27.2 C
Lagos
Friday, May 3, 2024

G20 leaders accused of not showing leadership on fossil fuel phase out

The G20 summit is said to have concluded with no ambitious calls to phase out fossil fuels equitably. Despite acknowledging the need to address the climate crisis, G20 leaders have been accused of failing to translate their words into tangible outcomes or actions.

G20 Summit
A session at the G20 Summit in New Delhi, India

A group of climate activists, who made this submission after the release of Statement from Leaders in New Delhi, India, on Saturday, September 9, 2023, pointed out that the alleged lack of leadership has been further compounded by geopolitical strife.

The activists submitted: “An inadequate commitment by rich countries in the G20 also owes to the fact that they continue to subsidise and support fossil fuel expansion, perpetuating dependence on them and impeding just, sustainable and equitable transition to greener options while having the financial resources to do so. While, it is commendable that governments have made a commitment to raising ambition towards tripling renewable energy by 2030, the shift must happen alongside rapid elimination of fossil fuels and carried out in a fair and equitable way.

“While world leaders at G20 may have failed to course correct on calling for phasing out fossil fuels, they have an opportunity to be ambitious and show political commitment at the upcoming United Nations General Assembly and UN Secretary General backed Climate Ambition Summit this month. The science is clear and unmistakable – fossil fuels are unsustainable. They have accounted for an astounding 86% of CO2 emissions during the last decade and the world is in the midst of an irreversible climate crisis that requires a fast, fair, equitable and permanent phase-out of all fossil fuels. Wealthy nations bear a disproportionate share of historical responsibility and are obligated to honour their pledges by financially supporting a just transition in developing countries.”

Alex Rafalowicz, Director of the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty initiative, said: ”Continued dependence on fossil fuels remains a primary driver of climate change, carrying dire and irrevocable consequences for ecosystems, communities, and the global economy. G20’s failure to come up with anything substantial on fossil fuel phase out  is unacceptable. World leaders, particularly rich countries, need to  rise to the occasion and fulfill their fair share of responsibilities in the fight against the climate crisis. Anything less would be an affront to both humanity and our planet. As we head to the Climate Ambition Summit this month and COP28 conference in November, international cooperation should focus on addressing the urgent climate crisis backed by ambitious calls for a fossil fuel phase out and a just and equitable transition.”

Tasneem Essop, Executive Director, Climate Action Network International: “The G20 countries, who together account for over 80% of global emissions, have once again shown that they are not serious about addressing the climate emergency. They have failed to address the root cause of the climate crisis – fossil fuels, which does not even get a mention in the declaration. This shows  dangerous backsliding despite the recent devastating climate impacts experienced across the world and the latest UN assessment showing a glaring gap in the delivery of the Paris Agreement goals.

“Rich nations in particular within the group should be leading by example and setting a high bar ahead of COP28. The Global Fight to End Fossil Fuels mobilisations taking place across the globe next weekend, will shine a spotlight on this shameful lack of leadership. It is time for people to mobilise and hold these leaders to account.”

Harjeet Singh, Head of Global Political Strategy, Climate Action Network International: “While the G20’s commitment to renewable energy targets is commendable, it sidesteps the root cause – our global dependency on fossil fuels. As the climate crisis looms like a dark cloud over humanity, the world cries out for a just transition away from fossil fuels. Rich nations within this group of leading economies have not only failed to curb their own emissions but have also fallen short in financially aiding developing countries with their green initiatives. It’s high time for these nations to lead by example, turn their promises into actions, and help forge a greener, more equitable future for all.”

Mohamed Adow, Director, Power Shift Africa: “The inclusion of the African Union into the G20 has long been talked about so it’s good to see it finally coming.  Hopefully adding countries on the very front line of the climate crisis will provide some impetus to improve the quality and urgency of the G20’s response to climate change. For too long the G20 has dragged its feet, making promises on climate then failing to act on them. We need to see African leaders holding the G20 polluters feet to fire and turn it into a group that takes the lead on climate action.”

Sanjay Vashist, Director, Climate Action Network South Asia: “In a clear victory for fossil fuel producing nations, the New Delhi Leader’s Summit Declaration adopted by G20 nations fails to mention timelines for the phase out of fossil fuels even as it refers to ‘pursuing and encouraging efforts to triple renewable energy capacity through existing targets and policies’ and reaffirms its ‘commitment to tackle climate change by strengthening the full and effective implementation of the Paris Agreement.’ Unfortunately the New Delhi Declaration, despite its good intentions, fails to send a strong signal to countries to take transformative action and once again global ambition and implementation to address climate change remains insufficient.”

Ashfaq Khalfan, Oxfam Climate Change G20 spokesperson: “G20 leaders leave the Summit with no change to their plans of maintaining their emissions to levels in 2030 at least double what they should be. They aspire to triple renewable energy capacity but do not want to go beyond existing targets and policies! The richer G20 countries had a choice. On the one hand, climate catastrophe.

“On the other, to drastically reduce their emissions and provide sufficient levels of climate finance to the Global South. They leave New Delhi having chosen catastrophe. G20 members could raise $2.1 trillion annually through higher taxes on the mega-wealthy and taxes on the huge windfall profits in the fossil fuel, food and other sectors.”

Andreas Sieber, 350.org Associate Director of Policy and Campaigns: “The G20’s commitment to triple renewable energy is a historic step, a glimmer of hope in our battle against climate chaos. Tripling renewable energy by 2030 may propel us back on a path to keep global heating to 1.5C. But let’s not celebrate just yet. We must hold them accountable, demand they phase out fossil fuels, and lead with urgency. In particular the rich nations must bear the weight of responsibility and provide finance to achieve the commitment to triple renewable energy by 2030.”

Gaïa Febvre, International Policy Coordinator Réseau Action Climat France :
“Promoting the phase-in of renewable energy and setting targets is a positive step, but without a clear, comprehensive, and irreversible phase-out plan for fossil fuels, it falls short of safeguarding our planet for current and future generations. To truly protect our environment, we must prioritize the adoption of renewables with a clear plan but also the permanent cessation of fossil fuel reliance, fast, fair, and forever.”

Dr Stephan Singer, Climate Science and Energy Policy Advisor CAN International: “The commitments to clean renewable energy and energy efficiency are riddled with loopholes. Tripling renewable energy capacity by 2030 is a huge step forward if done properly. But what beyond 2030? It is unclear what the baselines are, unclear what the specific process is to establish national targets of countries to achieve this global goal and unclear how any transparent monitoring, review and assessment of these targets could be conducted and by whom.

“It is fully unclear as to how about $1 trillion annual public financial support by rich OECD nations, necessary for a 1.5 C pathway for the planet, could be generated for poor developing countries to transition to clean energy. G20 sharpened its mouth but forgot to whistle.”

Rachel Cleetus, Policy Director, Climate and Energy Program, Union of Concerned Scientists: “G20 leaders acknowledged a gap in climate action to date and the harsh toll of worsening climate impacts around the world. While they’ve signaled support for strong global renewable energy and energy efficiency goals, the weak language in the final outcome doesn’t give assurance that these goals will be met. In the context of the U.N. Global Stocktake report just released, which shows countries are falling well short of meeting global climate goals, this G20 outcome is woefully inadequate. Major emitting nations have a responsibility to clearly and firmly commit to a rapid scale-up of clean energy investments and a sharp curtailment of fossil fuels to ensure deep cuts in heat-trapping emissions by 2030 aligned with the latest science. This must also be accompanied by a significant increase in finance from richer nations, including the United States, to help low- and middle-income countries make this transition in an equitable way.”

Glen Klatovsky, CEO, Climate Action Network Australia: “The G20 has allowed a nation like Australia to continue to avoid international scrutiny for our role in fossil fuel extraction. Australia continues to approve new coal mines, we are one of the two biggest exporters of coal and LNG and we are among the biggest per capita emitters on earth. Every leader at the G20 knows we urgently need to end fossil fuels, and yet there is no demand for action in the Leaders statement today. The G20 leaders should be demanding that Australia make the rapid transition now for the sake of all of us.”

Latest news

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

×