civil society.

During the workshop, an Action Plan developed by the civil society to deepen its involvement in EITI implementation in Nigeria was ratified.

ECOWAS partners ICEED on cookstoves testing, standards

0

In collaboration with the International Centre for Energy, Environment & Development (ICEED), the ECOWAS Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency (ECREE) is training scientists and representatives of the clean cooking energy industry in West Africa on testing and standards.

ewah-1
Dr Abubakar Bukola Saraki, President of the Senate (left), exchanging views with Ewah Otu Eleri, National Coordinator of the Nigerian Alliance for Clean Cookstoves (NACC) and Executive Director of ICEED, during NACC’s visit to the Senate

The training programme, holding at the ICEED Clean Energy Training Centre in Afikpo on June 5 – 9, 2017, brings together about 20 representatives of the clean cooking industry in West Africa to learn the latest developments on stove testing and standards and forge collaboration among West African countries.

Over 90% of households in the ECOWAS region are dependent on traditional use of wood as primary energy source for cooking. Globally, smoke from the kitchen results in over four million deaths annually. Traditional cooking methods is also expensive, burning up to 90% more wood than is necessary and costing poor families in West Africa money that could be put to better use on education, health and nutrition.

Testing and standards are key to growing the market for the clean cooking energy solutions in the region. Lack of standards and regulations for clean cookstoves hinders stove manufacturers’ efforts to differentiate their stoves, and also prevents consumers, investors and donors from making informed decisions. Despite the importance of stove testing and standards, a majority of countries in the region do not have testing laboratories and lack the required capacity and awareness on stove testing and standards. Consistent with the mandate of ECREEE, the agency seeks to share regional capacity building on testing and standards with clean cooking energy experts and professionals in ECOWAS.

ICEED established the Clean Energy Training Centre in Afikpo, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. The centre has an ISO certified testing laboratory. It seeks to improve technical standards for clean cookstoves; provide testing and certification services related to stove technical quality, indoor air pollution, and energy efficiency; assist stove developers in improving stove design and construction methods; and conduct research and development in collaboration with international research institutes and laboratories. The laboratory has trained numerous scientists, stove producers and professionals on stove testing protocols and have tested over 30 stove models.

Participants for the training workshop are drawn from Togo, Senegal, Cote d’voire, Ghana, Mali, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Nigeria. Participants will enhance their knowledge on testing protocols; understand the equipments required for complete stove testing, analysis and certification; and provide hands-on testing experience for both household and institutional stoves. At the end, participants will discuss the ISO process and development of national and regional standards.

Both ICEED and ECREEE hope to create the capacity for participants to conduct training for other professionals in their countries; and provide a basis for establishing testing laboratories in all the ECOWAS countries. ICEED and ECREEE will also seek to support the establishment of national standards and ECOWAS-wide regional standards; and increase regional awareness of issues relating to testing and standards.

Incorporate REDD+ into national development process, UNDP advises government

1

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has advised the federal government to prioritise the implementation of the REDD+ programme and incorporate it into the national development processes.

REDD+ conference
Dignatories at the High-Level National REDD+ conference

The UNDP Resident Representative in Nigeria, Edward Kallon, gave the advice at the High-Level National REDD+ conference held on Wednesday, May 31, 2017 in Abuja.

The REDD+ conference provided an opportunity for experts in climate change to discuss Nigeria’s strategy to reduce emission from deforestation and forest degradation and jointly mobilise political, strategic and institutional support for its implementation.

The REDD+ strategy comprised of  policy reforms, innovative solutions, investment priorities and related REDD+ implementation framework with due monitoring and safeguard systems as called for under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Represented by Deputy Country Director – Operations, Betty Wabonoha, Kallon reiterated that the forest sector plays an important role in Nigeria’s economy in the provision of food and ecosystem by contributing to the sustainability of the environment.

“So, when addressing REDD+, you must have in mind the bigger picture and the need for coordinated approach to meet the development challenges of our time- namely food security, climate change and others.

“We recognise that stakeholder engagement is essential and crucial for the sustainability of the REDD+ process and we need the support and commitment of all stakeholders and partners.

“REDD+ offers an opportunity to integrate climate change into the national development processes. Some of the proposed strategic interventions in the REDD+ strategy go far beyond the forest sector.

“We need to ensure that we do not loss the momentum gained during the development of the strategy. This is also an opportunity for resource mobilisation to scale up the REDD+ in Nigeria,” he said.

While congratulating the federal government for organising the conference, the UNDP helmsman noted that climate change presents one of the most compelling developmental challenges globally.

He disclosed that, in Nigeria, the current national deforestation rate which is estimated at 3.7 per cent is one of the highest in the world and that more than 300,000 hecters of forest have been lost in the last 40 years.

“Whereas we have to contend with this challenge, the good news is that together we can do something about it. In line with this National REDD+1 and the Cross River State REDD+ strategy offer an opportunity for us to bring transformational change in the way we can manage and protect our forests,” he noted.

According to him, the implementation of the REDD+1 strategy and the Cross River State REDD + strategy will provide an opportunity to demonstrate Nigeria’s commitment to the Paris agreement.

“The Paris agreement acknowledges the role that forest and indeed the REDD+ play in addressing climate change and adaptation.

“It will also contribute to the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) such as Goal 13 to take certain actions to combat climate change and its impact and Goal 15 to protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystem, sustainably large forest, combat desertification, and halt biodiversity loss,” he further explained.

He reiterated that the UNDP would continue to support the federal government and other stakeholders in the years ahead in transforming from the REDD+ readiness of implementation for Nigeria to ultimately get to result base gains.

While declaring the conference open, the Permanent Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Environment, Dr Shehu Ahmed, acknowledged the support given to Nigeria by the UNDP and other development partners since the inception of the REDD+.

He noted that the collaborative efforts demonstrated by the development partners  has further heightened Nigeria’s speed in implementing the REDD+ programme as well as develop enviable ideas that will enable the programme attain its desired objectives.

Ahmed therefore appealed to the participants at the conference to brainstorm and come out with implementable outcomes that will advance the REDD+ strategy.

In his message of goodwill, the Senate Committee Chairman on Ecology and Climate Change, Senator Bukar Abba Ibrahim, advocated for massive awareness on the REDD+ initiative to enable Nigerians buy into it.

He emphasised that the programme is key to national development and if accepted by most Nigerians it will lead to drastic reduction in emission and environmental degradation in the country.

He said: “The Programme is very key, but has not been given the needed awareness it deserved. REDD+ should interface with key stakeholders to carry out extensive awareness.

“This approach, if adopted will lead to increase in behavioural change and bring greater awareness and perception thereby reducing emission and environmental degradation in our country.”

He, however, lamented that one of the greatest challenges of climate change in the country is the alarming rate of extinction of the ecosystem, owing largely to human activities or lack of it.

“Our national forests are at the verge of extinction. The desert from the north is encroaching fast leading to the loss of natural farm lands and living species in alarming proportion.

“Programmes like REDD+ should help in creating awareness on the emission reduction and spread knowledge for forest management.

“The REDD+ should take the programme to the host communities, adapt local channel of communication using traditional  and local dialects to woo the host communities from the known to the new,” he explained.

He said that his committee was ready to work with the Federal Ministry of Environment to implement programmes that will promote the attainment of the Paris Agreement which Nigeria signed in September 2016 “while we look forward to a more robust engagement on these and many more.”

The conference was well attended by experts and stakeholders in the environment sector.

The National Assembly (including both the Senate and the House of Representatives) was also represented at the conference.

By Hassan Danmaryam

Need for disaster management-gender mainstreaming policy implementation underscored

0

Participants at the just concluded two-day National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) organised and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) supported Expert Review Workshop held at the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru-Jos, Plateau State, have emphasised that all hands must be on deck in implementing the policy on mainstreaming gender in disaster management when it becomes a working document.

NEMA-UNDP
Participants at the close of the workshop

While evaluating the workshop at the close of the event on Friday, 2nd June, 2017, they opined that mainstreaming gender in disaster management is key to aligning the society for proper development.

Speaking, Special Assistant to the Vice President on Humanitarian Affairs, Ms Olabisi Ogungbemi, stated that the workshop is a good development for NEMA and the country and aided in sieving through the policy document draft to see how it can be completed and pushed for proper implementation.

“There are challenges and when it comes to gender issues in the country, it is a sensitive issue to tread with caution, however, we have the political will to push and continue to push till we get what we want,” she added.

Also speaking, Assistant Director (Head Gender Unit), Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Mrs Ifeoma Anyanwu, who commended UNDP for anchoring the workshop and being visible in interventions on gender issues, said that, for the document to work, the gender unit of NEMA has to be supported by all components of the Agency.

In her remarks, Gender Desk Officer, Department of Climate Change, Federal Ministry of Environment, Oluwabusola, Ajibola, stated that there is every need to ensure that the policy is implemented and not left on the shelf like others.

She maintained that NEMA has done a good job with drafting the gender policy and hope they will take ownership of the document and advocate for its implementation with a vigorous push.

For Dr Elias Lamle, a lecturer with the Centre for Conflict Management and Peace Studies, University of Jos, the workshop which is practical and inclusive will usher in a well tailored policy on gender mainstreaming in disaster management which other organisations too can benefit from.

In her closing remarks, the workshop’s consultant, Prof. Funmilayo Para-Mallam, who noted that gender is a critical issue impacting on the lives of women, men, boys and girls, commended participants for their input, stating that it would go a long way in fashioning a sustainable policy document.

In his vote of thanks, Deputy Director Disaster Risk Reduction, NEMA, Benjamin Oghenah, while appreciating NIPSS collaboration by hosting the workshop thanked participants for their robust contributions and passion put into the workshop.

By Damian Daga, Kuru-Jos

Paris Agreement: There’s nothing Washington can do to stop us, says Bloomberg

0

While U.S. President Donald Trump was on Thursday, June 1, 2017 announcing the nation’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on Climate Change,  American philanthropist and UN envoy, Michael Bloomberg, on the other hand was doing what appears to be the exact opposite – filling a significant funding gap arising from Trump’s action and ensuring that America and other countries fulfill the landmark climate accord.

Michael Bloomberg
Michael Bloomberg

Bloomberg, the United Nations Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Cities and Climate Change, announced a commitment of up to $15 million to support the operations of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Executive Secretariat, including its work to help countries implement their commitments under the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change. Bloomberg will also work with other governments and philanthropies that may be interested in supporting the UNFCCC at this critical time.

The pledge aims to fill a significant funding gap that comes as a result of President Donald Trump’s announced withdrawal from the Paris agreement and proposed steep budget cuts for international programs, including on climate.

“Americans are not walking away from the Paris Climate Agreement,” said Bloomberg.  “Just the opposite – we are forging ahead. Mayors, governors, and business leaders from both political parties are signing onto a statement of support that we will submit to the UN – and together, we will reach the emission reduction goals the U.S. made in Paris in 2015. As a sign of our commitment, Bloomberg Philanthropies, in partnership with others, will make up the approximately $15 million in funding that the U.N.’s Climate Secretariat stands to lose from Washington. Americans will honor and fulfill the Paris Agreement by leading from the bottom up – and there isn’t anything Washington can do to stop us.”

Patricia Espinosa, the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), said: “We are grateful to Bloomberg Philanthropies for this generous contribution. While funding from governments remains central to our work, this kind of support is crucial for the work of the Secretariat to assist nations in their efforts to implement their commitments under the Paris Climate Change Agreement. In order to achieve Paris in full and deliver low emissions, resilient and more secure future for every man, woman and child, it is very encouraging to see that all actors reaffirm their willingness to work together.”

Trump indicated the administration will terminate all support for UN climate change efforts. This would slash the US contribution to the operations of the UNFCCC – the climate negotiating body of the UN – creating an immediate gap. It will also cut previously promised funding for the Green Climate Fund, which provides billions of dollars in support for developing countries to meet their Paris Agreement commitments. The Green Climate Fund recently launched a request for proposals from private sector companies to cut emissions or improve climate resilience in developing countries, offering a total $500 million in funding overall.

From 2014 to 2016, Bloomberg Philanthropies supported the UNFCCC – the climate negotiating body of the UN – for its work with “non-state actors” including cities, states and businesses. Bloomberg Philanthropies can fill the gap left by the US government backing out of its commitments. Support would be allocated to cover staff costs in Bonn, Germany associated with their climate negotiations and communications efforts.

The Bloomberg Philanthropies works in more than 120 countries around the world to ensure better, longer lives for the greatest number of people. The organisation focuses on five key areas for creating lasting change: Arts, Education, Environment, Government Innovation and Public Health. Bloomberg Philanthropies encompasses all of Michael R. Bloomberg’s charitable activities, including his foundation and his personal giving. In 2016, Bloomberg Philanthropies distributed over half a billion dollars.

Changing environmental trajectory to build Africa’s sustainable cities

0

The Nakivubo wetland, one of several large wetland systems within and around the Ugandan city of Kampala, is severely degraded. The volumes of contaminated runoff entering wetland channels from informal areas and partially treated wastewater from the overburdened sewage works have increased significantly.

Kampala
The city of Kampala in Uganda

The city is considering rehabilitating the Nakivubo wetland, but it would cost $53 million, in addition to ongoing maintenance and operating costs of about $3.6 million per year – it is now too costly and impractical to restore the wetland to a state where benefits can be achieved.

Had Kampala grown in a way that protects the wetland, the city would today be reaping the benefits of this natural asset and the flow of economic and fiscal value that it could supply.

“Once ecosystems such as wetlands in urban areas have become severely impacted, they are often effectively eradicated, as is the stream of services they can provide to support economic production and human well-being,” stressed Roland White, Global Lead for City Management, Governance and Financing for the World Bank and lead author of the Greening Africa’s Cities report launched on Thursday, June 1, 2017 in Dar es Salaam. “While the environmental quality of cities may be treated as a low priority by financially-strapped local governments, it carries tangible economic, fiscal, and social costs.”

 

The adverse impacts of environmental degradation in Africa’s cities

Deterioration of environmental quality arising from urbanisation is negatively impacting health, income, productivity, and the quality of life in African economies and cities. In sub-Saharan Africa, public welfare losses resulting from exposure to household and ambient air pollution were estimated to amount to 3.8% of the regional gross domestic product.

The degradation of natural assets and ecosystems can also increase the impacts of extreme weather events. As cities grow, the magnitude of flood flows arising from any given rainfall event also grows. This means that the natural floodplain areas in low-lying parts of the city also increase. In Dar es Salaam, the expected annual losses from damage to structures in the Msimbazi floodplain alone amount to an estimated $47.3 million per year.

Cities may also forfeit property tax income from premium property owners who are willing to pay for being close to natural and open space areas that are in good condition. Research undertaken in the city of Durban, which has a well-developed network of green open space, shows that the premiums paid for proximity to good quality natural and man-made open space areas can amount to $339 million.

 

Building sustainable and resilient cities in Africa

According to White, “Africa is urbanising late but fast. Africa’s cities have grown at an average rate of close to 4.0% per year over the past twenty years, and are projected to grow between 2.5% and 3.5% annually from 2015 to 2055.  Yet most African cities are on a trajectory of environmental degradation that has become negatively reinforcing and unsustainable.”

Africa is urbanising at relatively low levels of industrialisation, motorisation, and technology by international standards. However, its heavy reliance on biomass fuels is generating high levels of fine and small particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) relative to other regions.

In addition, Africa is urbanising at substantially lower levels of wealth than other regions, with low proportions of overall capital investment (infrastructure, housing, and office building) – around 20% of GDP. Relative to city size, fiscal resources are extremely limited, with public expenditures on urban infrastructure and services (outside of South Africa) in a range of less than $1 to around $15 per capita per year. For the entire region, the proportion of urban residents with access to sanitation was estimated to be only 37% in 2010.

Add to that the fact that institutions and systems that are critical to effective urban development and management are weak, with most large metropolitan areas covering numerous jurisdictions, and managed by different elected bodies, local government structures, and agencies. Many of them have fragmented and overlapping planning and regulatory authority that restricts effective urban environmental management.

“There is a significant risk that Africa’s cities may become locked into a ‘grow dirty now, clean up later’ development path which may be irreversible, costly, inefficient, and welfare-reducing,” White explained.

The report, “Greening Africa’s Cities”, underscores the urgency for green urban development policies that can help cities move toward a more harmonious relationship between the natural and built environments if focused action is taken, tackling the core problems of pollution and waste, overconsumption of natural resources and eradication of ecosystems, and the deterioration of biodiversity in the context of urban growth.

“The World Bank helps clients build inclusive, resilient, and sustainable cities, villages, and communities,” said Ede Ijjasz-Vasquez, Senior Director of the World Bank’s Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice, “with strong linkages to the Bank’s twin goals of ending extreme poverty and promoting shared prosperity in a sustainable way.  The Bank is working with African countries in developing green urban development strategies to build sustainable cities.”

Trump Paris Agreement rejection described as ‘call to action’

0

U.S. President Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on climate change puts the United States at odds not just with the international community, but with overwhelming scientific evidence and the publicly expressed wishes of hundreds of American companies, from Apple to Exxon.

Scott Vaughan
Scott Vaughan, Preident and CEO of International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)

These are part of sentiments expressed by Scott Vaughan, President and CEO of International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).

According to him, without the United States, the rest of the world will have a harder time meeting the Paris Agreement’s goal of preventing global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. “And the United States will miss out on the creation of more jobs and economic growth as well as reduced business risks,” he adds.

His words: “While we are deeply disappointed by this ill-informed decision, we are also heartened by the immediate response from other major countries determined to proceed with climate action. India, the European Union and China pledged to accelerate their efforts. Canada announced it will co-host a ministerial summit with China and the European Union in September to advance action on the Paris Agreement.

“Even more importantly, new coalitions of states, cities and businesses within the United States have emerged in defiance of the president’s decision.

“Governors from California, New York and across the country declared they would work together to move ahead with climate action. Yesterday, 83 mayors signed a statement vowing to uphold the commitments to the goals enshrined in the Paris Agreement.

“And finally, U.S. businesses have expressed their frustration and disappointment with the decision, but also stressed that it would have little impact on their own ongoing efforts. Brad Smith, CEO of Microsoft, said this about the Paris Agreement: “A global framework strengthens competitiveness for American businesses. It creates new markets for innovative clean technologies, from green power to smart grids to cloud-enabled solutions.”

“At IISD we will continue to work across the world and in the United States at every level of government to help implement climate action.

“We echo the words of the 83 U.S. mayors who committed to adopting and upholding the Paris Climate Agreement goals: ‘The world cannot wait—and neither will we’.”

Ibrahim Usman Jibril, Nigeria’s Environment Minister of State, said: “Despite the pulling out of the United States from the Paris Agreement, I want to state categorically that Nigeria joined the Paris Agreement as a Sovereign Country taking into account its national circumstances and convection in a global approach to tackle climate change.

“Nigeria is committed to the provisions of the Paris agreement as it is in accordance with its National interest.”

The Least Developed Countries (LDC) group, representing nearly one billion people in the 48 poorest countries in the world, in a reaction, has expressed disappointment in the decision, but emphasised that global climate momentum will continue with or without the US.

Chair of the LDC group, Mr. Gebru Jember Endalew, said: “It is deeply disappointing to see the US shirking its responsibilities as a member of the global community. We are already seeing the impacts of climate change with record droughts, flooding and heat waves recently faced around the world. For LDCs the impacts are especially devastating; as the poorest countries in the world we are highly vulnerable but the least capable to respond to the threat of climate change. By refusing to commit to ambitious action on climate change President Trump is showing disregard for the lives of millions around the world.

“In Paris the world united with a call for climate action and the wave of momentum now behind the Agreement cannot be slowed by one country deciding to sit on the sidelines. Many countries have taken up the mantle of global climate leadership through ambitious climate policies and innovation, and the US has lost a seat at this table.

“The international community won’t wait for the US to catch up. Transformations in technology, consumption patterns and demand for clean, green innovations are charging ahead of political will around the world. Countries are learning that taking advantage of these innovations is not only smart for the climate, but smart for the economy. Joining the transition to a green economy means embracing business opportunities that are beneficial for all.

“The US is only one country. I urge global leaders not to let President Trump’s decision to distract us from the important work we need to do to achieve the vital goals enshrined in the Paris Agreement. I also invite President Trump to reconsider his decision. Let us continue to work together to build a safe world for present and future generations.”

Climate justice must be prioritised, say faith-based groups

0

The ACT Alliance, the Lutheran World Federation and the World Council of Churches, have called for a prioritisation of climate justice as US President Donald Trump on Thursday, June 1, 2017 issued executive order withdrawing the US from the Paris Climate Agreement.  They express deep dismay at the development, which they believe goes against global commitments to address climate change.

ACT Alliance
An interfaith group of religious leaders sits in front of empty trays during a public action at COP21 in Paris in 2015. Photo credit: Ryan Rodrick Beiler/LWF

The three faith-based bodies, it was gathered, actively contributed to the development of the Paris agreement, and welcomed its outcomes and the commitments of the nations of the world to it.

“Only 18 months ago global leaders welcomed the landmark Paris Climate Agreement for taking into account the immediate needs of countries most severely affected by the impacts of climate change. The move by the President of the United States flies in the face of ethics and Christian values,” says Rudelmar Bueno De Faria, ACT Alliance General Secretary.

“Addressing climate change equals protecting human beings, their workplaces and the economies of the world. The LWF will continue to promote climate justice, as an issue of intergenerational justice, in the conviction that creation is not for sale,” says Martin Junge, LWF General Secretary.

“This is a tragedy, missing an opportunity to show real, accountable leadership for the future of humanity and our common home. This is a decision that is not morally sustainable – and not economically sustainable either. The struggle for climate justice has to continue,” says Olav Fykse Tveit, WCC General Secretary.

As global temperatures continue to rise, severe floods, droughts and superstorms are becoming more and more commonplace. It is the most vulnerable people who are hit first.

The poorest countries will be hit twice more: first by unwillingness to curb US carbon emissions, and then by a planned decrease in climate finance to support people in adapting to the impacts of climate change and towards a transition to clean energy for poor countries.

The implementation of the Paris agreement is the only way for the human family to turn away from the threat of global warming. The ACT Alliance, the Lutheran World Federation and the World Council of Churches affirm their commitment to climate justice and call on the nations of the world to stand by the commitments of the Paris Agreement.

ACT Alliance is a global alliance of 143 churches and related organisations working together in over 100 countries to create positive and sustainable change in the lives of poor and marginalised people.

×