27 C
Lagos
Saturday, February 28, 2026
Home Blog Page 32

SERAP sues Adelabu, NBET over ‘failure to account for missing N128bn in power ministry’

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a lawsuit against the Minister of Power, Mr. Adebayo Adelabu, and Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading Plc. (NBET), Abuja “over the failure to account for the missing or diverted N128 billion of public funds from the Ministry of Power and NBET.”

The allegations are documented in the latest annual report published by the Auditor-General on September 9, 2025. Corruption contributes significantly to the frequent grid collapses, as Nigerians last week witnessed the first grid collapse of 2026, plunging the country into darkness.

In the suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/143/2026 filed last Friday at the Federal High Court, SERAP is seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr. Adelabu and NBET to account for the missing or diverted ₦128 billion from the ministry of power and NBET.”

Adebayo Adelabu
Minister of Power, Mr Adebayo Adelabu

SERAP is also seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr Adelabu and NBET to disclose details of how the missing or diverted ₦128 billion was spent including the dates of disbursement and the purported beneficiaries or contractors, who received the money as well as their registered business names and addresses.”

SERAP is seeking: “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Mr. Adelabu and NBET to disclose the full names, official designations, and offices of all public officers who authorized, approved, or otherwise participated in the release of the missing or diverted ₦128 billion in the ministry of power and NBET.”

In the suit, SERAP is arguing that: “Nigerians continue to pay the price for the widespread and grand corruption in the power sector. There is a legitimate public interest in ensuring justice and accountability for these grave allegations.”

SERAP is also arguing that, “granting the reliefs sought would contribute to tackling corruption in the power sector and addressing the persistent breakdown of transmission lines in the country, as well as improving access of Nigerians to regular and uninterrupted electricity supply.”

SERAP is arguing that, “granting the reliefs sought would also strike a blow against the impunity of those responsible for the missing or diverted public money meant to provide Nigerians with access to regular and uninterrupted electricity supply.”

According to SERAP, “Ordinary Nigerians continue to pay the price for corruption in the electricity sector–staying in darkness, but still made to pay crazy electricity bills.”

The lawsuit filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers, Kolawole Oluwadare, Kehinde Oyewumi, and Andrew Nwankwo, reads in part: “These grim allegations by the Auditor-General suggest a grave violation of the public trust, the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and international anticorruption standards.

“According to the recently published 2022 audited report by the Auditor-General of the Federation, the Federal Ministry of Power failed to account for over N4.4 billion [N4,404,647,938.53] ‘transferred to Mambilla, Zungeru and Kashimbilla project accounts by the Ministry.

“There was ‘no evidence of how the funds were expended.’ The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted.’ He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.

“The Ministry also paid over N95 billion [N95,415,183,701.83] to ‘some contractors for various projects.’ But ‘there was no document on the payments, and no evidence that the projects existed and were executed.’ The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted.’ He wants the money recovered.

“The Ministry paid over N33 million [N33,557,959.00] ‘for foreign travels’, but ‘without any approvals.’ The money ‘was paid as estacode, flight tickets, visa fees and other allowances to enable the minister and his aides to attend the World Utilities Congress at Abu Dhabi and Huawei innovation land exhibition in Dubai.

“The travels ‘were never approved by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation or the Head of Civil Service.’  The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted.’ He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.

“The Ministry failed to account for over N230 million (N230,795,255.27) being ‘expenditure on the GIGMIS platform.’ The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted.’ He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.

“The Ministry also paid over N282 million (N282,672,576.53) as ‘non-personal advances to various staff of the ministry for the procurement of goods and services.’ But the ‘payments were beyond the statutory threshold of N200,000.00.’ The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted.’ He wants the money recovered.

“The Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading Plc., (NBET) Abuja also ‘irregularly awarded contracts for over N427 million (N427,491,866.16). There was ‘no evidence of advert placements in the procurement journal’.

“The Auditor-General fears ‘the contracts may have been awarded to incompetent contractors’, resulting in ‘loss of government funds.’

“NBET ‘irregularly transferred over N7 billion (N7,620,840,000.00) into purported sub-accounts of unnamed beneficiaries.’ There was also ‘no authority for such payment, contrary to the Financial Regulations.’

“NBET claimed it paid over N9.3 billion (N9,336,986,697.17) to Egbin Power PLC ‘as outstanding payment on GenCos for Power Sector Reform Programme.’ But there ‘was no document to authenticate the genuineness of the transactions.’  The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted.’ He wants the money recovered.

“NBET paid over N8 billion (N8,027,355,487.20) ‘to some beneficiaries’ but ‘without entering the transaction into the payment vouchers register and the vote book.’ The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted and misapplied.’ He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.

“NBET also reportedly ‘awarded contracts of over N420 million (N420,665,525.65) to eleven ineligible consultants.’ The payments ‘were for various consultancy services such as technical support on power plant capacity testing of 5 power plants.’ But there was ‘no evidence that the services paid for were rendered.’

“The ‘engagement of the consultants also failed to meet due process as required by the Procurement Act.’ The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted.’ He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.

“NBET also failed to account for ‘payments of over N45 million [N45,851,647.92] as contingency, logistics and security charges for six contracts.’ The payments were ‘made without any application from the contractors and without any approval.’

“There was ‘no breakdown of the expenditure’. The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted’ or the payments ‘may be for work not done.’ He wants the money recovered and remitted to the treasury.

“NBET spent over N61 million (N61,775,659.75) from the capital vote on consultancy services but without any provision made for it in the approved capital budget of the company.’ The ‘payments were also made without any approval for virement.’ The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted’ or ‘may have been misapplied.’ He wants the money refunded to the treasury.

“NBET also ‘irregularly awarded contract of over N39 million (N39,661,081.83) for the supply and installation of a video conferencing solution to the NBET office.’ But ‘there was no evidence of any work done.’

“The same contract ‘was re-awarded to another contractor without any open competitive bidding, such as advertisement, quotations, and financial bid evaluation.’ There was also ‘no evidence that any job was completed.’

“NBET ‘paid over N49 million (N49,995,000.00) for the supply of three units of Toyota Corolla, 2019 model’, but the contract was awarded without any approval.’ There was ‘no Bureau of Public Procurement approval, minutes of tenders board approvals and technical and financial evaluation reports.’

“NBET also ‘paid over N8 million [N8,744,186.05] as legal fees to a legal practitioner.’ But the payment was ‘without the approval of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation.’

“NBET also ‘irregularly paid over N8.9 million [N8,928,000.00] for the professional development program of five officers working in the organization.’ The payment ‘was made as reimbursement of the balance of the course fee.’ The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been diverted.’ He wants the money recovered.

“NBET also spent over N1 billion [N1,100,279,895.20] ‘as extra-budgetary spending’, but without any approval from the Minister of Finance and the National Assembly.’  The Auditor-General fears ‘the money may have been misappropriated and misapplied.’ He wants the money refunded and remitted to the treasury.

“NBET also ‘paid over N110 million (N110,556,502.00) to companies and retail supermarkets for staff to pick items and promotion packages for Easter and Salah between 2021 and 2022.’ The payments ‘were made without any document.’

“Section 13 of the Nigerian Constitution imposes responsibility on the ministry of power and NBET to conform to, observe and apply the provisions of Chapter 2 of the constitution. Section 15(5) imposes the responsibility on the ministry and NBET to abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power.

“Article 26 of the UN Convention against Corruption which Nigeria has ratified requires the ministry of power and NBET to ensure ‘effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions’ in cases of grand corruption.

“Article 26 complements the more general requirement of article 30, paragraph 1, that sanctions must take into account the gravity of the corruption allegations.”

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

ADSW 2026: How President Tinubu’s focused leadership showcased Nigeria’s wins

Two things made Nigeria’s attendance at this year’s Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week Summit (ADSW 2026) very remarkable. One, it showed how the sequence of actions by Nigeria’s leader, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, undergirded his determination to pave a promising future for the country’s energy transition agenda.

Secondly, the fact of the President’s consistent attendance, which made it easy for him to attract the hosting of Investopia 2026 to Nigeria, and the unveiling of the Nigeria’s Carbon Market Framework, combined to make the country the cynosure of all delegations at the seven days event.

ADSW 2026
President Bola Tinubu (left) and President of the UAE, Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan (R) in Abu Dhabi for Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week. Photo credit: X@officialABAT

The Investopia, which is expected to be co-hosted by Nigeria and the United Arab Emirates, in Lagos in February, this year, will showcase Nigeria as an investors’ haven, especially its pedigree as home to over 250 million persons and Africa’s most populous nation.

Bouyed by its significant population of well-educated youths and easy access to ECOWAS and the rest of Africa, Nigeria indeed is the go-to place as far as access to market and networking is concerned.

Although it came at a great personal cost, I was happy I made it to the Abu Dhabi meet, where the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) Assembly preceded the talks on the Sustainability Week. As I sat through the President’s address, I quickly recalled his 2025 observations. The President had declared at the ADSW2025: “The fight against Climate Change is not merely an environmental necessity, but a global economic opportunity to reshape the trajectory of our continent and the global energy landscape.” Further, he stressed that “to succeed, we must innovate, collaborate and decisively collaborate as a global community.”

I recalled also, how in the course of his inaugural address at the Eagle Square, Abuja, on May 29, 2023, the President had stated: “Our government shall also work with the National Assembly to fashion an omnibus jobs and prosperity bill. This bill will give our administration the policy space to embark on labour-intensive infrastructural improvements, encourage light industry and provide improved social services for the poor, elderly and vulnerable.”

At every turn in the activities of the ADSW 2026, it was evident that President Tinubu’s consistent push for environmental renewal undergirded his belief that energy transition was the key to future prosperity.

That could explain why during his 2024 Budget Speech in November 2023, he declared that “we have strategically made provisions to leverage private capital for big-ticket infrastructure projects in energy, transportation and other sectors.

“This marks a critical step towards diversifying our energy mix, enhancing efficiency and fostering the development of renewable energy sources…”

Of course, knowing that here was a President who signed into law the Electricity Bill barely eight days after taking office, made me recall the rigours the House of Representatives and I, under the efficient leadership of Speaker Femi Gbajabiamila, went through to deliver Nigeria’s signature law, the Climate Change Act 2021.

So far, the Nigerian leader has continued to build on that foundation to catapult the country’s profile in the emerging global energy economy. And all that showed during the ADSW 2026.

By assenting to the Electricity Act of 2023, the President dismantled decades of suffocating centralised control over power and invited states and the private sector to finally build. It was the first tangible signal that this administration might approach its promises as a blueprint, not a bromide.

What is more, as Nigeria approached the COP28 climate summit, the directive to relevant agencies was sharp and singular: secure substantial international funding and partnerships to bolster the national energy transition plan. The mandate was to move from advocacy on the global stage to securing concrete, actionable commitments.

At the Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week, therefore, the President reinforced my conviction that Nigeria’s prosperity depends on a fundamental shift to clean, reliable energy. ADSW showed that indeed, the polished global conversation had finally moved from declarations to the gritty mechanics of delivery.

Verging on the core of this progressive conversation is the continuing search for how nations are building on their ambitious promises. Nigeria’s leader did not disappoint. President Tinubu was there live, not as a passive potentate, but as a leader actively involved and leading the charge, providing directions and proffering workable strategies.

The fact of his 2025 and 2026 consecutive physical presence did much to impact on the atmosphere in a way no policy paper could. It signaled to every investor, diplomat, and executive present that Nigeria’s energy transition is not a side project managed by mid-level officials, but a top priority owned and driven from the very highest level of government.

“Nexus to Next: All Systems Go,” that was the theme of the ADSW 2026. To Nigeria, that phrase carried a particular, almost painful, weight. Our systems – the grid, the financial architecture, the regulatory environment energy, human capital – have infamously not been “going” for a long time. Our message was that we are finally, seriously, rewiring them, and we are using the global green transition as the master blueprint for this overhaul.

We came forward with proofs and specifics: That the 2023 Electricity Act is no longer just a landmark legislation. It is the thriving legal bedrock, which allows a company to construct a solar mini-grid for a hospital in rural Abia, Nasarawa, Borno, etcetera without pleading for federal permission. We are talking about a decisive shift from theoretical potentials to practical, on-the-ground projects.

In plain terms, it could be seen that Nigeria was particular about energy financing. Our pitch was built for the financial pragmatists in the room. We did not ask for aid or concessionary pity; we presented a business case, complete with the instruments we had already built and tested.

A Sovereign Green Bond, oversubscribed by 82 per cent, was cited as proof that the market was listening. A five-hundred-million-dollar Distributed Access through Renewable Energy Scale-up (DARES) was highlighted as capital that is well established, managed, and ready to deploy. A seven-hundred-and-fifty-million-dollar programme with the World Bank, already in motion, aims to bring clean electricity access to over seventeen million Nigerians.

The takeaway from ADSW 2026 for other countries is that Nigeria has progressed from making pledges to creating the financial machinery to fulfil them. The country has clearly set the structure for global connectivity and revenue inflow.

The gamechanger

It was a bang: The signing of the Nigeria-United Arab Emirates Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), came through as the gamechanger. Here was a hard negotiated, and ratified trade deal. The UAE will eliminate tariffs on over seven thousand Nigerian products, and Nigeria will do the same for about six thousand UAE products.

This agreement also signals the creation of qualitative jobs, particularly for Nigeria’s young population, in agriculture real estate, digital banking, retail and infrastructure financing. Can you beat that? Consider what that means for a moment.

To a furniture manufacturer in Lagos, a certified cocoa processor in Ondo, or an assembler of electronics in Nnewi, one of the most significant barriers to entering one of the world’s most affluent and connected markets has just been dismantled. 

This is the most decisive policy push for a post-oil, industrialised economy I have witnessed in a generation. It will masterfully transform Nigeria’s green transition from an internal development goal into a compelling global trade and investment opportunity. 

In the conference hall, you could almost see the recalibration happening in real-time behind the eyes of the assembled investors and partners.

Yet, amidst this powerful forward thrust, the most intellectually resonant moment for me was one of direct and necessary challenge: President Tinubu turned to the custodians of global development finance, reminding them that their prevailing model has become fundamentally flawed.

He argued persuasively that shackling developing nations with ever more sovereign debt to build the very solar grids, climate-resilient agriculture, and infrastructure the whole world needs is neither morally fair nor operationally sustainable.

President Tinubu’s proposal for innovative blended finance was, in essence, a clarion call to rebalance the scales of risk. It framed the conversation not as a plea for concessionary terms, but as a strategic renegotiation of the partnership between global capital and emerging economies. 

The audacity of this position carried significant weight precisely, because of the groundwork he had just laid. For the preceding hour, his presentation had systematically dismantled the old narrative. He had not outlined a list of needs; he had catalogued a portfolio of ready opportunities, established governance frameworks, and concrete financial instruments. He had demonstrated that Nigeria arrived at the table not as a supplicant, but as a serious and credible counterparty, fundamentally changing the context of the tasks that followed.

Lessons

Nigeria’s presence at the ADSW 2026 had rich lessons. First, credibility is a currency minted through consecutive, verifiable action. Nigeria’s voice carried an unfamiliar weight in those rooms because it was backed by a trail of veritable policies: The Climate Change Act, the Electricity Act, the oversubscribed green bonds, the National Climate Change Fund, our Pilot Electric Mobility Project, National Carbon Market Activation Policy, etcetera. The President’s personal stewardship on that global stage was the final, unmistakable stamp on that currency.

Second, true progress lies in deliberate connection. We are finally, seriously attempting to systematically link power generation to job creation, our vast rare earth minerals to domestic manufacturing, and foreign investment to the development of local skills. This is the integrated, forward-thinking industrial strategy we disastrously failed to build during the oil boom. The green transition, ironically, is our nation’s second chance to get it right.

Finally, and most importantly, there is more crucial work to be done. If Abu Dhabi was the international exhibition hall where we displayed the blueprint and the prototypes, our country has become the workshop floor where we must now manufacture the future at scale.

The landmark trade deal with the UAE is a paper victory if our businesses cannot innovate, scale, and produce goods of competitive quality to seize the opportunity. The billion-dollar funds are empty vessels without a robust, transparent pipeline of professionally managed, bankable projects to absorb the capital.

To me, as the sponsor of the Nigeria’s Climate Change Act 2021, leaving the fine city of Abu Dhabi my mind revolved around challenges the country faces in ensuring that we meet the lofty expectations the global energy community has come to place on due to President Tinubu’s highwater offerings.

With the President’s commitment and determination, we can rest assured that come COP31, the world will be pleased to learn how far Nigeria and its energy transition advocate, President Bola Tinubu, have doubled down on its successes.

They call it “All Systems Go”. From my vantage point in Abu Dhabi, it seems Nigeria has, against considerable odds and history, managed to get its key systems to the Launchpad, and begun the ignition sequence.

President Tinubu’s closing statement, “Let me close by reassuring the international business community that Nigeria is ready for business,” captures the mind of a leader that is confident of his strategies. A bright future awaits.

By Rep Sir. Sam Onuigbo, a member of Governing Board of the North East Development Commission (NEDC), who attended the ADSW2026 in Abu Dhabi

Inclusive waste governance in Nigeria: Informal workers for a circular economy

I walked into the exhibition thinking I understood waste, bins, trucks, recycling slogans, and policy gaps. I walked out realising that what we often call “waste management” in Nigeria is actually people management. And most of the people doing the work are invisible.

The project exhibition and dialogue, titled “Capturing Realities and Empowering Change: Informal Waste Work in Abuja’s Circular Economy”, was held in Abuja on January 22, 2026, and convened by the Nigeria Green Academy fellows Mr. Aniebiet Obot and Mr. Eugene Yakubu Shichetwith support from the Heinrich Böll Stiftung, Nigeria.

It brought together informal waste workers, policymakers, private sector actors, civil society, and development partners. But more than that, it brought stories into the room. Stories that do not usually make it into policy documents.

waste evacuation
Officials of one of the AEPB waste evacuation contractors, on duty in Garki Area of Abuja

From the beginning, the tone was different. This was not about presenting perfect solutions. It was about naming reality. One of the strongest moments for me came during the keynote address by Mr. Aniebiet Obot. He spoke about how informal waste work sustains families far beyond. Many waste workers send money back home.

They support siblings, parents, and their children. Some are responding to loss of livelihoods caused by climate change, desertification, and insecurity, especially in the Northeast. Waste picking in this context is not a temporary hustle; it is a livelihood strategy in a country where options are shrinking.

We often talk about unemployment in abstract numbers. But here, the numbers had faces. In Abuja alone, there are over 10,000 informal waste workers. That is not a fringe group, that is a workforce. Yet they remain largely criminalised, stigmatised, and excluded from formal planning.

During the first panel discussion on lived realities of informal waste workers, an informal waste worker, Mr. Hamisu Jamiu, described his daily experience. He has worked in the sector for over 10 years. He spoke about harassment by security personnel, lack of protective equipment, and the absence of any formal identification that could help people recognise him as someone providing a public service, not committing a crime.

Still, he was clear about one thing. This work feeds his family. It puts food on the table. It keeps life moving. Listening to him, I realised how often policy conversations erase dignity. We debate systems but forget the cost of exclusion on real bodies.

Other panelists reinforced this point from different angles. Representatives from the recycling sector acknowledged their reliance on informal waste workers. Government officials spoke about the need for organisation, structure, and professionalism, while also recognising that current systems are fragmented and weak. Everyone, in one way or another, admitted the same truth. The system already depends on informal labour. Pretending otherwise only makes it more fragile.

One comment from the participants stayed with me. She suggested leadership and capacity-building training for informal waste workers. Not just skills training, but advocacy, organisation, and cooperative development. The idea was simple. When people are better structured, they do not have to wait to be included. They can claim space, negotiate partnerships, and respond to opportunities on their own terms.

The second discussion, which focused on policy and practice integrating the informal sector, showed that inclusion is not theoretical. Private sector actors shared examples of programmes that work with women, youth, and informal waste workers. From supporting women to earn income through recycling, to projects that use waste as a form of currency to pay school fees for children and communities, the message was clear. When informal waste workers are supported, the benefits ripple outward.

What became obvious by the end of the event is this. Nigeria’s waste system is not broken because informal workers exist. It struggles because they are excluded from protection, planning, and investment. Informal waste workers already collect, sort, and recover materials at a scale the formal system cannot match. They reach communities others do not. They keep recyclables circulating. They hold the circular economy together, quietly. The real failure is governance that refuses to recognise what is already working.

As I left the exhibition, I kept thinking about how often we chase “innovative solutions” while ignoring the people who have been solving the problem all along. Inclusion, in this context, is not charity. It is practicality. Recognition, protection, and partnership are not radical demands. They are the minimum required for a waste system that is fair, efficient, and human.

This exhibition did not just capture realities. It asked an uncomfortable question.
 If informal waste workers disappeared tomorrow, what would Abuja and Nigeria in general look like?

I think we already know the answer.

By Chibundum Chioma Udeh, Project Officer, Saabi Finding Impact Consulting

Boots on the Ground: The voices shaping elephant conservation in Kenya

0

The Elephant Protection Initiative (EPI) Foundation friend of the month series for the year 2026 begins with a feature on Dibblex Lesalon, a storyteller and community-led conservation expert from Kenya (a member state of the EPI since 2015).

Dibblex works for the Mara Elephant Project (MEP) as the Community Engagement & Outreach Coordinator, and he is the founder and host of the Boots on the Ground podcast, a platform dedicated to amplifying African voices for conservation, one conversation at a time.

Dibblex Lesalon
Dibblex Lesalon

To begin, could you briefly describe the work you do today?

My work currently entails conservation education, outreach activities, and working directly with communities across the Greater Mara Ecosystem to mitigate human-elephant conflict by disseminating information and knowledge on effective HEC reporting tools and techniques that aid rapid response from our ground teams.

Looking back, what was your childhood like, and did an early connection with nature play a role in shaping who you are now?

I grew up in Narok County surrounded by abundant wildlife species. Having come from a family that loves travelling, I was introduced to nature, wildlife, and people from a very young age. I was also very outdoorsy as a child, and I have very fond memories of exploring nature and being amused by it. Fast forward to my school days, I got the opportunity to study at Strathmore University, where I pursued a Bachelor of Science Degree in Tourism Management, a path that has cemented my passion for all things sustainability and community-led conservation initiatives to date.

At what point did elephants and conservation more broadly become central to your life’s work? What drew you into this space?

Having worked in the tourism and hospitality industry, I got the chance to work in very remote and wild places in Kenya, for example, the Lewa Wildlife Conservancy and the Maasai Mara, opportunities that gave me the chance to understand the direct interrelation between tourism and conservation and how they mutually go together. As a wildlife tourism-driven economy, Kenya boasts some of the world’s most iconic species, and elephants make a huge chunk of that pie.

Fast forward to when I got the opportunity to serve as Communications Officer for the Mara Elephant Project; that is when I really got a first-hand experience and good understanding of the elephant as a species, their social structures, the threats facing them, and my contribution to sharing stories that directly tell of their significance in the larger ecosystem and why their conservation matters more than ever in the 21st century.

You’re deeply involved in fieldwork. Could you tell us more about what “boots on the ground” conservation looks like in practice and what inspired you to create this platform?

I love the fact that every day, I get to experience what conservation on the ground is like. Interacting with field teams, especially the rangers, the people working on the frontlines to ensure our wildlife and wild spaces are safe and secure, is what truly motivates me. Whether it’s attending to an elephant treatment, engaging in a collaring operation, or hosting visitors who are interested in learning about elephant conservation work, the work itself is very fulfilling. Boots on the Ground Podcast is a platform that I founded, having the same mindset and belief that stories, when told correctly, can and always do inspire hearts and minds towards collective action.

I created the platform to share stories of exemplary men and women across Africa and beyond who are on the ground, putting in the work, and getting their hands in the mud, spending hours away from their families to safeguard our shared biodiversity. I am grateful for the stories we have told and keep telling, and the youthful population across the African continent is now showing a lot of interest and potential that we are ready to take up the leadership mantle, couple technology and indigenous knowledge to ensure that conservation works and that our wildlife is surviving and thriving, local communities’ livelihoods are improving, and that the wildlife economy is working and benefitting every player in the sector.

Your content strongly centers on wildlife conservation and storytelling. Do you see yourself primarily as a conservationist who communicates or a communicator whose mission is conservation?

Deep in my core, I’m driven by what I see daily, whether it is a snare that has been removed, charcoal that has been intercepted somewhere, or a poacher that has been arrested with a piece of ivory somewhere, and I feel the pain and therefore am driven by the urge to be the voice for nature. I would therefore like to believe that I am a conservationist who communicates.

It is a very interesting space to be in since I am on the ground and interacting and meeting all these challenges directly in my line of work. The content that I share by bringing in experts, who are equally passionate and, on the ground, putting in the work, resonates well with my ideals and the values that I hold dear as a pro-conservationist.

A key part of conservation is community engagement. Do you feel progress is being made in winning the hearts and minds of the communities living around the Mara?

Conservation work is very daunting; sometimes you make one big step forward, and other times you make two steps back. The biggest challenge we now face is the human-wildlife conflict, and this touches the communities we work hand in hand with. The expansion of the human footprint has brought its fair share of challenges, and the headache facing a lot of conservation organizations is how to balance the needs of people and nature and ensure coexistence and a win-win situation for both parties. Community engagement is at the core of what we do.

What I have come to appreciate is that when communities feel seen, heard, and invited to serve and make decisions, it makes work very easy for all parties involved. Equal employment opportunities, gender equality, decision-making, and equal compensation are some of the things that communities care about, and if done correctly, everyone wins and our wildlife and wild spaces remain safe and intact. The Maasai community have long been conservationists since time immemorial.

With a thriving ecotourism business and a conservation model through the creation of community conservancies, community members across the Mara are reaping benefits from tourism and conservation. Are there challenges still facing communities? Yes, there are. Are there members of the community that still feel left out? Yes, there are, but I would like to argue that there is a lot of work still to be done; there is still a lot of fundraising to do to create more opportunities for our young people and to protect some of the threatened spaces, such as the Loita forest, from destruction. There is progress, and I believe that by working more collectively, we could achieve more and better.

The Mara, with its wildlife, people, and protected areas, is globally significant yet increasingly under pressure. Looking ahead 50 years, what is your vision for the Mara’s future?

Looking ahead, I see a vibrant, safe, wildlife-rich ecosystem where conservation and tourism activities are locally run and driven. A technologically and data-driven sector where young people truly understand what it means to protect and improve what our forefathers fought so hard to protect.

SRADeV commends NAFDAC ban on sachet alcohol, sub-200ml PET bottles

Sustainable Research and Action for Environmental Development (SRADeV Nigeria) has commended the National Agency for Food and Drugs Administration and Control (NAFDAC) for its enforcement of the ban on alcoholic beverages packaged in sachets and in PET bottles below 200ml.

The decision, according to the organisation, represents “a very bold, professional action that clearly places public health and environmental protection above narrow economic interests, and portends a major turning point for environmental health sustenance in Nigeria”.

While NAFDAC had signalled plans in previous years to ban or restrict alcoholic drinks packaged in sachets and sub-200ml PET bottles, enforcement timelines were repeatedly extended following industry pushback and resistance leading to prolonged stakeholder consultations.

Alcoholic drinks in sachet
Alcoholic drinks in sachets and small volume bottles

SRADeV believes that the renewed and firm enforcement now signals a critical policy shift that affirms that public health and environmental wellbeing must take precedence over narrow commercial interests.

“This decision reflects regulatory resolve, a commitment to evidence-based governance and a bold statement of intent from NAFDAC under the leadership of the current DG, Prof. Mojisola Christianah Adeyeye,” stated SRADeV in a statement endorsed by Dr. Leslie Adogame, the Executive Director.

Findings from SRADeV Nigeria’s Plastics Brand Audit conducted in Lagos State and many other states of the Federation, between 2019 and 2024 suggest that PET bottles remain the numberone plastic pollutant, while sachet-packaged products, including alcoholic drinks, consistently ranked as the second major source of plastic pollution in Nigeria.

These materials are predominantly single-use, difficult to recover and recycle, and disproportionately contribute to clogged drainages, flooding, and urban environmental degradation. Their prevalence in informal consumption markets further exacerbates improper disposal and leakage into waterways and coastal ecosystems.

“Continuous lobbying by industry players and plastics manufacturers must not override the public health and environmental consequences of single-use plastics. NAFDAC’s bold and responsible decision deserves national commendation as it sends a clear message that the health of Nigerians and the integrity of our environment must always come first,” said Dr. Adogame.

The National Plastic Waste Management Policy (2020) and the upcoming NESREA plastic waste regulation identify these single-use plastic such as straws, lightweight bags, sachets, bottles, for phased reduction or elimination to promote environmental sustainability. Although NESREA’s regulations to implement these policy goals has yet to be officially gazetted largely due to industry over-bearing influence, however NESREA’s ongoing regulatory focus reflects the policy’s direction on plastics and calls for synergy by both institutions.

Together with NAFDAC’s actions, although driven by public health concerns on the alcoholic drinks, this alignment across regulatory institutions highlights how deeply cross-cutting the plastic issue is, linking public health, environmental protection, waste management, and social wellbeing.

SRADeV Nigeria also notes that this policy action supports the growing global call to eliminate single-use plastics – a position that almost all the 64 African countries currently upholds, which have become a pervasive menace worldwide. From marine pollution and biodiversity loss to climate impacts and chemical exposure risks, single-use plastics pose an undeniable threat. Countries and cities across the world are increasingly prioritising reuse systems, refill models, and sustainable packaging alternatives. Nigeria must not be left behind in this global transition.

“This moment reinforces the urgent need to move away from unsustainable ‘throwaway culture’. Reuse era is no longer optional, it is a practical, climate-smart, and environmentally responsible lifestyle choice,” saidManu Hannatu Ahmadu, Communications and Outreach Officer, SRADeV Nigeria.

SRADeV Nigeria says it stands firmly with NAFDAC in this action and calls for sustained enforcement, public awareness, and complementary policies from other relevant government bodies that promote reuse, waste reduction, and environmentally sound alternatives. Protecting public health and safeguarding our environment must remain non-negotiable priorities.

NMDPRA plans to accelerate gas distribution for industrialisation

0

The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) says it will enforce strict compliance while accelerating gas distribution to drive industrialisation and lower production costs nationwide.

Mr. Saidu Mohammed, Authority Chief Executive of the NMDPRA, made the disclosure on Friday, January 23, 2026, in Port Harcourt during an inspection of petroleum and gas facilities in Rivers State.

Mohammed said the authority was committed to engaging operators across the midstream and downstream segments while providing the necessary regulatory support to achieve desired outcomes.

NMDPRA
L-R: Chairman of Stockgap Limited, Dr Stanley Ohamarije; Authority Chief Executive, Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), Saidu Mohammed

He said the inspection of facilities formed part of the Federal Government’s commitment to the Decade of Gas initiative, aimed at maximising Nigeria’s vast gas resources.

According to him, expanding domestic utilisation requires robust distribution networks capable of delivering energy efficiently to industries and consumers.

“Distribution networks are critical to industrialisation because industries thrive when gas is available.

“Gas provides a cleaner and more efficient energy source that lowers production costs and ultimately reduces consumer prices,” Mohammed said.

He added that the Federal Government’s overarching goal was to deploy activities across the oil and gas value chain to drive industrial growth.

The NMDPRA chief said government priority was to deepen domestic gas utilisation alongside exports to strengthen the national economy.

He said the regulator would continue to support gas distributors and other midstream operators to ensure orderly expansion within transparent and clearly defined technical and commercial frameworks.

“Inspecting these facilities underscores government’s resolve to reposition the gas sector as a catalyst for industrial growth and national prosperity.

“Transparency remains central to our mandate under the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA),” he said.

Mohammed disclosed that the authority was in the process of mapping the entire country for the allocation of Gas Distribution Licences.

He said licensed gas distribution companies would operate within defined franchise areas to expand gas penetration nationwide.

According to him, where transmission pipelines are unavailable, the authority would deploy virtual gas distribution through Compressed Natural Gas (CNG).

“These operators may appear small, but they are vital to government’s aspiration of delivering gas to every corner of the country, particularly industrial hubs,” he said.

Mohammed noted that industrialisation remained key to national development and economic recovery, adding that government was working to enhance gas penetration through increased access to appliances.

He clarified that while the authority did not provide appliances such as gas cylinders, it ensured that facilities meet required standards from production to final consumption.

Mohammed warned that scarcity inevitably drove higher prices, stressing that increased supply was essential to achieving affordable energy costs.

According to him, the authority would deploy all regulatory powers granted under the PIA to support operators and ensure gas availability nationwide.

“Our goal is to deliver petroleum gas at the lowest possible cost, from production through transportation to distribution,” he concluded.

The delegation inspected facilities operated by Stockgap Fuels Limited, Matrix Petrochemical Limited and Central Horizon Gas Company Limited to assess their operational standards.

Speaking, Dr Stanley Ohamarije, Chairman of Stockgap Limited, said the company planned to inject 5 million gas cylinders into the market over the next five years.

Ohamarije said the investment would support government’s 10-million-cylinder target and deepen gas penetration, noting that Stockgap’s plant has a production capacity of 2,500 cylinders per hour.

He added that the initiative reflected the company’s commitment to improving access to gas for Nigerians and supporting national industrial growth.

On his part, Mr. Kahide Alabi, Managing Director of Central Horizon Gas Company Limited (CHGC), said the firm was expanding gas infrastructure across the country to support industrialisation under the Federal Government’s Decade of Gas initiative.

Alabi said the visit by the NMDPRA would further encourage the company to scale up gas supply to industries.

“Natural gas remains a major driver of industrial growth globally, CHGC is establishing facilities across Nigeria to support economic development,” he said.

He added that the company was expanding infrastructure to meet rising demand, attributing the progress to regulatory support through timely licences and approvals.

By Desmond Ejibas

Five ways in which education is driving environmental action

Environmental challenges are undermining the health of ecosystems, the stability of economies and the well‑being of communities worldwide. Around 3.2 billion people – roughly 40 per cent of the global population – are directly affected by land degradation, while up to $577 billion in annual global crop production is at risk from pollinator loss.

Experts agree that addressing these challenges requires not only technological solutions or policies but also informed, engaged and capable societies. 

This is where education comes in. 

Education Day
Dominican primary school students learn how to plant a sapling in a used plastic bottle as part of a broader drive, backed by the Global Environment Facility and UNEP, to raise awareness about the reuse and recycling of plastics among children and young people. Photo credit: Jack Hewson / UNEP

On January 24 each year, the International Day of Education, led by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), brings global attention to education’s role in shaping a better future and achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.  

From classrooms to communities, and from local initiatives to global movements, here are five ways in which education is driving environmental action. 

1. Investing in students is investing in the future 

Education from an early age is important for understanding the natural world and humanity’s relationship with it. By building environmental literacy, critical thinking and problem-solving skills, schools shape informed citizens who can make environmentally responsible decisions throughout their lives.  

Initiatives like #GenerationRestoration Schools, led by the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration in partnership with the Foundation for Environmental Education (FEE), support schools worldwide to teach and take action for nature, enabling students to learn about the environment by taking part in hands-on ecosystem restoration projects.

2. Outside the classroom, environmental learning teaches life skills 

Beyond school grounds, non-formal means of education also play a crucial role in building environmental awareness. Things like workshops, training groups and programmes empower young people to collaborate, mobilise and tackle challenges within their communities.  

For example, the Tide Turners Plastic Challenge, part of UNEP’s Beat Plastic Pollution campaign, engages youth worldwide through existing networks. In partnership with World Scouting and Girl Guides, it has reached over 800,000 young people, showing the power of grassroots action. Opportunities such as this build leadership and life skills while driving youth-led environmental solutions. 

3. Universities are stepping up for ecosystem restoration 

By incorporating ecosystem restoration into teaching, research, operations and supply chains, universities are transforming their campuses into living laboratories for nature recovery. For example, more than 700 higher education institutions in over 100 countries are part of Nature Positive Universities, a global network dedicated to halting and reversing biodiversity loss through efforts like habitat restoration, biodiversity monitoring and sustainable infrastructure projects.

These actions improve the environments of cities and local landscapes, contributing to the development of a nature-positive future. 

4. Students already are changemakers 

Students around the world are exploring, documenting and communicating environmental challenges. Through journalism, storytelling and digital platforms, young people are sharing solutions and inspiring others to take action.  

Programmes like Young Reporters for the Environment (YRE), which partners closely with the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, have been training and mentoring thousands of future environmental leaders for over 30 years. Many environmental reporters and advocates today started their journeys through YRE, where they developed skills to investigate issues, report on local challenges, and support initiatives focused on solutions.

5. Classrooms are becoming future-proof 

According to a recent analysis by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), at least 242 million students across 85 countries had their schooling disrupted by climate crises in 2024, including heatwaves, storms, floods and droughts. In some contexts, repeated disruptions have threatened children’s right to education. 

Climate-resilient schools help protect children from extreme weather and keep learning on track. For example, in one of India’s most heat-vulnerable regions, Supriya Sahu, laureate of the UNEP Champions of the Earth Award, has introduced cooling measures and nature-based solutions to protect families and schools. Projects like the Cool Roof Project in public “green schools” lower indoor temperatures and improve learning conditions, ensuring that learning can continue. 

Grid collapses again due to system disturbance

The Ikeja Electricity Distribution Company has announced that a system disturbance was experienced on Friday, January 23, 2026, at about 12.40.

The DisCo announced this development in a public notice on its official X handle.

National grid
National grid lines

It said, ”Dear Esteemed Customers, be informed that we experienced a system outage on Friday at 12.40pm affecting all feeders.

”Efforts are currently being coordinated by the National County Centre to effect restoration of supply to all locations affected by the development.”

There was also a system collapse at 2.01 on Dec. 29, 2025, which resulted to loss of power supply across their network.

By Constance Athekame

FAO commits to early planting season toward humanitarian needs, response plan

United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) Representative to Nigeria, Dr Hussein Gadain, has reaffirmed commitment to timely planting season to achieve the Humanitarian Needs and Response Plan (HNRP).

Gadain disclosed this while briefing newsmen on the organisation’s strategy following the recent unveiling of the 2026 Nigeria HNRP for Borno, Adamawa and Yobe (BAY) states on Thursday, January 22, in Abuja.

The introduction of the 2026 HNRP underscored the need for coordinated action to save and protect lives through humanitarian action led by the Nigerian government, supported by national organisations and international partners.

Hussein Gadain
FAO Representative in Nigeria and ECOWAS, Hussein Gadain

According to him, the HRP represents a shared commitment for all of us as a humanitarian community in the country, and particularly the communities facing the most food insecurity.

Gadain said, “As FAO, our key message today is that livelihoods are life-saving. So, saving livelihoods saves lives. When farmers receive seeds and tools on time, they are able to produce their food.

“Also, when livestock are protected and kept productive, and when communities can irrigate, even, a small plot behind their house, they will be able to produce the food they need.

“These interventions preserve dignity for us all, stabilise food access by families and reduce the need for repeated emergency assistance, especially during these difficult times where the global funding is shrinking.

“So, in 2026, for this HNRP, FAO intends to focus on timely agricultural inputs ahead of the planting season, which starts in June. We also support farmers during the dry season.”

Gadain revealed that the organisation was at present, supporting a number of farmers planting during the dry season, while promising to provide livestock health services, including feeds and livestock.

According to him, these livestock  are very good assets for rural communities, adding that such rely on them for nutrition and also as assets.

“When the dry season comes, they sell them and buy food. We focus on small-scale irrigation and water management.

“Irrigating small plot can be more than enough for families to produce food needed, especially nutritious food like vegetables, besides agricultural inputs and life support.

“We intend to do what we call cash plus package. We link the inputs with training and market access as well.

“Families need cash before they grow their food and on this, FAO will provide the cash and inputs together, while people are planting and harvesting, they have cash to buy food.

“We look forward to strengthening partnership, including farmer groups. We bring farmers together to learn from each other and train each other, and also national NGOs and government institutions,” he said.

Gadain further mentioned that the organisation would  work more closely with the food security sector to ensure coherence to make positive impact and to avoid duplication and also to drive stronger accountability to affected population.

He urged partners to front-load flexible funding, so that inputs could reach farmers on time, before the rainy season.

“This is critical to transforming humanitarian assistance into resilience building at large scale. FAO, together with our partners, especially WFP, look forward to working together to deliver more food-secure year for Nigeria.

“It does not matter how little the proportion of HNRP the agricultural component is, but the integration.

“If we work together and identify our beneficiaries together, and target them differently, we will create sustainability, and people who are going to receive repeated assistance every year will reduce,” Gadain said.

By Fortune Abang

Group flays illegal Abia granite mining, lauds govt on clean cooking plan

0

The Foundation for Environmental Rights Advocacy & Development (FENRAD), an environmental advocacy group, has condemned alleged illegal granite mining activities in Imobi Autonomous Community, Uturu, Isuikwuato Local Government Area of Abia State. The group says that it supports the peaceful protest staged by women of the community demanding urgent government intervention.

FENRAD expresses concern over reports that granite quarrying activities are being initiated without due process, community-wide consent, a valid Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), or a Community Development Agreement (CDA), as required under Nigerian environmental and mining laws.

Gov. Alex Otti
Gov. Alex Otti of Abia State

Allegations of Illegal Consent and Community Exclusion

According to information available to FENRAD, a small group of individuals allegedly signed consent documents and registered a mining company without the knowledge, consent, or approval of the broader Imobi Autonomous Community, which comprises Amaedi, Amanyanwu, and Onuzo villages.

Placards displayed during the protest carried messages such as: “The consent letter was signed by improper persons and should be forfeited”, “No community development agreement, no quarry operations”, and “Lime I International Nigeria Ltd is not known to our community”.

The grievances, stated FENRAD, raise serious questions about transparency, legitimacy, and compliance with extant laws governing extractive activities in Nigeria.

Environmental and Public Health Risks

FENRAD warns that granite quarrying, if conducted without strict environmental safeguards, poses severe and irreversible environmental and health risks, including:

  1. Land degradation and loss of fertile farmlands
  2. Pollution of surface and groundwater sources
  3. Air pollution from dust particles (PM2.5 and PM10) leading to respiratory illnesses
  4. Noise and vibration impacts that may damage buildings and cause psychological stress
  5. Destruction of biodiversity and natural vegetation
  6. Public safety hazards, including blasting accidents and abandoned quarry pits

Rural communities like Imobi, which depend heavily on agriculture and natural water sources, are said to be vulnerable to these impacts.

Violation of Environmental and Mining Laws

FENRAD emphasises that under the Environmental Impact Assessment Act (Cap E12 LFN 2004) and other relevant regulations:

  1. No quarrying activity should commence without a comprehensive EIA
  2. Host communities must be fully consulted and involved
  3. A Community Development Agreement is mandatory
  4. Environmental protection and land reclamation plans must be in place
  5. Any operation carried out in violation of these provisions is illegal and subject to revocation.
  6. Position of Traditional Authority

FENRAD also notes with concern the disclosure by the traditional ruler of Imobi Autonomous Community, HRH Eze Simeon Chimezie Chukwuemeka (Imobi IV), through the community’s Secretary General, that the alleged consent was obtained without the knowledge or approval of the traditional institution or the community at large.

This development further underscores the need for immediate government scrutiny and intervention.

FENRAD’s Demands

In line with its mandate to promote environmental justice, community rights, and sustainable development, FENRAD called on:

  1. Governor Alex Otti and the Abia State Government to immediately halt all quarrying-related activities in Imobi Community pending full investigation.
  2. The Abia State Ministry of Environment and relevant regulatory agencies to verify the legality of all permits, consent letters, and company registrations associated with the proposed quarry.
  3. Enforcement of a transparent, inclusive, and community-wide consultation process.
  4. Conduct of an independent and credible Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
  5. Protection of Imobi people from environmental degradation, livelihood loss, and social conflict.

The group stated: “FENRAD commends the women of Imobi Autonomous Community for their peaceful, lawful, and courageous advocacy in defense of their environment, health, and future generations. Their action reflects a broader national concern over extractive activities that prioritize profit over people and the environment.

“The Foundation reiterates that development must not come at the expense of environmental sustainability, community rights, and the rule of law.”

In a related development, FENRAD has congratulated the Abia State Government on the official launch of the Abia State Clean Cooking Plan, describing it as a landmark policy initiative that reflects visionary leadership, environmental responsibility, and a strong commitment to public health and sustainable development.

FENRAD particularly commends the Abia State Ministry of Environment, with special recognition to the Department of Climate Change, for providing strategic leadership and effective coordination in the development of the Plan.

According to the organisation, the effort underscores Abia State’s proactive response to climate change, environmental degradation, and energy poverty, while promoting climate-resilient and low-emission development pathways.

The organisation applauds the Abia State Government for prioritising clean cooking solutions as a critical intervention to reduce household air pollution, curb deforestation, and address the disproportionate health impacts associated with traditional cooking methods, especially on women and children.

FENRAD noted that the Clean Cooking Plan represents a bold and timely policy instrument that aligns with Nigeria’s national development priorities and international climate and sustainable development commitments, including the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

The organisation also acknowledged the vital technical and institutional support provided by the International Centre for Energy, Environment and Development (ICEED) in the development of the Plan. FENRAD stated that ICEED’s partnership ensured that the framework is evidence-based, inclusive, and responsive to local realities, while remaining fully aligned with the policy direction of the Federal Ministry of Environment and Nigeria’s National Clean Cooking Plan.

This alignment, FENRAD emphasised, strengthens policy coherence and enhances the prospects for effective and sustainable implementation.

Furthermore, FENRAD commended the inclusive, multi-stakeholder approach adopted by the Abia State Government and the Ministry of Environment, noting that it reflects a clear understanding that clean cooking is not merely an energy issue but a cross-cutting development priority that advances public health, gender equity, environmental protection, climate mitigation, and economic empowerment.

As a civil society organisation committed to environmental rights, climate justice, and sustainable livelihoods, FENRAD reaffirmed its readiness to support the Abia State Ministry of Environment and its Department of Climate Change in the implementation of the Clean Cooking Plan through community engagement, advocacy, policy monitoring, and strategic partnerships.

The organisation stressed that sustained political commitment, adequate financing, and strong institutional collaboration will be essential to translating the Plan into tangible benefits for households across both urban and rural communities in Abia State

FENRAD expressed confidence that the successful implementation of the Abia State Clean Cooking Plan would significantly improve public health outcomes, reduce environmental degradation, strengthen climate resilience, and contribute to a cleaner, healthier, and more sustainable future for the people of Abia State.

×