Monday 6th April 2020
Monday, 6th of April 2020
Home / News / NJC sets up panel to probe two chief judges, 13 others

NJC sets up panel to probe two chief judges, 13 others

The National Judicial Council (NJC) has set up a total of 15 different committees to investigate various allegations contained in petitions against 15 Judicial Officers, including two Chief Judges.

Justice Walter Onnoghen  NJC sets up panel to probe two chief judges, 13 others Justice Walter Onnoghen

Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen

The Council, which is under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Walter Onnoghen, took the decision at its 83rd meeting, after considering the reports of the two Preliminary Complaints Assessment Committees, on 46 petitions written against judicial officers in the federal and state judiciaries.

According to the statement issued on Monday, October 2, 2017 by the Director of Information, NJC, Barrister Soji Oye, the Council had dismissed a total number of 31 petitions, 29 of which it found unmeritorious, while the remaining two written against Justice James T. Tsoho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, and the Acting Chief Judge of Ondo State, Justice O. O. Akeredolu,  were withdrawn at the instance of the petitioners.

Al-Sagr National Insurance Company, which wrote against  Justice Tsoho withdrew its petition since the Judge had delivered the ruling in his case.

ALSO READ:  Enugu deputy governor collapses before impeachment panel

Also, Chief  Raheem A. Badmus, who wrote against Justice Akeredolu voluntarily withdrew his petition for personal reasons.

The Council treated the two petitions as withdrawn, since it did not find anything in them sufficiently serious for further consideration as stipulated in Regulation 9 (1) of the Judicial Discipline Regulations.

However, it considered and found worthy of further investigation, the petition written by Azi A. Phillip on behalf of All Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN), Plateau State Chapter, accusing the immediate past Chief Judge of Plateau State, Justice P. D. Damulak of bias, for failing to make his judgment in Suit No. PLD/J/236/16 delivered on November 4, 2016, available to him till the time he wrote the petition.

But the Council had decided not to constitute an investigative committee to look into the matter, because the Chief Judge had already retired from service and therefore, no longer in the employment of the National Judicial Council.

ALSO READ:  FRSC bans use of second hand tyres

It also considered and dismissed petitions written against two other Judicial Officers –  High Court of Justice, Abia State, Justice L. T. C. Eruba and Grand Kadi, Sharia Court of Appeal, Kano State, Abdullahi Waiya, for lacking in merit.

It also decided to issue two letters of advice to Justice M. A. Dada of the Lagos State High Court of Justice, and Justice Chukwudi Charles Okaa of the Anambra State High Court, for violating the extant laws in the course of their judicial duties.

This position was based on petitions written against them by Dayo Adamolekun, Ridwanulah Olanite, and Reverend F. U. Ekavhiare & Associates, respectively.

The Council also unanimously agreed to report Adesina Ogunlana to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (L.P.D.C.) for misconduct bordering on the use of uncouth language in a petition written to NJC against the immediate past Chief Judge of Lagos State, Justice O. O. Atilade.

ALSO READ:  NEITI commits to open government partnerships

The Council however welcomed as good development, a letter from Zamfara State Government, approving the recommendation of the NJC for the removal of Justice Musa Ibrahim Anka from office, for allegedly receiving N200,000 bribe from one Zubairu Abdumalik in order to deliver judgement in his favour.

The recommendation was made to the Zamfara State Government by the Council in 2011.

By Chinyere Obia

One comment

  1. NJC needs to sustain the momentum. There should be no excuse in punishing corrupt judicial officers even if they are retired. The NJC can recommend for the prosecution of retired or retiring judicial officers and provide the evidence and witnesses to nail them in court when they are charged. That way, others would be careful engaging in corrupt practices.

%d bloggers like this: