29.1 C
Lagos
Friday, June 27, 2025
Home Blog

Thousands march in cities worldwide demanding international financial overhaul ahead of UN finance conference

0

Thousands around the world are holding mobilisations in time for the 4th International Conference on Financing for Development (FFD4), a once-in-a-decade gathering of governments held under the auspices of the United Nations to agree on international responses to urgent finance issues.

Sevilla
The Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development (FfD4), is taking place in Sevilla, Spain from June 30 to July 3, 2025

Movements, civil society groups, communities and publics are mobilising in 41 countries, in 149 cities, towns, and districts from June 27 to 29, 2025.

The global actions are calling for a transformation of the international financial system, as well as immediate demands such as debt cancellation, wealth taxes, and the delivery of climate finance. Movements and civil society groups are challenging Global North governments and the UN system to take the lead in bridging the development and climate finance gap, estimated to be in the trillions.

A core part of this is financial reparations for historical and continuing injustices inflicted by the Global North on the peoples of the Global South.

According to Jean Saldanha, director of EURODAD: “The global financial architecture is dominated by rich countries and not responsive to the needs and priorities of the global south. It is in the interest of all of us, in the global south and north, to build a Financing for Development system that reduces inequality, provides stability and ensures adequate public finance for climate change. Yet the global north has chosen to defend an unjust status quo instead of seizing this opportunity to advance essential reforms that would give the global south a seat at the decision-making table. We in civil society will continue to demand this reform, before, in and after Sevilla.”

Civil society organisations and movements are reiterating the urgent demand for debt cancellation and calling for a UN Framework Convention on Debt Convention to pave the way for a democratic, multilateral and transparent mechanism to address unsustainable and illegitimate debt. They assert that it is vital to move away from creditor-dominated forums that have failed to prevent and resolve the accumulation of unsustainable and illegitimate debts and have resulted in debt relief schemes that protect creditor interests.  In 2022, developing countries paid $49 billion more to their external creditors than they received in fresh disbursements. 

UN Member States are also being challenged by civil society to support and ensure a robust outcome from the negotiations for the ​​UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, in order to effectively address international tax abuse, avoidance and evasion especially by multinational corporations and elites, which are resulting in losses in public revenues of at least $492 billion a year. Similarly, there is strong clamor for wealth taxes to help mobilize the trillions needed for sustainable development and climate action. 

Dereje Alemayehu, executive coordinator of Global Alliance for Tax Justice, said: “The international tax system is broken. Developed by the ‘rich countries’ club’ of the OECD, it has failed to deliver the resources urgently needed for public services, development, human rights, gender equality, and climate justice. Tax abuse by the rich and multinational corporations has instead taken these resources, deepening the debt crisis faced by so many of our countries. Now, a historic process is underway as countries will meet in August to begin negotiations on a UN Tax Convention. We expect all UN Member States to negotiate in good faith to deliver a robust Framework Convention and two early protocols.”

In addition to debt service payments and tax abuse, developing countries’ public coffers are being depleted by climate disasters. Developed countries that have historically caused the climate crisis are legally obligated by the UN Climate Convention to cover the costs of climate mitigation, adaptation, loss and damage and just transition in developing countries. Although developed countries have long claimed that they lack the public funds for climate finance, research has shown they can raise trillions by taxing polluters and profiteers, redirecting fossil fuel subsidies, and redistributing even just a fraction of their enormous military budgets.

Civil society organisations and climate activities emphasise that climate finance must be delivered in the form of public, predictable, grants-based finance, instead of loans that will only exacerbate the already unsustainable debt crises in the developing world.

Tasneem Essop, executive director of Climate Action Network International, said: “The world is on fire – and the systems meant to protect us are feeding the flames. The intersecting crises of debt, climate collapse, and inequality are not abstractions – they are lived realities for people in the Global South, every single day. While governments dither and elites profit, it’s up to us to raise the alarm and demand justice. We will not stand by while wealth is siphoned from our communities, our land, our labour, to line the pockets of corporations and the ultra-rich. We will not be silenced.”

Aid cuts recently announced by the US, UK, and other Global North governments will also make it much harder for developing countries to address immediate financial needs arising from the multiple crises and undertake systems wide changes for a rapid, equitable and just transition to sustainable and climate resilient societies. Civil society groups are denouncing the cuts and asserting that aid must not be seen as charity but rather part of the reparations owed to the South. 

Lidy Nacpil, the coordinator of the Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development, said: “What our world needs is a massive transfer of resources from North to South, as part of the reparations we are owed for historical injustice. For centuries, the people of the Global South have been exploited, and our natural resources have been plundered – all to enrich the elites and governments of the Global North. Their enormous wealth was accumulated at the expense of our people and planet, and it is past time for them to pay up for the damage they’ve done.”

The different protest actions denounce the Global North governments for spending trillions on subsidies for fossil fuels, on wars and genocide, on militarization and domestic authoritarian operations while failing to deliver their financial obligations.

Bronwen Tucker, public finance lead of Oil Change International, said: “We’re facing record-breaking cost-of-living, record-breaking fossil fuel production, and a record-breaking debt crisis. These problems are connected. They are all driven by a financial system that is catering to a tiny number of billionaires and CEOs. The only thing that can stop this is record-breaking people power. That is why we are on the streets today. At the last Financing for Development a decade ago, a UN Convention to rewrite tax rules was rejected, but now it has been won because of persistence from Global South governments and civil society. A UN Convention on debt is next. It’s incredibly shortsighted for the EU, Canada, Japan, and UK to be blocking this.”

Civil society has called for wider social transformation and a just transition to new modes of production, distribution, and consumption that prioritize peoples’ needs over profit. To achieve this, the inequitable economic and political relations between countries must change, and the institutions that control global economic and financial governance must be transformed.

Patricia Miranda, global advocacy director of LATINDADD (Latin American Network for Economic, Social and Climate Justice): “Debt is the greatest challenge for the Fourth Financing for Development Conference. As we face a new debt crisis trapped in a system that concentrates power in few hands, it is urgent to initiate real reform and lay the foundations for truly democratic governance. A UN Convention on Sovereign Debt, in which all countries have a voice, can deliver fair, sustainable and equitable solutions for all.”

Jenny Ricks, general secretary of Fight Inequality Alliance: “We are living in the era of the billionaire, but this is also a time of a debt crisis. Across the Global South, people are not waiting for summits to create a just world – we are on the streets to demand it. Governments need to hear the urgent cries for systemic changes like debt cancellation and taxes on the super rich, not cosmetic tweaks.”

Ingo Ritz, director of Global Call to Action Against Poverty: “As a European I am ashamed. In the FfD4 negotiations the EU – together with other rich countries – blocked the proposals from the global south to solve the global debt and financing crisis. These northern governments are defending the status quo – an international financial architecture that protects the interests of big corporations. Billions of people are suffering under austerity and conditionalities of IMF and World Bank that cut public services, increase inequality and create poverty and hunger. To ensure health, education and social protection for all we need a transformed financial international architecture.”

Absolom Jim, chapter lead of Debt for Climate: “The FFD4 process has proved a façade, another Global North-sponsored theatre where the debt noose around our necks is tightened under the disguise of false solutions. Zimbabwe and much of Africa are not asking for charity, we’re demanding system change. We reject debt swaps, delays, and greenwashed gimmicks. The time for compromise is over. The world must hear this from Africa: cancel the debt and dismantle colonial finance.”

Petro Damian, chapter lead of Debt for Climate: “Africa is rich in people, culture, and resources yet trapped in debt it did not create. We demand the cancellation of illegitimate debt and the creation of a fair financial system that allows our continent to thrive, not just survive.”

Arjun Bhattarai, co-chair of Global Call to Action Against Poverty: “We need to halt the debt crisis and prevent it from occurring again. Economic Justice is the key to ending poverty, reducing inequalities and solving the climate crisis.”

WaterAid rolls out Danida Project to end period poverty in Nigeria

0

Danida Project – an initiative aimed at tackling period poverty in Nigeria through the enhanced production and sales of safe, recyclable sanitary pads, empowering girls and women – has been launched by WaterAid in Lagos.

Danida Project
Participants at the project launch and inception meeting in Lagos

Period poverty refers to the lack of access to menstrual products, sanitation facilities, and adequate education related to menstruation.

During the project launch and inception meeting in Lagos on Thursday, June 26, 2025, Grace Uwadiale of WaterAid noted that the Danida project’s main focus is on improving access to clean water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH).

“It specifically aims to empower communities through sustainable solutions, promoting human rights, and addressing issues like period poverty. The initiative also supports green growth, enhances resilience to climate change, and fosters innovation in WASH-related technologies,” she stated.

Uwadiale disclosed that the project seeks to address period poverty in Nigeria by providing safe, recyclable sanitary pads and empowering women and girls while promoting local production, environmental sustainability and a commercially viable business model through improved market access and behavioral change.

According to her, “the product will be produced locally in Nigeria thereby serving as a means of empowering women and creation of jobs through skill development in manufacturing”.

In his remarks, Mahmood Adegbite, Permanent Secretary, Office of Drainage Services, Ministry of Environment and Water Resources, commended WaterAid for venturing into such a laudable project that will be of immense benefit to the female gender.

Adegbite, who was represented by Mr. Akinwunmi Babatunde, Deputy Director in the Ministry, noted: “Based on those local productions, it means that it can empower people. And the main aim of this programme is innovating sustainable goods and the green transition to end period poverty in Nigeria and I’m really very keen on that aspect of period poverty.”

On her part, Mrs. Rianat Ajibike Onigbanjo, Permanent Secretary, Women Affairs and Poverty Alleviation (WAPA), submitted: “Women with better knowledge of menstrual hygiene and practices are less vulnerable due to reproductive tract infraction and overgrowth, and increasing awareness and knowledge of the health and disability of a woman depends on poor menstrual hygiene practices affecting millions of women and young girls.”

Onigbanjo, who spoke through Mrs. Folashade Adeyanju, added: “The Ministry of Women and Child Parenthood’s regulation has always regarded success in the past menstrual hygiene rule to the distribution of sex-free pads, sanitisers, soaps, menstrual cards, advice to the disabled people, governments and NGOs. This helps to create more awareness to the vulnerable and illiterate women in rural states.

“The Ministry also provides interactive mapping where women and girls are able to learn and discuss issues related to menstrual hygiene management, to participate in a talk on the use of pads instead of other materials that can be harmful to the body system.”

Dr. Omobolaji Gaji, Permanent Secretary, Office of Environmental Services, Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources, noted that the launch of Danida Project is not coincidental. According to him, “it’s something that is long overdue, and we appreciate WaterAid for taking the will and the heart to go into those projects, and we trust that they will be revived. 

“We appreciate the work they have done. We appreciate everyone who has partnered with them. We thank you WaterAid and we hope to do more partnerships with you,” he submitted.

Dignitaries that graced the project launch and inception meeting include Mr. Henry Adenigba, Executive Director, Humanity Family Foundation for Peace and Development (HUFFPED); Prince Adeniran Ogunbanwo, CDC Chairman, Ikorodu North LCDA; Pastor Segun Fayemi, CDC Chairman, Ojodu LCDA; representatives from Ministry of Health, Ministry of Basic Secondary Education as well as Education District 2 and 6 in Lagos State, among others.

By Ajibola Adedoye

Aggregated climate action: The example of SPP – Rep. Kama Nkemkanma

Historically, the month of June is an important one for climate action. This is because it is the month when the meeting of the Subsidiary Bodies(SB) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) usually holds. These SBs’ meetings are critical as they address leftover discussions from the previous Conference of Parties (COPs), and shape agenda items for upcoming COPs.

Rep. Kama Nkemkanma
Rep. Kama Nkemkanma

This year’s June however took on additional importance as I had to participate in two other key global events in my role as the Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Climate Change and Security.

The first of these was the Parliamentary Roundtable on NDCs, which took place in Berlin on 10 June, on the eve of the Global Conference on NDCs. The event was convened by GLOBE Legislators in collaboration with the Westminster Foundation for Democracy, NDC Partnership, E3G, Germany’s International Climate Initiative (IKI). This event presented an opportunity to highlight the important role of Members of Parliament in the Nationally Determined Contributions(NDCs) process of their countries. As I stated clearly there, this role is very critical and must start at the inception phases to the implementation phases.

Upon my return from Berlin, I flew to Marrakech to attend the Marrakesh Parliamentary Green Investment Dialogue convened by Climate Parliament and the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO). There, I spoke on the need to leverage legislative momentum to promote community-based Green Energy Zones, particularly in underserved or off-grid areas.

The overarching message from these events was the need for Members of Parliament to continue to exercise their Constitutional responsibility, and leverage oversight functions to engender more climate action in our countries.

Furthermore, these engagements underscored the importance of multilevel action in order to achieve a resounding impact.

I was therefore pleased when I returned to Nigeria to hear that the Society for Planet and Prosperity (SPP), a leading NGO in the climate and environmental space in Nigeria, has taken an important first step to organisational accountability by releasing the report of its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the year 2024, while also outlining plans for emissions reductions in the coming years.

This action by SPP is highly commendable and it aligns with my vision as the chairman of the Climate Change and Security Committee at the House of Representatives which has necessitated my engagement with Ministries, Departments and Agencies of Government, and the private sector to kickstart the first step of emissions reduction accountability in compliance with the provisions of the Climate Change Act 2021.

It is therefore important to emphasise that the only pathway to aggregated climate action is when individuals, households, communities, organisations, etc, begin to take structured steps to be accountable. The sum of these actions will significantly yield massive impact that will enhance NDCs implementation, and further bolster Nigeria’s journey to sustainable development.

As a committee, we intend to expand our engagements with all organisations and therefore expect to see similar efforts at climate accountability by both the private and public sectors of the Nigerian economy.

SPP has laid down the gauntlet. We expect to see similar actions from other organisations – companies with over 50 employees; MDAs at national and subnational levels; diplomatic bodies; etc, following suit. As part of our Constitutional responsibility, we will follow up and demand reports.

Rep Kama Nkemkanma is the Chair of the Committee on Climate Change and Security, House of Representatives, and Nigeria’s Parliamentary Champion for Climate Change

NGO unveils school-based club project to encourage sustainable farming practices

Undoubtedly, the Agroecology Club Project (ACP), launched by the EcoSteward and Humanitarian Foundation (EHF) in schools, will contribute to meeting the growing demand for actively involving young people in the struggle for climate-resilient and sustainable food systems.

Agroecology Club
Participants at the Primark International Academy in Abuja for the official launch of the EcoSteward and Humanitarian Foundation’s (EHF) Agroecology Club Project (ACP) in schools

By teaching students environmentally friendly farming techniques like composting, organic pest control, and crop rotation – which not only improve soil fertility and crop yield but also lessen reliance on dangerous chemicals, fostering long-term sustainability and ecosystem health – this programme is also expected to add to the improvement of food production and ecological preservation.

In response to a question about what inspired the project’s conception, Obinna Nweze, the organisation’s programme director, hinted that the desire to bridge this existing gap was what informed their decision to introduce agroecology to students at a young age.

“The lack of practical environmental education in schools further motivated the creation of this initiative, designed to empower students with both knowledge and hands-on skills,” he told a group of participants who had gathered on Thursday, June 26, 2025, at Primark International Academy in Jikwoyi, Abuja, the capital of Nigeria, to witness the groundbreaking ceremony.

According to him, the event’s theme, “Eco-Champions for Agroecology,” emphasises his organisation’s efforts to cultivate a new generation of young leaders who will not only be knowledgeable about ecological farming concepts, but also passionate advocates for food justice and environmental protection.

As Nigeria seeks solutions to the numerous environmental challenges it faces, such as land degradation and biodiversity loss, Nweze explained that the aim of selecting the students as champions is to position them as future change-makers who will lead the charge in building greener communities through informed action and leadership.

These young leaders will carry out regular club activities, including mentorship and training on how to maintain their school gardens. Additionally, they will also monitor and document the progress of the project to measure its impact and inform future recommendations.

“The goal is to expand to more schools and use the lessons learnt to advocate for greater integration of agroecology into educational and national development frameworks,” said the EHF programme director.

Sir Oko Agaji, the principal of Primark International Academy, stated in his introductory remarks that he was delighted that the programme had been introduced to his school due to the fact that it will help address the misunderstanding that agriculture is an outdated practice by educating the students at a young age.

He went on to say that the school is fully aware of agriculture’s benefits to society, which is why they have long had a club to promote its growth.

“Personally, I have a garden at my home, and I understand the benefits I am gaining from it,” he said, particularly how it is supplementing the food that he and his family consume.

He assured that, moving forward, they would continue to collaborate with EHF and her partners to ensure that agriculture receives robust support in both practical fieldwork and classroom environments.

Oji Nwachukwu, a senior secondary three student at the school and one of the 20 recently crowned champions, said the event had an impact on her because of the new things she learnt.

“My takeaway from this programme is to say no to inorganic fertiliser that destroys our ecosystem and human health,” she said, vowing to use her newly acquired knowledge to mobilise and teach other students about some of the sustainable farming methods.

Highlights of the occasion included speeches by representatives of the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa, Ecocykle Development Foundation (EDF), GreenFaith Africa, Global Initiative for Food Security and Ecosystem Preservation (GIFSEP), Community Action for Food Security, and EnviroNews, who urged the students to preserve the environment while pursuing their need for food production. Furthermore, the school received a handbook on understanding agro-ecological techniques to help guide the students and improve their knowledge of the topic.

While the excitement lingered, one major issue highlighted by stakeholders was the long-term sustainability of this commendable project. Many believe that incorporating new activities such as demonstration gardens for hands-on learning, teacher training to support ongoing efforts in schools, and collaboration with local organisations to provide mentorship will foster a strong sense of student ownership while also providing the tools and resources that the clubs require to thrive beyond the pilot phase.

By Etta Michael Bisong, Abuja

Govt promotes CNG adoption to cut emissions, create jobs

Pi-CNG Programme Director, Presidential Compressed Natural Gas Initiative (Pi-CNG), Mr. Michael Oluwagbemi, has reiterated the Federal Government’s dedication to reducing carbon emissions, tackling urban air pollution, and creating green jobs.

CNG
Participants at the Pi-CNG workshop in Lagos, on Thursday

Oluwagbemi gave the assurance in Lagos on Thursday, June 26, during the 2025 Fuel with CNG Diesel Retrofit Workshop, organised by Pi-CNG for stakeholders in the industry.

According to him, these targets are through the adoption of Compressed Natural Gas (CNG).

“We are not just retrofitting engines, we are reimagining Nigeria’s energy future,” Oluwagbemi declared.

He emphasised the initiative’s role in solving national problems, including reducing inflation and improving the financial wellbeing of ordinary Nigerians.

“It is also the impact on the life of the common Nigerian. More money in your pocket means that you can use money to buy, send your child to school.

“Also, treat a sick sibling in the hospital, invest in your own life, to build a house, to buy cars, right?” the programme director asked.

By introducing a “cheaper, safer, more reliable source of energy that is domestic,” the programme aims to lower energy costs.

It also allows citizens to more disposable income for education, healthcare, housing, and other investments.

Similarly, the guest speaker, Mr. Toba Omibiyi, Technical Director at Large and Grant Ltd., a construction company, affirmed the safety of CNG, countering common concerns.

He attributed public misconceptions to a lack of proper orientation and education, stressing the need to educate the public about CNG’s advantages and debunk myths, such as confusing it with Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).

The workshop focused on Nigeria’s transition toward cleaner, more sustainable fuel alternatives.

It brought together high-level government officials, automotive industry leaders, environmental experts, fleet operators, and green tech innovators.

Also, discussions during the workshop included strategies for converting diesel-powered vehicles to run on CNG, which is a cleaner, cost-effective alternative expected to revolutionise Nigeria’s road transport system.

By Taiye Olayemi

NGX boss lauds Dangote’s contributions to Nigeria’s financial market

0

The Group Chairman of Nigerian Exchange Group (NGX Group), Alhaji (Dr.) Umaru Kwairanga, has praised the President/Chief Executive, Dangote Group, Aliko Dangote, for his substantial contributions to the Nigerian capital market and private sector development.

Dangote
L -R: Vice President, Oil and Gas, Dangote Industries Ltd, Devakumar Edwin; CEO NGX, Temi Popoola; President / CE, Dangote Industries Ltd, Aliko Dangote; Group Chairman, NGX Group Alhaji (Dr.) Umaru Kwairanga, Managing Director/ CEO of Central Securities Clearing System Plc, (CSCS), Haruna Jalo-Waziri, during the NGX Group’s Visit to Dangote petroleum Refinery and fertiliser plant, Ibeju-Lekki Lagos on Tuesday June 25, 2025

He noted this during a courtesy visit to the Dangote Petroleum Refinery & Petrochemicals and Dangote Fertiliser Limited by capital market stakeholders.

Kwairanga, who called for the listing of Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Dangote Fertiliser on the NGX, stated that it would represent a natural progression in the Dangote Group’s journey towards transparency, market leadership, and inclusive wealth creation.

Noting that the Nigerian capital market takes great pride in Dangote and his contributions to the economy, he commended the impact of the Dangote Petroleum Refinery on the Nigerian economy, stressing that the various initiatives introduced have provided much-needed relief to Nigerians.

Kwairanga recalled Dangote’s tenure as President of the Council of the Nigerian Stock Exchange, describing him as a visionary whose leadership shaped the capital market landscape.

“Through the listing of companies such as Dangote Cement Plc, Dangote Sugar Refinery Plc, and NASCON Allied Industries Plc, the Group has significantly deepened market liquidity, boosted investor confidence, and driven long-term value creation for shareholders,” he stated.

The Chairman emphasised that the visit was more than a tour; it was a reaffirmation of the NGX’s commitment to aligning investment capital with national development goals.

The President/Chief Executive of the Dangote Group, Aliko Dangote, reaffirmed that the Group would soon list the Dangote Fertiliser Limited on the Nigerian Exchange (NGX), with the aim of revolutionising the capital market.

He assured shareholders that those investing in Dangote Fertiliser Limited would not need to worry about the value of the local currency, as the company operates within a dollarised business framework.

“So, what are we aiming to do to bring about a major revolution in the capital market? The main challenge is that many investors are hesitant, thinking, ‘If I invest my naira now, by the time I receive dividends in ten years, the naira will have lost value.’ However, we are entering the market with a dollarised business model,” he explained.

Dangote further disclosed that the company is working on expanding its fertiliser plants to boost revenue, with a target dividend payment to shareholders exceeding $3 billion.

“In the next 40 months, our fertiliser business should generate $20 million in revenue per day. We are pushing hard. We expect to reach over $70 billion in revenue and possibly pay dividends of $3–4 billion. Our philosophy is to always think big,” he said.

He added that the Group is also strengthening its cement business by investing in new plants and targeting clinker exports to West African countries, which will boost revenue and provide better dividends for shareholders.

Praising the recent progress of the NGX, Dangote stressed that Nigeria needs companies like Reliance Industries Limited, which once held its Annual General Meetings in a stadium. Such companies, he noted, would stimulate the economy and encourage wealth distribution.

Emphasising that Nigeria cannot attain its $1 trillion economy target without a vibrant stock exchange, Dangote affirmed his continued engagement and support for the NGX, acknowledging its crucial role.

The Vice President of Oil & Gas at Dangote Group, Edwin Devakumar, who led the delegation on a tour of the facilities, described the construction of the 650,000-barrel-per-day refinery as a monumental achievement that demanded immense courage, vision, and determination. He noted that the Group acted as its own Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) contractor for the refinery – a feat never before attempted at this scale.

He also stressed that the refinery has ensured Nigeria is no longer reliant on imports to meet its petroleum needs and is now exporting refined products to various continents worldwide.

Also present were the CEO of NGX, Temi Popoola; Managing Director/CEO of Central Securities Clearing System Plc (CSCS), Haruna Jalo-Waziri; CIS President, Oluropo Dada; ASHON Chairman, Sam Onukwe; CEO of NGX Regulation, Olufemi Shobanjo; CEO of Lagos Commodity Exchange, Akeredolu Ali; and other major stakeholders.

Stakeholders celebrate Osagie Okunbor’s legacy in farewell events

0

Country Chair, Shell Companies in Nigeria, Osagie Okunbor who retires at the end of June 2025, has been commended for his role and record in the development of the oil and gas industry, especially the growth of Nigerian content and impactful social investments in communities across the Niger Delta and the rest of the country.

Osagie Okunbor
Mr. Osagie and Mrs Soala Okunbor during the retirement event in Lagos

Okunbor, who retires after a career of over 39 years, was commended for ploughing back his wealth of experience to pursuing the Shell vision of powering progress in Nigeria through the companies he led at management or board level – The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd., (SPDC), Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Ltd, (SNEPCo) Shell Nigeria Gas (SNG), Shell Nigeria Closed Pension Fund Administrator, All On and Daystar Power.

Okunbor also played a leading role in the acquisition of SPDC by Renaissance, in a notable example of empowerment of Nigerian companies.

“We celebrate a legacy of momentum by someone who enjoyed widespread respect in the industry, communities and government,” Shell’s Executive Vice President, Nigeria, Marno de Jong, said at a sendforth ceremony in Lagos on Thursday, June 26, following on from a similar event in Abuja on Tuesday, June 24. Marno described Osagie’s career as an inspiring journey and wished him a fruitful retirement.

President, Shell Upstream, Peter Costello, who himself once served as Vice President, Nigeria and Gabon, flew in from Australia to bid Okunbor farewell. He congratulated him on a successful career which he said was marked by “calm and collected management of crisis, courageous leadership and authenticity.”

His remarks were echoed by the Group Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited, Bayo Ojulari, who said the oil and gas industry expected Osagie to weigh in with the qualities that have endeared him to stakeholders.

He said: “We want you to bring the same visionary leadership, resilience and strategic thinking to the industry so Nigeria can benefit more from this wealth of experience.”

In his response, Osagie said: “39 years is not a short time and I’m grateful to God for the grace to go through this period. I’m also grateful to everyone, friends and colleagues within and outside the country and mentors who helped me to forge a long career in Shell. My wife has been a pillar in my journey and I’m extremely grateful for her support and the rest of the family.”

The management of All On had earlier held a luncheon in honour of Okunbor in Lagos on Wednesday, June 25, during which the Chief Executive Officer, Caroline Eboumbou, thanked him for his support as pioneer chairman since it began operations in 2016.

He helped to guide the non-profit organisation in the fulfilment of its mission “to increase access to commercial energy products and services for under-served and un-served off-grid energy markets in Nigeria, with a special focus on the Niger Delta.”

Among other achievements, All On has enabled over 200,000 off-grid connections and impacted more than 1 million lives in Nigeria.

UN climate chief urges more pace, action as Bonn talks end in stalemate

0

Stiell closes SB62 talks with a blunt warning that the world is falling dangerously short of action, and that the delay is costing lives. Falling short of expressing disappointment at the slow pace of negotiations, particularly on finance, adaptation, and just transition, he urges countries to “go further, faster, and fairer” ahead of COP30 after talks on core issues stalled amid procedural fights and a widening trust gap between developed and developing nations

Simon Stiell
UN Climate Change Executive Secretary, Simon Stiell

UN Climate Change Executive Secretary, Simon Stiell, has voiced frustration at the slow pace of progress at the close of the Bonn Climate Change Conference (SB62), warning that parties must “go further, faster, and fairer” if the world is to keep the Paris Agreement goals alive.

Addressing delegates in the closing plenary, Stiell struck a tone that was equal parts urgent and dissatisfied. While he welcomed limited progress on issues such as the Just Transition Work Programme, Gender, National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), and transparency mechanisms, he did not shy away from naming the areas where talks had floundered, most notably on climate finance, the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA), and response measures.

“I’m not going to sugar coat it; we have a lot more to do before we meet again in Belém,” Stiell said, referring to the upcoming COP30 negotiations in Brazil. “There is so much more work to do to keep 1.5 alive, as science demands.”

His comments came after nearly two weeks of technical talks which failed to deliver meaningful breakthroughs on key agenda items that developing countries have long considered urgent. Throughout SB62, countries from the Global South expressed deep concern that adaptation goals and climate finance, critical lifelines for vulnerable nations, were again being sidelined by procedural wrangling and political inertia.

A flashpoint early in the meeting was the attempt to remove reference to Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement, which clearly obligates developed nations to provide climate finance, from the agenda. The move triggered a procedural standoff that stalled negotiations for over 30 hours. For developing countries, this was a red flag signalling a broader retreat from commitments.

Reacting to the stalemate at the end of the talks, Mohamed Adow, Director, Power Shift Africa, said the outcome was “a sobering reminder that the international community is still dragging its feet, even as lives are being lost to climate breakdown.”

His words: “The slow pace on core issues like finance, adaptation, and just transition reveals a deepening trust gap between rich and vulnerable nations,” said Adow, adding that “the attempt to sideline Article 9.1 and reduce climate finance to rebranded aid should alarm us all.

“This is not just procedural wrangling, it is a retreat from obligations. If the Global Goal on Adaptation is to mean anything, it must be underpinned by finance that is new, predictable, and grant-based. There was some welcome momentum on the UAE Just Transition Work Programme. Progress on creating an enabling international environment is vital, especially in tackling barriers like unilateral trade measures.”

But, added, Adow, time is running out. “As the UN climate boss Simon Stiell rightly said, we need to go ‘further, faster, and fairer.’ The Brazilian Presidency has a major task ahead. COP30 in Belém must be the moment where commitments become delivery – and where justice moves from rhetoric to reality.”

Cristina Rumbaitis, Senior Advisor on Adaptation and Resilience at UN Foundation, agreed with these sentiments, saying: “It is deeply disappointing that Parties were unable to come to an agreement on the way forward on the GGA in Bonn. Failure to deliver clear next steps  on the GGA indicators and guidance to technical experts would potentially set back the process for a year or more.  We must find a way to make progress on the Global Goal on Adaptation, a priority for so many developing  countries and a critical, yet unfulfilled, pillar of the Paris Agreement.”

On the penultimate day of talks, negotiators had scrambled for hours to wrap up key items. While, for instance, progress had been made on gender and the Adaptation Fund, discussions on just transition remained unresolved. And on the Global Goal on Adaptation, Parties clashed over guidance on indicators, with the African and Arab Groups pushing for alignment with the Paris Agreement and deletion of duplicative cross-cutting language. Tensions also rose over means of implementation (MoI), with developing countries rejecting proposals that downplayed finance obligations. A streamlined text on indicator guidance was eventually agreed upon.

While adaptation communications saw agreement after compromise over a paragraph referencing the Adaptation Committee, discussions on reviewing the committee’s performance exposed governance disagreements between developed and developing countries. And on mitigation, parties clashed over the Mitigation Work Programme’s scope and structure. The LMDCs demanded removal of all bullet points, while others wanted science and NDC synthesis reports referenced. No consensus emerged on a proposed digital platform.

Stiell’s closing remarks, therefore, echoed that sense of dismay among Parties and delegates. He stressed the need for negotiators to engage between sessions, urging them to stop deferring “the hard decisions” until COP summits. “We need leaders and ministers to roll up their sleeves,” he said. “This is your agenda. Your process. Progress here will benefit your people.”

For many delegates from the Global South, the frustration goes deeper than the gridlock in Bonn. There is growing sentiment that the climate talks are increasingly detached from the lived realities of countries already facing the worst climate impacts. While the Global Goal on Adaptation was meant to offer clarity and a pathway to climate resilience, parties failed to agree on indicators, particularly those linked to finance.

India, on behalf of the Like-Minded Developing Countries (LMDC) group, had at the beginning of the talks pushed back against what it called attempts to dilute equity under the guise of a “just transition.” It argued that, for many nations, the term rings hollow when divorced from state responsibility, financing guarantees, and protections for workers and communities facing economic upheaval.

Khaled Hashim, the coordinator for G77+China, noted that, on the UAE Just Transition Work Programme, “we are satisfied to see progress made during this session, particularly concerning the enabling international environment for just transitions. This highlights the importance of the urgent delivery of means of implementation, including climate finance, capacity-building, and technology development and transfer, to facilitate just transition pathways, while also addressing international barriers to a global just transition, such as unilateral measures.”

He added: “We acknowledge the importance of the UAE JTWP dialogues, and the new institutional arrangements proposed by G77+China, aimed at supporting and enhancing the implementation of Just Transition pathways. We encourage all parties to consider these arrangements at SB63 to enhance international cooperation, therefore enabling equitable and inclusive global Just Transition, that leaves no one behind.”

The finance debate hovered over the entire process like a gathering storm since the first day two weeks ago. Despite long-standing pledges, the delivery of predictable, grant-based finance has been sluggish. No firm progress was made in Bonn on new quantified targets, nor were there signals that the developed world is prepared to move beyond symbolic contributions and private-sector-heavy models.

Stiell acknowledged the trust parties placed in the UNFCCC by agreeing to the institution’s budget, calling it “a modest but vital investment.” But that goodwill, he warned, must now be matched by action. “This process is humanity’s only means of preventing climate-driven global economic meltdown, with terrible human costs. Just as we have no Planet B, there is no Process B.”

With COP30 just five months away, expectations are mounting for a course correction. The new NDC Synthesis Report, expected in September, will assess the strength of countries’ updated national climate plans, but also expose the gap between pledges and planetary needs. A separate report on Biennial Transparency Reports (BTRs) is set to outline barriers to implementation, many of which revolve around finance, capacity, and political will.

Stiell encouraged parties to form “frontrunner groups” to break deadlocks and demonstrate ambition. But observers note that voluntary coalitions, however well-intentioned, cannot replace binding commitments, especially when core issues like adaptation and finance remain mired in stalemate.

In closing, Stiell paid tribute to delegates, co-facilitators, and long-serving staff members preparing to retire. But his final remarks reinforced what many in the room already sensed: time is slipping, and the current pace won’t cut it.

“We must find a way to get to the hard decisions sooner,” he urged.

For the Global South, battered by floods, droughts, and spiralling debt, the message was clear, if not reassuring: Belém must deliver more than platitudes. It must deliver justice.

Simon Stiell’s statement:

We need to go further, faster, and fairer. 

I commend the hard work that has paid off over the last 10 days, including on the Just Transition Work Programme, Gender, NAPs, Transparency and the UAE Dialogue. 

Work on some other areas such as Response Measures and the Technology Implementation Programme, has struggled.    

I’m not going to sugar coat it; we have a lot more to do before we meet again in Belém.  

There is so much more work to do to keep 1.5 alive, as science demands.  

We must find a way to get to the hard decisions sooner.  

We need leaders and ministers to roll up their sleeves. 

We will need negotiators to sit together between sessions to find common ground. 

This is your agenda. Your process. Progress here will benefit your people.  

You have so much more in common than divides you. We need to spend more time reflecting and building on this. 

Outside of these halls, the transition is accelerating. Presenting astonishing opportunities. Smart leaders should form frontrunner groups to tackle tough issues and create change.  

We look forward to receiving new and stronger NDCs by September and will include them in a new NDC Synthesis Report. This report will show how far we’ve come and how far we must go.  

We’ll also share lessons and identify barriers to overcome with our first BTR Synthesis Report, and report progress on National Adaptation Plans. 

All eyes will then be on COP30, to deliver the response to these reports, to see how nations pick up the pace of implementation. 

I thank Parties for agreeing the UNFCCC’s budget. We take this as a vote of confidence in our collective work, and a clear signal that governments continue to see UN-convened climate cooperation as essential, even in difficult times. 

This is a modest but vital investment, because this process is humanity’s only means of preventing climate-driven global economic meltdown, with terrible human costs. Just as we have no Planet B, there is no process B.  

We will work to repay this trust by continuing to deliver on the mandates Parties have given us, while always seeking efficiency and continuous improvement.  

On behalf of the Secretariat, I would like to extend my heartfelt thanks to the SB Chairs, Adonia Ayebare and Julia Gardiner, along with their team of co-facilitators, for their dedicated efforts.  

I am also deeply grateful for the tireless, round-the-clock work of so many delegates, and, of course, the unwavering commitment of my colleagues in the Secretariat. 

Today, I offer my sincere appreciation to two valued staff members, Olga Pilifosova and Lando Velasco, for their decades of exceptional service to the United Nations. As they prepare for their well-earned retirement, I wish them all the very best.  

I again pay tribute to the COP29 Presidency for their support and look forward to continuing the hard work ahead with the incoming COP30 Presidency. I thank you.

Bonn: Breakthrough as just transition priorities tabled in UN climate process

Ten days of negotiations in the German city of Bonn to lay the groundwork for the UN Climate Change Conference in Brazil in November 2025 ended on Thursday, June 26.

Bonn Climate Change Conference
Flags of the United Nations Climate Change Conference fly in front of the Climate Secretariat in Bonn. Photo credit: Oliver Berg/dpa © DPA

German State Secretary for Climate, Jochen Flasbarth, described the Bonn climate conference, a mid-year meeting of stakeholders, as an “important reality check.”

Efforts to limit global warming must now be reflected in concrete new climate plans from around 200 countries, Flasbarth told dpa.

“This is because in 2025, all countries will be required to submit these plans and outline how they will further reduce their climate-damaging emissions in line with the 1.5-degree limit by 2035,” he said.

Some countries have already presented their strategies, while the EU and many others are still working on theirs, said Flasbarth.

However, after two tense weeks of negotiations, breakthrough appears to have emerged in the SB62 climate talks in Bonn: civil society’s Just Transition priorities were officially tabled in the UN climate process, thanks to relentless pressure from social movements, workers, and frontline communities.

According to observers, this vital step opens the door in the fight for transitions that put people first – ensuring climate action centres justice, dignity, and decent work, rather than enabling corporate greenwashing or elite control.

But, beyond this opening, Bonn reportedly laid bare a system in crisis.

Even as NATO leaders just 200km away pledged more than US$1 trillion a year in additional military spending, rich polluting countries showed up at the climate talks pleading poverty. The silence on war, genocide, and rising global inequality was deafening.

Despite the escalating toll of climate impacts and injustice, the talks revealed a growing chasm between the urgent demands of communities on the frontlines of climate breakdown and the hollow, evasive language of a process struggling to retain relevance.

Negotiations on adaptation were little more than a smokescreen. Developed nations dodged their financial obligations towards developing countries once again, and held the process hostage, preventing progress.

The ghost of Baku seemed to haunt the talks, with developing countries facing fierce pushback when they united in their demand for a formal agenda item on the provision of climate finance by developed countries.

“And it’s clear the so-called ‘Baku to Belém’ roadmap remains riddled with holes. Without new, additional and grant-based public finance from historical emitters, there will be no money to fund a real Just Transition, no closing of the ambition gap, and no hope of holding the line at 1.5°C. The COP30 Presidency and all parties must put a plan in place to address the critical issue of the provision of climate finance, or risk a blow up,” environment watchdog group, Climate Action Network International, submitted in a statement.

As countries belatedly prepare their new climate action plans (Nationally Determined Contributions), one thing is clear: they will fall far short of what is needed. Despite this, there was a resounding silence around the ambition gap that is so clearly emerging.

Countries that hold historic responsibility for the climate crisis continue to expand oil and gas exploration while pushing developing countries to shoulder the burden they themselves refuse to bear – both in cutting emissions and providing climate finance. It’s a double standard that deepens injustice and delays real action.

Tasneem Essop, Executive Director of Climate Action Network International, said: “Enough is enough. While bombs get billions and polluters are increasing their record profits, Bonn has once again exposed a system rigged to protect polluters and profiteers – complicit in a global order that funds destruction but balks at paying for survival.

“But even in this broken space, people’s power shone through. Due to the relentless pressure from civil society, the Just Transition fight finally made it into the formal process, laying the table for a win for workers, for communities, and for every person fighting to build a future rooted in dignity and hope. Decision-makers must come to Belém with the commitment to make this a reality. 

“As this process drifts further from the real world, it is grassroots movements that continue to lead the way – resisting delay, greenwashing, and false solutions with vision, urgency, and courage. From the streets of Bonn to the heart of Belém, the fight for climate justice is turning into a roar that cannot be ignored.”

Caroline Brouillette, Executive Director, Climate Action Network Canada: “The world is facing a treacherous moment. Political headwinds and unfair economic rules are preventing the level of climate action we need. The UNFCCC feels increasingly disconnected from the real world.

“Amidst the dark clouds of these existential challenges to the planet and to this process, there is a ray of sunshine: parties are finding common ground around a Just Transition. The text forwarded to Belem offers us a fighting chance to a COP30 outcome that truly connects workers, communities and Peoples with the Paris Agreement.”

Amiera Sawas, Head of Research & Policy, Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative: “As the Northern hemisphere suffers deadly heatwaves, UN climate talks remain frozen in an out-of-touch process. War and military spending escalated outside, while inside there was no discussion – and no finance. Civil society fought to bring negotiations into the real world, but geopolitics and the fossil fuel lobby kept derailing progress. Even successes, like the draft text for the ‘Just Transition Work Programme’ informed by workers and Indigenous Peoples, were nearly paralysed by fossil fuel interests at the end.

“We are already at risk of breaching the 1.5 temperature limit, there’s no time for paralysis. There’s a real risk that the UN climate talks fail to address the crisis’s biggest drivers: coal, oil, and gas. We cannot afford any more failure; we must urgently do better. And we will – whether inside or outside the UN. Brazil is talking big, but its actions speak louder than words and its recent approval of new oil extraction in the Amazon is the worst possible signal.”

Stela Herschmann, Climate Policy Specialist for Observatório do Clima (Brazil): “This is a party-driven process. What the Bonn meeting showed us is that the parties want to discuss public finance. Despite Brazil’s best intentions to streamline the agenda and make progress on other issues, it may not be possible to do so without including a conversation about public finance in the official COP30 agenda.

“Brazil had three priorities for Bonn. One of them, Just Transition, saw good progress and produced a preparatory text with key asks from civil society organisations so this work programme can actually deliver justice to the people. The other two resemble Baku. The text on indicators for the global goal of adaptation advanced well but is being held until the last minute due to the discussion around finance and means of implementation.

“The UAE dialogue on the implementation of the Global Stocktake, did not progress as much. We will leave Bonn with two similar documents because the parties could not agree on a single informal note, and we can expect to see the same disputes over the scope and modalities in Belém.”

Mariana Paoli, Global Advocacy Lead, Christian Aid: “The Bonn climate talks have shown that there’s hangover from the chaotic ending at COP29 in Baku. Finance remains the elephant in the room. While negotiators circled around the issue in Boon, limited progress was made. We cannot afford another year of delay – COP30 must deliver where COP29 fell short.

“There has been an over reliance on the illusion that private finance will solve the climate crisis. Its growing presence in these spaces is starting to resemble a Trojan horse. Public grants-based finance is essential to deliver climate action, decisions should be done based on the needs of communities and not profits and should be rooted in fairness and science.”

Teresa Anderson, ActionAid International: “Rich countries’ continued refusal to put real climate finance on the table means that climate talks are facing uncertain times. For once, however, it’s not all bad news. Governments are starting to get excited about Just Transition, and shaping energy and food systems in a way that really works for workers, women, farmers and communities.

“This comes at such a critical time, amid so much economic uncertainty, when many people feel they are being forced to choose between their immediate needs and a climate safe future. If approved at COP30, the Just Transition mechanism will deliver action on the ground, requiring and supporting governments to put people’s needs first and foremost at the start of every climate plan. This represents a major evolution in climate action, and the spark of hope that our planet urgently needs.”

Nithi Nesadurai, Director & Regional Coordinator, CAN Southeast Asia: “The Bonn climate meeting took place within the backdrop of a continuing genocide in Gaza, a hot war and the NATO Summit. Interestingly, while developed countries blocked decisions on their financial obligations on all the major climate negotiating items, a short distance away in The Hague, NATO members readily agreed to increase their military budgets to 5 per cent of GDP.

“Easily amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars, it shows finance is available, unlike what they implied in the Bonn negotiations. If not for the progress on the Just Transition Work Programme, which gives civil society a core issue to rally around on the road to Belem, this meeting offered little to get excited about on all other fronts.

Nafkote Dabi, Climate Policy Lead, Oxfam International: “The Bonn conference exposes the stark injustice between rich and poor countries. The richest, primarily responsible for the climate crisis, are dodging their duty to provide public, grant-based finance for developing countries to adapt and rebuild. As warming spirals toward a catastrophic 3°C, urgent action is critical. Rich countries must own their climate debt and stop pushing private finance, that prioritises profit over people, as a solution. The Brazilian COP presidency must also step up and champion equity and justice in Belem.”

Sanjay Vashist, Director, Climate Action Network South Asia: “Climate talks in Bonn have failed South Asia once again. While our communities face climate-induced floods, heatwaves, and hunger, wealthy nations dodge their obligations, offering empty words on adaptation and loss and damage finance. The refusal to put public finance on the table is a betrayal. As we pivot to COP30 in Belém, we demand not just promises, but delivery – real, predictable, and equitable finance. The era of evasion must end. The lives of millions in South Asia depend on it, however the UNFCCC process appears to have succumbed to fossil fuel lobbyists and private sector forces.”

Romain Ioualalen, Global Policy lead at Oil Change International: “Bonn saw the Global North further retreat from its responsibilities to provide public finance for climate action, instead promoting fabricated narratives on private finance filling the gap – despite evidence the market-led approach is not delivering. On top of blocking finance, rich countries failed their homework on fossil fuels with four Global North countries responsible for 70% of projected oil and gas expansion, which made calls from developed parties to center the fossil fuel phaseout in the negotiations continue to ring hollow and hypocritical. An outcome on just transition in Belém is within reach and could provide momentum for centering justice in the transition.”

Ife Kilimanjaro, U.S. Climate Action Network: “Bonn confirmed the UNFCCC feels dangerously out of touch with global crises – war, inequality, and a climate already past 1.5 degrees. The fight for public climate finance was an uphill battle; rich nations diverted responsibility, pushing risky private solutions that won’t close the ambition gap. Yet, a vital glimmer of hope emerged: civil society secured demands in the Just Transition text. This shows organised people can make progress even in disconnected spaces. For USCAN, it’s clear: we must keep bridging the gap between power and lived realities, demanding genuine accountability and justice.”

Fernanda de Carvalho, WWF Global Climate and Energy Policy Lead: “The breakthrough we achieved in Dubai is at stake. Developed countries who should be leading the way, continue to explore for, and use fossil fuels while deforestation is on the rise. We need them to step up at the global level and commit to phasing out all fossil fuels, putting some much-needed momentum into the international climate talks. We also need strong measures to halt and reverse deforestation by 2030. We look to Belém as a political course-correction moment, and we count on the Brazilian Presidency and the political will of all countries to deliver that.”

Avantika Goswami, Programme Manager, Climate Change, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), India: “We do not see appetite to uphold multilateralism from developed countries, and Bonn made that clear. The refusal to dive deeper into Article 9.1 and hear out concerns from developing countries about unilateral trade measures, symbolise the imbalance of power that persists in this space. While civil society is driving momentum on issues like just transition, all other spaces remain paralysed by inequity, and refusal of the Global North to support, fund and enable climate action in the rest of the world in line with its historical duty.”

Ann Harrison, Climate Justice Policy Adviser, Amnesty International: “Human rights references and protections were again sacrificed at the altar of consensus which drives down ambition. UNFCCC reform must be on the table, including greater protections for free speech and peaceful protest which were further restricted, particularly for actions protesting the genocide in Gaza and solidarity actions for imprisoned defenders.

“Fossil fuel producers continue to undermine progress towards the full, fast, fair and funded fossil fuel phase out and just transition we need. And let’s be clear, providing adequate public, grants-based climate finance, especially for adaptation and loss and damage is also a human rights obligation for developed countries, and it must be massively scaled up to contribute towards climate justice.”

Andreas Sieber, 350.org Associate Director of Global Policy and Campaigns: “Bonn was bogged down by political divisions and bruised by global tensions, with results that leave much to be desired. A serious injection of energy and urgency is required as we look ahead to COP30 in Belém. Negotiators must make progress on implementing the Global Stocktake, closing the ambition gap, and delivering the finance needed to turn ambition into action. 

“Civil society must hold the line on the agreement to triple renewables and phase out fossil fuels, and rich countries must course correct after Baku’s shortcomings. COP30 has much to make up for, and for it to be a success, the Presidency must lead with the integrity, diplomacy and flexibility this crisis demands.”

Gaïa Febvre, Réseau Action Climat France, International Policy Lead: “As the Bonn climate talks come to a close, it is shocking to see France, once the proud ‘guardian’ of the Paris Agreement, actively blocking a more ambitious EU NDC.

“What’s the point of hosting summits and delivering grand speeches if, behind closed doors, France stalls the very commitments needed to keep 1.5°C alive? The Paris Agreement doesn’t need more ceremony, it needs leadership. It needs a France that pushes the EU to step up, not one that defends the status quo or fossil interests. The window to act is closing. France must choose: will it honor the legacy of Paris, or betray it?”

More than 5,000 delegates took part in the negotiations in Bonn. The city is home to the UN Climate Change Secretariat, which coordinates international climate policy.

The annual talks are seen as a critical step in shaping the global climate agenda ahead of the main event in the Brazilian city of Belém in November, known as COP30.

Egypt urges acceleration of renewable energy projects, local manufacturing

Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi, has urged stepped-up efforts to expand investment in renewable energy to localise  production of equipment used in the sector.

Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi
Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi

Egypt’s energy strategy focuses on sustainability, new investments, and boosting domestic production of green technology components.

Daily News Egypt, a partner of TV BRICS, reported this.

During discussions with Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly, and Minister of Electricity and Renewable Energy, Mahmoud Essmat, the president reviewed Egypt’s updated energy strategy, with an emphasis on clean energy, grid resilience, and industrial self-sufficiency.

Presidential spokesperson, Mohamed El-Shennawy, said the meeting addressed several key issues, including the diversification of Egypt’s energy mix, the integration of renewable sources and battery storage technologies.

It also addressed efforts to improve the performance of the national electricity grid through interconnection projects with neighbouring countries.

Mahmoud Essmat revealed that an additional 2,000 megawatts of renewable energy capacity is planned, with investments estimated at $2.3 billion.

The agenda also covered efforts to enhance local manufacturing in the energy sector, including cooperation with leading international firms to establish domestic production facilities for storage batteries and wind turbines.

The move is part of a broader strategy to strengthen Egypt’s industrial base and reduce reliance on imports.

The current installed renewable capacity stands at 8,031 MW, derived from wind, solar, and hydroelectric sources.

The officials also reviewed projections under Egypt’s Integrated and Sustainable Energy Strategy, including solar and wind additions expected by mid-2028 and long-term goals for 2030.

×