Wednesday 21st August 2019
Wednesday, 21st of August 2019
Home / Cover / World Bank sets new environmental, social criteria for investments

World Bank sets new environmental, social criteria for investments

The World Bank has introduced a fresh set of criteria for environmental and social framework for project execution in Nigeria.

Rachid Benmessaoud

Rachid Benmessaoud, World Bank Country Director in Nigeria

At a workshop held on Tuesday, April 3, 2018 in Abuja, the institution sought for government officials to acquaint them with its new environmental and social requirements for the projects it finances in the country.

The World Bank Nigeria Country Director, Mr Rachid Benmessaoud, at the forum, said the bank would apply the new Environmental and Social Framework (ESF) to new investment projects it finances from October.

He said the new requirements seek to protect people and the environment from potential adverse impact that could arise from World Bank-financed projects and promote sustainable development.

“Time and again, we have seen that investment projects are more sustainable and have a greater development impact when the environment is protected, and when communities and people are engaged.

ALSO READ:  Green Campus Initiative launched as forum decorates achievers

“The ESF is a great opportunity to work together with the Nigerian Government to strengthen its environmental and social systems, and help build the country’s capacity to implement programmes in a sustainable way and to achieve stronger results,” he said.

He said also that the framework would assist the borrowing governments to manage certain environmental and social risks in investment projects proposed for World Bank financing support.

Meanwhile, the Minister of State for Environment, Mr Ibrahim Jibril, said that the government was in support of any policy that focuses on environmental and social protection.

“Many states in the country are being affected by climate change with significant impact on the environment.

“The ESF is a welcome development as it will give us a chance to manage the effect of climate change or ignore it at our own peril,’’ he said.

ALSO READ:  Nasarawa villages get access to sustainable energy

Also, the World Bank Lead Environmental Specialist, Mr Africa Olojoba, said that under the new framework, the bank would classify all projects into four classes, listed to include: high risk, substantial risk, moderate or low risk.

He said that, in determining the appropriate risk classification, the bank would take into account relevant issues such as the type, location, sensitivity and scale of the project.

According to him, the ESF has 10 standards which a project must meet before the bank finances, and these include environmental and social risk assessment as well as labour and working conditions.

He also said that resource efficiency, pollution prevention, community health and safety standards, biodiversity conservation and sustainable management of living natural resources requirements must be met.

In addition, Olojoba said any new project must meet World Bank’s requirement for protection of cultural heritage, land acquisition, restrictions on land use and involuntary resettlement among others.

ALSO READ:  Cross River loses over 23,000ha of forest yearly

He said that henceforth, the ESF would form part of loan agreement developed between any government and the World Bank.

In Aug. 2016, the World Bank’s Board of Executive Directors approved the ESF, which would go into effect in 2018 and progressively replace the bank’s Safeguards.

The ESF is the result of extensive consultations conducted by the World Bank, with engagement around the world with governments, development practitioners, and civil society groups, reaching nearly 8,000 stakeholders in 63 countries.

The new framework provides a broad coverage of environmental and social issues, including important advances on transparency, non-discrimination, social inclusion, public participation, and accountability.

The ESF also places more emphasis on strengthening Borrower governments’ own capacity to deal with environmental and social issues.

By Rachael Ishaya

%d bloggers like this: