25.2 C
Lagos
Tuesday, May 20, 2025
Home Blog Page 1802

Nations celebrate as Minamata Convention enters into force

0

The world’s first Convention to protect the environment and human health in close to a decade, the Minamata Convention on Mercury, entered into force on Wednesday, August 16, 2017 committing its 74 Parties to reducing the risks to human health and the environment from the harmful release of mercury and mercury compounds. Mercury is recognised to be particularly harmful to unborn children and infants.

Minamata Convention
Participants at the workshop in China to commemorate the entry-into-force of the Minamata Covention

The entry-into-force celebrations took place on Wednesday in various parts of the world, including in Beijing, China. The 30th Party to the Convention, China convened a workshop that focused on the medical devices sector.

Governments that are party to the Convention are now legally bound to take a range of measures to protect human health and the environment by addressing mercury throughout its lifecycle. This includes banning new mercury mines, phasing-out existing ones, and regulating the use of mercury in artisanal and small-scale gold mining, manufacturing processes, and the production of everyday items such as cosmetics, light bulbs, batteries and teeth fillings.

Nigeria is yet to ratify the Convention.

The convention also seeks to reduce emissions as side effects from other industrial processes, such as coal-fired power stations, waste incineration, cement clinker production, and contains measures on the interim storage of mercury, on mercury waste and on measures to reduce the risks of contaminated sites.

“The Minamata Convention shows that our global work to protect our planet and its people can continue to bring nations together. We did it for the Ozone layer and now we’re doing it for mercury, just as we need to do it for climate change – a cause that the Minamata Convention will also serve. Together, we can clean up our act,” said Erik Solheim, head of UN Environment.

UN Environment hosts the secretariat of the Minamata Convention and assists countries in working toward meeting the Convention’s objectives.

According to scientists, there is no safe level of exposure to mercury nor are there cures for mercury poisoning, which at high levels causes irreversible neurological and health damage. Unborn children and babies are the most vulnerable, along with populations who eat fish contaminated with mercury, those who use mercury at work, and people who live near a source of mercury pollution or in colder climates, where the dangerous heavy metal tends to accumulate.

A 2017 study comparing mercury levels among women of child-bearing age in the Asia and Pacific regions revealed high traces of mercury in 96 percent of the women tested from Pacific communities who have high fish diets.

“I am delighted to join others in the international community and celebrate the entry into force of the Minamata Convention on Mercury. It is an honor for the Global Environment Facility (GEF) to be tasked with providing grants for projects and programs to reduce and eliminate the use of mercury. We are ready to continue to help countries conducting inventories, implementation plans, and investments in technology to make mercury history,” said Naoko Ishii, GEF CEO and Chairperson.

The GEF is part of the Financial Mechanism of the Minamata Convention.

Up to 8,900 tonnes of mercury are emitted each year. It can be released naturally through the weathering of mercury-containing rocks, forest fires and volcanic eruptions, but significant emissions also come from human processes, particularly coal burning and artisanal and small-scale gold mining. Mining alone exposes up to 15 million workers in 70 different countries to mercury poisoning, including child labourers.

Other human activities that may be sources of mercury pollution include the production of chlorine and some plastics, waste incineration and use of mercury in laboratories, pharmaceuticals, preservatives, paints and jewelry. Since the element is indestructible, the Convention also stipulates conditions for interim storage and disposal of mercury waste.

Like other heavy metals, mercury persists in the environment and builds up in human and animal tissue, particularly in fish. Because it is easily vaporised, mercury can be transported through the air over long distances far removed from its original emission source, polluting air, water and soil.

Signed by 128 countries, the Convention takes its name from the most severe mercury poisoning disaster in history, which came to light in Minamata, Japan in May 1956, after sustained dumping of industrial wastewaters into Minamata Bay, beginning in the 1930s. Local villages who ate fish and shellfish from the bay started suffering convulsions, psychosis, loss of consciousness and coma. In all, thousands of people were certified as having directly suffered from mercury poisoning, now known as Minamata disease.

The first meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Minamata Convention on Mercury (COP1) will take place from September 24 to 28, 2017 in Geneva, Switzerland.

Court hears Evan’s N300m suit against Police, reserves judgment August 29

0

A Federal High Court, Lagos on Wednesday, August 16, 2017 heard the N300 million fundamental rights enforcement suit filed by suspected kidnap kingpin, Chukwudumeme Onwuamadike, also known as Evans.

Evans kidnapper
Evans

Justice Abdulaziz Anka, in a ruling, dismissed the objection filed by the police against the hearing of the application on the grounds that the Inspector-General of Police and the Nigeria Police Force were served with court papers in Lagos rather than in Abuja.

Justice Anka upheld the argument by Evans’ counsel, Mr. Olukoya Ogungbeje, that,by virtue of Order 5 Rule 2 of the Fundamental Rights Procedure Rules 2009, the IG and the NPF were rightly served through their agents at Alagbon in Lagos.

The court also agreed with Ogungbeje that Mr. Emmanuel Eze, who appeared for the 3rd and 4th respondents in the case, had no right to speak for the IG and the NPF, which were joined in the suit as the 1st and 2nd respondents respectively.

The judge agreed that the coast was clear for the hearing of the suit on Wednesday, as there was proof of service on the IG and the NPF, which was exhibited before the court.

Eze’s bid to get an adjournment so as to go and prepare well for the hearing of the case also failed as Justice Anka held that the counsel has had enough time to prepare since June when the case was filed.

Arguing his client’s case, Ogungbeje insisted that the police had violated Evans’ rights by detaining him since June 10, 2017, without charging him to court.

Ogungbeje contended that the continued detention of Evans without a court order was unlawful and a violation of the suspect’s rights under sections 35 (1) (c) (3) (4) (5) (a) (b) and 36 of the Constitution.

He urged the court to compel the police to charge Evans to court immediately or to release him and let him go if they were not ready to bring him to court and arraign him.

But, opposing him, Eze, who appeared for the Commissioner of Police, Lagos State and the Special Anti-Robbery Squad, insisted that Evans’ rights were not being violated, because, according to him, Section 35(7) of the Constitution gave the police power to detain a suspected capital offender without any court order.

Besides, he argued that the offences allegedly committed by Evans were grievous and as such his fundamental rights were not absolute.

Eze said it would be premature for the police to either charge Evans to court for now or release him because the suspect was helping the police in investigations towards tracking down his gang members.

He said it would be dangerous to release Evans into the society.

Mr. Henry Obasi, who subsequently announced appearance for the IG and the NPF, pursued the same line of argument and urged Justice Anka to dismiss Evans’ suit.

But Ogungbeje urged the judge to discountenance the submission by Obasi, saying he did not file any court paper on behalf of the IG and the NPF.

Justice Anka adjourned till Tuesday, August 29, 2017, for judgment after listening to arguments from all parties.

By Chinyere Obia

ICC asked to investigate alleged missing N11tr electricity fund

0

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has asked Mrs. Fatou Bensouda, Prosecutor, International Criminal Court (ICC), to use her “good offices and leadership position to investigate whether the allegations of widespread, systematic and large-scale corruption in the electricity sector since the return of democracy in 1999 and under the governments of former presidents Olusegun Obasanjo, Umaru Musa Yar’Adua and Goodluck Jonathan in Nigeria amount to crimes against humanity within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, and to prevail on the Nigerian government to surrender all suspected perpetrators for trial by the ICC.”

Gov-Babatunde-Fashola3
Minister of Power, Works and Housing, Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN)

Nigeria is a state party to the Rome Statute and deposited its instrument of ratification on 27 September 2001. In the petition dated Wednesday, August 16, 2017 and signed by SERAP deputy director, Timothy Adewale, the organisation said: “Allegations of corruption in the electricity sector in Nigeria have had catastrophic effects on the lives of millions of Nigerians, akin to crimes against humanity as contemplated under the Rome Statue and within the jurisdiction of the Court.”

According to SERAP, “The Rome Statute in article 7 defines ‘crime against humanity’ to include ‘inhumane acts causing great suffering or injury,’ committed in a widespread or systematic manner against a civilian population. The common denominator of crimes against humanity is that they are grave affronts to human security and dignity.  Therefore, the staggering amounts of public funds alleged to have been stolen over the years in the electricity sector create just these consequences. Crimes against humanity are not only physical violence; allegations of corruption in the electricity sector hold a comparable gravity, which the Prosecutor should examine and thoroughly investigate.”

The petition reads in part: “The elements that need to be established to prove a “crime against humanity “under article 7(1)(k) of the Rome Statute are that, the perpetrator inflicted great suffering or serious injury by means of an inhumane act; that the perpetrator was aware of the circumstances, and that the act was committed within a widespread or systematic attack on a civilian population; and that the perpetrator knew of that link.

“The consequences of allegations of corruption in the electricity sector are similar to those of the offences in article 7(1). Corrupt officials and corrupt contractors in the electricity sector know well that their conduct is criminal and injurious, and the denial of human dignity coupled with a radical breach of solemn trust, aggravate their alleged crime.

“SERAP considers these allegations of widespread and systematic corruption in the electricity sector as amounting to crimes against humanity and therefore clear violations of the provisions of the Rome Statute of International Criminal Court. SERAP believes that these allegations have given rise to individual criminal responsibility of those suspected of perpetrating corruption in the electricity sector, as entrenched in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

“SERAP considers the apparent failure of successive governments and high-ranking government officials to prevent widespread and systematic corruption in the electricity sector as amounting to complicity under the Rome Statute.SERAP therefore believes that the widespread and systemic nature of large scale corruption in the electricity sector fits the legal requirements of a crime against humanity.

“The 2006 Commonwealth working group on asset repatriation specifically refers to corruption including in the electricity sector being defined as an international crime. SERAP believes an international investigation by the ICC would complement the anticorruption initiatives by the current government and contribute to ending a culture of impunity of perpetrators.

“SERAP believes that substantial grounds exist to warrant the intervention of the Prosecutor in this case. Pursuant to the Rome Statute, the Prosecutor has power to intervene in a situation under the jurisdiction of the Court if the Security Council or states parties refer a situation or if information is provided from other sources such as the information SERAP is providing in this case.

“SERAP is seriously concerned that the instances of corruption highlighted above and details of which are contained in the enclosed From Darkness to Darkness report are not isolated events, but illustrate the widespread and systematic nature of large scale corruption in the electricity sector under the governments of former presidents Olusegun Obasanjo,Umaru Musa Yar’Adua and Goodluck Jonathan. This level of corruption has limited access to and affordability of electricity in Nigeria.

“Widespread, systemic and large-scale corruption in the electricity sector and the lack of transparency and accountability in the use of public funds to support the operations of Discos have resulted in regular blackouts and disproportionately affected the most disadvantaged and vulnerable sectors of the population who cannot readily afford expensive generators in order to have a reliable power supply. The situation is not likely to improve considering that the production of electricity is not proportionate with the rapidly growing population.”

SERAP therefore asked Ms Bensouda to:

  • Urgently commence an investigation proprio motu on the allegations of widespread and systematic corruption in the electricity sector since the return of democracy in 1999, with a view to determining whether these amount to crimes against humanity within the Court’s jurisdiction. In this respect, she is urged to invite representatives of the Nigerian government to provide written or oral testimony at the seat of the Court, so that the Prosecutor is able to conclude since available information whether there is a reasonable basis for an investigation, and to submit a request to the Pre-Trial Chamber for authorisation of an investigation;
  • Bring to justice those suspected to be responsible for widespread and systematic corruption in the electricity sector in Nigeria;
  • Urge the Nigerian government to fulfil its obligations under the Rome Statute to cooperate with the ICC; including complying with your requests to arrest and surrender suspected perpetrators of widespread and systematic corruption, testimony, and provide other support to the ICC.

FRSC to hold 7th Annual Lecture Series

0

The Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) has scheduled its 7th Annual Lecture series to hold on Thursday, August 24, 2017 at the Banquet Hall of the Presidential Villa, in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.

Boboye
Road Safety Corps marshall, Boboye Oyeyemi. Photo credit: premiumtimesng.com

The event is themed: “Achieving the goals of the UN Decade of Action for Road Safety in Africa”.

According to the Corps Public Education Officer of the FRSC, Bisi Kazeem, topical issues which bother on the five pillars of the Decade of Action for road safety in Africa will constitute parts of what will be discussed, amongst other burning issues on road safety.

In his words, the five pillars include: Road Safety Management, which concerns the institutional framework needed to implement road safety activities; Safer Roads and Mobility  that deals with road development; Safer Vehicles, which focuses on standards, entry and exit of vehicles into and from countries; Safer Drivers and Other Road Users that addresses driver training, testing and licensing, driving permits and enforcement of the driving code, awareness and education of the public, and the development of a safety culture; and lastly, Post-crash Response, which deals with onsite care, transport and trauma care of injured.

According to Kazeem, Acting President of Nigeria, Professor Yemi Osinbajo, is the Special Guest of Honour, while Oba Adeyeye Enitan Ogunwusi (Ojaja II, Ooni of Ife) is the Chairman of the Occasion.

The Guest speaker at the occasion is Jean Todt the President of Federation Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA) at the United Nation’s Secretary General’s Special Envoy for Road Safety.

Kazeem stated that the Corps Marshal of the FRSC, Dr. Boboye Oyeyemi, expects that the occasion of the 7thAnnual Lecture series and the morals gathered from it will cascade down to all categories of road users in Nigeria and in Africa, such that they imbibe a safety culture and see road safety as everyone’s.

Organising committee for biosafety summit inaugurated

0

As part of efforts to ensure a smooth National Biosafety Conference, the Director General/CEO, National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA), Dr. Rufus Ebegba, on Tuesday, August 15, 2017 in Abuja inaugurated the Local Organising Committee (LOC) for the conference, which is the third in the series.

National Biosafety Management Agency
Director General/CEO, National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA), Dr. Rufus Ebegba, with members of the Local Organising Committee (LOC)

The DG/CEO charged the Committee to be up and doing in order to properly show case the Agency and its mandate.

He said: “We have a very serious responsibility to showcase our expertise as the Biosafety authority in Nigeria and you should not disappoint the Agency.”

According to him, the objective of the annual Biosafety Conference is to bring stakeholders together to discuss how to strengthen the Nigerian Biosafety System and to enlighten them on the National Biosafety status.

Dr. Ebegba, who announced that the conference will hold at the Nile University in Abuja on Thursday, September 14, 2017, said various agencies would partner with NBMA to ensure the success of the forum.

Responding, Chairperson of the Committee, Ms. Chinyere Nzeduru, Director, Environmental Biosafety & General Release, commended the DG/CEO for bestowing on them the honour of organising the forth coming conference and said they would work as hard as possible to ensure that the event meets the set standard.

Minamata Convention’s entry into force to curtail global mercury crisis, say groups

0

The entry into force of the Minamata Convention on Mercury on Wednesday, August 16, 2017 establishes the first new multilateral environmental agreement in over a decade, according to the Zero Mercury Working Group and SRADev Nigeria.

Adogame
Leslie Adogame of SRADev Nigeria

The groups, who claim that they had been calling for a legally binding treaty for over a decade, have welcomed the new protocol.

“While there are alternatives to mercury, there are no alternatives to global cooperation,” says Michael Bender, coordinator of the Zero Mercury Working Group.

“Mercury respects no boundaries and exposes people everywhere,” notes Leslie Adogame, Executive Director of SRADev Nigeria. “Only a global pact can curtail this dangerous neurotoxin.”

In October 2013, the convention text was adopted and signed by 128 countries, but would not take legal effect until at least 50 countries had ratified it formally. The milestone was reached in May, 2017, and the convention eventually entered into force on August 16.

“We are now on the right track line,” states Elena Lymberidi-Settimo, Project Manager, European Environmental Bureau and ZMWG Co-coordinator. “Over time, the Convention is expected to provide the necessary technical and financial resources to reduce exposure risks worldwide. Governments must therefore move swiftly towards efficient implementation of the Treaty’s provisions.”

Seventy-four countries have so far ratified the Convention – excluding Nigeria.

“On one hand we are elated that the global Convention has finally come to effect but, on the other hand, we feel disappointed that Nigeria is seating on the fence. Ratification is about ‘acceptance’ and commitment to the Convention,” laments Adogame.

He adds: “For us who have been promoting national action since the inception of the process, it is really a shame that Nigeria is not joining the League of Nations to COP1 as a ‘Party’ to the Convention, rather as an ‘Observer’. It is unacceptable that while many African countries ‘blazed the trail’ to ratify, we simply lagged behind after four years of signing the Convention in 2013, whereas the Federal Executive Council (FEC) gave its approval as far back as April, 2017. The implication is that Nigeria will not be able to derive technical and financial support it could otherwise gain.”

The aim of the Convention is “to protect the human health and the environment” from mercury releases.

The treaty holds critical obligations for Parties to ban new primary mercury mines while phasing out existing ones and also includes a ban on many common products and processes using mercury, measures to control releases, and a requirement for national plans to reduce mercury in artisanal and small-scale gold mining. In addition, it seeks to reduce trade, promote sound storage of mercury and its disposal, address contaminated sites and reduce exposure from this dangerous neurotoxin.

The First Conference of the Parties (COP1) will take place from September 24 to 29, 2017 in Geneva, Switzerland. Over 1,000 delegates and around 50 ministers are expected to assemble in Geneva to celebrate and lay the groundwork for the treaty’s overall effectiveness.

The Conference will culminate in a High-Level Segment (on September 28 and 29, 2017) hosted by the President of Switzerland, entitled “Make Mercury History”, to celebrate the commitment of the international community to the Minamata Convention. It will be preceded on Saturday 23 and Sunday 24 September by preparatory meetings, including regional and Bureau meetings.

The Minamata Convention joins three other UN conventions seeking to reduce impacts from chemicals and waste – the Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions.

COP23 Gender Action Plan: UN seeks nominations for focal points

0

The incoming Fijian COP23 Presidency and the UNFCCC Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) on Monday, August 14, 2017 invited all countries that have not yet done so to nominate a national focal point for Gender and Climate Change prior to the COP23 UN climate change conference, which will take place from November 6 to 18, 2017 in Bonn, Germany.

Nazhat Shameem Khan
Chief Negotiator for the Fijian COP23 Presidency and the Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva, Ambassador Nazhat Shameem Khan

According to the COP23 Presidency, the gender focal point will assist with all gender-related decisions and mandates under the UNFCCC processes, including work to develop and implement the first Gender Action Plan at COP23.

The Chief Negotiator for the Fijian COP23 Presidency and the Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva, Ambassador Nazhat Shameem Khan, said that both the UNFCCC and the COP23 Presidency recognise the importance of the equitable involvement of women in sustainable development and the implementation of climate policies, including the Gender Action Plan.

“This is why we are pushing for decisive action to finalise the Gender Action Plan at COP23. This is an important priority for us at the upcoming COP. We are committed to ensuring that women’s voices are heard because women are key agents of change in their communities,” she said.

“Our experience in Fiji and similar experiences around the world have shown that the increased participation of women in political discussions has led to a stronger response to the effects of climate change, as well as greater cooperation across political and ethnic divides,” she added.

The Ambassador also added that at COP23 the Fijian Presidency and the Government of Switzerland will host a special diner for female leaders.

All Heads of Delegations and CEOs of institutions engaged in climate change attending the climate summit are invited, she disclosed, adding that the dinner will take place on November 13, one the eve of Gender Day, which will take place at COP23 on November 14.

To nominate a national gender focal point, in accordance with Decision 21/CP.22, paragraph 22, all Parties are asked to email, via their UNFCCC focal point, a signed letter to the UNFCCC Secretariat (secretariat@unfccc.int and copy gender-team@unfccc.int) with the following details: Name, Title, Institution, and Contact Information (telephone, email, fax, website, if applicable).

Once nominations are received, the newly appointed National Focal Point for Gender and Climate Change will be published on the UNFCCC Gender and Climate Change website, it was gathered.

12 firms top NEITI compliance ranking

1

The on-going Independent Audit of the Oil and Gas Industry covering 2015 by the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) has recorded 94% compliance by companies and relevant government agencies.  Fourteen companies topped the ranking table with a maximum score of 100%. The companies are Chevron Nigeria Ltd, Consolidated, Continental, Eroton, Esso Exploration, Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited and Niger Delta Petroleum Resources.

Waziri-Adio
Executive Secretary of NEITI, Waziri Adio

Other oil companies within the 100% compliance ranking include Nigeria Gas Company, Orient Energy, Star Deepwater Petroleum and Waltersmith Petroman. Remarkably, two government agencies, the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and the Nigeria Content Development and Monitoring Board also recorded 100% compliance in the ranking.

Similarly, five companies namely: Shoreline, Statoil, Petrobas, Mid Western and ND Western, scored between 98% to 94% to book their respective places in the  top compliance ranking category. In the same direction, twenty companies scored between 80% and 88% while twelve others recorded between 72% and 75% in an exercise industry experts have described as successful and innovative.

The compliance ranking report further showed that only four companies representing 6%, failed to make submissions before the deadline.  Of these four companies, two made submissions after the ranking deadline had elapsed and therefore scored zero ranking, while two others failed to comply at all.

The criteria for the compliance ranking focused mainly on two major critical areas in the NEITI audit value chain. These are timeliness and completeness in submission of information and data requested by NEITI in the audit templates. While timeliness measured when the covered entities submitted the templates, the completeness considered how many of the applicable templates were submitted.

Speaking on the ranking exercise, the Executive Secretary of NEITI Mr. Waziri Adio, remarked: “We decided to rank companies and government agencies covered by the NEITI audit process so as to incentivize timely and complete compliance.

“Given that this is the first time we are doing this, we are very impressed with the compliance rate. We commend the high fliers and call for improvement from others. We want to see a situation where all the entities score 100% possibly by next year.’’

The data collection and voluntary submission of information and data in NEITI/EITI Audit process is a major step in the independent audit value chain. NEITI wishes to state that this exercise does not represent full compliance assessment with the audit process, as the audit is not yet completed. All entities will be further ranked in terms of their cooperation with the NEITI auditors, the accuracy of their data and level of reconciliation, among others.

The process began on May 2, 2017 when the audit templates were dispatched by NEITI to affected companies and relevant government agencies. This was followed by a workshop to enlighten all the companies and relevant government agencies on their roles in populating the audit templates.

At that workshop, the entities were duly informed of NEITI’s plan to rank them in terms of compliance. NEITI also published the company compliance ranking procedure and the deadline in the national dailies. The deadline was later moved from June 1 to August 3, 2017. This became necessary to enable more entities complete the templates and return same to NEITI. During the ranking exercise, 65 covered entities, made of up 55 oil and gas companies and 10 relevant government agencies, participated.

NEITI’s decision to carry out a compliance ranking for companies and relevant government agencies covered by NEITI process is to push the boundaries of implementation of EITI in Nigeria as provided for in the law and global standards.

The 2015 independent oil and gas audit by NEITI is set out to examine payments made by companies including taxes, royalties, rents, signature bonuses where applicable and receipts by relevant government agencies. The audit will also report on quantities of oil and gas produced, exported or imported.  It will carry out validation of payments by companies against receipts by government agencies to determine if companies paid what they ought to pay and if government received what it should receive.

The exercise will equally review policies and procedure of revenue collection, report on cases of underpayments and under assessments. The audit process will weigh the financial, physical and process transactions during the period under review on the scale of transparency and accountability as required by the global EITI standard and provisions of NEITI Act.

It is important to further clarify that all information and data submitted will still be subjected to further verification, validation and reconciliation by the independent auditor engaged by NEITI through painstaking international competitive bid process.

Adio commended the companies and government agencies for their level of cooperation and compliance.

The details of the 29-page report on the company ranking is already available on NEITI website www.neiti.gov.ng. NEITI is equally working on developing an annual index that will rank companies and government agencies in the extractive sector space in terms of their adherence to the tenets of transparency and accountability.

Meanwhile, the National Stakeholders Working Group (NEITI Board) has ratified the appointment of a reputable indigenous company, Haruna Yahaya & Co, to conduct the audit exercise (2015 Oil & Gas). This was one of the key decisions taken by the NEITI Board at its meeting over the weekend.

The Board’s decision followed the approval of the competitive contract process undertaken by NEITI by the Bureau of Public Procurement. Haruna Yahaya & Co had in the past conducted two different cycles of audit for NEITI in the solid minerals sector. The Auditors are expected to conclude the assignment by November this year.

Eko Atlantic City, Fine & Country partner for Refined Investors Series

0

South Energyx Nigeria Limited, the developers and planners of Eko Atlantic City situated adjacent to Victoria Island, has partnered with Fine and Country West Africa for the Refined Investors Series 2017, scheduled to take place in London, United Kingdom on October 6 and 7, 2017.

Eko Atlantic City
Model of Eko Atlantic City

The event, described as the leading premium real estate forum, is themed: “Taking Nigeria to the World” and is targeted at Nigerians in the Diaspora and other international investors.

The Refined Investor Series UK is a premier event focusing on unique real estate opportunities in Nigeria that are reportedly safe, secure and highly sustainable. The event also targets affluent and high net worth individuals and astute investors in the Diaspora. The series aims to celebrate the best of Nigerian real estate.

During the forum, Eko Atlantic City will be exhibiting to showcase the expertise that have been put into building of the estate. Also, the documentary video that depicts milestone of the city as a blend of infrastructure, engineering and technology will be shown to the audience.

Speaking on the partnership, Mr. Ronald Chagoury Jr, Vice Chairman of South Energyx Nigeria Limited, said: “Eko Atlantic City is excited to be part of the Refined Investor Series in the United Kingdom. The road show will grant investors in the diaspora the opportunity to invest directly into Eko Atlantic City. The road show will certainly restore the confidence of Nigerians in the diaspora who are unwilling to invest in the country’s real estate sector.”

Eko Atlantic’s planning divides the estate into 10 distinct districts (for Phases 1 & 2 only) connected with a transport systems integrated with the Lagos waterways. The Business District is said to be home to the future financial hub of Africa, and covers 700,000 square meters of prime real estate.

According to the promoters, the city will fulfil the residential needs of Lagos State, while also catering to her commercial needs. Other highlights of development in the city so far include the completion of 14 bridges, the Great Wall of Lagos (which the estate’s proponents say has reduced the ocean surge into Victoria Island and environs), and the Eko Pearl Towers, amongst others.

The scheme has an infrastructure network, including a communications system, remarkable road network and uninterrupted electricity supply. Upon completion, Eko Atlantic City will accommodate about 300,000 people as residents while 200,000 individuals are expected to commute to the city on a daily basis either for work or business transaction.

Police prays for cost against Evan’s lawyer

0

The police on Tuesday, August 15, 2017 prayed the Federal High Court, Lagos to compel Mr. Olukoya Ogungbeje, counsel to suspected kidnap kingpin, Chukwudumeme Onwuamadike also known as Evans, to pay a punitive cost of N300,000.

Evans kidnapper
Evans

The Police want the lawyer to pay the cost for alleged wrongful service.

Evans, through Ogungbeje, had filed N300 million fundamental rights enforcement suit against the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), alleging wrongful detention.

Joined as respondents in the suit are the Nigerian Police Force (NPF), Commissioner of Police (COP) Lagos State and the Lagos State Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) as second, third and fourth respondents respectively.

The suit was stalled before Justice Abdulaziz Anka  on July 20, following Ogungbeje’s failure to comply with a July 13order to pay the police N20,000 as costs.

However, at the commencement of proceedings yesterday, Ogungbeje informed Justice Anka that the cost was paid on August 10.

He said he had complied with the court’s order to serve the respondents and that the matter was ripe for hearing.

But counsel to the COP and SARS, Emmanuel Eze, opposed him.

Eze argued that Ogungbeje failed to serve IGP and NPF in Abuja as directed by the judge.

He said: “It is not true that the matter is ripe for hearing. This is a fundamental rights enforcement suit brought by the applicant.

“He has not got the leave of court for the matter to be heard during vacation. That is the condition precedent to hearing any matter during vacation.”

Relying on Section 215 of the Constitution and Order 5 Rule 8 of the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules 2009, Eze argued further that the COP Lagos State and the IGP were distinct personalities.

Ogungbeje, he stated, had only served the COP at Alagbon in Lagos but had yet to serve the IGP in Abuja.

He said: “Our submission is that he has not taken steps to clothe this court with jurisdiction to hear this case. Since Ogungbeje has refused to do the right thing, we are asking the court for costs of N300,000.”

In response, Ogungbeje maintained that the IGP and NPF were served on June 29 at the addresses contained on the originating motion and that the proof of service was in the court’s file.

He said: “Order 5 Rule 2 of the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules has made it clear that service on the respondents’ agents will amount to personal service on respondents.”

He argued that since Eze announced appearance for only the third and fourth respondents, he had no locus to speak for the IGP and The Police.

“He had no mouth to speak for the first and second respondents when there is proof of service.

“Lastly, this proceeding is sui generis (unique). As we speak, the applicant (Evans) is still in detention.”

He urged the court to discountenance Eze’s application for N300, 000 costs.

Justice Anka adjourned till Wednesday for ruling.

By Chinyere Obia

×