25.4 C
Lagos
Sunday, June 8, 2025
Home Blog Page 377

Ramping up food security with dry season farming

0

At an event designed to project ambition and to signpost business unusual, the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, led by the Minister, Sen. Abubakar Kyari, and Minister of State, Sen. (Dr) Aliyu Sabi Abdullahi, flagged off the 2023/2024 national dry season farming with an impressive array of stakeholders in the food security sector in attendance.

Sen. Abubakar Kyari
Minister of Agriculture and Food Security, Sen. Abubakar Kyari

The event, held in the farming community of Kadume, Hadejia local government area of Jigawa State on Saturday, November 25, 2023 was the formal roll-out of the National Agricultural Growth Scheme and Agro-Pocket (NAGS-AP) project being implemented under the African Emergency Food Production Facility (AEFPF) funded through a loan by the African Development Bank (AfDB).

The project, to be implemented across the 36 states of the federation and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), for three consecutive farming seasons beginning with the 2023/2024 dry season farming, is backed by a total sum of $134 million allocated to Nigeria, to be utilised through the National Agricultural Growth Scheme and Agro-Pocket (NAGS-AP), an ICT-based farm inputs delivery mechanism designed to promote transparency, accountability and easy assessment of impact.

The project comes with four mutually reinforcing components, namely, agricultural sector reforms, improvement in the delivery of farm inputs and quality extension services, support to wheat production, and enhancement of private sector participation in the production of agricultural inputs.

This is not the first time dry season farming has taken place in the country. But, evidently, the present one, the first to be staged under President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, differs from the past in its scope and focus. There are also very compelling reasons for the approach being adopted.

The Russia-Ukraine War has occasioned massive disruption in grains supplies around the world, with Africa (Nigeria inclusive) bearing more of the brunt. In parts of Nigeria where insecurity is rife, farming activities have been impacted as farmers have either been sacked from their communities by terrorists and bandits, or they have had to pay with their harvests for protection by the organised criminal elements. In some cases, as happened in Niger State, terrorists and bandits burnt down farms and killed farmers.

These unsavoury developments, along with others, such as perennial flooding and poor extension services, have resulted in lower productivity by farmers, which in turn affected the value chain, as in poultry services where the prices of livestock feeds have skyrocketed largely due to poor supplies of inputs for livestock feed production.

The NAGS-AP project aims to increase total food production to crash the continued rises in prices of agricultural commodities and make them affordable to average Nigerians, thereby further assuring food security. Food inflation stands at over 120 per cent and about 88.5 million Nigerians are faced with inadequate food consumption and that was why President Bola Tinubu declared a state of emergency on food security in July 2023.

The key objective of NAGS-AP is to increase the production of wheat, rice, maize, sorghum, soya beans and cassava through the provision of relevant agricultural inputs such as fertilisers, seeds, stems, pesticides, and herbicides to the registered small-scale farmers for both wet and dry season farming across the 36 states of the Federation including the FCT.

The dry season farming NAGS–AP project encapsulates the Tinubu Administration’s resolve to expand the capacity of Nigerian farmers to engage in the cultivation of key staples like rice, maize, cassava and wheat, across the country. These high value staples will be joined by others like soybeans and sorghum in the wet season. The aim is to increase crop yield by at least 20 per cent compared to the previous year.

According to the Minister of Agriculture and Food Security, “In wheat alone, we aim to support between 150,000 and 250,000 farmers with 50 per cent input subsidy. Other selected staples are earmarked for similar, varied support, all aimed at significantly reducing food inflation, as well as Nigeria’s dependence on foreign import, while increasing domestic consumption. Ultimately, this will promote agricultural self-sufficiency and stimulate economic growth.”

Overall, the project is targeted to support about one million farmers with relevant farm inputs under wheat, rice, maize, sorghum and soya beans value chains, in addition to other institutional support to increase local production of the selected commodities to guarantee food and nutrition security in Nigeria.

The first-line beneficiaries of the project, therefore, are farmers involved in the identified grain production. They will be supported with relevant farm inputs to cultivate about 100,000 hectares with expected output of wheat to be added to the food reserve in order to reduce dependence on importation of the product and increase domestic consumption, particularly to the flour millers.

As part of the project, subsidised agricultural inputs will be provided to cultivate 150,000 hectares of rice, 30,000 hectares of maize and 20,000 hectares of cassava during the 2023/2024 dry season farming across the 36 states of the Federation and FCT where functional irrigation facilities are available.

In a marked example of the synergy between government and the private sector to achieve stated targets for the 2023/2024 dry season, the Flour Mills of Nigeria facilitated the importation of certified wheat seeds from Mexico, in addition to seeds sourced locally in Nigeria, to meet the quantum of seeds required for planting during the season.

Of course, the farmers are also guaranteed a market for their produce as the project has in place links between the farmers and produce users. Specifically, the wheat segment of the market already has off-takers in the Flour Millers Association of Nigeria who have up to 6,000,000mt of annual demand.

In pushing the project to a successful conclusion, the Ministry envisages a number of challenges. However, the Minister said smart extension services, innovative irrigation techniques, promoting water conservation and good agronomic practices are being mainstreamed.

“We will invest more in farm infrastructure, all with a view to enabling our farmers maximize their agricultural output and overcome the limitations imposed by the elements,” he said. “For us, the slogan is, ‘Farmers First: Farmers Always!’”

After all the good intentions expressed about the dry season farming, the painstaking planning and the official flag-off, what remains, and that is the ultimate knotty issue, is how to overcome the perennial challenge of implementation of government policies and programmes. The dry season period runs generally from November to April. And for growers of wheat during the dry season, the period between planting and harvesting varies between 100 and 120 days, that is, about four months.

It is a reasonable expectation that all those superintending the NAGS-AP, from the national to the sub-national levels, will, as Americans say, dust the ants off their pants, and work round the clock to make the 2023/24 dry season a huge success that it promises to be. Knowing our systemic glitches, it should be no surprise that not all eligible cluster of farmers will get their subsidized agro inputs as and when due. Some may not know where to find agro dealers, or some agro dealers may not be open when the farmers arrive from their different locations.

It should also not be surprising that a few unscrupulous elements may attempt to game the system by short-changing those who are qualified for the agro inputs; nor, will be totally strange that hoarding may take place, or those who had stock-piled substandard urea and fertilisers might attempt to off-load them to unsuspecting clusters of farmers. These are probabilities and possibilities, not impossibilities. The managerial task of the NAGS-AP co-ordinators, therefore, is to think ahead and have trouble-shooting mechanisms that minimise disruption of inputs supplies and the goals of the dry season farming.

Bridging the gap: Addressing energy poverty, inequality through renewables

0

Lack of electricity in Nigeria critically affects the overall development of its economy. The country has the world’s largest absolute electricity access deficit, with 45 per cent of the population (90 million) lacking access to the electricity grid, a recent World Bank report states. Large disparities exist in access to electricity between urban areas (84 per cent) and rural ones (26 per cent).

Solar panels
Renewable energy: Solar panels. It is said that acheiving net zero by 2050 is still possible by tripling renewable energy capacity

This deficit has increased by over seven million citizens over the last decade as the pace of population growth has overtaken the pace of electrification, the report adds. This disproportionately affects vulnerable groups, particularly women and children, worsening existing inequalities.

Electricity is an essential part of modern life and important in driving socio-economic development. People’s needs for electricity vary from powering home appliances, operating machines, enabling communication, storing agricultural produce, preserving medical equipment, and transportation, to mention but a few.  Nigeria should be able to transmit about 15,000 megawatts (MW) of electricity, but due to weak and ageing infrastructure, it transmits less than 5000 MW of about 13,000MW of electricity generated to its over 200 million citizens.

These recurring energy challenges have further worsened the country’s economy and forced vulnerable groups’ reliance on unclean and unsustainable sources like kerosene and firewood, leading to respiratory illnesses and deforestation.

In a World Health Organisation (WHO) report, standard operating procedures for most hospitals require energy use for water supply, temperature control, lighting, ventilation, and clinical processes. Primary health centres, PHCs are supposed to be the first places to go for health services in rural areas, but many of these facilities in Nigeria underperform due to lack of energy access.

A recent report by the Sustainable Energy for All (SEforALL) estimates that 40 per cent of PHCs in Nigeria lack access to electricity. This lack of reliable access to energy continues to undermine the coverage and quality of basic healthcare and social welfare services delivered to millions of people in the country.

Pregnant women still give birth to their babies in the dark and critical surgeries are carried out using candlelight and torchlights. It’s literally a matter of life and death for many poor sick children because there is no capacity to preserve vaccines in a refrigerated environment. Also, girls are prone to attacks when fetching firewood in most villages and lack access to electricity to do homework after school.

Nigeria’s recurring electricity challenges have further resulted in weakened industrialisation, unemployment, the withdrawal of foreign investments, and her inability to compete in the global market. The World Bank estimates that Nigeria loses about $29 billion a year resulting from unreliable electricity.

In a recent report, the Association of Small Business Owners of Nigeria stated that 25 per cent of manufacturing businesses have ceased operations so far in 2023 alone. The closures is aggravated due to Nigeria’s inadequacy to compete in the global industrial market owing to its slow integration of heavy innovative technologies, which require stable and reliable power supply.

Bridging the energy gap through renewable energy

Access to reliable and affordable energy is essential for socio-economic development and the overall well-being of communities. In Nigeria, decentralised renewable energy solutions have great potential to bridge the energy gap and provide access to electricity in both rural and urban centres. According to a recent IRENA release, renewable energy can help Nigeria not only meet its energy needs but also power sustainable economic growth and create jobs while achieving global climate and sustainable development objectives.

Adopting renewable energy sources like solar, biomass, and hydro presents a compelling solution to address energy poverty and promote sustainable development in Nigeria. Renewable energy will be more affordable and accessible to last-mile communities where grid extension is expensive. Renewable energy sources, such as solar PV and mini-grids can generate electricity for hospitals, schools, companies, farm operations, transportation, and powering home appliances, among others.

Women often require energy for productive activities like sewing, processing agricultural products, and running small businesses. Renewable solutions like solar-powered lanterns and micro grids can address these specific needs, empowering women and contributing to their economic independence. The adoption of clean cooking technologies serves as a suitable alternative to save their health and environmental hazards.

The way forward in bridging the energy gap:

  • Federal and state governments should implement supportive policies that incentivise investments in renewable energy and facilitate grid integration.
  • Removal or grant of tax waivers on imported renewable energy equipment and streamlining of licensing procedures in Nigeria.
  • Improving the income of rural women to catalyse the achievement of transition to clean energy.
  • There should be more public-private partnerships, i.e. collaborative efforts between the government, private sector, and NGOs like renewable energy-driven associations like the Renewable Energy Association of Nigeria (REAN) to leverage resources and expertise for the implementation of renewable energy projects, facilitate project monitoring, and collectively address challenges.
  • State and local government should invest in efficient clean stove programs for women and small-scale clean energy agroprocessing machines.
  • Innovative investment for implementing renewable energy and removal of bottlenecks from local financial institutions.
  • Adequate education and training should be provided for women, especially in rural areas, in the use of clean cooking technologies and solar energy systems.
  • Innovative financing models, such as micro-finance and green bonds, are accessible to renewable energy developers to design projects for low-income households and communities.
  • Adopting demand-side subsidies and grants to make renewable energy solutions more affordable for low-income households and communities.
  • Promoting public awareness by stakeholders like the Renewable Energy Association of Nigeria to create awareness and more adoption of renewable energy and to further speed up Nigeria’s energy transition targets.

By Ayobami Adedinni and Godwin Jimoh, Renewable Energy Association of Nigeria (REAN)

NNPC, TotalEnergies sign MoU on adoption of methane detection technology

0

The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Ltd. (NNPC Ltd.) has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with TotalEnergies for the adoption and deployment of a methane detection technology known as Airborne Ultralight Spectrometer for Environmental Application (AUSEA) in all its upstream operations.

NNPC and TotalEnergies
R-L: Executive Vice President, Upstream, NNPC Ltd., Oritsemeyiwa Eyesan and Managing Director and Country Chair, TotalEnergies EP Nigeria, Matthieu Bouyer, sign an MoU between NNPC Ltd. and TotalEnergies on the use of the latter’s Airborne Ultralight Spectrometer for Environment Detection (AUSEA) Technology, aimed at detecting and monitoring methane emissions in oil and gas operations. Watching with keen interest are the Group Chief Executive Officer of NNPC Ltd., Mele Kyari (standing right) and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TotalEnergies, Patrick Pouyanné (standing left)

With the agreement, which is a direct benefit from the company’s participation at the recently concluded United Nations Climate Change Conference (also known as COP28) in Dubai, UAE, NNPC Ltd. will be able to deploy the TotalEnergies AUSEA technology on its upstream operations sites to ascertain the level of methane emissions from them, with a view to working out emission curtailment measures to help in combating global warming and climate change.

The MoU was signed by NNPC Ltd.’s Executive Vice President, Upstream, Oritsemeyiwa Eyesan, and Managing Director and Country Chair, TotalEnergies EP Nigeria, Matthieu Bouyer, on behalf of their respective companies, under the watch of the Group Chief Executive Officer (GCEO) NNPC Ltd., Mele Kyari, and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TotalEnergies, Patrick Pouyanné.

Speaking on the collaboration at the MoU signing event, the GCEO, NNPC Ltd, Mele Kyari, described TotalEnergies as a great and reliable partner over the years with whom the Company was looking forward to exploring greater opportunities in the nation’s energy sector.

On his part, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TotalEnergies, Patrick Pouyanné, said his company was offering the technology to NNPC Ltd. in keeping with its commitment to promote responsible production of hydrocarbons.

He applauded NNPC Ltd. for its successful transition into a limited liability company, stressing that he could see and feel the energy that the reforms have brought about, not only in the company but also in the sector.

Putting the deal in proper perspective, the NNPC Ltd.’s Executive Vice President, Upstream, Oritsemeyiwa Eyesan, said the pilot phase of the TotalEnergies AUSEA deployment would be on NNPC Ltd.’s owned operations, adding that the deal would enable the company to deploy methane abatement measures.

Other benefits of the TotalEnergies AUSEA technology include identification of unaccounted emission sources, establishment of a basis for querying and improving current emission reporting processes, provision of data to review operational system and implement corrective actions, and estimation of flare combustion efficiency.

Young Nigerian ecologist features in new cohort of global restoration stewards

0

Young people across the globe are spearheading the movement for a fairer and healthier world through activism, outreach and community-led solutions for ecosystems and livelihoods.

Anna Obi Akpe
Anna Obi Akpe

A graduate in plant and ecological studies, Anna Obi Akpe, has been selected from over 300 candidates as one of the 2024 Restoration Stewards, by international organisations the Youth in Landscapes Initiative and the Global Landscapes Forum to receive funding, mentoring and networking opportunities.

In the programme’s fourth year, Anna will be one of the two 2024 Wetland Restoration Stewards. To deepen the impact of her project on mitigating climate change from biodiversity hotspots, she will be offered scientific and peer guidance, training, a grant of 5,000 EUR and other resources.

Nigerian Anna Obi Akpe, a passionate and dedicated biodiversity conservator, will represent the Biodiversity Rescue Club (BRC)’s Mangrove Restoration Project (MRP), which aims to revive and reconstruct the natural structure and functioning of mangrove forests in the community of Esierebom in Calabar South Local Government Area, Cross River State, Nigeria. The project will enhance biodiversity, local livelihoods, carbon capture and water quality.

Along with Anna, six other young ecosystem restoration experts from Bolivia, Brazil, India, Kenya, the Philippines and Rwanda were selected for the one-year Restoration Stewards programme (stewards.globallandscapesforum.org) to restore drylands, forests, mountains, wetlands and oceans in 2024.

Climate change: NGGW committed to improving livelihoods of affected communities – DG

0

The National Agency for the Great Green Wall (NAGGW) has restated commitment towards improving livelihood of communities affected by desertification and land degredation occasioned by climate change.

Great Green Wall
Great Green Wall

The Director-General of the Agency, Dr Yusuf Maina-Bukar stated this at the North-East Stakeholders’ Forum on Monday in Kano.

The theme of the forum is: “Building Multi-Stakeholders Responsiveness in the Implementation of the Great Green Wall Programme in Nigeria”.

Maina-Bukar said the agency would also adopt effective measures to counter the effects of desertification, protect natural resources and secure a brighter future for generations to come.

According to him, the agency has the core mandates to combat land degradation, desertification and improve the resilience of affected communities to the impact of climate change.

Represented by Safiyanu Yabala, Director Resource Mobilisation of the agency, Maina-Bukar said that this reflected the commitment toward fostering synergy and upscaling activities within multi-level sectors and indigenous stakeholders.

“The vision of the Great Green Wall is to create a sustainable and productive landscape that not only restores degraded lands but also promotes community development, biodiversity conservation, and resilience against climate change.

“The programme is not simply an ambitious project; it is Nigeria’s response to an urgent environmental and socio-economic crisis.

“Over the last few decades, the encroachment of the desert has had a devastating impact on our communities, threatening the livelihoods of millions and exacerbating existing conflicts,” he said.

He implored indigenous stakeholders to actively participate in shaping the future of a greener environment and communities.

According to him, the voices and perspectives are of utmost importance as they seek to implement programmes that are not only effective but also responsive to the needs and aspirations of the people.

The NGGW boss said that traditional knowledge and cultural heritage were instrumental in guiding the actions toward sustainable land management and long term resilience.

“Let today’s National Stakeholders Forum be a catalyst for heightened collaboration, increased synergy, and scaling-up of activities across the eleven frontline states.

“Together, we can build a resilient and productive landscape that will benefit both current and future generations.

“I have full confidence that, by working hand in hand, we will achieve our goals and make a lasting difference in the lives of our people,” he added.

Mr Muhammad Faw, representative of Gombe State at the meeting,  said that the state governor, Inuwa Yahaya, had signed a N12 billion contract to address gully erosion, safeguard lives and preserve the environment.

The project, he said, was a step forward in the state’s collective resolve to restore the agricultural and environmental landscapes ravaged by gully erosion and environmental degradation.

Faw stressed Inuwa Yahaya dministration’s commitment to environmental sustainability through the Gombe Goes Green (3G) project.

The 3G launched in 2019, aimed at combatting desertification, deforestation, and soil erosion through annual tree planting campaign.

Also speaking, Hajiya Habiba Lau, Director Policy Planning and Coordination of the agency, said the event was critical for the agency in the life span of it’s activities across the nation.

She said the core of the Nigerian component of the GGW initiative is to reverse desertification, land degradation, and mitigate effects of climate change.

Lau urged the participants to come up with ways the agency would use to promote development at the grassroot level.

In a presentation, Prof. Nura Sani, the Deputy Vice Chencellor, Academic,Federal University, Dutse (FUD), urged the participants to explore ideas and share knowledge on how to combat desertification and land degradation to mitigate climate change.

While commending the agency for engaging the University, community and development organisations in the GGW project, Sani lauded its tree planting campaign which increases soil fertility, serves as wind break and create employment for the locals.

By Muhammad Nur Tijani

Disaster: NEMA, UNDP partner on risk reduction strategies

The National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) are to develop a national disaster risk reduction strategy and action plan to mitigate disasters.

Ahmed Habib
Director-General, National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), Mr Ahmed Habib

The Director-General of NEMA, Mr Mustapha Habib-Ahmed, made this known at the opening of a two-day workshop on disaster risk reduction strategic action plan 2023-2030 for Nigeria on Monday, December 18, 2023, in Kano.

Habib-Ahmed, represented by NEMA’s Director of Disaster Risk Reduction, Dr Daniel Obot, said that need to develop the plan arose from the assessment findings conducted by the overseas development institute.

He said the unprecedented recurring boat mishap, building collapse, urban market fires and hydro-metrological hazards which have become dominant in Nigeria’s disaster risk profile compelled them to develop the management plan.

“Management of disaster risks is anchored on Preparedness, Mitigation, Risk Reduction and Adaptation,” he said.

The workshop is themed: “Strengthening Capacities for Disaster Risk Reduction and Adaptation for Resilience in the Sahel Region: Fostering Risk-informed Solutions for Sustainable Development’’.

He said: ”The project is also within the context of multi-partnership implementation led by the UNDP in partnership with the African Union Commission (AUC) and other regional organisations.

“For us in Nigeria, the Sahel Resilience Project is expected to support the renewed hope agenda of the Federal Government especially in the areas of poverty eradication, food security and inclusivity,” Habib-Ahmed said.

Also speaking, Mr Sunday Amama, representative of UNDP for Sahel Resilience Project Nigeria, describe the workshop as apt as communities are being impacted by environmental and health hazards.

He said disaster risk management at all levels was key to building the resilience of communities and economies.

“As a signatory to the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR), Nigeria has been working diligently towards achieving its targets.

“Our collaboration with NEMA is to develop a new DRR strategy for Nigeria aligned with the African Union’s Programme and efforts to strengthen disaster preparedness response capabilities in West Africa and Sahel region to create a resilient,” he said.

He explained that there is need for organisational culture change, political commitment, motivation and financial backing as well as protect the population against current and future disaster risks.

“The new disaster risk reduction strategy will promote policy coherence related to sustainable development, poverty eradication and climate change, aligning with the sustainable development goals,” Amama said.

Also speaking, Dr Nuradden Abdullahi, NEMA Territorial Coordinator, Kano Office, said the workshop would bring positive impact to develop risk management plan.

By Ramatu Garba

COP28: Norway bolsters Africa’s climate defenses with $6.5m disaster financing pledge to AfDB

Norway has announced a financial commitment of 70 million Norwegian Krone ($6.5 million) for an African Development Bank (AfDB) Group programme to boost Africa’s resilience and responsiveness to climate shocks.

AfDB and Norway
Norway’s Minister of International Development, Anne Beathe Tvinnereim, with Dr. Beth Dunford, African Development Bank Group Vice President for Agriculture, Human and Social Development

With the pledge, Norway becomes the fifth country to join the Bank Group’s Africa Disaster Risk Financing Programme (ADRiFi) Multi-Donor Trust Fund, which bolsters sovereign drought insurance protection to mitigate the negative impacts in Africa of climate-related extremes such as cyclones, flooding and drought.

The financing commitment, over three years, was announced on the sidelines of the COP28 UN climate summit, where officials from the AfDB and the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation met in Dubai.

Norway’s Minister of International Development, Anne Beathe Tvinnereim, said: “Norway is proud of becoming a new donor to the Africa Disaster Risk Financing Programme and providing additional funding to reduce the risk of climate related disasters and make parametric insurance solutions more accessible to a greater variety of stakeholders on the African continent.”

She added that climate change has disrupted the daily lives of many Africans. Enhancing countries’ resilience and response to climate shocks by responding to early warnings, “enables mitigation of some of the devastating effects before they have occurred – securing lives, livelihoods, and economies.”

Dr. Beth Dunford, African Development Bank Group Vice President for Agriculture, Human and Social Development, said: “Growing numbers in the international community are realising that this African-led solution to Africa’s climate change-related challenges is impactful and important. Norway’s support for the ADRiFi Multi-Donor Trust Fund will help bring protection to millions of the continent’s most vulnerable coping with climate risk and enhance African countries’ ability to be more resilient to climate change.”

Other donor countries to the ADRiFi Multi-Donor Trust Fund include: the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the United States and Canada.

Under the Africa Disaster Risk Financing Programme and in collaboration with the African Risk Capacity Group, the Bank is at the forefront of promoting proactive climate risk management instruments in Africa. The Bank has invested more than $100 million and supported 15 African countries to access sovereign insurance and financial protection against climate hazards.

Since its inception in 2018, the ADRiFi programme has provided financial protection against severe droughts and tropical cyclones to more than five million people, significantly contributing to bolstering resilience in vulnerable communities.

Surge Africa launches manifesto as youths unite for climate action

0

Surge Africa has officially launched of the Youth Manifesto on Climate Change, a collective call to action from Nigerian Youths to the Nigerian government on key socioeconomic and environmental issues that must be addressed to fully tackle the growing threat of the climate crisis.

Surge Africa
Participants at the Surge Africa launch of Youth Manifesto on Climate Change on December 16, 2023

These issues are highlighted as a list of intersecting demands for key sectors outlining health, water, agriculture, urban sustainability, energy access, climate finance, waste management, and transportation as fundamental areas of action for the government to effectively address.

The launch event, held on December 16, 2023, created a platform for meaningful engagement between state and non-state actors and the adoption of the Youth Manifesto on Climate Change by key stakeholders.

Some notable endorsement of the Youth Manifesto on Climate Change comes from the Sokoto State Ministry of Environment, the Zamfara Ministry of Environment, Mines and Solid Ministry Development, the National Automotive Design and Development Council (NADDC), and the Nigerian Youth Parliament.

To create a lifeline of implementation for the Youth Manifesto on Climate Change, Surge Africa developed the Youth Climate Collective: an initiative that seeks to streamline the demands of the Youth Manifesto into actionable points to ensure that the call to action outlined in the Youth Manifesto on Climate Change are prioritised and implemented.

“The Youth Climate Collective emerges as a dynamic platform, promoting actionable steps for a sustainable future from a youth perspective. This initiative stems from the collective determination of Nigeria’s vibrant youth to address the climate crisis and its profound impact on our nation’s prosperity,” stated the group.

With Nigeria boasting one of the world’s largest youth populations, and the demography that will be most impacted by climate change, the Youth Climate Collective is said to serve as a rallying point, advocating for urgent and robust political interventions to address the existential crisis.

“Our vision is to build a network of young changemakers leading the charge on Climate Governance and Diplomacy across Nigeria and beyond the African continent. The Youth Climate Collective invites stakeholders, visionaries, and advocates from diverse backgrounds to contribute their invaluable knowledge and experiences to this pivotal gathering, shaping a sustainable future for generations to come,” added Surge Africa.

The Youth Manifesto on Climate Change can be downloaded here.

Nnimmo Bassey: COP28 and quest for climate justice

0

The foundation for voluntary emissions cut by nations was laid in the Copenhagen Accord (2009) and consolidated in the Paris Agreement (2015) under what is known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC). The voluntary mechanism essentially blunted the Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR), a cardinal justice principle of the UNFCCC.

Nnimmo Bassey
Nnimmo Bassey

Whereas in the past, rich, industrialised and polluting nations were grouped as Annex 1 nations and had binding emissions reduction requirements, under the NDCs, there are no binding obligations. Nations simply have to do what is convenient for them to do and report back on what they have done to the COP. Such submissions were made for the stocktake at COP28.

Voluntary emissions reduction can work in a situation where there is no crisis and no urgency for action. However, the world has already progressed from global warming to global heating and the prognosis for the future shows very dire situations. The evidence of the trend is presented in the various IPCC reports as well as in UNEP’s Emissions Gap Report (EGR). The EGR issued just before COP28 showed that rather than

reducing, global greenhouse emissions increased by 1.2 per cent from 2021 to 2022 to reach a new record of 57.4 Gigatonnes of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent. In addition, an aggregation of the NDCs proposed by nations showed that the world was heading for a 2.5 to 2.9C temperature increase above pre-industrial level. At that temperature level, there will be a spike in freak weather events and the overall conditions will make parts of the world uninhabitable.

The reliance on NDCs lock in inequality and injustice in the entire climate negotiation process. With this understanding, my initial conclusion is that COPs conducted on an unjust basis will continue to yield hollow outcomes that at best scratch the surface of the climate crisis.

Fossil Notice

COP28 has three significant accomplishments, but around each are bubbles of uncertainties and loopholes. The three highlights are the adoption of Loss and Damage Fund mechanism, the agreement to triple renewables, capacity and double energy efficiency by 2030, and the agreement to transition away from fossil fuels in energy. Yet, in all, the real winners are the army of fossil fuels lobbyists and the petrostates.

After kicking and screening for decades, the COP finally agreed to acknowledge that burning of fossil fuels must end. The phrase of transitioning from fossil fuels for energy was so carefully crafted it leaves an ocean-wide space for the fossil fuel industries to keep on prospecting for and extracting the resources. The restriction of the open-ended transition to renewable energy gives the industry the space to keep drilling for production of plastics, petrochemicals and diverse products. In other words, that celebrated clause does give a lifeline for the petroleum civilisation to trudge on.

Carbon Wordsmiths

The wordsmiths of the COP play with the imaginary of the world and it is time to wake up to this fact. At COP26 the phrase “phase down” instead of “phase out” was introduced. A phasing down of coal, for example, simply indicates there would be some efforts to tinker with production and consumption volumes of the hydrocarbon. It does not by any stretch suggest halting dependence of the dirty energy source. A lot of energy was spent at COP27 and COP28 to push for the “phase out” language in the outcome documents. The draft outcome document of COP28 particularly gave a number of options on how the language for “phasing out fossil fuels” could be couched.

While negotiators and politicians tried to wrap their heads around the clause, which would remain a clear ending of the fossil fuels age, the wordsmiths came out with “transitioning from fossil fuels in energy.” So, there is the phase down, phase out and then a partial transition. Strikingly, the document also highlights the continued role of transition fuels – a clear reference to fossil gas. Fossil fuels moguls must lift up glasses to that.

Carbon Speculators

Whereas there was no agreement on adopting a UN sanctioned mechanism for carbon trading, aspects of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement opened the floodgates for carbon capture and utilization and storage, carbon dioxide removals and variants of geoengineering. Carbon capture introduces the notion of pollution abatement, an interesting term.

Whilst it is clear that the best action is to stop pollution at source, the COP says keep polluting, but capture the pollution before it escapes into the environment. If it doesn’t work, all the polluter needs to do is to show that it is sucking or removing the errant carbon from the atmosphere. The cheers that accompanied the closure of the COP has always reminded some of us of the same reaction we see when bells are rung at the stock exchange. Carbon polluters anonymous unite!

The carbon market business has been a speculator’s paradise, with scant transparency or integrity. This state of play allowed carbon cowboys and dealers to trade in phantom carbon or even forests, leaving investors in limbo. With the matter now rolling over to COP29, observers now wonder if the tide of land and forest trading desks across Africa would be stemmed. In the run up to COP28 there were reports of deals aimed at selling off huge swathes of African territories to be utilised as carbon sinks.

There are reports of nations inking memoranda of understanding or agreements to cede huge segments of their territories for carbon credits. Zimbabwe has put 20% of its forests on the chopping block, Zambia and Liberia are extending 10% while Tanzania is said to offer 8 million hectares of forest. Nigeria’s Niger State offered to sell 760,000 hectares of land to Blue Carbon, a UAE carbon focused company, for afforestation programme that would see the planting of 1 billion trees.

The thing to note is that the lands or forests are not sold in perpetuity. The leases have stipulated years over which the investor would find ways of securing the carbon in the land, sea or forest. They could also engage in carbon farming through, for example, clearing the territory and then creating a tree plantation which should be seen as a colonial euphemism for monoculture cash cropping. The investor farms carbon and owns the credit accruing from there.

The investor can use the carbon to offset his polluting activity at home and can even sell off some to help others offset their polluting activities. The investor can count a carbon sink in Africa as part of their Nationally Determined Contributions actions. The country that sold its territory may not do so. A question that requires answers in this market environmentalism project is about what happens with the sequestered carbon if a new buyer steps in after the expiration of the lease over a forest or territory. Supposing the new buyer embarks on land use changes, of what value was the carbon offset business beyond being carbon fiction or trading on hot air?

Lost and Damaged

Adopting Loss and Damage on the first day of the COP was a master stroke. After years of demands for payment for loss and damage suffered by victims of climate change, this was a great moment. The slack was that the funds would be warehoused in the World Bank, an institution that has a reputation of being anything but a bank of the world. Seen as a heavy-handed neoliberal institution, the bank is loathed by citizens of nations over which it has engineered poverty despite its glossy poverty reduction papers. Aside from keeping the funds with the World Bank, a very instructive lesson was on how much funds were pledged for the fund at that first day.

Pledges came from the UAE, Germany, USA and others. The $100 million pledged by UAE was a mark of generousity that, nevertheless, blunted the justice principle that requires that those with historical responsibility for the crisis should be the first to step forward. A total of a little over $400 million was recorded on the first day and this climbed to over $700 million by the close of the COP. The highlight of the pledges was the miserly $17.3 million made by the USA.

The point this made was that the unwillingness of polluters to stop polluting and to financially support climate action including loss and damage is not due to lack of financial resources. To back this assertion, one only needs to look at how much is expended by the rich polluting nations in military action around the world. NATO, for instance, had a budget of $1.2 trillion in 2022.

Climate Justice

Having climate justice in quotes says a lot about the mindset of the nations with regard to the disproportionate climate change impact on vulnerable communities, territories and nations. The COP26 outcome document did not place climate justice in quotes but added that it was only important to some. In other words, climate justice is not something of universal concern. COP28 avoided that blatant disregard of the Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR-RC), a clear climate justice principle in the climate convention. In keeping with the general wordsmithing approach of the COPs, the principle and reality was now placed in harmless quotes.

Africa at the COP

African negotiators went to the COP loaded with the outcome of its recently held African Climate Summit. Among the key outcomes was the need for the continent to demand for sufficient finance for the needed energy transition and the operationalising of the Loss and Damage Fund.

African politicians see the continent as having limitless land and resources, including the so-called green or critical minerals, ripe for exploitation in exchange for cash. The leaders resolved to aim for green development and green industrialisation. They also agreed to develop green hydrogen and its derivatives. To a large extent, the highlights of the document may not have influenced the official negations as much as it did bilateral and directional deals.

The push by OPEC that its members should not accept a fossil phase out and, probably, no mention of fossil at all sat well with African negotiators, including Nigeria. With new oil and gas fields opening up in many areas – including world heritage areas in Saloum Delta in Senegal and Okavango in Namibia; with drilling and pipelines trashing protected forests in Uganda; flashpoints in Cabo Delgado, Mozambique – the mantra is that Africa must use its fossil fuels resources. On this, Africa’s politicians scored a point when the COP document stated that the transition from fossil fuels must be fast but also fair. This suggests that the transition will move on different gears in different regions.

Nevertheless, the point is that the fossil fuels industry has been put on notice. The days of fossil fuels are numbered. Rather than talk of decarbonising, the world will soon be speaking of depetrolising. Within the coming decades, the global north will halt the production of internal combustion engines and, sadly, Africa will become the cemetery for such automobiles. italic previous but not you so much.

Another point is that over 85% of the infrastructure on the continent are installed for exports clearly showing that they are not extracted to meet the energy needs on the people on the continent.

The need to rein in fossil fuel extraction and burning goes beyond the climate question. The point that must not be missed is that from extraction to processing and burning, fossil fuels cause havoc on people and the Planet. The oil fields in many parts of the world are veritable crime scenes. Millions of old or orphaned oil wells have been abandoned around the world and remain ticking time bombs that could blow up and cause major spills at any time.

Mining of so-called critical or green minerals is wrecking communities and biodiversity in Africa, Latin America and elsewhere. These have happened irrespective of whether the material is dirty or green. Lack of respect for people living in the territories where these resources are extracted routinely lead to a lack of consultation with the people, a lack of interest in their consent and a lack of care for the people. It is time to reach a consensus on the Rights of Nature to maintain her regenerative cycles without disruptions by humans. Indeed, the climate crisis is tied to our irresponsible relationship with Mother Earth.

Nnimmo Bassey spoke at the Nigerian Resource Justice Conference 2023 hosted by Social Action and CAPPA on December 18, 2023, in Abuja

Giving a concise account of COP28

0

The 28th Session of the Conference of the Parties (COP28) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that held in Dubai, the UAE, began on November 30, 2023, on a high note.

COP28 UAE
Opening session at COP28

During the opening plenary, parties adopted a decision operationalising the new loss and damage fund that was established the previous year in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, and a number of parties announced pledges for its initial capitalisation. This success was made possible by an agreement reached in the Transitional Committee that was tasked and met throughout 2023 to make a recommendation on the institutional arrangements for the fund.

Parties also swiftly adopted the agendas for the meeting. Pre-sessional consultations managed to secure agreement for a number of contentious issues to be addressed either in presidency consultations or under existing agenda items, rather than as stand-alone items.

Despite these initial high points, negotiations throughout the two-week meeting were difficult, especially on the central outcomes for this conference: the first Global Stocktake (GST) under the Paris Agreement, the framework for implementing the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA), the mitigation work programme, the work programme on just transition pathways, and matters related to Paris Agreement Article 2.1(c), on aligning finance flows with low-greenhouse gas (GHG) climate-resilient development.

During the second week, negotiations were largely conducted behind the scenes, with the Presidency, its appointed ministerial Co-Facilitators, and others conducting bilateral consultations on draft texts with a view to identify landing zones. Key issues of contention related to, among others, language on fossil fuel phaseout in the GST decision and references to means of implementation for the GGA.

Despite the Presidency’s intention to close the meeting on time on Tuesday, December 12, consultations continued into the early hours of Wednesday, December 13. In the early morning, draft decisions on the remaining issues were eventually posted and adopted by the closing plenary.

Parties adopted a decision on the GST that recognises the need for deep, rapid, and sustained reductions in GHG emissions in line with 1.5°C pathways. It encourages parties to ensure their next nationally determined contributions have ambitious, economy-wide emission reduction targets, covering all GHGs, sectors, and categories, and aligned with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.

Among other things, the decision also calls on parties to contribute, in a nationally-determined manner, to global efforts on:

  • tripling renewable energy capacity globally and doubling the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements by 2030;
  • accelerating efforts towards the phase down of unabated coal power;
  • accelerating efforts globally towards net zero emission energy systems, utilizing zero- and low-carbon fuels well before or by around mid-century;
  • transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, in a just, orderly, and equitable manner, accelerating action in this critical decade, so as to achieve net zero by 2050 in keeping with the science;
  • accelerating zero- and low-emission technologies, including, inter alia, renewables, nuclear, abatement and removal technologies such as carbon capture and utilization and storage, particularly in hard-to-abate sectors, and low-carbon hydrogen production;
  • accelerating and substantially reducing non-carbon-dioxide emissions globally including, in particular, methane emissions by 2030;
  • accelerating the reduction of emissions from road transport on a range of pathways, including through development of infrastructure and rapid deployment of zero and low-emission vehicles; and
  • phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that do not address energy poverty or just transitions, as soon as possible.

Closing statements showcased how difficult it was to reach the compromise on the GST. Many denounced the lack of a clear reference to fossil fuel phaseout, weak language on coal and methane, and the loopholes associated with so-called “transitional fuels,” which the decision says “can play a role in facilitating the energy transition while ensuring energy security.”

Others found the reference to these specific global efforts too prescriptive and underscored the bottom-up and nationally-determined nature of the Paris Agreement. Nevertheless, the decision is celebrated as the “beginning of the end of fossil fuels.”

Other outcomes of the conference include:

  • the adoption of the framework for the GGA established in the Paris Agreement, which aims to guide the implementation of the goal and, among other things, establishes impact, vulnerability, and risk assessment (by 2030), multi-hazard early warning systems (by 2027), climate information services for risk reduction and systematic observation (by 2027), and country-driven, gender-responsive, participatory, and transparent national adaptation plans (by 2030);
  • the designation of the consortium of the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction and the UN Office for Project Services as the host of the Santiago Network on loss and damage;
  • the launch of the implementation of the work programme on just transition pathways, with at least two hybrid dialogues to held prior to the two annual sessions of the Subsidiary Bodies;
  • the decision to continue and strengthen the dialogue to exchange views on and enhance understanding of the scope of Article 2.1(c) of the Paris Agreement (on aligning finance flows with low-GHG climate resilient development) and its complementarity with Article 9 of the Paris Agreement (on climate finance); and
  • the decision to convene an expert dialogue on mountains and climate change and an expert dialogue on the disproportionate impacts of climate change on children at the Subsidiary Bodies meetings in June 2024.

The UAE Climate Change Conference convened from November 30 to December 13, 2024, 24 hours longer than originally scheduled. The conference consisted of the 28th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the 18th meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP 18), the 5th session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement (CMA 5), and the 59th sessions of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA 59) and the Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI 59).

In total, 97,372 people were registered for on-site attendance, including 51,695 delegates from parties, 25,360 observers, 3,972 members of the media, and 16,345 support and Secretariat staff. Of the observers, 4,885 were guests of the host country, the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Another 3,074 people, including 177 delegates from parties, 2,821 observers, and 76 media representatives registered for online participation. COP28 was by far the largest UN climate change conference to date.

×