31.6 C
Lagos
Tuesday, May 13, 2025
Home Blog Page 2002

How urbanisation drives deforestation, by study

0

Cities’ sustainability efforts may be undermined by urban destruction of forested carbon sinks. Worldwatch Institute’s “Can a City Be Sustainable?” examines the core principles of sustainable urbanism and profiles cities that are putting them into practice

Tom Prugh, Senior Researcher, Worldwatch Institute
Tom Prugh, Senior Researcher, Worldwatch Institute

Urban centres lie at the root of an important – and often neglected – source of emissions: deforestation. According to Senior Researcher Tom Prugh in “Can a City Be Sustainable?”, the latest edition of the annual State of the World series from the Worldwatch Institute, deforestation caused by growing urban consumption is contributing to massive emissions globally, despite increasing sustainability efforts locally.

Tropical deforestation accounts for an estimated three billion tons of carbon dioxide per year – equivalent to the emissions of some 600 million cars – according to researchers at Winrock International and the Woods Hole Research Centre.

Urban growth drives deforestation in at least two ways. First, as rural migrants to cities adopt city-based lifestyles, they tend to use more resources. Their incomes rise and their diets shift to a greater share of animal products and processed foods. This, in turn, drives land clearance for livestock grazing and fodder, either locally or in other countries that export such products or their inputs. Meeting the food needs of a rising and urbanising global population could require an additional 2.7 to 4.9 million hectares of cropland per year.

“In Brazil, a surge of deforestation in the Amazon in the early 2,000s has been attributed to the expansion of pasture and soybean croplands in response to international market demand, particularly from China,” writes Prugh. There, economic growth and diets richer in meat products have boosted soy imports from Brazil to feed pork and poultry.

Even in relatively highly productive European agriculture, it takes an estimated 0.3 square meters of farmland to produce an edible kilogram of vegetables, but 7.3 for chicken, 8.9 for pork, and 20.9 for beef.

A second, and likely lesser, factor linking urban growth to deforestation is that cities are often expanding into areas of farmland and natural habitat, including forests. Cities worldwide are growing by 1.4 million new inhabitants every week. Urban land area is expanding, on average, twice as fast as urban populations. The area covered by urban zones is projected to expand by more than 1.2 million square kilometers between 2000 and 2030.

“Ironically, even as urban expansion drives forest clearance for agriculture, it simultaneously consumes existing farmland,” writes Prugh. “By one estimate, urbanisation may cause the loss of up to 3.3 million hectares of prime agricultural land each year.”

“The impact of urban expansion can, in principle, be attenuated by focusing on proven methods of shaping urban form to emphasise compact development and higher densities,” writes Prugh. Reducing consumption, however, is more complicated.

The first and most obvious option is to increase the efficiency of economies at delivering human well-being per every unit of resource input. The impact of the dietary share of higher consumption could be reduced sharply by reducing food waste and creating incentives for much lower meat consumption.

Cities also may have a role in determining broader agricultural policies. In addition to reducing meat consumption, it is possible to reduce the impacts of meat production by shifting from intensive, fossil fuel-based livestock systems to more-diverse, coupled systems that emulate the structure and functions of ecosystems.

Greenpeace: How DRC breached logging moratorium

0

Investigation by Greenpeace Africa has revealed that the DRC government violated its own 2002 moratorium on new logging titles, granting in 2015 three concessions of a total of 650.000 hectares

Robert Bopolo Mbongeza, DRC's Minister of Environment, Conservation of Nature and Sustainable Development (MECNDD)
Robert Bopolo Mbongeza, DRC’s Minister of Environment, Conservation of Nature and Sustainable Development (MECNDD)

A Greenpeace Africa investigation has revealed that the government of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) violated its own 2002 moratorium on new logging titles. Government is said to have granted three concessions of a total of 650.000 hectares in 2015 to a company called Société la Millénaire Forestière SARL (SOMIFOR) in Equateur and Tshuapa Provinces, and to another firm called La Forestière pour le Développement du Congo SARL (FODECO) in Tshopo Province. Greenpeace researchers obtained the concession contracts signed in 2015 by then Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development Bienvenu Liyota Ndjoli.

On 30th of January 2016, Robert Bopolo Mbongeza, the Minister of Environment, Conservation of Nature and Sustainable Development (MECNDD) stated that “measures are underway” to lift the moratorium. At the time of his announcement, says Greenpeace, the Minister must have been aware that his predecessor illegally allocated these three logging concessions. Under the current Minister’s responsibility, a whole a series of meetings with villages in the concession areas took place and social clauses were signed in March and April 2016. In the briefing report published on Tuesday 12 July 2016, Greenpeace presents evidence that, via these secret allocations, the DRC government is circumventing the moratorium, with the intention to lift it before preconditions have been met, threatening the world’s second largest rainforest.

Yet, it is clear that the preconditions for lifting this safeguard measure are far from achieved and that it would create an even greater chaos in the forest sector, notes the environment watchdog.

“We demand that the DRC government immediately cancel SOMIFOR’s and FODECO’s concessions and ensure accountability of all officials associated with the violations. The Minister should also determine whether there have been any further breaches of the moratorium,” said Irene Wabiwa Betoko, Forest campaign manager at Greenpeace Africa. In a letter dated June 9th, Greenpeace asked the Minister of Environment for clarification about these flagrant violations of the moratorium, but never received an answer. These cases will be sent to the Public Prosecutor of DRC to investigate these issues.

The country’s 155 million ha of forests represent around a tenth of the world’s remaining tropical forest, and is home to forest elephants, gorillas, bonobos, okapis, hundreds of bird species and thousands of plants. The moratorium was established in 2002 to prevent a post-war free-for-all in the country’s huge forests, and protect this unique biodiversity. With World Bank guidance and financial support, the DRC was to transform logging into a sustainable industry generating billions of dollars of revenues and tens of thousands of jobs, while conserving the forest. Yet, instead of implementing the measures it committed to, the DRC government constantly violated this moratorium, allocating scores of illegal titles, fueling corruption and creating social and economic havoc.

To oppose the lifting of this moratorium, Greenpeace and other environmental and anti-corruption organisations have formed a coalition, and raised the alarm bells loudly in early 2016. “The DRC government must maintain the moratorium on the allocation of new forest concessions as long as all the conditions defined by law are not met,” stated Wabiwa. “Industrial logging does not generate significant tax revenue for the DRC government, contributing a pitiful USD 8 million in 2014. The Congolese authorities should consider and promote alternatives such as community forestry,” added Wabiwa.

Some 40 million people in the country rely on these forests for their livelihoods, including food and fuel, whilst forest cover in the DRC alone stores 7% of the world’s forest carbon – making it one of the largest forest carbon stocks in the world.

How GMOs threaten food security

0

Activist Nnimmo Bassey (who is Director, Health of Mother Earth Foundation – HOMEF), in a reaction to a recent statement by an official of the National Biotechnology Development Agency (NABDA) and Open Forum for Biotechnology (OFAB), insists that GMOs depend on toxic agrochemicals, are not friendly to soils and ecosystems, and thus are a threat to food security

Nnimmo Bassey
Nnimmo Bassey

Some of the comments made by Rose Gidado as reported under the title, Nigeria Not At Crossroads Over Food Security – Agency Chief (published in The Guardian on 8th July 2016) must be based on questions that were not accurately posed to her. It could also be that her comments were based on faulty reporting she got from persons who may have been at the conference she referred to. She may not have been at the conference under reference because neither Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF) nor African Faith and Justice Network (AFJN) had invited her to the conference.

As an Assistant Director at National Biotechnology Development Agency (NABDA) and as the coordinator of Open Forum for Biotechnology (OFAB) in Nigeria, she has links to two institutions that have as their mandate the promotion of GMOs and placement of their products in the Nigerian market and on the dining tables of citizens of this country. Some of us have queried the place and role of NABDA on the Governing Board of the National Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA) – an agency set up to regulate the activities of GMO promoters in the country. The place of GMO promoters on the board of a regulatory agency raises questions of conflict of interest as already evidenced by their teaming up with Monsanto Agriculture Nigeria Ltd to apply for a permit for confined field trials of Monsanto’s GMO maize, to which assent was given in record time of less than two months from the date the application was advertised for comments from the public.

The comment at the conference under reference that modern biotechnology can be compared to a cowboy technology was made by me. This was an allusion to the use of “gene guns” in the process of insertion of the genetic materials that the technologists may have prepared. As with any shooting activity, it does happen that at times the genetic engineers shoot off target. At other times when they hit their desired target they can not really be so sure of what the outcome would be. One top GMO promoter said recently that GMO cotton failed in Burkina Faso because of insertion of the genetic material in a wrong germplasm. This was said on television and confirms that genetic engineering is not as precise as the biotech industry would want us to believe. It is a technology searching for problems and feeding fat on false promises and hype.

It should also be noted that the insertion of genetic materials from fish into GMO tomato is not a fictional tale. A biotech company, DNA Plant Technology of Oakland, California, actually put the fish gene in a tomato. The GMO tomato was discontinued because of the public uproar that followed its creation. See the story at The Monsanto GMO Story: Adding a Fish Gene into Tomatoes.

The notion that GMOs are part of a safe technology “needed to achieve developmental strides in economic diversification, food security, improved health systems, cleaner energy, job creation, wealth generation and poverty reduction, Nigeria” is contestable. Agricultural modern biotechnology poses peculiar problems to any environment. No wonder the industry survives largely through their political clout and by the open door policy they have with regulators that are at the same time promoters.

The fact that tampering with nature has impacts on religious, social and cultural sensibilities cannot be denied. Neither should it be described as unfortunate. It is the reality. Applied science must be alive to these sensibilities because science must be in the interest of society. And, in any case, we cannot be bullied into silence by the claim that science is neutral.

Science may be right when it says that every living thing can ultimately be broken down to carbon, for instance. Perhaps the basic building blocks of our bodies are similar across species. But some persons may not feel happy to have genes from a pig inserted in rice, for instance.

The fact that science is often not neutral is very much illustrated by goings on in research on genetic engineering, including new areas such as synthetic biology, gene editing and gene drives. Critical scientists continue to be hounded out of jobs or into silence. Those who dance to the tunes of the biotech industry and their political backers flourish on the other hand.

The GMO cotton and maize varieties for which permits have been issued with the active support of NABDA and OFAB pose special risks to our environment. One reason we worry is that the crops are all engineered by Monsanto to withstand their weed killer Roundup of which a key constituent chemical is known as glyphosate. Just like debates raged on whether other toxic chemicals were safe, the debate is on concerning glyphosate. The World Health Organisation (WHO) said that glyphosate is probably a carcinogen, based on research carried out by its (WHO’s) research arm and later became more ambivalent. However, the researchers affirm that they stand by their findings.

GMOs do not necessarily yield higher than natural crops. They promote monocultures and will promote land grabbing and thus displace and impoverish small scale farmers. GMOs depend on toxic agrochemicals that are not friendly to soils and ecosystems. They are a clear threat to food security.

No matter what NABDA, OFAB and NBMA say, Nigerians have solid reasons to worry about the opening of the doors of our agriculture and food systems to risky technologies.

 

Akwa Ibom plans transition to low-carbon, climate-resilient economy

1

Issues supporting Akwa Ibom State’s transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy, in the light of its vulnerability as a coastal state, are expected to be addressed at an international summit scheduled to hold next month in Uyo, the capital city.

Dr. Iniobong Ene Essien, Commissioner for Environment and Mineral Resources
Dr. Iniobong Ene Essien, Commissioner for Environment and Mineral Resources

The first ever state-organised State Climate Change and Clean Energy Mega Summit/Expo will bring together international and national experts and major stakeholders in the fields of environment, climate change and energy nexus. It is being organised by the Akwa Ibom State Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources in collaboration with the Water Safety Initiative Foundation (a United Nations accredited NGO), University of Uyo and African Clean Energy Summit Group. It will hold 26th -28th July, 2016 at the Le’ Meriden Ibom Hotel and Golf Resort, Uyo.

Themed: “Charting a Roadmap for Sustainable Environment and Creation of Green Jobs”, the summit, according to Dr. Iniobong Ene Essien, Commissioner for Environment and Mineral Resources, aligns with the Paris Climate Change Agreement as well as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

According to him, the forum will include exhibitions of clean energy and other climate change related technologies that can be deployed in the country, as well as a tree planting campaign to raise awareness on the dangers of deforestation to satisfy the need for fuel wood.

Dr Essien was quoted in a statement endorsed by his aide, Unyime Robinson, as saying: “Specifically, the summit will enable us to explore the abundant renewable energy resources in the state and the innovative energy technologies that would enable the state, an indeed Nigeria, to significantly contribute to the goal of providing universal access to energy in Africa by 2025. Akwa Ibom State desires to be among the first that will work with stakeholders to make this to happen.

“As a major oil producing state, our desire to transition to low-carbon development will create the much-needed green jobs as well as significantly contribute to achieving Nigeria’s Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) submitted as part of the Paris Agreement. You may note that Akwa Ibom State has remained the only sub-national government that has sponsored and hosted a Post-COP21 national dialogue to articulate how it can contribute to meeting Nigeria’s targets in its INDCs as well as to take advantage of the opportunities provided by the Paris Agreement.”

According to him, the outcomes of this summit will shape the state’s thinking on:

  • The establishment of the first Clean Technology and Export Processing Hub in West Africa
  • The first Low Carbon City in Akwa Ibom State; and
  • The development of concrete projects that we can present at COP22 in Morocco for implementation as part of the Paris Agreement.

A special golf tournament is also planned for 29th July and 30th July to take advantage of the World Class Golf Course at the Le’ meridien Ibom Hotel to raise awareness on the climate change, environment and energy nexus in Akwa Ibom State.

Hope restored as remediation begins in lead-poisoned Shikira

0

The Federal Government has commenced the clean-up of Shikira, a small rural mining community situated in Rafi local government area of Niger State. This is coming exactly a year and three months after the devastating outbreak of lead poison that killed 28 children and left over 300 others below the ages of five with high level contaminants in their blood.

Men work in the mines where they dig deep to find the rock and then crush these rocks to find the gold ore. Inside the rocks there is also deposits of other metals, one being lead which is poisoning children. Photo credit: sweetcrudereports.com
Men work in the mines where they dig deep to find the rock and then crush these rocks to find the gold ore. Inside the rocks there is also deposits of other metals, one being lead which is poisoning children. Photo credit: sweetcrudereports.com

“This exercise is mostly profound in the sense that at the moment it is expected to prevent further exposure, open the door of opportunity for the treatment of those already affected as well as restore back the ecosystem and ensure livelihood sources,” says Hamzat Lawal, chief executive of Connected Development (CODE), which is monitoring developments in Shikira under its “Follow The Money” initiative.

Follow The Money team, while celebrating what it tags a “significant landmark in history of the Nigerian mining industry”, also wants government to be transparent in carrying out the assignment and come up with a clear work plan showing the actual amount budgeted and a definitive time frame for completion of the project. The sum of N256,688,000 was appropriated in the 2016 budget for “Characterisation & Remediation of Lead Poison Contaminated Communities” that was signed my Mr. President.

“This is important, so as to enable us effectively participate in monitoring the process and provide the public with every necessary information they may require,” notes Lawal, adding:

“Also, it gladdens out heart to attribute a large chunk of our happiness to MSF/Doctors Without Borders for their relentless efforts and patience to the success of this noble initiative. Their willingness to render free medical services to the victims as soon as the clean-up is completed justifiably explains our accolade. We, therefore, urge the Federal Ministry of Health to work closely with MSF in fulfilling this critical task and initiate collaboration, especially in the area of knowledge transfer to strengthen her manpower capacity to handle such issues in the future.

“The sad story of Shikira is just one in a million. It will be recalled that, in 2010, 400 children lost their lives and over 1,500 others were infected due to a similar occurrence in Bagega, Anka local government area in Zamfara State. And this is highly pathetic because the incident occurred long after the release of a report by OK International warning of an impending lead poison explosion in the affected communities including Shikira.

“So, we are calling on the Federal Ministry of Solid Minerals to revisit that report and ensure that its recommendations are followed in subsequent interventions and plans to avert any possible repeat of the ugly situation elsewhere in the country.

“The Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is another key institution to recognise in this achievement. The passage of an outright legislation mandating the Federal Government to immediately clean up the impacted site, without further contemplation, in our assessment vividly demonstrate the hallmark of true leadership. Accordingly, we implore similar gesture and magnanimity from the lawmakers to also consider the review of the 2007 Mining Act to capture present realities in the industry, empower host communities and permanently address the challenges bedeviling large and small scale artisanal mining activities in Nigeria.

“In conclusion, we will like to commend President Muhammadu Buhari for demonstrating the trait of a listening leader by adhering to public outcry. Amina Mohammed, the honourable Minister of Environment, is another character of noteworthy; we are highly gratified over her visit to Shikira, an action that opened the mind of government to the depth of the epidemic which subsequently facilitated the commencement of the exercise. The greatest of our humility goes to the public especially those who added their voices and ensured that the right thing is done. They are the ultimate winner of this struggle, and this is so because their actions have again revealed how the power of unity and mobilisation can help sharp any government.”

UN sustainability scheme targets female smallholder farmers

0

Female smallholder farmers are the primary players and beneficiaries of a programme aimed at improving food security in the country.

Female smallholder farmers
Female smallholder farmers

Executive Director, Women Farmers Advancement Network (WOFAN), Dr. Hajia Salamatu Garba, who made the disclosure at a two-day consultation workshop held in Abuja recently, noted that the scheme would support efforts to scale-up more sustainable and more resilient approaches, practices and technologies across the targeted agro-ecological systems. These include innovative approaches to improving soil health, water resource management and vegetation cover with direct benefits to the most vulnerable land users.

Project promoters, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), has selected seven states for the project, which is tagged: “Fostering Sustainability and Resilience for Food Security in the Savanna Zones of Northern Nigeria.” Valued at about $7 million, it comes under the Global Environment Facility (GEF) as one of three integrated approaches that were agreed as part of the GEF sixth replenishment scheme.

Executive Director, Women Farmers Advancement Network (WOFAN), Dr. Hajia Salamatu Garba
Executive Director, Women Farmers Advancement Network (WOFAN), Dr. Hajia Salamatu Garba

The states include Benue, Nassarawa, Adamawa, Gombe, Jigawa, Kano and Katsina spanning the Guinea Savannah, Sudan-Sahel and Sudan Savannah ecological regions.

The Food Security Integrated Programme is targeting agro-ecological systems where the need to enhance food security is linked directly to opportunities for generating global environmental benefits.

Through the programme, the GEF support will specifically promote mechanisms for multi-stakeholder coordination, planning and investment in sustainable land management at scale, with engagement of the private sector. This will be crucial for integrating ecosystem services into mainstream development investments to support agriculture and food security across multiple scales, according to the UNDP.

The lead expert, Prof. Emmanuel Oladipo, said that the programme would contribute to enhancing long-term environmental sustainability and resilience of food production systems of Nigeria to achieve improved national food security.

Specifically, the meeting discussions focused around the three main components: enhancing the institutional and policy environment for achieving improved food security; scaling up sustainable agricultural practices and market opportunities for smallholder farmers in the target agro-ecological zones to increase food security even under increasing climate risks as well as addressing gender disparities and youth unemployment.

Oladipo explained that there is a growing consensus about the need to incorporate ecosystem services into resource management decisions at all levels. The programme is therefore both crucial and timely, he added. “Consistent with the programming objectives of the land degradation focal area, the GEF, through the programme, will leverage investments by other development partners to ensure that the flow of agro-ecosystem services is maintained or improved,” he added.

The programme will build on planned or existing initiatives, partnerships and institutional frameworks that address genetic resources, the use of and access to agricultural inputs, as well as access to markets and extension services with a view to mainstreaming sustainable land management practices for enhanced agro-ecosystem services and food insecurity.

Additionally, the programme is fostering supportive policies and incentives for smallholder farmers to adopt sustainable and resilient practices (including low-emission technologies and biodiversity considerations) and promote increased private sector investment in climate-resilient and low-emission food value chains.

Nigeria not at crossroads over food security, says Gidado

0

Coordinator of the Open Forum for Biotechnology (OFAB) in Nigeria and an Assistant Director at the National Biotechnology Development Agency (NABDA), Dr Rose Gidado, has faulted claims by the duo of The Africa Faith and Justice Network (AFJN) and Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF) that Nigeria is at a crossroad in the struggle for sustainable agriculture, safe food, biosafety and biosecurity.

Dr Rose Gidado
Dr Rose Gidado

The duo’s position, expressed recently at a meeting, was based on the fact that the country was introducing genetic modification into the food chain process and therefore contaminating the country’s natural agriculture process.

But, reacting to the issue, Gidado stated that it was important to note that, to achieve developmental strides in economic diversification, food security, improved health systems, cleaner energy, job creation, wealth generation and poverty reduction, Nigeria must be determined to deploy every safe technology and invest purposefully in the training of manpower for the deployment of such technologies.

While commending the efforts of the organisers, Gidado noted that the onus lies on them to ensure that the citizenry get correct information.

“The integrity of a conference at which official and sponsored speakers made comments seeking to disparage the national programme on immunisation which has been scientifically proven to reduce the incidence of polio in Nigeria as a disguise to give Nigerian children oral wild virus to kill them and reduce the population of Nigeria is worrisome,” she said.

She described comments made that genetic engineering consists of indiscriminate and blind shooting of genes into plants and that it involves taking genes from a fish and inserting same indiscriminately into tomatoes as quite unfortunate.

Equally alarming, according to her, is the surreptitious attempt of the meeting to mix applied science with religion, the attempt to intimidate and sow fear in people by hiding under the veil of religion as demonstrated at the meeting in question, and the refusal to provide balanced information to a carefully chosen, mostly scientifically under-informed population.

She noted that because modern biotechnology was still considered as a new technology and the advancement in these areas have been so rapid, it has been the object of some doubts, fears, concerns as well as intense and divisive debate. These all bother on the potential risks to human health, the environment and society, and so are understandable.

Dr Gidado argued that even as the debates rage, mostly in technologically developing nations, agricultural products of modern biotechnology have been consumed without deleterious effects for 25 years, even as she underlined the need to understand that perceptions of the impacts of any technology were more complex than simple perception of benefits or risk.

She said: “As for any new or emerging technology, we must develop the capacity to balance benefits and risk of alternative technologies, while respecting human autonomy, justice and the environment.”

Fresh funds emerge for developing country climate action

0

Additional funds are now available for ambitious emission reduction action in developing countries, with the announcement of up to Euro 60 million from the NAMA Facility to support the implementation of transformational climate action plans laid out in countries’ Nationally Appropriate Mitigations Actions (NAMAs).

paris agreement
Climate change mitigation: Women sell mango and sweet potato jam at the food processing shop in Bantantinnting, Senegal. They produced the jam with a Multifunctional Platform Project (MFP) introduced by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), helping women and girls to no longer spend several hours a day gathering firewood or collecting water. MFP is a diesel engine to which a variety of end-use equipment can be attached, including grinding mills, battery chargers, vegetable or nut oil presses, welding machines and carpentry tools. Bantantinnting, Senegal. Photo credit: United Nations Photo Gallery

Transformational NAMAs can be projects, policies or programmes that shift a technology and/or sector in a country onto a low-carbon development trajectory. With the right support, NAMAs can be an important channel for achieving countries’ nationally determined contributions (NDCs), which are the main pillar of last December’s landmark Paris Climate Change Agreement.

This is the fourth Call of its kind for NAMA support project outlines and will run until 31 October 2016 (12 pm CEST/GMT+2). This additional funding brings the total made available to more than Euro 260 million, with 14 NAMAs already being supported in Africa, Latin America and Asia. Some changes in the 4th Call aim to simplify the application procedures and strengthen the readiness and financial structuring of NAMAs.

The NAMA Facility was established by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) and the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) in 2012. Denmark and the European Commission joined in 2015.

Support is provided for projects to carry out a range of financial and technical measures. However, the main focus is on the mobilisation of additional capital investments to foster transformational change in the partner country. All projects submitted during the three previous Calls were evaluated against pre-determined selection criteria, which ensured that the most ambitious and transformational NAMAs would be selected for funding. The projects selected are listed below.
First Call:

  • Chile: Self-supply Renewable Energy
  • Colombia: Transit-oriented urban development
  • Costa Rica: Low Carbon Coffee
  • Indonesia: Sustainable Urban Transport Programme

 

Second Call:

  • Burkina Faso: Biomass Energy
  • Peru: Sustainable Urban Transport
  • Tajikistan: Forestry
  • Thailand: Refrigeration and Air Conditioning

 

Third Call:

  • Colombia: Domestic refrigeration
  • China: Integrated waste management
  • Guatemala: Efficient Use of Fuel and Alternative Fuels in Indigenous and Rural Communities
  • Kenya: Mass rapid transport system for Nairobi
  • South Africa: Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings Programme (EEPBP)

 

Detailed information on the 4th Call of the NAMA Facility, including all relevant application documents, are available here.

Important dates and upcoming events:

Deadline for submission: 31 October 2016
Webinar: 4th Call Introduction, 27 July 2016
Webinar: 4th Call Introduction, clarifications and FAQs, 7 September 2016

Germany to help developing countries implement Paris treaty

0

Germany has unveiled an initiative that will assist developing nations to implement climate change commitments made last December in Paris, France. Many developing countries at the COP21 UN climate conference made their first ever commitment to complying with climate targets with the adoption of the Paris Agreement.

German Federal Environment Minister, Barbara Hendricks Photo credit: Stephanie Pilick/dpa
German Federal Environment Minister, Barbara Hendricks. Photo credit: Stephanie Pilick/dpa

However, a new implementation partnership now aims to help them transform these targets into specific strategies and measures, thanks to disclosures made recently by the German Federal Environment Minister Barbara Hendricks and Federal Development Minister Gerd Müller at the Petersberg Climate Dialogue.

The implementation partnership has been initiated jointly by the German Ministry for the Environment and Building and the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development together with the World Resources Institute (WRI). Its goal is to support developing countries in specifying and implementing their nationally determined contributions (NDCs). It also aims to help merge existing climate and development goals and to achieve greater harmonisation among the various donor programmes. The partnership will be officially launched at the Marrakesh climate conference in Morocco (COP22) in November.

Hendricks said: “In Paris we all pledged to stop dangerous climate change. We now have to achieve the targets we have set ourselves and to breathe life into the Paris Agreement. We are ready to support developing countries in tackling this challenge and to share our experience with them. This should also give our partner countries new opportunities for development. I believe that this initiative will send an important political signal at the next Marrakesh climate conference.”

Müller’s words: “Climate change is driving millions of people out of drought-stricken regions in Africa and coastal regions in Asia. We will only be able to achieve a world without hunger and poverty if we all join forces to drive forward effective climate action. This is a key challenge for the international community in the 21st century and the prerequisite for peace, and for equitable and fair globalisation.”

Developing countries, donor countries, institutional partners and NGOs will participate in the partnership. Membership is open to all countries, it was gathered. To support the set-up of the partnership, the German Ministry for the Environment and Building and the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development will finance the establishment of a secretariat in Washington and Bonn. Additionally, the climate action projects of both ministries will focus to an even greater extent on implementing the nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement.

One of the implementation partnership’s key tasks will be to organise quick access to tailor-made advice for developing countries. The partnership will draw on the know-how and work of numerous organisations, initiatives and platforms. There will also be a contact point for developing countries with specific climate-related questions – for example on developing the use of renewable energies, sustainable urban development and climate-resilient agriculture to name but a few. The partnership also aims to ensure that the various donors in different countries work hand in hand in implementing the Paris Agreement.

Training schemes to boost cancer care access in Africa

0

Access to cancer care in Africa is receiving a boost, following the disclosure on Sunday in Darmstadt, Germany that some indigenous doctors have been pencilled down for medical training programmes in Kenya and India.

Merck, University of Nairobi and oncology experts discussing the first Merck Africa Medical Oncology Fellowship Programme for sub-Saharan African countries. Merck will sponsor nine medical doctors from Sub-Saharan African countries such as Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Ethiopia and South Africa for a period of two years
Merck, University of Nairobi and oncology experts discussing the first Merck Africa Medical Oncology Fellowship Programme for sub-Saharan African countries. Merck will sponsor nine medical doctors from Sub-Saharan African countries such as Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Ethiopia and South Africa for a period of two years

The initiative, which is also aimed at increasing the number of oncologists on the continent, will see nine medical doctors from sub-Saharan countries of Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Ethiopia and South Africa benefit from a two-year programme sponsored by Merck, a leading science and technology company.

Merck announced on Sunday that it is starting the first Merck Africa Medical Oncology Fellowship Programme for sub-Saharan African countries in partnership with the University of Nairobi, Kenya, where the programme will be conducted. The firm says the gesture is part of efforts to improve access to cancer care and strengthen the healthcare system in emerging markets.

The Kenya training is the first step of the programme, disclosed Merck, adding that it will be extended to other African countries in the following year. Also, Merck will support another five African doctors to participate in a paediatric and adult medical fellowship programme, which will be held annually at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. This programme will start in August this year.

“We are committed to improving patient’s access to healthcare all over the world,” said Rasha Kelej, who, as Chief Social Officer of the healthcare business sector of Merck, leads the implementation and coordination of activities designed to have a positive impact on societies in developing countries.

“In Africa, where the number of oncologists is very limited, this starts by building additional medical capacity. Our new programme aims to increase the number of qualified oncologists across the continent. The scarcity of trained healthcare personnel capable of tackling prevention, early diagnosis and management of cancer is a bigger challenge in Africa than the lack of financial resources. Therefore, we firmly believe that initiatives like ours are very helpful for Africa and also in a further step for more developing countries,” Kelej added.

Prof. Isaac Kibwage, Principal of Colleges of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, said: “We believe that the only way to effectively prevent, detect and treat the rising number of cancer cases in Africa is through establishing public private partnerships between health ministries, academia, and industry in implementing successful programs such as the partnership with Merck. This fellowship program will not only target Kenyan doctors but doctors from sub-Saharan African countries as well with the aim of improving the quality and accessibility of cancer care in the continent.”

Health experts believe that shortage of oncologists threatens cancer care in Africa. According to World Health Organisation (WHO), by 2020 there are expected to be 16 million new cases of cancer every year, 70% of which will be in developing countries where governments are least prepared to address the growing cancer burden and where survival rates are often less than half those of more developed countries.

According to research done by Merck Kenya only has 13 oncologists, most of them based in Nairobi for a population of 47 million, which means one oncologist per 3.6 million people. For reference, in the UK there are around 13 oncologists per one million people. In Ethiopia, there are only four oncologists, all based in Addis Ababa for a population of around 100 million inhabitants.

Merck disclosed in a statement that, over the past years, that, in addition to its cancer drug Erbitux, which made Merck is a pioneer in targeted cancer therapy, the company is also making progress in the field of immuno-oncology, which is aimed at mobilising the body’s own immune system to fight cancer.

×