29.8 C
Lagos
Sunday, May 4, 2025
Home Blog Page 2074

Concern over IUCN red-listed cactus plant

0

Thirty-one percent of cactus species are threatened with extinction, according to the first comprehensive, global assessment of the species group by IUCN and partners, published on Monday, October 5, 2015 in the journal Nature Plants. This places cacti among the most threatened taxonomic groups assessed on The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species – more threatened than mammals and birds.

Thirty-one percent of cactus species are threatened with extinction. Photo credit: universofdeals.com
Thirty-one percent of cactus species are threatened with extinction. Photo credit: universofdeals.com

According to the report, cacti are under increasing pressure from human activity, with more than half of the world’s 1,480 cactus species used by people. The illegal trade of live plants and seeds for the horticultural industry and private collections, as well as their unsustainable harvesting are the main threats to cacti, affecting 47% of threatened species.

“These findings are disturbing,” said Inger Andersen, IUCN Director General. “They confirm that the scale of the illegal wildlife trade – including trade in plants – is much greater than we had previously thought, and that wildlife trafficking concerns many more species than the charismatic rhinos and elephants which tend to receive global attention. We must urgently step up international efforts to tackle the illegal wildlife trade and strengthen the implementation of the CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, if we want to prevent the further decline of these species.”

Other threats to cacti include smallholder livestock ranching affecting 31% of threatened species, and smallholder annual agriculture affecting 24% of threatened species. Residential and commercial development, quarrying and aquaculture – particularly shrimp farming, which expands into cacti’s habitats – are also among major threats faced by these species.

Cacti are key components of New World arid ecosystems and are critical to the survival of many animal species. They provide a source of food and water for many species including deer, woodrats, rabbits, coyotes, turkeys, quails, lizards and tortoises, all of which help with cactus seed dispersal in return. Cactus flowers provide nectar to hummingbirds and bats, as well as bees, moths and other insects, which, in turn, pollinate the plants.

Cactus species are widely used by people in the horticultural trade, as well as for food and for medicine. Their fruit and highly nutritious stems are an important food source for rural communities. The nutritional value of one cactus stem of Opuntia ficus-indica – a ‘prickly pear’ cactus popular in Mexico, where it is known as ‘nopal’ – is often compared to that of a beef steak, and the roots of species such as Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus which is listed as Near Threatened, are used as anti-inflammatories.

Trade in cactus species occurs at national and international levels and is often illegal, with 86% of threatened cacti used in horticulture taken from wild populations. European and Asian collectors are the biggest contributors to the illegal cactus trade. Specimens taken from the wild are particularly sought after due to their rarity.

“The results of this assessment come as a shock to us,” says Barbara Goettsch, lead author of the study and Co-Chair of IUCN’s Cactus and Succulent Plant Specialist Group. “We did not expect cacti to be so highly threatened and for illegal trade to be such an important driver of their decline. Their loss could have far-reaching consequences for the diversity and ecology of arid lands and for local communities dependent on wild-harvested fruit and stems.”

“This study highlights the need for better and more sustainable management of cactus populations within range countries. With the current human population growth, these plants cannot sustain such high levels of collection and habitat loss.”

The illegal trade in cacti has been reduced to a certain extent by the inclusion, since 1975, of most cactus species on CITES appendices and through the increased availability of plants grown from seed on the international market. However, the threat of collection prevails, especially in countries where the implementation of CITES has only recently been enforced.

For example, the once-abundant Echinopsis pampana, endemic to the puna desert of Peru, has been collected illegally for the ornamental plant trade at such high rates that at least 50% of the population has disappeared in the last 15 years. Its loss is irreversible as the areas that were once populated by the species have since undergone land use change for housing purposes. The species is now listed as Endangered.

Cacti are renowned for their diverse forms and beautiful flowers. They are endemic to New World arid lands except for one species, the Mistletoe Cactus (Rhipsalis baccifera), which is also found in southern Africa, Madagascar and Sri Lanka. Hotspots for threatened cactus species include arid areas of Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Uruguay. These areas are perceived as uncharismatic and unimportant, even though they are rich in biodiversity, hence arid-land species like cacti are often overlooked in conservation planning. The report’s authors highlight the need to broaden arid land protected area coverage and raise awareness about the importance of sustainable collection of cacti from the wild in order to better conserve the species.

“The startling results reflect the vital importance of funding and conducting assessments of the threatened status of all of the species in major groups of plants, such as the cacti,” says Kevin Gaston, from the University of Exeter, who co-led the Global Cactus Assessment. “Only by so doing will we gain the overall picture of what is happening to them, at a time when, as evidenced by the cacti, they may be under immense human pressures.”

Shell commences production from Bonga Phase 3 project

0

Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Ltd (SNEPCo) has announced the start-up of production from the Bonga Phase 3 project.

Shell's General Manager, External Relations, Igo Weli
Shell’s General Manager, External Relations, Igo Weli

Andrew Brown, Shell’s Upstream International Director, said: “This new start up is another important milestone for Bonga, adding valuable new production to this major facility.”

Bonga Phase 3 is an expansion of the Bonga Main development, with peak production expected to be some 50,000 barrels of oil equivalent. This will be transported through existing pipelines to the Bonga floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) facility, which has the capacity to produce more than 200,000 barrels of oil and 150 million standard cubic feet of gas a day.

The Bonga field, which began producing oil and gas in 2005, was Nigeria’s first deep-water development in depths of more than 1,000 metres. Bonga has produced over 600 million barrels of oil to date.

The Bonga project is operated by SNEPCo as contractor under a production sharing contract with the Nigerian National Petroleum Company, which holds the lease for OML 118, in which the Bonga field is located. SNEPCo holds a 55% contractor interest in OML 118. The other co-venturers are Esso Exploration & Production Nigeria Ltd (20%), Total E&P Nigeria Ltd (12.5%) and Nigerian Agip Exploration Ltd (12.5%).

Expert fears new climate draft agreement will delay decision in Paris

0

Work towards a new universal climate change agreement was  apparently strengthened on Monday, October 5, 2015 through the issuance of the first comprehensive draft of the agreement.

Co-Chairs Ahmed Djoghlaf (right) and Daniel Reifsnyder. Photo credit: www.npr.org
Co-Chairs Ahmed Djoghlaf (right) and Daniel Reifsnyder. Photo credit: www.npr.org

But experts are expressing fears that a draft agreement is not what is needed right now but a negotiating text.

The Co-Chairs of the Ad hoc working group on the Durban platform (ADP), the body tasked with negotiating the agreement, prepared the draft, which contains the basis for negotiation of the draft Paris climate package. In addition to the agreement, the package contains a draft of the decision that will operationalise the agreement from 2020 and a draft decision on pre-2020 ambition.

The documents can be found here: Agreement and decision to operationalise the agreement: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/adp2/eng/8infnot.pdf

Decision on pre-2020: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/adp2/eng/9infnot.pdf

The draft of the agreement is a concise basis for negotiations for the next negotiating session from 19-23 October 2015 in Bonn. Co-Chairs Ahmed Djoghlaf of Algeria and Daniel Reifsnyder of the United States prepared the draft in response to a request from countries to have a better basis from which to negotiate.

In a reaction, a source close to Nigeria’s Climate Change Department siad: “Going by the outcome of the last meeting in Bonn, what the world is expecting from the Co-Chairs is a negotiating text, and not a draft agreement.

“The draft is a wrong approach that will delay the decision process by about three days out of the five days we have in Paris.”

According to him, Nigeria’s INDC has been completed, and waiting for President Muhammadu Buhari’s endorsement before its official release and dispatch to the UNFCCC, which pointed out that governments are committed to reaching the new agreement at the UN Climate Change Conference to be held in Paris in December this year.

Floods wash snakes into farms, homes in states

0
The massive flooding in Plateau State has washed snakes from far distances into farms and residences in Pankshin/Kanke/Kannam Federal Constituency, according to Rep. Timothy Golu.
Along with trees and other hazards, flood waters may contain surprises such as snakes. Photo credit: tomcox.files.wordpress.com
Along with trees and other hazards, flood waters may contain surprises such as snakes. Photo credit: tomcox.files.wordpress.com

Golu, who represents the area in the House of Representatives, told the News Agency of Nigeria in Jos on Sunday that “all manner of snakes” had taken over his constituency.

He said: “The floods have pushed snakes into my constituency. They move around openly and snake bites have become very common there. As the waters pushed them, some snakes climbed trees, others entered holes, while some just held unto any straw. All of them later descended into residences and farms where they have been wreaking havoc.”
Golu said the commonest species were black mamba and carpet viper.
He said the people now travel to a snake clinic in Zamko, Langtang Local Government Area, but there were no more drugs in the facility.
“The drugs are very expensive and purchasing them had been difficult for the proprietor of the clinic because it was always difficult or outrightly impossible for the patients to pay,” he said.
Golu advised the federal and state governments to take over the production of local drugs to help the generally rural populace that had been the victims of the menace.
He said farmers were being advised to use hand gloves and rain boots at the farms to minimise the effect of such bites, but lamented that many hardly heed the counsel.
The lawmaker said some of the victims had often preferred orthodox therapy, but observed that such therapy had its side effects, with some victims succeeding and surviving, while others die.
Golu asked the Federal Government to resuscitate the production of anti-snake venom so as to ensure massive quantities that would be accessible and available to the people.
He said: “The best step will be to get the snakes’ poison from the affected areas so that the anti-snake venom will work effectively.”
Golu claimed that 26 states were at the risk of snake bites and called for concerted efforts to rid the society of the reptiles.

SAIREC: Greenpeace upbeat on Africa’s renewable energy prospects

0

The opening of the four-day South African International Renewable Energy Conference (SAIREC) offers African states an opportunity to increase their renewable energy targets and make commitments towards building decentralised energy systems, which could take millions on the continent out of poverty, according to Greenpeace International Executive Director Kumi Naidoo.

Melita Steele, Senior Climate and Energy Campaign Manager for Greenpeace Africa. Photo credit: LinkedIn
Melita Steele, Senior Climate and Energy Campaign Manager for Greenpeace Africa. Photo credit: LinkedIn

“Countries in Africa have ever-growing energy needs, and in terms of social justice, a key priority must be ensuring energy access to all of Africa’s people. The vision of achieving 100% renewable energy by 2050 is indeed possible. Africa can leapfrog dirty development, and instead invest in decentralised renewable energy solutions, putting power back into people’s hands. The African continent is ideally placed to champion a future built on clean renewable energy sources which have the potential to generate millions of the vast number of jobs needed on the continent while stimulating economic growth” said Kumi Naidoo, Greenpeace International Executive Director.

The South African International Renewable Energy Conference (SAIREC), hosted by the South African Department of Energy together with the South African National Energy Development Institute (SANEDI) – under the theme RE-energising Africa – will provide a global platform for government ministers, private sector players and civil society, to discuss and exchange their vision, experiences and solutions to accelerate the scale-up of renewable energy in Africa and globally.

“Hosting SAIREC is a key opportunity to strengthen South Africa’s commitment to renewable energy solutions. South Africa’s private renewable energy bidding programme has been praised both domestically and internationally as a world class programme. To date investment in renewable energy has expanded from next to nothing in 2011 to over R44 billion by mid-2015, and renewable energy capacity has grown to 3915MW,” said Melita Steele, Senior Climate and Energy Campaign Manager for Greenpeace Africa.

“While huge strides have been made in South Africa when it comes to creating a thriving renewable energy programme, now is not the time for complacency. Renewable energy is an immediate solution to the current electricity crisis, and in order to fully benefit, the remaining barriers to renewable energy must be removed. Greenpeace believes that the Department of Energy should use SAIREC as a platform to announce more ambitious over-arching renewable energy targets,” continued Steele.

Greenpeace calls on the South African government to recognise the staggering growth that has already begun in the private renewable energy programme, and to aim to massively expand renewable energy investments through removing the remaining barriers.

“In order to create major expansion of rooftop solar, it is time to create an enabling and stable framework, while also removing the artificial caps on investments in renewable energy. Even though the private renewable energy bidding programme has resulted in major growth of the renewable energy sector in South Africa, the bidding process is opaque, expensive, subject to extensive delays, and ad hoc incremental increases which creates uncertainty in the renewable energy sector and effectively puts a cap on renewable energy investments,” noted Steele.

“It is time that South Africa commits to a long-term goal of ensuring that 94% of South Africa’s electricity comes from renewable energy by 2050. The worst outcome from SAIREC would be that this conference becomes nothing more than another talk-shop, with no tangible positive outcomes for South Africa or the African continent,” added Steele.

South Africa becomes the sixth country, and the first in Africa, to host the International Renewable Energy Conference (IREC). Convened by the Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21), IREC is a high-level political conference series hosted by a national government.

While the Department of Energy has been consistently announcing new bidding windows for the country’s private renewable energy programme, all of the current ambitions fall well within the 17800MW of renewable energy that are aimed for by 2030 in the current IRP2010. Greenpeace believes that this target is insufficient to drive investment and growth while combating some of the worst impacts of climate change.

Why President Buhari should prioritise maternal, child health

0

The Development Communications (DevComs) Network / NOTAGAIN Campaign team insists that high maternal and child mortality rate, ineffective implementation of health policies, security threats constituted by maternal deaths, and citizens’ fundamental rights to health are major reasons why President Muhammadu Buhari must invest in maternal health in Nigeria

Muhammadu Buhari, President of Nigeria
Muhammadu Buhari, President of Nigeria

Maternal death is one of the daunting consequences of inadequate health care during pregnancies and within 42 days after termination of pregnancy. The mere fact that it can be avoided unlike some public health issues indicates that it could be reduced to the barest minimum if adequate measure is taken.

With the change in administration, leadership style and ideology that greeted Nigeria on May 29 this year, it is still unclear what the future holds for the health sector, particularly maternal and child health, under the new dispensation.

For so long, the investments of government in the health sector have been determined by so many factors, including the willingness of the leaders to prioritise health. This fact has been justified by the percentage of funds allocated to health under the past administrations. Experts have said that increasing budget allocations to health would ensure that more skilled health workers are employed, trained and adequately motivated to attend to citizens accessing their services. It is also believed that the challenges of inadequate health facilities, drugs and commodities are overcome.

Consequently, the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari would have to learn from the successes, challenges and prospect of maternal health care in Nigeria in order to improve health status of women and children.

In addition, studies have proven that high maternal and child mortality rate, ineffective implementation of health policies, security threats constituted by maternal deaths, and citizens’ fundamental rights to health are major reasons why president Buhari must invest in maternal health in Nigeria.

 

Nigeria records needless high maternal and child mortality yearly

Nigeria ranks second among countries with the highest maternal mortality rate in the world with about 40,000 deaths and 560 per 100,000 live births according to the 2014 publication of the World Health Organisation titled: “Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 – 2013“. This means that the country accounts for 14% of global maternal mortality. The chances that a 15 year-old would during pregnancy and child birth in Nigeria is one in 31 compared to Ghana (one in 66) and South Africa (one in 300) who share the same continent with the country.

Similarly, Nigeria’s under-five mortality in 2013 was 804,000 while the under-five mortality rate is 128 deaths per 1,000 live births (NDHS 2013). This also is a far cry from the under-five mortality rate of Ghana (78 per 1000 live births) and South Africa (44 per 1000 live births) according a 2014 report titled: ‘Levels & Trends in Child Mortality’ published by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality.

 

Failed promises causing Nigerians to lose confidence in health sector

The last 15 years in Nigeria has witnessed the development of several plan, policies and strategies that have not been achieved. One of such plan is the National Strategic Health Development Plan 2010-2015 (NSHDP) which was developed in the year 2010 to last till 2015, with the over-arching goal of improving the health status of Nigerians through the development of a strengthened and sustainable health care delivery system.
The national plan had targeted a maternal mortality ratio of 273 per 100, 000 live births in 2013 and 136 per 100, 000 live births in 2015, which will amount to a one-third reduction in maternal mortality ratio between 2010 and 2015. Similarly, the percentage of federal, state and local government budget allocated to the health sector was anticipated to increase from 5% in 2011 to 15% by 2015.

However, a number of the targets in the NSHDP was not met as the most recent figure given by the Nigeria Demographic and  Health Survey (NDHS) 2013 is 576 per 100, 000 live births while the government ’s spending on health has varied from 4% to 9% between 2001 and 2013. The health budget had declined from 6.07% in 2012 to 5.61% in 2013 and rose slightly to 5.67% in 2014.

The consequence of these failed promises is a weak health system which has encouraged the preference of several pregnant women and communities for antenatal care and delivery at homes, religious places and traditional birth attendants’ (TBA) places.

It will be recalled that the Federal Government and State Governments in Nigeria had committed to improve the health status of Nigerians during the Presidential Summit on Health Care held in Abuja on 10th November 2009.  The summit which was tagged “Accepting collective responsibility for improving our health in Nigeria occasioned the signing of several targets including; reducing infant mortality rate of 75/1,000 live births and under-five mortality rate of 157/1,000 live births by half by 2015, increasing budget allocations to health at the Federal, State and Local Governments from the baseline level by at least 25% each year towards achieving the Abuja Declaration target of 15%; committing to at least 90% budget release and 100% utilization by the end of the year; reducing maternal mortality ratio by a third (136/100,000 live births) from 545/100,000 live births by 2015; and many other targets which are yet to be achieved.

Maternal death constitute socio-economic losses and security threats
The loss of a mother during or after childbirth deprives a child and other children in the family of basic motherly care and moral education needed by members of a society to behave in an acceptable manner.

A recent study on the consequences of maternal morbidity and maternal mortality published by The National Academies Press indicated a relationship between maternal death and infant death as well malnutrition among children under five years of age.

Similarly, maternal mortality rate (MMR) has been found to impact negatively on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of countries in the WHO African region. In a study on “Effects of maternal mortality on gross domestic product (GDP) in the WHO African region” published in year 2006 by African Journal of Health Sciences, the maternal mortality of a single person was found to reduce per capita GDP by US$ 0.36 per year. The study demonstrated that maternal mortality has a statistically significant negative effect on GDP.

“Thus, as policy-makers strive to increase GDP through land reform programs, capital investments, export promotion and increase in educational enrolment, they should always remember that investments in maternal mortality reducing interventions promises significant economic returns.” the authors concluded.

Health care is a constitutional and human right
The chapter II (article) 17(3)(d)) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria which refers to the fundamental objectives and directive principles of state policy requires all organs of government, authorities and persons exercising legislative, executive or judicial powers to ensure adequate medical and health facilities for all persons in Nigeria.

In view of this, many experts have likened the right to health to fundamental human rights, which are said to be justiciable rights and guaranteed by the constitution of Nigeria. The United Nations in 1987 described human rights as those rights ‘which are inherent in our nature and without which we cannot function as human beings’.

The right to quality health (including maternal health) is also an important obligation of the government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria because the country has ratified international laws and instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, The Convention of the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), The Convention on the Rights of the Child, and other regional treaties like The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

Thus, most needless deaths of women and children would be avoided if the government is responsive and provides adequate and affordable maternal and child health care through sufficient, motivated and skilled health workers. This can only be achieved when the health sector is sufficiently funded according to international standards such as the 15% specified by the African Union Head of States during the Abuja Declaration of April 2001 held in Abuja.

In addition, community and religious leaders must do more in mobilizing pregnant women and mothers to attend healthcare provided by skilled health workers. There is a need for training and retraining of health care providers as most women who attend antenatal and failed to deliver in the hospital have claimed poor attitude of health workers was among the factors responsible for their actions. More importantly, there is a need for improved public-private partnership in the health sector with the aim of increasing access to maternal and health care in Nigeria.

DMO facilitates bailout for 23 states, restructures N575 billion debts

0

The Debt Management Office (DMO) has helped to facilitate bailout for 23 states of the federation by working out an arrangement under which their domestic debts were restructured for repayment over a much longer period.

DMO officials at the workshop
DMO officials at the workshop

Director General of DMO, Dr. Abraham Nwankwo, disclosed this on Friday while speaking at a workshop for online publishers organised in Lagos by the Agency. He said that DMO came up the debt restructuring proposal as its own way of assisting states facing financial crisis as a result of declining federal allocation occasioned by the sharp drop in federal revenue as a result of the plunge in the price of oil in the international market.

“We made the proposal to the Vice President, who liked it and took it to the President, who approved it and then presented to the National Economic Council, which also approved it. Twenty-three states showed interest and we have restructured their debts into 20-year Federal Government of Nigeria bonds,” Dr. Nwankwo said. He gave the total debt restructured at N575 billion, disclosing that 15 banks are involved in the exercise.

The DMO DG commended President Muhammadu Buhari for promptly taking appropriate steps to bail out financially troubled states. “Countries have problems from time to time. What matters is how fast the leadership responds to the problems. In this case, President Muhammadu Buhari has acted promptly and his government took appropriate action to restabilise the system,” Dr. Nwankwo said.

The DMO DG described debt as a necessity for development and a global phenomenon. He dismissed the notion that Nigeria has an unhealthy debt stock, saying: “Debt is not necessarily bad. That is why the USA, which is the biggest debtor in the world, is also the strongest economy. How much a state or the Federal Government owes is not the issue; what matters is debt sustainability – the size of your debt relative to your macro-economic activities.

“Nigeria’s debt is sustainable. Our debt is among the lowest in the world in terms of GDP ratio. In terms of ratio, you find that we are not doing badly, but I admit that we need to do a lot of work to put our economy in better shape.”

The workshop, which attracted online publishers from various parts of the country, educated participants on the stringent processes involved in approving loans for both the states and the Federal Government. It also dwelt on how DMO has sanitised the borrowing process since its establishment, ensuring that there has been no defaulting in debt repayment since 2007.

Apart from Dr. Nwankwo, who delivered the Keynote Address, other DMO top officials who delivered papers at the workshop included Patience Oniha, Director, Market Development; Dele Afolabi, Hannatu Suleiman, Director, Debt recording & Resettlement; Asmau Mohammed, Director, Strategic Programmes; and Head, Portfolio Management.

UNEP forum devises strategy to curb chemicals’ risks

0

An International Conference on Chemicals Management has agreed on a plan that could prevent the annual deaths of more than one million people exposed to toxic chemicals. More than 800 participants, including ministers, industry and civil society leaders, have agreed on a strategy to reduce risks from chemicals at a weeklong United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) conference.

Olga Speranskaya, Co-chair of IPEN. Photo credit: gdb.voanews.com
Olga Speranskaya, Co-chair of IPEN. Photo credit: gdb.voanews.com

Chemicals are an integral part of peoples’ lives. Yet while they are essential and beneficial, they also can be hazardous. Managing those hazards is difficult because little is known about many of them.

According to UNEP, only a fraction of the estimated 100,000 chemicals on the market have been thoroughly evaluated to determine their effects on human health and the environment.

But, enough is known to determine they can be dangerous. UNEP reports the infant death rate from environmental causes is 12 times higher in developing than in developed countries. It says childhood lead exposure contributes to about 600,000 new cases of mental disabilities in children every year.

However, delegates to an international forum addressing global and national chemical issues at the weekend re-committed to take essential actions to fulfill a goal of sound chemicals management by 2020, but allowed the only programme funding activities in the most impacted countries to expire.

The $4 trillion per year chemical industry, which participates in the conference, also failed to offer new funds to pay their fair share for the costs of chemicals management and harm. A very small global levy on the industry of 0.1% would yield more than $4 billion per year.

“ICCM4 agreed to take action on some critical toxic chemical issues,” said Olga Speranskaya, Co-chair of IPEN.

“However, a five-year funding gap will make it extremely difficult to implement them. This makes the need for funding urgent. Governments, financial institutions, intergovernmental organisations and the chemical industry must each pay their fair share,” she added.

Current issues addressed critically during the conference include highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs), information about chemicals in products (CiPs), eliminating lead paint, nanotechnology, pharmaceutical pollutants, and endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs).

A key outcome at ICCM4 was a strategy to tackle the world’s worst pesticides – those that are highly hazardous and linked to a rising incidence of cancer and developmental disorders. The decision at ICCM4 represents the first time that these substances will be addressed in a comprehensive way in a UN agreement. Delegates took a major step towards sustainable agriculture by emphasising a more holistic agroecology approach.

“In Ethiopia, highly hazardous pesticides poison farmers and pollute the land,” said Tadesse Amera, Pesticide Action Nexus. “Now we need to get to work on the new strategy so that instead of poisoning ourselves with pesticides, we grow food in a way that respects human health, our land, and our water.”

Positive actions taken by this year’s ICCM4 include:

Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs). Delegates affirmed that HHPs harm human health and the environment, particularly in developing and transition countries. ICCM4 agreed to take concerted action on HHPs with an emphasis on promoting agroecology as an alternative to HHPs and strengthening regulatory capacity.

International chemicals management beyond 2020. Delegates mandated the development of a plan for continuing international cooperation on chemicals’ management beyond 2020 when the process expires.

Information about chemicals in products. ICCM4 recommended that companies identify and disclose harmful chemicals in their products and supply chains using both national laws and criteria for chemicals of concern. Delegates recommended to start pilot participatory activities on information disclosure and signaled the need to make information disclosure equally available in developing countries.

Hazardous chemicals in electronics. Delegates called on equipment manufacturers to provide health and safety information to workers on chemicals they are handling or exposed to and to devise and implement take back programs at the end of life. ICCM4 also signalled the need for procurement initiatives that favour greener electronic products and called on the industry to make safer products.

Endocrine disrupting chemicals. Except for chemical manufacturers, the meeting participants agreed that endocrine disrupting chemicals can harm humans and wildlife and that reducing exposure should be an important focus. Delegates agreed to respond to needs identified by developing and transition countries.

Lead in paint. ICCM4 affirmed the goal to phase out lead in paint by 2020.

Nanotechnology. There was a mandate to all stakeholders to conduct awareness raising, capacity building and information sharing activities on nanotechnology; a call for sustained funding; encouragement to develop a clearinghouse mechanism; and for activities to include information about both benefits and harms.

Pharmaceutical pollutants. At ICCM4, environmentally persistent pharmaceutical substances became a special SAICM focus area with intent to increase awareness among policymakers and other stakeholders.

Leslie Adogame is Executive Director of SRADev Nigeria who represented Nigerian NGOs (a participating member of IPEN), an international network of more than 700 organisations that fight toxic chemicals and works with people who suffer from contamination from farm pesticides, mercury hotspots, lead poisoning and other toxic products.

“For us in Nigeria (perhaps Africans), we are happy we got relatively most of all we wanted in the deal and pleased with the outcomes of this political conference (despite the poor funding commitment) because the delegates adopted among others concrete risk reduction activities hazardous pesticides use, elimination of lead in paints, (as you know lead is continuously added to Nigerian paints), and chemicals added to products, which if implemented, will result in the reduction of toxic exposure on human health and the environment,” said Adogame.

“We now return home to push our government towards fulfilling this obligations and her recent statements of commitments to sustainable development goals (SDGs) beyond leap service. Prejudicial funding and national budgeting of the chemicals sector is key just as the immediate mainstreaming of chemicals management into national developmental agenda is very imperative for the plan for action,” he added.

‘Nigeria now has a legal biosafety basis to operate’

1

Rufus Ebegba, Director-General and CEO of the the National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA), stresses that the recently passed Biosafety Act not only ensures biosafety in the country, but is a safety valve for harnessing the potentials of modern biotechnology safely

Rufus Ebegba, Director-General and CEO of the the National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA). Photo credit: climatereporters.com
Rufus Ebegba, Director-General and CEO of the the National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA). Photo credit: climatereporters.com

The development of a national biosafety regulatory framework for Nigeria dates back to 1994 when the first National Biosafety Guidelines were developed and the subsequent finalisation of a National Biosafety Management Act 2015. The process of the development of the Act followed a systematic public involvement from 2002 to 2015.

The National Biosafety Management Agency Act, established the National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA), was charged with the responsibility for providing regulatory framework, institutional and administrative mechanism for safety measures in the application of modern bio-technology and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nigeria. The Act is in conformity with established national and International laws, procedures and rules that govern the safe adoption of the modern biotechnology practice and the safe use of GMOs globally. The NBMA Act is the only safety valve in the adoption of modern biotechnology and the deployment and use of GMOs for Nigeria’s national economic development.

In view of the responsibility of the agency, and the immerse responsibility ahead for knowledge based regulatory regime a need to expand biosafety information through the media will give room for factual reporting and build public confidence in adoption of safe GMOs and encourage scientist and others within the sector.

The National Biosafety Management Act 2015 prescribes procedures for the application of the modern technology, risk assessment before the adoption and use of any genetically modified organisms and penalties for contravening the Biosafety Act. The Biosafety Act is therefore a safety valve for harnessing the potentials of modern biotechnology safely

The Act seeks to:

  • provide derived benefits from modern biotechnology under a legal framework for economic growth, improved agriculture, job and wealth creation, industry growth and sustainable environment,
  • minimise risks to human health.
  • confirm and harness the potentials of modern biotechnology,
  • protect and guard against any adverse effect of GMOs on biological Diversity and the environment.
  • guard against any socio-economic consequences.
  • give confidence in the practice of modern biotechnology, use and handling of GMOs and GM products ,.
  • reaffirm Nigeria’s commitment to the principles of International agreements, treaties (CBD and in particular the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB).
  • determine in advance when hazards to human health and natural systems will result if any particular GMO is released into the environment amongst others.
  • proper regulation of imported GM products, so Nigeria will not be a dumping ground.

The National Biosafety Management Agency implements the Act in the safe adoption of modern biotechnology, the deployment and the safe use of products of modern biotechnology for national economic development.

The objectives of the Agency include the following:

  • establishment and strengthening of the institutional arrangement on Biosafety matters in Nigeria;
  • safe guarding human health, biodiversity and the environment from any potential adverse effect of genetically modified organism including food safety;
  • ensuring safety in the use of modern biotechnology and provide holistic approach to the regulation of genetically modified organisms;
  • provision of measures for the case by case assessment of genetically modified organisms and management of risk in order to ensure safety in the use of genetically modified organisms to human health and the environment;
  • provision of measures for effective public participation, public awareness and access to information in the use and application of modern biotechnology and genetically modified organisms; and
  • ensuring that the use of genetically modified organisms does not have adverse impact on socio-economic and cultural interest either at the community or national level.

The National Biosafety Management Agency has the capacity to give Nigeria the desired holistic Biosafety in a transparent manner, so that the nation can benefit from modern biotechnology maximally without compromising safety to the environment and human health. It has developed various regulatory instruments as well as the establishment of biosafety laboratory for the detection and analysis of genetically modified organisms for effective biosafety management in Nigeria.

The absence of a Biosafety Law in the past greatly hampered safe research and development in modern biotechnology in Nigeria. The Biosafety Act has therefore opened the avenue for our research institutes to carry out their statutory functions under a legal biosafety regime. Nigerian modern biotechnology industry in general now also has a legal biosafety basis to operate.

The Agency is adequately positioned to manage biosafety in Nigeria. The staff of the Agency are well trained on biosafety regulation, some up to Masters level from foreign universities and short biosafety courses.

The Agency currently has the following regulatory instruments in place as part of Nigeria’s Biosafety Preparedness :

  • Biosafety Policy;
  • Biosafety Act;
  • Biosafety Guidelines;
  • Nigeria Biosafety Application Administration Guidelines
  • Biosafety application forms;
  • Biosafety Containment Facilities Guidelines;
  • Accreditation of Institute application form;
  • certification of Biosafety containment Facility form,
  • Confined Field Trial Monitoring and Inspection Manual,
  • GMOs import/shipment form,
  • National Biosafety Risk Analysis Framework,
  • Decision document.
  • National Biosafety Communication strategy
  • National Biosafety Emergency Response strategy
  • National Laboratory for GMO detection and analysis
  • Cessation Order ,
  • Revocation Order,
  • Draft Biosafety regulations developed in anticipation of a biosafety Act:
  1. GMOs import, Export and transit,
  2. GMOs Packaging, identification and transport,
  3. GMOs Commercial release,
  4. Biosafety Liability and Redress,
  5. GMOs Contained Use and Confined Field trial

The following decisions have been taken so far on biosafety approvals in Nigeria:

  1. Accreditation of the following Institutes for modern biotechnology activities:
  • National Root Crops Research Institute, (NRCRI) Umudike;
  • Institute for Agricultural Research, (IAR) Zaria;
  • Federal University of Technology, (FUTA) Akure;
  • National Cereals Research Institute Badeggi
  • National Biotechnology Development Agency
  1. Approved Confined Field Trials in Nigeria:
  • Bio-fortified cassava enhanced with pro-vitamin A, (concluded) – at National Root Crops Research Institute, Umudike
  • Bio-fortified cassava enhanced with Iron, (concluded) – at National Root Crops Research Institute, Umudike
  • Cowpea modified for resistance against Maruca insect pest currently at multi-locational level – at IAR,
  • African Biofortified Sorghum: bioavailability of iron, zinc, protein and pro- Vitamin A(on going) – at IAR
  • GM rice modified for Nitrogen use efficiency, water use efficiency and salt tolerance (Yet to Commence) -at National Cereals Research Institute, Badeggi

GM Cassava resistant to cassava mosaic virus and brown streak virus(Yet to Commence) – at National Root Crops Research Institute, Umudike.

Nigeria has now joined the league of the following African States with National Biosafety laws and Biosafety: South Africa, Egypt, Kenya, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Sudan, Mali, Cameroun and Tanzania.

I wish to use this medium to request operators dealing in modern biotechnology activities and genetically modified organisms to formalise their dealings with National Biosafety Management Agency on or before 30th of December 2015 as there are consequences for default. The Agency does not doubt the existence of GMOs suspects in Nigeria since Nigeria imports food products from counties where GMOs are being produced and consumed,

The public should trust the Agency’s decisions and avoid being misled by unscientific information and acts capable of causing misinformation, public distrust and panic. The Agency would partner with all relevant sister Agencies in the discharge of its functions.

India promises 33-35% emissions intensity drop by 2030

0

In its submission to the UNFCCC a few weeks before the Paris climate summit, India also promises to generate 40% of its electricity from renewable sources

Prakash Javadekar, India’s Minister for Environment, Forests and Climate Change, speaks at a recent New Delhi conference on INDC. Photo credit: Council on Energy, Environment and Water
Prakash Javadekar, India’s Minister for Environment, Forests and Climate Change, speaks at a recent New Delhi conference on INDC. Photo credit: Council on Energy, Environment and Water

India’s much-awaited Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC) to the global combat against climate change promises the country will reduce the intensity of its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per unit of GDP by 33-35% by 2030, compared to 2005.

India – the world’s third highest GHG emitter but way down the list on per capita emissions – has promised to generate 40% of its electricity from “non-fossil fuel based energy resources by 2030 with the help of transfer of technology and low cost international finance including from Green Climate Fund (GCF)”.

The 40% includes hydropower and nuclear power. India already has a target of generating 175 GW through solar and wind power by 2022. The government now plans to float infrastructure bonds to the tune of US$794 million, particularly for renewable energy projects. India’s electricity demand of 776 terawatt hours in 2012 is estimated to increase to 2,499 TWH by 2030.

Submitting its INDC almost literally at the last hour of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) deadline, the Indian government also promised “to create an additional carbon sink of 2.5 to 3 billion tonnes of CO2 (carbon dioxide) equivalent through additional forest and tree cover by 2030”.

The approximate cost of India’s climate action in mitigating GHG emissions and adapting to climate change effects is estimated at US$ 2.5 trillion.

Addressing the media nearly 11 hours after the government had submitted the INDC, Prakash Javadekar, India’s Minister for Environment, Forests and Climate Change, said a 35% reduction in emissions intensity by 2030 was a “75% jump in ambition over 2020 targets. We have increased the target of non-fossil fuel based energy capacity to 40%, which is a jump of 50%. This is a huge jump.”

By carrying out the activities promised in its INDC, “India will save carbon emissions to the tune of 3.95 million tons,” Javadekar added.

By and large, independent analysts were supportive of the INDC, but they had some questions. Talking about the emissions intensity reduction target, Siddharth Pathak of Climate Action Network pointed out, “It is not clear whether these are carbon emissions or GHG emissions. In China’s INDC they clearly state that it is carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP.” Carbon dioxide is the most significant GHG, but there are others, including methane, water vapour and some refrigerant gases.

Sandeep Chachra, Executive Director of ActionAid India, said, “Despite huge developmental challenges, India has put forward a climate action plan that is far superior to ones proposed by the US and EU. Its ambitious focus on energy efficiency and dramatic increase in renewable energy deserves credit but must lead to enhanced energy access for the poor. This clearly puts the onus on developed countries to meet their obligations of providing public finance and technology transfer to developing and least developed countries.”

Sanjay Vashist, Director, Climate Action Network (CANSA), said, “India, through its announced INDC, demonstrates its willingness to play an important role on the international stage ahead of the climate talks in December in Paris.  India’s signal could no doubt be much stronger – going even further to help the international community avoid unmanageable climate impacts – should the rich and developed countries step up and provide adequate finance and technology support.”

Harjeet Singh, Climate Policy Manager at ActionAid International, said “The devastating extreme weather events in the last few years have pushed India to recognise its vulnerability and prioritise adaptation to the impacts of climate change. In its climate action plan, India shared how its expenditure on programmes with critical adaptation components has increased from 1.45% of GDP in 2000-01 to 2.82% during 2009-10. It is now focusing on several climate sensitive sectors such as agriculture, water management, health and protecting biodiversity.”

Javadekar also asked developed countries to “at least walk the talk on $100 billion GCF considering that funds required to combat climate change run in trillions.” In 2009, rich nations had promised that by 2020 they would ramp up their climate financing to $100 billion per year, but the GCF has just a little over $10 billion in its kitty now.

Governments from many rich countries have said there was no way they could mobilise so much money. Reacting to that, Javadekar referred to a Columbia University study which said this money could be raised by levying a cess of $4 per tonne of coal. “That is a one-stop solution. We are doing it but they haven’t done it.” India levies a coal cess of Rs 200 (over $3) per tonne.

As for India’s main promise, some international analysts referred to a number of recent studies that recommended an emissions intensity reduction target of 35-50%. They said the declared target of 33-35% was definitely achievable and India may well surpass it.

In 2009, India had promised to reduce its emissions intensity per unit of GDP by 20-25% by 2020 from 2005 levels. Now its INDC says the country has achieved a 12% reduction from 2005 to 2010.

India’s 2008 National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) had eight missions to deal with climate change and its effects. Its INDC now confirms what the Narendra Modi has been saying for some time – four missions or programmes will be added. These are for wind energy, health, waste to energy, and coastal areas. The INDC says the government is also redesigning the National Water Mission and the National Mission on Sustainable Agriculture. However, it does not contain any detail on any of the new missions.

 

Adaptation

As expected, the INDC submitted shortly after midnight local time on Mahatma Gandhi’s birth anniversary – October 2 – placed a lot of emphasis on adaptation to climate change effects. India said it would enhance investments “in sectors vulnerable to climate change, particularly agriculture, water resources, Himalayan region, coastal regions, health and disaster management”.

India is setting up a National Adaptation Fund with US$ 55.6 million of capital. It is also setting up a National Disaster Relief fund.

The INDCs – to be submitted by all countries – will form the bedrock of a global agreement to fight climate change. The agreement is expected to be signed at the Paris summit this December. By the morning of October 2, 120 of the 194 member countries of the UNFCCC had submitted their INDCs, and the number was changing almost by the hour. An independent analysis showed that INDCs submitted by October 1 – and this included most major emitters – may be able to limit average global temperature rise to 2.7 degrees Celsius by 2100, above the two-degree limit agreed by all governments in 2010.

 

Wanted: money and technology

India’s INDC raises a prickly issue still unresolved on the road to Paris – the extent to which rich nations will help others to reduce their emissions and to handle climate change effects. It says the government wants “to mobilize domestic and new and additional funds from developed countries to implement the above mitigation and adaptation actions in view of the resource required and the resource gap”.

Throwing its weight behind a strong deal in Paris, the government has said, “The successful implementation of INDC is contingent upon an ambitious global agreement including additional means of implementation to be provided by developed country parties, technology transfer and capacity building.”

These “means of implementation” are going to be very costly. “Preliminary estimates indicate that India would need around US$206 billion (at 2014-15 prices) between 2015 and 2030 for implementing adaptation actions in agriculture, forestry, fisheries infrastructure, water resources and ecosystems,” the INDC reads.

“Apart from this there will be additional investments needed for strengthening resilience and disaster management. An Asian Development Bank study on assessing the costs of climate change adaptation in South Asia indicates that approximate adaptation cost for India in energy sector alone would roughly be about US$ 7.7 billion in 2030s. The report also projects the economic damage and losses in India from climate change to be around 1.8% of its GDP annually by 2050.”

“Mitigation requirements are even more enormous. Estimates by NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India) indicate that the mitigation activities for moderate low carbon development would cost around US$ 834 billion till 2030 at 2011 prices.” NITI Aayog is the successor to India’s Planning Commission.

The government has not yet finalised how much climate money India will need from rich nations. According to the INDC, “A preliminary estimate suggests that at least $2.5 trillion (at 2014-15 prices) will be required for meeting India’s climate change actions between now and 2030.”

As for the other big issue dividing developed and developing countries, India has reiterated its demand for transfer of clean technologies “free of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) costs to developing countries. IPR costs can also be borne from the GCF through a separate window.”

 

The steps

India’s INDC lists the steps it will enhance and its new initiatives:

  • Introducing new, more efficient and cleaner technologies in thermal power generation.
  • Promoting renewable energy generation and increasing the share of alternative fuels in overall fuel mix.
  • Reducing emissions from transportation sector.
  • Promoting energy efficiency in the economy, notably in industry, transportation, buildings and appliances.
  • Reducing emissions from waste.
  • Developing climate resilient infrastructure.
  • Full implementation of Green India Mission and other programmes of afforestation.
  • Planning and implementation of actions to enhance climate resilience and reduce vulnerability to climate change.

These are apart from the new missions under the NAPCC.

Officials had earlier hinted that India may submit two INDC figures – one based on what it could do on its own, and the other what it could do if it received all the help it wanted from developed countries. The INDC that has been submitted does not follow that pattern, but makes it very clear that India wants substantial help from rich nations.

By Joydeep Gupta (thethirdpole.net)

×