29.4 C
Lagos
Monday, May 5, 2025
Home Blog Page 2140

Fatima Denton: Africa can turn agriculture as engine of development

0

Director, Special Initiative Division at the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (NECA), Dr Fatima Denton, says on Wednesday in Marrakech, Morocco at the opening of the Fourth Annual Conference on Climate Change and Development in Africa (CCDA-IV) that even though climate change constitutes the greatest challenge of Africans, it is also the continent’s greatest opportunity to widen out ripples of prosperity. Denton, who is also coordinator of the African Climate Policy Centre (ACPC), believes that Africa can go a step further by making agriculture the engine of its development

 

Fatima Denton. Photo: Pan-African Media Alliance for Climate Change (PAMACC)
Fatima Denton. Photo: Pan-African Media Alliance for Climate Change (PAMACC)

We are gathered under a common theme that reflects our collective resolve, to keep climate food insecurity at an arms length, and to stimulate growth through the translation of climate information into practical action.

The theme over the next few days will reflect the on-going work by the African Union Commission and the need to ensure that agriculture is embedded into a solution space, in which climate change becomes not only a risk amplifier, but an opportunity to shift our current modes of production into a viable entrepreneurial activity.

Our deepest conviction is that climate change remains a double edge sword. It constitutes the greatest challenge of our times, but it is also Africa’s greatest opportunity to widen out ripples of prosperity across our continent. Africa is already defying the rest of world and showing great potential in terms of its macroeconomic growth. Our continent is well poised to use its resources towards achieving structural transformation and severing ties with poverty for good. A 2-degree warming will make a mockery of all our efforts to combat poverty, and instead of embalming our stride towards sustainable development, it will reduce the scope we have to make poverty a thing of the past.

Africa is one of the few regions where hunger and undernourishment continue to claim lives, and robs productive sectors of their most basic tools, healthy women and men who are able to replenish their human and physical capital to stimulate growth in the agricultural sector. Sub-Saharan Africa, for example, has the highest prevalence of hunger with one in four people in the region being undernourished.

Last year we reflected on the theme: Africa on the rise, but, we noted that Africa’s flight towards agricultural sovereignty cannot be achieved if we do not deliberately use agriculture as a catalyst for growth. Unfortunately, Africa’s high economic growth and rising GDP in the last decade, does not reveal the full story of the potential of agriculture as a bedrock to erect and safeguard Africa’s development, now and in the future. The increase in extractive minerals and other non-renewable resources have propelled growth in recent years and injected huge capital flow into the economy.

But in many ways, this increase has diverted policy focus away from agriculture. We are missing the opportunity to use agriculture as a foundation for our industrial pathway.

Agriculture has not served as a transformational hub in fuelling economic growth and propelling industrialisation. Pre-industrial agricultural in the developed world has been largely predicated on three variables: climate, culture, and the deployment of smart technologies. With agricultural transformation came migration, industrialisation, which enabled countries such as Britain, to increase both population growth and improving living standards. Indeed, no industrialised country has achieved sustainable economic growth without a solid agricultural foundation.

We have a major opportunity in turning agriculture in Africa as the engine of development.

Africa currently possesses a demographic dividend, predominantly comprised of a youthful population with over 60% under 30. In addition, Africa is globally experiencing the fastest rate of urbanisation with 50% of the population expected to be living in urban areas by 2030.

This will require a deep reflection not just about producing more food, but also how we produce it using SMART agriculture for example.

Currently, agriculture in Africa employs about 70% of the population. However, the current form of agricultural practice will not serve the aspirations of our younger generation. We must turn it into a source of lucrative business rather than simply a subsistence way of life, and incentivise our younger generation in embracing it as a wealth creating opportunity.

Leaders across Africa have consistently showed their commitment towards agriculture’s role in Africa’s development. The Abuja Declaration of 2006, for example, is a testimony to this commitment. The African Heads of States and Governments recently pledged to uphold the principles of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP), and further committed themselves to enhancing investment finance in agriculture, in the Malabo Declaration of June 2014. They reiterated their resolve in the Maputo Declaration, to uphold the allocation of at least 10% of public expenditure to agriculture to ensure its efficiency.

Weaving all these together requires climate information services in overcoming the current challenges posed by climate change. Climate information services enable better integration of the water, energy and land nexus.

They are critical along the entire agricultural commodity value chain.

According to the Africa Agriculture Status Report of 2013, agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa depends on the climate as irrigation only constitutes 10% of productive land. Therefore, managing climate change remains an indispensable component of any future investment in agricultural development.

The Climate for Development in Africa (ClimDev-Africa) programme jointly implemented by the African Union Commission, the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa and the African Development Bank was entrusted with a mandate by the African Heads of States and Governments to improve climate information services in support of African development agenda.

Consolidating the potential for agriculture, using climate information services, will have a multiplier effect in catering for our youth, shared prosperity, and providing food, water and energy security.

This puts Africa along the transitional pathway of a vision towards a green and blue economies agenda. Ladies and gentlemen, let’s use this conference to start stitching the various pillars of African development using climate information services.

Our leaders have recently met in New York during the UN Secretary General Summit on Climate Change. They have accentuated their determination as world leaders to honour commitments of the past and provide concrete assurance that our past actions cannot be the predictors of our future performance.

Africa wants to turn its back on promises that have not gone the extra mile, commitments that have not translated into adaptation resources and funds that have remained pledges and hollow words for our vulnerable communities of farmers, fishers, pastoralists.

We remain convinced that the international agreement under negotiation can only be meaningful to Africa if commitments to support adaptation have a legally binding provision. As such, Africa has proposed a Global Goal for Adaptation in supporting such an outcome.  Our governments already bear the costs of adaptation, and these must find recognition as part of contributions in the new agreement.

Action must ripple through to mitigation efforts, and this means that developed nations must shoulder the overwhelming responsibility to turn mitigation efforts into decisive actions. Africa and other developing countries are playing their part. We have recognised that the pledged mitigation efforts by developing countries for 2020 exceed those of the developed world, despite our lower levels of responsibility for causing climate change and limited capacities to address it.

We are here today because our planet is under threat, our resources are being depleted, our ecosystems are being degraded; but most of all, the legacy that we can hand down to our children is diminishing. Our collective resolve is to prepare clear signposts that will lead to a strong post Kyoto Protocol agreement.

Africa and the rest of the world will not gain from a weak agreement in Paris in 2015. We cannot bend history. We are here today because both historical and current emissions have conspired to compromise the existence of our most valuable resources. Hence, we cannot win the fight against climate change unless developed countries take the plunge and raise the ambition bar in delivering on bold mitigation commitments.

Climate change has crystallised what is at stake. It is the core of our humanity – our most sacred assets that will undermine our collective human security if we continue on the “politics as usual” trajectory. Africa is not sitting idly by waiting for blueprints. Our conviction is that we can turn the strong currents of underdevelopment into wealth creation through our hard work, resilience and “inclusive” growth. We have all the ingredients that will give greater hope to our children, as we walk with them in choosing viable pathways that are signposted to sustainable development.

The next generation of African youth will be the custodian of the world, our generation should do all we can today to ensure that the impacts of climate change do not constitute the only legacy that we handed down to them, and that we start weaving together a rich tapestry of prosperity that we can all share for the well being of our people and the future we deserve.

European steel makers seek to stay afloat amid climate, energy agenda

0

The European steel industry is worried that a continental climate policy will engender regulatory carbon dioxide (CO2) costs that may undermine the sector’s wellbeing.

A steel making plant line
A steel making plant line

The greenhouse gas (GHG) of most relevance to the world steel industry is CO2. On average, 1.8 tonnes of CO2 are emitted for every tonne of steel produced. According to the International Energy Agency, in 2010 the iron and steel industry accounted for approximately 6.7% of total world CO2 emissions.

But defiant steel makers in Europe have joined hands and forged a campaign to protect their interests, ahead of the European Council meetings scheduled to hold in Brussels, Belgium 23-24 October, 2014. They insist that a climate policy should rather strengthen the industry so as to provide the products, jobs and incomes for the policy’s successful implementation.

In a letter to Heads of State and government, President of the European Parliament, President and President-elect of the European Council, and President and President-elect of the European Commission, 60 CEOs of the European steel industry are demanding from the October EU summit to give a clear guidance that the EU’s new climate and energy framework will not impose regulatory direct and indirect CO2 costs “on globally competing European industries”.

Declaring that they share the EU’s ambition to find an effective response to the climate change imbroglio, the group pointed out however that, to be effective, such response needs a policy that supports a healthy manufacturing industry with jobs on the continent.

“That would be a policy which benefits European society as a whole. Our products and products applications, our employees are the foundations for a carbon lean, energy efficient, and prosperous European society. There are not only four million jobs at stake in energy intensive industries in Europe but many more in the value chains and its dependent service sectors,” the CEOs wrote.

They went further, demanding: “Is it asking too much that at least the most CO2 efficient manufacturers in Europe must have no competitive disadvantage from EU climate policies vis-à-vis the global competitors?

“If no effective safeguard measures are taken, the EU Emission Trading System could cost the EU steel industry about 70 to 100 billion Euros in the first period from 2020 to 2030. The measures presently in place to protect the industry will largely run out by 2020. Free carbon allowances for even the most efficient installation will have been reduced by 75%, electricity prices for European industry are already twice as high as elsewhere and still rising enormously.

“It’s not sufficient to say that carbon leakage provisions should continue – they must continue at the level of 100% for the most efficient installations. They cannot be reduced or phased out through the backdoor by the so-called correction factor.

“In March 2014 the heads of State promised that the decision of the new policy framework will provide the necessary basis for growth for its economic operators. We the CEOs of the industry in Europe now trust in this promise.”

The CEOs are: Aditya Mittal (CEO, ArcelorMittal Europe), Andreas J. Gross (CEO, ThyssenKropp Steel Europe AG), Karl Kohler (CEO and Managing Director, Tata Steel Europe), Francesc Rubiratta i Rubio (Chiarman and CEO, Celsa Group), Cesare Riva (CEO, Riva Fomi Elettrici), Heinz Jorg Fuhmmann (CEO, Salzgitter AG), Martin Lindqvist (President and CEO, SSAB AB), Wolfgang Elder (Chairman and CEO, Voestalpine AG), Lucia Morcelli (CEO, Accial Speciali Temi SpA), Geovanni Arvedi (President Acciaieria, Arvedi SpA), Bernardo Velazquez (CEO, Acerinox), Philippe Darmayen (CEO, Aperam), Andre Sombecki (CEO, Benteler Steel/Tube GmbH), Jerzy Kozicz (President, CMC Poland Sp. Zo.o.), Gunnar Kohlschein (CEO, BGH Edelstahlwerke GmbH), Roberto Marzorati (Vice-President, Cogne Acciai Speciali), Eneas Garcia Diniz (CEO, Companhia Siderurgica Nacional), Martin Lowendick (CEO, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke GmbH), Karlheinz Blessing (CEO, Dillinger Huttle/Saarstahl AG), Antonio Gozzi (CEO, Duferco Belgium), Ivan Kroo (Director, Dutrade Steels Products Processing and Trade Co), Dmitrij Scuka (Chairman of the Board of Directors, Evraz Vitkovice Steel a.s.), Goran Ek (Managing Director, Fagersta Stainless AB), Giuseppe Pasini (President, Feralpi Siderurgica SpA), Pieter van Buren (CEO, FNSteel BV), Gunna Lohmann-Hutte (Managing Director, Friedr. Lohmann GmbH), Peter van Hullen (Georgsmarienhutte Holding GmbH), George Skindilias (Vice-President and CEO, Halyvourgiki Inc.), Vasil Vasilev (Manager, Helios Metalurg Ltd), Vassilios Goumas (CEO, Hellenic Halyvourgia SA), Melker Jernberg (CEO and President, Hoganas AB), Istvan Orova (Director, ISD Cokin Plant Ltd), Evgeny Tankhilevich (CEO, ISD Dunaferr) and Horacio Malfatto (CEO, NLMK Europe).

Others include: Mika Seitovirta (President and CEO, Outokumpu Oyj), Tom Erixon (President and CEO, Ovako), Imre Bartha (Director, Ozd Steelworks Ltd), Viktor Dembitski (Executive Director, Promet Steel), Pablo Ignacio Battistini (General Manager, Rodacciai SpA), Dirk Mahnke (Rohrwerk Maxhutte GmbH), Petra Einarsson (CEO, Sandvik Materials Technology), Nikolaos Mariou (General Manager, Sidenor SA), Jose Enrique Freire Arteta (CEO, Siderurgica Nacional SA), Anton Chernykh (President of the Board and CEO, SIJ-Slovenska industrija jekia, d.d.), Markus Ritter (Managing Director, Stahl-und Walzwerk Marienhutte GmbH), Eneas Garcia Diniz, (CEO&SWT Managing Director, Stahlwerk Thuringen GmbH), Emil Zhivkov (Executive Director, Stomana Industry SA), Marjan Mackosek (Managing Director, Store Steel d.o.o.), Luca Zanotti (Vice-President and Managing Director, TenarisDalmine), Adrian Popescu (CEO, TMK-ARTROM/TMK-RESITA), Jan Czudek (CEO, Trinecke Zelezamy), Jesus Esmoris (CEO, Tubacex SA), Enrique Arriola (CEO, Tubos Reunidos), George Babcoke (President, U.S.Steel Kosice), Patrick Lamarque d’Arrouzat (CEO, Ugitech), Philippe Crouzet (CEO, Vallourec SA), Sergiy Pronin (Director for Economics and Business, Dev Vorskia Steel Denmark A/S) and Vladmir Sotak (CEO, Zeleziame Podbrezova Slovakia).

Report urges accelerated action to meet biodiversity targets by 2020

0

Bold and innovative action is urgently required if governments are to meet the globally-agreed Strategic Plan for Biodiversity and its Aichi Targets by 2020, says a United Nations progress report on the state of global biodiversity.

Launched on Monday (October 6, 2014) one year before the halfway point of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 and the United Nations Decade on Biodiversity, Global Biodiversity Outlook 4 shows that there has been significant progress towards meeting some components of the majority of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.  However, in most cases, additional action is required to keep the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 on course.

The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, and its 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets, were agreed by the international community in 2010 in Nagoya, Japan, and have since been re-affirmed by the United Nations General Assembly and at the Rio + 20 summit in 2012.

Meeting the Aichi Biodiversity Targets would contribute significantly to broader global priorities addressed by the post-2015 development agenda; namely, reducing hunger and poverty, improving human health, and ensuring a sustainable supply of energy, food and clean water.  Incorporating biodiversity into the sustainable development goals, currently under discussion, provides an opportunity to bring biodiversity into the mainstream of decision-making.

However, reaching these joint objectives requires changes in society, including much more efficient use of land, water, energy and materials, rethinking our consumption habits and, in particular, major transformations of food production systems.

Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary General
Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary General

Ban Ki-moon, United Nations Secretary-General, underlined the linkage between biodiversity and sustainable development:  “I urge Member States and stakeholders everywhere to take GBO4’s conclusions into account in their planning, recognize that biodiversity contributes to solving the sustainable development challenges we face, and redouble efforts to achieve our shared goals,” he said.

Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary-General and Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), said, “The responsible management of our planet’s biodiversity is motivated not only by a shared sense of responsibility to future generations. The factors prompting policy makers to safeguard biodiversity are increasingly economic in nature. Without healthy biodiversity, livelihoods, ecosystem services, habitats and food security will be compromised.”

Achim Steiner of UNEP
Achim Steiner of UNEP

“Actions to reduce biodiversity loss will inevitably support a broad range of societal benefits and lay the groundwork for the socio-economic transition to a more sustainable and inclusive model of development,” he added.

“The good news is that Parties are making progress and concrete commitments to implement the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.” said Braulio Ferreira de Souza Dias, UN Assistant-Secretary-General and Executive Secretary of the Convention on Biological Diversity. “However, the report also shows us that efforts need to be significantly scaled-up if the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 is to be implemented and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets achieved.”

“Our efforts can and must be strengthened by combining actions that address multiple drivers of biodiversity loss and multiple targets. The world increasingly understands the critical links between biodiversity and sustainable development. Measures required to achieve the Aichi Biodiversity Targets also support the goals of greater food security, healthier populations and improved access to clean water for all,” he said.

Braulio Ferreira de Souza Dia
Braulio Ferreira de Souza Dia

With the progress achieved to date, plausible pathways exist for realising an end to biodiversity loss, along with achieving global goals related to addressing climate change, land degradation and sustainable development.

Environmental activism under threat in Malaysia

On the eve of the October 10-18 global ‘Reclaim Power’ week, Friends of the Earth Malaysia and Friends of the Earth International urged the Malaysian government to cancel its plans for 12 unnecessary and damaging large dams.

Jagoda Munic
Jagoda Munic

If the Malaysian government goes ahead with its plan to build these large dams in the state of Sarawak, the local environment and the lives and livelihoods of thousands of local people will be affected: not only those who would lose their homes and be forcefully relocated, but also all downstream communities.

The Malaysian government and powerful corporations are suppressing environmental and human rights protests by resorting to arbitrary detentions and defamation law, according to Friends of the Earth International.

“This year the Malaysian government arrested and intimidated more than a dozen citizens struggling to have their environmental and human rights respected. The Malaysian government should listen to citizens who express concerns over environmental problems instead of cracking down on them. Powerful corporations on the other hand appear to be resorting to legal suits which may be intended to stifle freedom of expression,” said Jagoda Munic, chairperson of the Friends of the Earth International federation.

On 22-26 September, a delegation from Friends of the Earth International visited Malaysia to take stock of the situation of environmental rights defenders and to express solidarity with individuals and communities affected by environmental and human rights violations.

The delegation met with Malaysians opposed to Australian rare earth miner Lynas Corporation.

Over the past three years there has been massive opposition in Malaysia to Australian rare earth miner Lynas Corporation building the world’s largest rare earth refinery in Kuantan: the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) has become one of the largest environmental issues in Malaysian history.

Friends of the Earth International supports the 1.2 million Malaysians who have signed the petition demanding Lynas to shut down the plant, clean up its waste and leave Malaysia.

Lynas has not sufficiently addressed its obligations. Major problems include a total lack of effective community consultation, a deeply flawed Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment and operating without a permanent waste disposal facility despite highly toxic waste including radioactive thorium.

Friends of the Earth International also stands in solidarity with the 15 Malaysian citizens arrested on the 22nd June 2014 outside the LAMP and demands for all criminal charges to be dropped.

The Friends of the Earth international delegation also met with community members from Bukit Koman in Pahang, where many people began to suffer various skin, eye and respiratory problems after a gold mining company began operations.

A civil case brought by the community against the Malaysian Department of the Environment and the gold mining company Raub Australian Gold Mining Sdn Bhd (RAGM) requesting a new Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment was met with defeat at all stages from the High Court to the Federal Court (the highest court).

In 2013 RAGM brought defamation suits against three community leaders in reaction to statements made to the press.

Friends of the Earth International calls for a full, independent and impartial investigation into the cause of the communities’ health problems; findings of which must be acted upon in consultation with them. Findings of all or any previous investigation must be released to the community.

Friends of the Earth International believes that if the Malaysian government wants to contribute to a better future for all its citizens it should start supporting the struggle of environmental rights defenders and protect and respect them, instead of criminalising environmental activism.

In addition, the government must ensure that any corporations responsible for environmental or human rights violations are held accountable for their actions.

A legally binding system to guarantee access to justice for affected communities and environmental defenders must be put in place.

Climate change: Can Africa feed Africa?

0

The African continent, regarded as one of the most vulnerable regions to the impact of climate change, has taken up a campaign to utilise climate knowledge to transform agricultural production systems in order to sustainably feed herself and improve the people’s socio-economic wellbeing.

Marrakesh in Morocco, the conference venue
Marrakesh in Morocco, the conference venue

Consequently, key stakeholders will gather next week for three days from Wednesday at the fourth edition of the Climate Change and Development in Africa (CCDA-IV) conference in Marrakesh, Morocco to deliberate on: “Africa Can Feed Africa Now: Translating Climate Knowledge into Action”.

The theme selection is in recognition of 2014 as the year of agriculture, and the spotlight will be on climate knowledge opportunities that can transform agricultural production systems to feed Africa sustainably.

The CCDA conference series is a policy influencing space organised each year under the auspices of the Climate for Development in Africa (ClimDev-Africa) Programme. ClimDev-Africa is a consortium of three leading pan-African institutions – the African Union Commission (AUC), the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) and the African Development Bank (AfDB).

According to the organisers, the overall objective of the conference is to provide a platform for deliberating on how Africa can utilise climate knowledge to transform agricultural production systems in order to sustainably feed itself and improve the socio-economic wellbeing of its people.

To continue on a trend that commenced during CCDA-III, CCDA-IV will lay focus on impacts of climate change on vulnerable groups and also integrate strong participation of civil society groups, with the aim of perceiving the realities, opportunities and challenges faced at the grass-root level, for which policy makers and researchers in attendance can begin to design interventions. The targeted vulnerable groups include farmers, women, the youth and pastoralists.

The promoters describe CCDA as a forum where stakeholders come together to discuss the interrelationships between climate change and development, with Africa as the main focus. “ClimDev-Africa partners, as well as other stakeholders, share their programmes’ achievements as well as challenges they face on key climate change issues and seek new knowledge on ways to better cope with them in the interest of Africa’s development. Further, it builds a consensus amongst policy makers, academicians, researchers, practitioners and other stakeholders on best approaches of integrating climate change opportunities in policies, strategies, planning and practices in Africa,” a source explains.

To realise the overall objective, the following specific objectives will guide deliberations:

  • To understand the role of climate data and information services and climate knowledge in transforming and managing risk and opportunities across the agricultural value chain.
  • To examine the implications of recent climate trends and projections on agricultural production systems and related infrastructure.
  • To better understand the importance of natural capital and ecosystem services in agricultural performance and sustainability.
  • To identify finance and technology challenges and opportunities for climate resilient agriculture value chains.
  • To build on CCDA3 recommendations and the Climate Research for Development (CR4D) climate research frontiers identified in the African Climate Conference 2013 (ACC2013).

The following subthemes are the pillars that will guide deliberations during the breakout sessions, and for which presenters will be invited to submit papers:

  • Sub-theme I: Improving and harnessing climate data, information, and knowledge for agricultural production, water resources management, and food security in Africa.
  • Sub-theme II: Agricultural opportunities for renewable energy development in Africa.
  • Sub-theme III: Enhancing Africa’s capacity to mobilize, access, and implement climate finance for agricultural development.
  • Sub-theme IV: Innovation and technology to enhance agricultural transformation in a changing climate.

African nations, others prepare for REDD+

Nepal. Ivory Coast, Madagascar and Kenya have requested UN-REDD targeted support on legal preparedness. All are looking to adapt their existing policies, laws and regulations in order to support or put in place national REDD+ processes and strategies, with Kenya having requested the second stage of such support

 

website-map---updated-November-2012-3

Activities have been taking place over the past two years with the support of the UN REDD/Cambodia Programme. Whereas Community Forest committee members had benefitted from awareness-raising in the past, this has now been extended to include children from the communities.

Legal preparedness for REDD+ refers to countries’ efforts to establish national and/or sub-national legal frameworks supportive of REDD+. Upon a government’s request, legal support may be provided to UN-REDD member countries to help them analyse and adapt laws governing forests and managing natural resources.

In Nepal, the analysis will help identify legal gaps regarding various aspects of REDD+, whereas work in Kenya will focus on drafting regulations that relate to tenure and REDD+ issues.

In Ivory Coast, one of the objectives of the targeted support is fora regulation to be drafted that improves institutional coordination over REDD+ matters. In Madagascar, efforts will concentrate on the integration of specific REDD+ legal provisions into the country’s new forestry code.

The DRC has also requested support in the form of drafting support on data sharing agreements. This will strengthen institutional mandates and the coordination of data collection and management.

In Honduras and Guatemala, legal assistance is being provided to analyze the legal frameworks related to REDD+ in these countries.  Laws related to forestry in the two countries are currently under revision in order to identify gaps or inconsistencies related to REDD+. The expected result in Honduras is for the forest law (2007) to be amended to include REDD+ provisions, while Guatemala aims to reinforce its recently-adopted climate change law by introducing a focus on REDD+ aspects.  A comparative analysis with legislation on payments for environmental services in Costa Rica, Mexico and Peru is also being developed and national validation workshops will take place in November 2014.

Part of the regional UN-REDD Programme workshop organised in Quito on REDD+ national strategies from 30 July to 1 August covered the legal challenges addressed by countries in the region. Participants discussed issues related to financial and economical mechanisms for obtaining funds and share benefits, institutional arrangements requiring a legal framework, the recognition and security of REDD+ related rights and legal issues related to safeguards.

Effective and supportive legal frameworks are crucial for REDD+ to work successfully. Legal preparedness not only strengthens governance structures in the long term – it also helps prepare the ground for REDD+ implementation and attracts investment for concrete REDD+ activities.

The service provides opportunities for building investor confidence through participatory law development approaches that involve national and local stakeholders, as well as the strengthening of law enforcement capacities.

Expert says hand washing curbs diseases beyond Ebola

0

hand washingRegular washing hand and use of sanitisers would eradicate polio, prevent pneumonia, typhoid fever, Hepatitis B and water born diseases, says Dr Rilwanu Mohammed.

Mohammed, who is the Executive Secretary, FCT Primary Health Care Board, made this known to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja on Friday.

He said that the awareness created on Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) prevention had made schools and other corporate organisations to provide fever testing kits and hand sanitisers.

“The use of hand sanitisers by schools will address the common problems of eating bacteria and jams due contamination on the children’s hands.

“This would prevent diarrhoea, cholera, typhoid fever, polio, Hepatitis B and other water born diseases,” the expert said.

He explained that malaria, pneumonia and any form of fever would be contained at the point where more students or pupils would not be affected by the disease any longer.

“Most of the communicable diseases enter our system through our hands; therefore, regular washing of hands would reduce these risks,” he said.

Mohammed said that sustained habit of regular washing of hands and use of sanitisers would control the chemical transmission into our body.

He advised mothers to prevent growing babies from taking particles into their mouth arbitrarily.

“The child exploring the environment would like to take everything to his mouth to test and see whether it is milk.

“It is there they get polio easily. It is the duty of the society to control open defecation and save our children from polio and other communicable diseases,” Mohammed said.

Besides, he said that infant mortality had decreased from 70 to 69 per 1,000 deliveries, while maternal mortality had increased from 545 to 645 per 1,000 live births.

He said that when women delivered they should be admitted for three days to check for blood pressure, bleed and other clot of blood, but it is not being done now due to over stretch of health facilities in the FCT.

A recent report said that the primary healthcare (PHC) facilities in the FCT are not working according to the WHO standards.

“We found out that only 30 per cent are working. The 215 healthcare centres had 1,002 staff against 4,098 required under the WHO standards.

“Eighty per cent of the PHCs in the FCT need to be renovated due to long term disuse, while 27 per cent are working,’’ Mohammed said.

According to him, the proposed national health fund would strengthen PHCs with 50 per cent funding.

“It (the special fund) will enable us to provide basic primary health care services such as provision of staff, essential drugs, ambulances, training and re-training of staff, among others,’’ he said.

Mohammed said that the fund is aimed at reaching pregnant women, children under the age of five, disable and other vulnerable groups who don’t have access to healthcare services monthly.

Mercury: CSOs demand end to Africa’s use of dental amalgam

0

Over 30 Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), including the Sustainable Research and Action for Environmental Development (SRADev) Nigeria, have signed a declaration calling for Africa to be the first continent on the planet to end the use of mercury in dental care.

mercury-fillingsAmalgam fillings are 50% mercury, a major neurotoxin. According to the activists, its continuous use is not justified because alternatives are now affordable, effective and available in Africa. The restriction of its use is demanded worldwide in the new Minamata Convention on Mercury, adopted by more than 140 governments and the EU in 2013, in Kumamoto Japan signed by 120 nations as at today (including Nigeria) and pending ratification.

Leslie Adogame of SRADev Nigeria said:“We are calling on Africa to be the first continent in ending the use of mercury-based dentistry. In the whole world, amalgam use is lowest in Africa, so we are nearer to the finish line than any continent.”

The CSOs say that the toxic trade in dental mercury – which can be diverted into illegal gold mining uses – needs to be ended. The surest route is to have a ban on the use of dental amalgam in all countries of the continent, and have mercury-free dentistry, they insist.

Mercury-free dentistry is growing in Africa. Recent studies in Côte d’Ivoire and Tunisia show that, already, almost 30% of dentists are using alternatives to dental amalgam.

African countries are requested to declare that the children of Africa – and all the people of Africa – have a basic human right to mercury-free dental care and a mercury-free environment.

The request follows the existence of sound scientific evidences that mercury can damage children’s developing brains and nervous systems even before they are born.” In addition to the literature, the Minamata Convention on Mercury adopted in October 2013, noted that the world recognises dental amalgam as a major environmental pollutant which requires each participating nation “to phase down the use of dental amalgam.”

Similarly, the CSOs are clamouring for Africa to become the first continent to phase out the dental amalgam.

The call is contained in the CSOs’ declaration made in Abuja in May 2014 towards Mercury-Free Dentistry for Africa. The declaration highlights that mercury, which is used in dental amalgam, is a restorative material that is approximately 50% elemental mercury, and is a notorious heavy metal of global concern that is known to be a potent poison of the human nervous system.

The CSOs’ concern is raised based on the fact that dental mercury accounts for 10% of annual global mercury consumption and 260-340 metric tons of mercury pollution around the world each year.

The dental amalgam mercury enters the environment via many pathways, polluting air via cremation, dental clinic releases, and sewage sludge incineration; water via human waste and dental clinic releases to septic systems and municipal wastewater; and soil via landfills, burials, and fertilizers. Once dental mercury is in the environment, bacteria in soils and sediments may convert it to methylmercury, a highly toxic form that builds up in fish, shellfish and animals that eat fish, thereby making fish and shellfish the main sources of methylmercury exposure to humans.

In the dental workplace, uncontrolled mercury vapours are a major occupational risk, especially to young women of childbearing age.

The CSOs are also reminding the African countries on their efforts during negotiations of the Minamata Convention. They worked hard to make sure that reduction in dental amalgam use specifically be included in the treaty, forcefully arguing for the phase out of amalgam generally and for an end to amalgam in milk teeth specifically. In the African Regional consultation held in Pretoria on 9th May 2012, the African Region adopted a plan for dental amalgam – the phase-down steps – that, coupled with subsequent amendments, was enshrined into the treaty. The reference is also made to the Libreville Declaration on Health and Environment in Africa (August 2008).

The phase down is possible since Mercury-free dental restorative materials are far less expensive than dental amalgam when environmental and societal costs are factored in.The costs of using mercury-free options (including retreatment) is about half the cost of amalgam without retreatment, making this mercury-free technique significantly more affordable in low-income communities, particularly in areas without electricity or dental clinics.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) report Future Use of Materials for Dental Restoration,  says that “recent data suggest that RBCs (resin-based composites) perform equally well” as amalgam – and offer additional oral health benefits because adhesive resin materials allow for less tooth destruction and, as a result, a longer survival of the tooth itself.

The CSOs call the African countries to work together and make Africa the first continent with mercury-free dentistry – considering that the current amount of dental amalgam used in Africa is much closer to zero than in any other continent. In 2010, the sub-Saharan African region used just six tons of dental mercury.

In addition, the CSOs call the countries to adopt effective amalgam phase down strategies that have been proven in nations that have already phased out or significantly reduced dental mercury use by raising awareness about dental mercury to parents, consumers, dental workers, health professionals, and educators, promoting the benefits of non-mercury dental restorative materials, considering government programmes and insurance policies that favour non-mercury dental restorative materials among others.

Furthermore, the CSOs call African countries to reject the double standard mentality which infers that Africans must accept toxic chemicals that the rest of the world rejects.

World Contraception Day: Experts clamour improved access to contraceptives

0

In a bid to ensure that every pregnancy is wanted, experts have urged government to increase access to family planning commodities on this year’s World Contraceptive Day.

contraception-illustrationThe need to increase contraceptive use among sexually active people in Nigeria is critical to reducing unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortion. According to the Nigerian Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS 2013), about 23 percent of teenage girls between ages 15 and 19 are already mothers or pregnant with their first child, while half of the women between ages 25 and 49 years were already married by age 18 and 61 percent were married by age 20.

Also, the sexual and reproductive behavioural pattern of Nigerians show that women and men tend to initiate sexual activity before marriage. These lifestyle, coupled with high fertility and low contraceptive prevalence rate, typically lead to unintended pregnancies, close births spacing and high-risk births.

Nigeria’s maternal mortality ratio currently stands at 576 per 100,000 live births and a World Health Organisation (WHO) report titled ‘Trends in Maternal Mortality’ had reported in May this year that Nigeria lost about 40,000 women due to child birth in 2013, a figure which is second to India’s.

In a statement released by Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative (NURHI), the Advocacy Advisor, Mrs. Charity Ibeawuchi, said, “The young persons who form the majority among the women of reproductive age should be encouraged to space pregnancies and childbirths. The adolescents and youths in Nigeria are faced with gross challenges of sexual and reproductive ill-health as a result of their inability to access relevant information and services. In particular, adolescent girls are more vulnerable to health problems arising from under-age child bearing, unwanted pregnancies, unsafe abortion, sexual exploitation and abuse which consequently contribute to the high maternal morbidity and mortality.”

With low contraceptive prevalence rate of 10% and high fertility rate of 5.5, there is strong indication that only a few Nigerian women are using modern family planning methods for spacing or limiting pregnancies. ”A woman’s ability to space and limit her pregnancies has a direct impact on her health and well-being as well as on the outcome of each pregnancy,” said the WHO.

Ibeawuchi urged the Nigerian government and other key stakeholders to take cognisance of the challenges associated with being an adolescent and young. “We must increase commitment to such investments that effectively equip and increase the potential of young people to safeguard their future,” she said.

Furthermore, access to contraceptives should be corroborated with appropriate information, policies and commitments that would encourage young people to make important decisions concerning their lives, wellbeing and future.

The World Contraception Day (WCD) is celebrated around the world each year on September 26th. It is a worldwide campaign whose vision is a world where every pregnancy is wanted. Launched in 2007, its mission is to improve the awareness of contraception and to enable young people to make informed decisions on their sexual and reproductive health.

Combating illegal logging with smartphones, smarter shopping

0

CustomMade, an online marketplace, discloses in this treatise that though illegal logging costs the global economy an estimated $30 to $100 billion in lost revenue annually, the mass exodus of our forests has more devastating, long-lasting implications, putting the environment, politics and social stability at risk

 

illegal-logging-headerMany of us make daily choices to try to live more environmentally conscious lifestyles. But there’s an element probably present in everyone’s home that’s contributing to the destruction of the natural world: items made from illegally sourced wood. The paper sitting in your printer, the toilet paper in your bathroom, and the coffee table in your living room may all come from illegal logging operations. Each year, more than 32 million acres of forest are illegally and unsustainably logged.

Illegal logging – the harvesting, transporting, processing, buying, or selling of timber in violation of national laws – is a global issue, affecting most forested countries. The term also includes wood harvested from protected areas or threatened species of plants or trees as well as the falsification of official logging documents, breached license agreements, and corruption of government officials. Because of the natural of illegal logging, it’s also difficult to measure the scale of the devastation. “Most of it is selective logging, not big clear cuts,” says Dr. Matt Finer, Amazon Conservation Association’s research specialist. The pick-and-choose method makes it extremely difficult to spot missing trees in aerial pictures or satellite imagery.

Illegal logging runs rampant in poorer nations and is dominated by organized crime.  A 2012 U.N. report estimated organized crime groups were to blame for up to 90 percent of tropical deforestation. It takes place primarily in the tropical forests of the Amazon basin, Central Africa, and Southeast Asia. Currently, Indonesia is the hardest hit country; 40 percent of its 6.02 million forest hectares have been lost to illegal logging. Though a short-term law enforcement effort in the mid-2000s temporarily slowed the loss, illegal logging has increased in scale over the last three to five years.

The main, most obvious reason for illegal logging the high global demand for timber, paper, and other wood-derived products. But not all logged trees are turned into flooring, paper, and plywood. Around40 percent of removed wood is used as fuel for energy needs, including cooking and heating; in some tropical regions, that figure skyrockets to as high as 80 percent.

Corruption, economic and political instability, a lack of democracy, insufficient regulations, and weak governments all contribute to illegal logging. There are also insufficient penalty systems in place: A low risk coupled with high profit incentive makes illegal logging all the more enticing to those who need or want the money. Because illegal timber is generally less expensive and revenues are up to five-ten times higher, it’s hard for legal timber operations to compete.

The source of the wood is only part of the problem. Consumer countries contribute by importing wood without always knowing or checking if it’s been legally sourced. For example, the U.S. is ranked as the largest wood products market in the world. Translation? Many of us unknowingly purchase items made from illegally logged wood and keep the demand for inexpensive goods strong.

 

illegal-logging-001The Impact

Illegal logging costs the global economy an estimated $30-100 billion in lost revenue annually – 10 to 30 percent of the total global timber trade. But the mass exodus of our forests has more devastating, long-lasting implications. It puts the environment, politics, and social stability at risk.

Clearing trees haphazardly decreases the chances for ecosystems to adapt to climate change and human contact. Research shows that for every commercial tree removed, 27 other trees are damaged, 40 meters of road are created, and 600 square meters of canopy is opened. Once trees are cut down, they are transported by tractor along the newly formed roads, which double as easy-access hunting routes.

Without dense forests to filter water and hold soil in place, soil erosion increases, and rivers and streams fill with sediment and debris, which has destroyed coral reefs and other aquatic habitats. Degradation of forests also destroys wildlife habitats on land, threatens populations of some of the most endangered primates, and jeopardizes plant biodiversity.

Logged areas are also susceptible to changing weather patterns as lost forest can make rainfall more erratic and consequently lengthen dry periods. Forest fires are another known environmental effect of logging: Clearing areas emits large amounts of carbon dioxide, which in turn becomes fuel for intense blazes.  Many major forest fires worldwide were either started or worsened by logging or other agricultural development in otherwise pristine environments.

Illegal logging can also result in political conflict and clashes over land and resources. When the law is disregarded, community values are strained. “(It) undermines the entire landscape-level conservation strategy,” Finer says.

For many tropical countries, the conservation of forest cover focuses on the establishment of protected areas and indigenous territories, he explains. Once illegal logging bulldozes its way through these formerly protected areas, the system is destabilized. Local villagers and indigenous tribes are driven from their homes, face murder and violence, and are subjected to uncontrolled colonization. In July 2014, Amazon Indians – previously unconnected with the outside world – emerged from a Brazilian rainforest due to illegal logging.

For the forest-dependent locals that have thrived on tropical forestland for thousands of years, logging near and through homeland can result in scarcer quantities of food, building materials, and medicinal plants. Meat and fish have been compromised by hunting, habitat destruction, and polluted conditions. Logging companies have even bulldozed through gardens and other edible plants and trees that provide nutrients for native peoples. Oil runoff from machinery and chemicals used to treat timber also pollute the land and water supply.

 

illegal-logging-002Putting a Stop to Illegal Logging

Even if timber sports a single producer label, it’s often been traded many times during transport and could have come from an illegal location. For a logging operation to be legal, there are a number of guidelines a company must follow to cut, extract, transport, and sell timber. Along that supply chain, there are countless methods of breaking logging laws. Even timber marked as certified – and with a higher price tag – may not be.

Some laws, such as the Lacey Act, control logging in certain areas in an attempt to halt illegal trade. Unfortunately, they’re often broken. Even in countries like Peru where forests are protected by a modern forestry law as well as a free trade agreement with the U.S., some logging operations still operate illegally. “This mostly comes from providing false information in the annual management plant and claiming the presence of trees that don’t actually exist within the concession, so they can then use those permits to log timber elsewhere outside,” Finer says.

Most legal logging initiatives focus on promoting sustainable logging, with incentives for legal trade (like REDD+); they don’t address the widespread extortion, fraud, laundering, and bribery. For instance, the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Action Plan (FLEGT) was developed to reduce illegal import to the European Union. The key to the program is voluntary partnership agreements that ensure only legally sourced timber and products are imported into the EU from participating countries. Other major players in the legal logging game include the International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime (ICCWC), which helps enforcement agencies prevent and detect illegal logging and other forest offenses as well as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), with around 2,000 delegates representing more than 150 governments, indigenous peoples, non-governmental organizations and businesses. Other regional partnerships, such as the recent one between Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania, have been put in place to improve customs at borders and ports and bolster enforcement.

Smaller efforts are working to make big changes, too. Rainforest Connection, a San Francisco-based non-profit (check out the Kickstarter campaign here) converts old phones and parts of old solar panels into devices to detect illegal logging and poaching. The recycled devices pick up real-time sound of chainsaws and notify conservationists, who can then put a stop to the damage before it continues. But even with these efforts, both big and small, illegal logging continues at an alarming rate.

 

illegal-logging-003The Future of Logging

The only effective way to combat illegal logging is global collaboration. It will take more effectively monitored trade methods, harsher punishments, and smaller-scale efforts, such as consumer awareness campaigns, to hinder the exploitation of our natural resources. The U.N. says the three most important law enforcement efforts would be to “reduce profits in illegal logging,” “increase the probability of apprehending and convicting criminals at all levels involved including international networks,” and “reduce the attractiveness of investing in any part of production involving high proportions of wood with illegal origin.” But, like we’ve discussed before, it’s not just the people in charge that matter. Everyone – government, corporations, investors, and consumers – will all have to play a part in reducing the viability of the illegal timber trade.

Though it’s difficult for consumers to determine where their paper towels or kitchen cabinetry actually came from, it’s a good idea to look for products certified by the Forest Stewardship Council. The certification means the wood was sourced in compliance with local laws and with respect for the rights of indigenous peoples. It’s not fool-proof but it’s a start. And ask your go-to stores to carry FSC-certified paper goods and other wood products.

Illegal logging will not cease completely soon. “Until the legal system shifts the focus away from transit documents and toward verifying extraction of wood at the source and the subsequent chain of custody,” Finer says, “widespread illegal logging will likely persist.” The problem is too big.  But with more initiatives, tougher penalties, and stronger global collaboration, the social, environmental, and economic effects of illegal logging may slowly and steadily decline over time.

×