30.3 C
Lagos
Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Home Blog Page 2036

Livelihoods, forests at risk if land rights are ignored, says report

0

Indigenous Peoples and local communities protect half the world’s land, but formally own just 10 percent, according to a report released today by a global alliance of NGOs.

Mike Taylor, the International Land Coalition (ILC) Director
Mike Taylor, the International Land Coalition (ILC) Director

The Global Call to Action on Indigenous and Community Land Rights, backed by more than 300 organisations all over the world, was on Wednesday launched with the publication of a new report.

Entitled “Common Ground: Securing Land Rights and Safeguarding the Earth,” the report represents a manifesto of solidarity with the ongoing struggles of indigenous peoples and local communities seeking to secure their land rights. The launch also marks the official start of the Land Rights Now campaign, calling for the amount of land these communities own to double by 2020.

Mike Taylor, the International Land Coalition (ILC) Director, said: “Billions of people around the world depend on their land to live; if we do not fight to secure this essential human right, we are turning our backs on them, their cultures, and the environment. The lives of those who depend on community-owned land for their homes and livelihoods are at stake.”

With livelihood security in decline for many forest dependent communities and peoples, the need to ensure full legal and practical protections for customary rights to land, territory and forest resources is increasingly urgent. The launch of the Land Rights Now campaign will help to draw international attention to the many rights-based approaches to curbing deforestation advocated by forest peoples themselves.

The report and the Land Rights Now campaign highlight the experiences of people who depend on land and forests for their livelihoods as well as their cultural identity.

Nicholas Fredericks, a spokesman for the Wapichan people of Guyana, where lands are under threat, said: “These forests are our life, but they are being taken from us. Outsiders have a financial view of the land. They see it as money. We see it as life. We have to win… for the future of our people.”

Winnie Byanyima, Executive Director of Oxfam International, said: “Oxfam is standing with the 2.5 billion people around the world who rely on community lands – for their livelihoods, security and cultural identity. We are calling for indigenous and community land rights to be secured once and for all: this struggle is as much about fighting poverty as it is about tackling injustice and inequality; and advancing women’s rights.”

The importance of land rights is underscored in two major recent international agreements, the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement on climate change. Addressing the unique needs of the world’s 2.5 billion Indigenous Peoples and local communities is crucial to fulfilling the aspiration of the SDGs to “leave no one behind.”

To mark the launch of the Global Call to Action, Forest Peoples Programme is supporting events taking place around the world, including Guyana, Kenya, Suriname, Peru and Liberia.

UNEP lifts wildlife trade embargo on Nigeria

0

As Nigeria joins the rest of the world in marking the 2016 World Wildlife Day, Minister of Environment, Amina Mohammed, has disclosed that the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has lifted the suspension on trade between Nigeria and other countries in all endangered plants and animal species as well as related products.

Nigeria's Environment Minister, Mrs Amina Mohammed. Photo credit: i.vimeocdn.com
Nigeria’s Environment Minister, Mrs Amina Mohammed. Photo credit: i.vimeocdn.com

The Minister has also asked Nigerians to do everything within the ambit of the law to protect the country’s wildlife, emphasising that the nation stands the risk of losing economic and social opportunities which wildlife presents to the economy in particular and the ecosystem in general.

Giving the charge in a press statement released in Abuja on the occasion of the 2016 World Wildlife Day, the Minister stated: “Endangering wild life threatens our personal wellbeing, the livelihood of local communities and our natural heritage. Wildlife forms a significant part of our biodiversity and plays a unique role as an indicator of ecological change. Without wildlife, we will lose the opportunity of economic and social value which wildlife brings to our ecosystem.”

World Wildlife Day is celebrated every 3rd of March as established by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on the 20th of December, 2013 at its 68th session. The day is set aside for all nations of the world to focus on the critical importance of protecting the fauna and flora (plants and animals) which are the world’s essential and natural heritage for the present and future generations. The day offers an opportunity to re-affirm the world’s commitments to the protection and preservation of wildlife, says the UNGA.

The theme for this year’s World Wild Life Day is “The future of wildlife is in our hands”, apparently implying a clarion call to all and sundry that protecting and conserving wild life throughout the world should be an individual and collective responsibility.

“We all have a role to play in the conservation and survival of our wildlife resources throughout the country,” said Mohammed.

Wildlife exploitation, illicit trade and habitat fragmentation are the key threats to biodiversity as they concern thousands of plants and animals’ species and can lead to extinction if not properly addressed, according to scientists. Hence, the UNGA resolution designated the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) of Wild Fauna and Flora secretariat as an instrument for monitoring illegal trade in wildlife species. CITES is also the facilitator for the global observance of the special day for wildlife.

In Nigeria, the Ministry is the focal point of implementation and has domesticated the convention, “the Endangered Species Act” to conserve wild species that are almost driven into extinction due to over exploitation, habitat change and illicit trafficking; such as cheetahs, lions, tigers, leopard, gorilla, manatee and high value timbers such as ebony and mahogany.

“We also need to protect many animals that are currently facing threats, such as elephants which are highly sourced for their ivory; pangolins for their scales; crocodiles for their skin and parrots as pets,” said the minister.

Ben Bem Goong, the Ministry’s spokesperson, submitted in a statement: “The Ministry of Environment under the leadership of Amina Mohammed and Ibrahim Usman Jibril (Minister of State) remains committed to saving our fragile wildlife from extinction and empowering communities whose livelihoods depends on wildlife resources. The Minister therefore urges every Nigerian to think of the future generation with a change of attitude towards wildlife exploitation and Conservation of the ecosystem.”

Nigeria was suspended from international trade in endangered species in March 2015 following its inability to submit an adequate National Ivory Action Plan (NIAP) in accordance with the provisions of CITES.

Peruvian community flays state oil firm over devastating spill

0

On the 18th February 2016 the autonomous territorial government of the indigenous Wampis people (Wampis GTA) submitted a formal complaint to Peru’s regulatory body for the environment (OEFA) accusing the state oil company (Petroperú) of gross negligence for its failure to prevent and contain the oil spill in the Wampis community of Mayuriaga. As a preventative measure the Wampis GTA demand that the pumping of oil along a branch of the pipeline is suspended.

Oil spill site in Mayoriaga
Oil spill site in Mayuriaga

The spill which, according to OEFA reports, occurred on the 3rd of February 2016 affected an area of 400m2 of land immediately adjacent to the pipeline before flowing into the Cashacaño river which itself flows into the river Morona. The reports document contamination along the length and both banks of the Cashacaño river to its confluence with the River Morona from where the spill extended a further 1.5 hours travel downriver (see reports (Spanish only) referred to in Resolución Directoral 012-2016-OEFA/DS of 15th February 2016).

OEFA’s final resolution which also referred to another spill on the river Chiriaco from the same pipeline on the 25th January highlights that “the affected bodies of water and soil support the subsistence livelihood of the native communities and surrounding populations” and that “for this reason both incidents represent a high risk of adverse impact, not only to the Inayo and Cashacaño tributaries and to the Chiraco and Morona rivers but also to the lives and health of those people who live in areas adjacent to these spills”.

In its report OEFA clearly establishes that the cause of these spills “both of which are from the Northern Peruvian pipeline operated by Petroperú… are the result of deterioration of the pipeline… due to failures caused by external corrosion which makes evident that Petroperú is not adopting the necessary measures to prevent spills that have environmental impacts”. OEFA’s damning conclusion is that these spills are “not isolated cases” and have documented 20 failures since April 2011 when OEFA assumed its operations.

The Wampis’ formal complaint to OEFA, which was submitted with the legal and human rights organisation, IDL (Institute of Legal Defence), demands that the regulatory body issue sanctions against Petroperú, provides effective oversight of a robust plan for control and remediation of the spill and ensures that Petroperú provide adequate alternative sources of food and water for affected communities.

Finally, given the shortcomings and incapacity of Petroperú to maintain its own pipeline the Wampis GTA demand the immediate suspension of pumping along the Northern branch of the pipeline as the “only effective measure that could prevent irreparable harm to the environment and harm to the health of neighbouring populations along the Northern Peruvian oil pipeline.”

Wrays Perez Ramirez, recently elected Pamuk or President of the Wampis GTA said: “This oil spill has already resulted in severe and irreparable harm to the community lands of Mayuriaga and to our collective territory as a people. Responsibility lies squarely with Petroperú who have acted with complete negligence. Over more than 40 years they have failed to maintain and repair their pipeline knowing full well that it needs constant maintenance and replacement every 10-15 years.

“We, the Wampis, never authorised or gave our consent to the construction of this pipeline in our territory yet we suffer the consequences. This is another example of where we have lost control over our territory which has been subdivided by the State into different village lands or issued as concessions to different companies. It is exactly this kind of problem that our territorial government is trying to address.”

The recently formed Wampis government which was elected by Wampis villages in November 2015 to assume jurisdiction over 1.4 million hectares of their customary land will bring together its almost 100 delegates (Irunin) representing its constituent communities to a summit meeting in the village of Soledad on the river Santiago from the 13th – 19th March 2016.

The Irunin are proposing several measures to address the situation which includes two planned legal resolutions. The first declares the affected area to be in a state of environmental and health emergency while the second annuls all those concessions, infrastructure projects and other state backed initiatives in their territory that have failed to comply with legal requirements to consult with the Wampis and secure their Free, Prior and Informed Consent.

These measures, which form part of the Wampis’ pioneering efforts to safeguard their ancestral lands, will be announced to coincide with the Global Call to Action on Indigenous and Community Land Rights which was launched today by an international coalition and is backed by more than 300 organisations all over the world.

Pollution: Shell reacts as fresh international legal actions are launched

0

Two Nigerian Niger Delta communities are suing oil big-wig Shell and asking for compensation for oil spills on their land. It is the second in five years that Shell will be sued to court.

shell
A polluted river in the Niger Delta region

One of the two communities involved is the Ogale community with a population of 40,000. In an area where most people derive their livelihood from fishing, oil spills have deprived the people of their livelihood as well as clean water.

The Bille community is the other party to the case and they claim that Shell should be held liable for the spills caused by the vandalisation of pipelines primarily because Shell did not properly secure its pipelines.

The law firm Leigh Day is handling the case to determine if the claimants can indeed institute proceedings against Shell.

A report by the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) in 2011 suggested a clean up after it was discovered that the water in both communities were contaminated with oil by products. Despite the recommendation and subsequent agreement by Shell, there have been no efforts to clean up the area.

Leigh Day said in a statement, “It is scandalous that four years after the UNEP Report, Shell is yet to clean up its oil in either Ogale or Bille. Our client’s patience has now run out and we intend to force Shell to act since it is clear they have no intention of doing so on their own.”

A spokesperson for the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria (SPDC), Olugbenga Odugbesan, said in a statement: “We are at an early stage of reviewing the claims made by the Bille and Ogale communities.  Both Bille and Ogale are areas heavily impacted by crude oil theft, pipeline sabotage and illegal refining which remain the main sources of pollution across the Niger Delta.  Ogale is in Ogoniland and it is important to note that SPDC has produced no oil or gas in Ogoniland since 1993.  Access to the area has been limited following a rise in violence, threats to staff and attacks on facilities.

“The Bille and Ogale communities have chosen to bring these claims in the UK instead of in Nigeria, whose laws govern our operations.  It is our intention to contest the jurisdiction of the English court over these claims.  We believe that allegations concerning Nigerian plaintiffs in dispute with a Nigerian company, over issues which took place within Nigeria, should be heard in Nigeria.”

“Furthermore, Ogoniland is the area covered by the United Nations Environment Programme’s Environmental Assessment (‘the UNEP report’) of 2011. UNEP presented its recommendations as an opportunity to bring a culture of multi-stakeholder cooperation to Ogoniland, a process in which SPDC has been involved.  SPDC has also initiated action to address all the recommendations directed to it in the UNEP report as operator of the SPDC Joint Venture.  In mid-2015 SPDC JV, along with the government, UNEP and representatives of the Ogoni community, agreed to an 18-month roadmap to fast-track the environmental clean-up and remediation of Ogoniland which includes a governance framework.

“These steps have been widely lauded across civil society in Nigeria and have been welcomed by members of the Ogoni community itself. Asking the English court to intervene and order remediation activity covering the same ground as the UNEP implementation plan is a direct challenge to the internal political acts and decisions of the Nigerian State, and its sovereign right to determine, within its own territory, the appropriate future path for the Ogoni community.”

Photos: Ségolène Royal visits Côte d’Ivoire

0

Newly appointed President of COP21, Ségolène Royal, last week paid a courtesy visit to the West African French-speaking nation of Côte d’Ivoire.

Royal, who recently replaced Laurent Fabius, the French Minister of Environment, Energy and Marine, was in the Ivorian capital, Abidjan, for several days, apparently to gather the support of President Ouattara Alasane towards the realisation of Africa’s transition to renewable energy, two months ahead of the planned formal signing of the Paris Agreement in New York.

Besides being hosted at the Presidential Palace, she convened a panel discussion at the French Embassy in Cocody and visited some noteworthy places.

Ms. Royal with President Ouattara Alasane
Ms. Royal with President Ouattara Alasane
Royal with senior government officials
Royal with senior government officials
During a trip to the Abidjan Banco National Park
During a trip to the Abidjan Banco National Park
On a tour with government officials
On a tour with government officials
With Ivorian Environment Minister, Rémi Allah-Kouadio
With Ivorian Environment Minister, Rémi Allah-Kouadio

Fiji begins post-Cyclone Winston cleanup amid call for climate action

0

A massive clean-up operation has begun on the Pacific Island of Fiji after a powerful cyclone.

Cyclone Winston hit the island last week, with winds of over 200 miles per hour, torrential rain, and waves of up to 12 metres. Many homes were destroyed, several people died and electricity lines were cut.

It’s the first time that Fiji has been hit by a Category 5 storm – the strongest kind of storm found on earth.

Fiji is the first nation to ratify the Paris Agreement.

Indeed, Tropical Cyclone Winston became the strongest tropical cyclone ever recorded in the Southern Hemisphere, wreaking havoc in Tonga and growing into an unpredictable and severe Category 5 system, leaving a trail of destruction across Fiji.

In the wake of the devastating cyclone 350.org Pacific is urging global climate action.

“The relationship between climate change and more severe tropical storms is well understood, and extreme weather events like Cyclone Winston are a timely reminder as to what is on the line,” pointed out Koreti Tiumalu, 350.org Pacific Region Coordinator.

“Every year, people in the Pacific Islands are finding ourselves at the forefront of climate impacts. As the world continues to experience the escalation in the force of natural disasters, it’s imperative now more than ever, that all countries also escalate their efforts to keep climate changing fossil fuels in the ground in order to change the outlook of those who have done the least to create climate change but are experiencing firsthand its worst impacts,” Timalu added.

London to host global investors at 18th Africa Energy Forum

0

The Africa Energy Forum is the global investment meeting for Africa’s power, energy, infrastructure & industrial sectors, expected to welcome 1,000 investors, 500 public sector stakeholders, 300 technology providers, 270 developers and 70 countries in June later this year.

water-scarcity
London, the capital of England, is hosting the forum for the first time. Photo credit: visitlondon.com

This year sees the Forum hosted in London for the first time – at the new London Intercontinental O2 overlooking the skyscrapers of the Canary Wharf and the River Thames. The decision to move the Forum to the UK this year was taken to capitalise on the investment potential of the United Kingdom and promote the strong trade relationship between the UK and Africa.

Shiddika Mohamed, Group Director, commented, “We are very excited to bring AEF to London. The theme of the Forum this year is ‘Mergers and Acquisitions’, so being in London, the world’s finance capital, will enable Africa’s growing number of power developers to showcase their businesses to decision makers of the world’s most prolific investment organisations from around the globe.”

Organisers EnergyNet will host a typically English opening night pub quiz party on the evening of 21st June featuring some legendary British culture and food, allowing participants to network in a fun, laid back environment before the formal opening on the 22nd.

New for this year will be the Growing Economies Energy Forum (GEEF), running alongside the Africa Energy Forum. GEEF will host a day of open discussions between the governments and private sector from new energy markets such as Iran, Pakistan, Myanmar and Peru, as these growing economies open up for international investment following political and economic developments.

The EnergyNet Student Engagement Initiative will once again bring 50 talented African students to the Forum from relevant disciplines to build relationships with industry leaders in the power sector.

The conference and exhibition will see the return of a mobile networking app to assist delegates with networking. 70% of attendees used the app in June 2015, with 1,900 messages exchanged and nearly 200 meetings arranged.

Water experts call for partnerships in tackling challenges

0

Water experts from different countries across the globe are rooting for the partnership approach in solving problems related to the vital resource.

Anders Berntell, the 2030 WRG Executive Director
Anders Berntell, the 2030 WRG Executive Director

The call comes as the water professional and authorities from Bangladesh, India, Kenya, Mexico, Mongolia, Peru, Tanzania meet in South Africa for a week-long knowledge exchange organised by the 2030 Water Resource Group (2030 WRG), a global public-private-civil society partnership based in Washington USA in collaboration with Stockholm International Water Institute and the Water and Sanitation Department of South Africa.

Addressing the close to 100 participants at Sheraton Pretoria Hotel, Anders Berntell, the 2030 WRG Executive Director stressed that partnerships based on collaboration and teamwork would provide more consistent, co-ordinated and comprehensive solution to the water resource problems.

Such partnerships could be between individuals, private sector, agencies, organisations and governments. And, according to water experts attending this meeting, this would help to solve problems like: water scarcity, aquifer depletion, corruption in the water sector, water overuse, pollution and changes in water availability, among others.

One of the countries that have benefited from this approach is Kenya, a nation facing a 30 per cent deficit between the water resources and demand, according to water experts.

In an exclusive chat with WaterSan Perspective at the meeting, Kimanthi Kyengo, the Kenya’s Deputy Director in charge of Water Services, said such an approach is a practical solution to Kenya’s water problems.

“It is one of the solutions that is potentially beneficial to Kenya. It brings ideas, expertise and resources in the water sector,” he stated.

Tanzanian delegation. Christopher Sayi, the chairperson of National Water Board for Tanzania, standing
Tanzanian delegation. Christopher Sayi, the chairperson of National Water Board for Tanzania, standing

To make this approach work, Kimanthi noted Kenya has “developed concepts on how it would benefit the economy, the environment and the citizens; sensitised all the stakeholders about the process and is now in the process of recruiting stakeholders to come together to look for solutions.”

Similarly, this approach has worked in Tanzania. Christopher Sayi, the chairperson of National Water Board for Tanzania, said it is helping to make sure all stakeholders especially the private sector know their roles in conserving the water resource.

“That is why we are encouraging these partnerships so that they (private sector) can also contribute in terms of technology and also contribute towards financing the management of water resources in the country.”

Earlier, while speaking during the opening session, Anton Earle, the Director of Africa regional centre for the Swedish International Water Institute, gave an example of partnership between governments, citing the South African government which is partnering with that of Lesotho to import water to Pretoria, some 400 kilometres away, following high rains in Lesotho.

By Fredrick Mugira (WaterSan Perspective)

Ségolène Royal, in Côte d’Ivoire, seeks African support for Paris Agreement

0

“As President of the COP, I need your support to help me succeed this new mission, especially the great project that African Presidents decided during the COP 21, that of Africa to renewable energy.”

Ségolène Royal, President of COP21
Ségolène Royal, President of COP21

Those were the words of Ségolène Royal, President of COP21, at a gathering on Friday (February 26, 2016) in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire.

Royale, who recently replaced Laurent Fabius, the French Minister of Environment, Energy and Marine, was in the Ivorian capital apparently to gather the support of President Ouattara Alasane towards the realisation of Africa’s transition to renewable energy, two months ahead of the planned formal signing of the Paris Agreement in New York. She was hosted at the Presidential Palace.

In the company of the Ivorian Environment Minister, Rémi Allah-Kouadio, Ms. Royal on Friday also visited Abidjan Banco National Park, saying: “I came here to learn, to listen, how to be most useful to relay projects, hopes, expectations of all that was agreed at COP 21.”

The duo was accompanied by the Ambassador of France in Côte d’Ivoire, Georges Serre, and the Ivorian Minister for Urban Safety and Sanitation, Anne Desiree Oulotto.

Allah-Kouadio said he was pleased with the visit of the French Minister, as well as the Banco National Park, the green lung and ecological sanctuary that extends over 3,474 hectares in the heart of Abidjan.

Earlier on Thursday in Abidjan, at the Residence of the Ambassador of France in Cocody, a high-level panel gathered to discuss “The issue of climate change in a post prospects COP 21 in Paris and report to Africa.”

Co-hosted by Royal and Allah-Kouadio, the panel helped to take stock of COP21 and explored prospects for the implementation of the Paris Agreement. The panel comprised officials of French and other embassies, representatives of international and public institutions, corporate organisations and the civil society.

Royal said: “My mission as President of COP21 is to effectively implement the Paris Agreement through its ratification. This ratification will enable all the signatory countries to integrate this Agreement to all national laws, thus enabling these countries to implement operational action by 2020 to maintain global temperature, below 1.5 degrees Celsius.”

David Wohary of AFHON Côte d’Ivoire, an NGO, remarked: “We are pleased that civil society was involved in this visit. Our biggest regret remains that the position of the State of Côte d’Ivoire has not changed regarding the law on renewable energies and above all the willingness to invest in the coal industry.”

Super Highway: HOMEF urges CRSG to halt assault on community, forests

0

The Cross River State Government (CRSG) has been asked to halt the bulldozers destroying farms at Etara/Eyeyen and are continuing towards Ekuri and Okuni forests/communities, preparatory to the construction of a highway.

Map showing the southern section of the proposed highway
Map showing the southern section of the proposed highway

According to the Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF), the authorities should reroute the Super Highway along a less damaging path and away from community forests and the National Park.

“The government should comply with the laws of the land by conducting an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), other relevant assessments and consultations as enshrined in ILO Article 169,” submitted HOMEF in a statement endorsed by Cadmus Atake, its Project Officer, and made available to EnviroNews on Monday.

The Benin City, Edo State-based organisation stated that some of the best preserved rain forests in Nigeria are the Cross River National Park and the Ekuri Community Forest, which are both under serious threat of being destroyed to make way for a Super Highway that it believes can easily be re-routed to preserve neighbouring communities as well as enormous biodiversity including rare and endangered species.

The 260km Super Highway is planned to lead from a proposed deep sea port at Esighi in Bakassi Local Government Area, run through the Cross River National Park and up to Katsina Ala in Benue State, Nigeria, at a cost of N700 billion or about $3.5 billion.

With a dramatic and outrageous appropriation of a massive 20.4-kilometre-wide track over 260km length, the Super Highway is a project of monstrous and needless proportions, observed HOMEF.

Northern section of the proposed highway
Northern section of the proposed highway

A Public Notice of Revocation signed by the Commissioner for Lands and Urban Development and published in a local newspaper, Weekend Chronicle, on 22nd January 2016 decreed, among other things, that: “All rights of occupancy existing or deemed to exist on all that piece of land or parcel of land lying and situate along the Super Highway from Esighi, Bakassi Local Government Government Area to Bekwarra Local Government Area of Cross River State covering a distance of 260km approximately and having an offset of 200m on either side of the centre line of the road and further 10km after the span of the Super Highway, excluding Government Reserves and public institutions are hereby revoked for overriding public purpose absolutely.”

But HOMEF insists that “this is clearly unacceptable under any kind of highway design.”

In a petition to the Governor of Cross River State, dated 13th February 2016, the Chiefs and people of Okokori Village of Obubra Local Government Area saw the revocation of the right to their lands including settlements, farmlands and community forest as a calculated attempt to extinguish them as a people.

They concluded: “Since the revocation of all our lands for a Super Highway have damning consequences on us and our environment, we are compelled not to welcome this project as the ulterior motive of your government is to grab our lands and make us worthless, ignoring the fact we voted overwhelmingly for you to better our lot but not to punish us unjustifiably.”

In an earlier petition dated 7th February and addressed to the Governor, the Ekuri Traditional Rulers Council stated: “The right of way for the Super Highway measuring 400 metres wide (200m on each side of the road from the centre line), being the width of four standard football fields, is too large and wil destroy our forest and farms that we have laboured to conserve and cultivate crops…The further 10km on either side of the Super Highway from the 200 metres ends totalling 20km width is appalling, meaning that the whole of our Ekuri community forest totalling 33,600 hectares, all our farms and community settlements would have been revoked leaving us landless.”

Firmly rejecting the routing of the Super Highway through their forest, the Ekuri Chiefs added that “Our forest is our wealth and the beacon of our hopes and aspirations.”

Many things are wrong with this planned routing of the Super Highway, declares Nnimmo Bassey, Director of HOMEF, adding that, if allowed to proceed along the path that has been planned, it would destroy the aforementioned forests and equally impact other forests and communities.

“We find it unacceptable that a project of this magnitude is pursued without regard to the law and in defiance of the rights of communities,” he said, adding: “Although the President conducted a ceremonial ground breaking exercise on 30th October 2015, that cannot be construed to mean an approval for the project to proceed without meeting the requirements of the law, particularly that of Environmental Impact Assessment. Moreover, as required by law, an EIA cannot be claimed to have been conducted if there are no consultations with citizens that would be impacted by the project.”

Observers think the project may be a cover for land grabbing, illegal logging and poaching and the destruction of habitats in the forests and reserves that are protected by law and preserved by custom. They question why a project of this nature would reportedly enjoy contributions from Nigerian banks without requisite preliminary surveys, plans and approvals.

The affected communities stressed that “besides the fact that the proposed route was going to cause untold damage to the globally important park, it also demonstrated that the route had been selected without looking at a contour map, let alone having an engineering survey.”

Chief Edwin Ogar of Ekuri community said: “The destruction of Ekuri and other community forests because of the revocation for a super highway will aggravate climate change crisis with dire consequences on humanity in general particularly among the poor.”

×