Tuesday 7th April 2020
Tuesday, 7th of April 2020
Home / Cover / Controversy rocks ‘environment-unfriendly’ Calabar highway project

Controversy rocks ‘environment-unfriendly’ Calabar highway project

Amid widespread discontent over the proposed a planned highway initiative, the Presidency may have given the thumbs-down to the controversial project.

Gov. Ben Ayade signing the quality control deal for the Calabar-Ikom-Ogoja-Obudu super highway in Germany  Controversy rocks ‘environment-unfriendly’ Calabar highway project Governor Ayade in germany e1442765189303

Gov. Ben Ayade signing the quality control deal for the Calabar-Ikom-Ogoja-Obudu super highway in Germany

The over 240-kilometre Calabar Super Highway, which will cut through the Cross River National Park, is expected to stretch from Calabar to Obudu. It is one among the three legacy projects promised by Governor Ben Ayade of Cross River State during his governorship campaign.

The road project has reportedly kicked off with massive deforestation in Obung/Nsan Community in Akamkpa Local Government Area with heavy duty equipment/ bulldozers deployed at project site.

However, President Muhammadu Buhari rejected the state government’s invitation to perform the project’s groundbreaking ceremony on the grounds of non-conformity with environmental standards.

Mr President, in a statement, said the project had no Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) conducted and therefore should not go on.

In a reaction, the Environmental Rights Action/ Friends of the Earth Nigeria (ERA/ FoEN) has commended President Buhari, saying that he deserves kudos for turning down the groundbreaking of the project.

The ERA/FoEN states that investigations reveal tensions and anxiety in the Obung/Nsan Community in Akamkpa Local Government Area over the development because, according to the organisation, the road project is anticipated to lead to massive deforestation, degrade biodiversity and contribute to climate change.

ALSO READ:  Campaigners say Super Highway project promoters should address concerns

ERA/FoEN Executive Director, Godwin Ojo, says: “The present administration has shown a clear sense of responsibility and commitment to the cause of the people and environment by turning down Governor Ayade’s invitation to perform the groundbreaking ceremony of a project that was set to take off with no consultation whatsoever with the people and no EIA conducted.”

Ojo explains that the National Park has one of the oldest pristine rainforests in Africa, and has been identified as a biodiversity hotspot with rare primates, which includes chimpanzees, drills and gorillas hence must not be disrupted.

He adds: “While we hail President Buhari for rejecting the project we want this administration to go further by demanding the Cross River government make public the mandatory Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIA) that meet the standards of the Federal Ministry of Environment legislation and made public for citizens participation.

“The solution to the traffic challenge and opening up Calabar to commerce is dualising the Calabar-Ikom-Obudu Federal Highway that is already in existence. As a first step, the route of the new road should be discussed and planned openly with civil society groups, management of the National Park, and other stakeholders.”

Going further, he suggests that the Federal Government should upscale the value of the national park to a UNESCO Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Reserve and a World Heritage Site (WHS) to prevent on-going and future encroachments.

ALSO READ:  Odigha: How Cross River can build credible national REDD+ process

He underlines the need for the Federal Government to urgently resolve the boundary of the Oban Division of the national park to be generally acceptable to all parties, the state, communities and the park institution.

Also in a reaction to the development, Ako Amadi of the Community Conservation and Development Initiatives (CCDI) says: “We are contending with a catastrophe that puts Nigeria’s efforts at natural resource management and disaster risk reduction in jeopardy. A modern highway through largely primary forest opens up several practical possibilities for the rapid destruction of an ancient system that houses immense biodiversity and carbon stocks.

“Why do our governments wait for the slightest opportunity to desecrate natural environments, but at the same time spend huge sums of money on urban lawns and gardens, and golf courses that are never properly maintained anyway? The day we spend our own taxpayers’ money on nature conservation, and not depend exclusively on international development agencies we probably would then place a premium on protecting forests.”

Paddy Ezeala, former spokesperson the Cross River National Park and the Nigerian Conservation Foundation, remarks: “This so-called super highway has been on the cards of government for more than 25 years. I wrote one of the initial press releases calling for expeditious action in the establishment of the Cross River National Park. I eventually became the first press officer of the Park when it was established. We feel pain at seeing those efforts going up in smoke owing to a chain of environmentally-untoward activities and decisions of those who think they are hungrier for ‘development’ than the rest of us.

ALSO READ:  Why Superhighway met stiff opposition, by Bassey

“Something drastic and comprehensive has to be done about the management of our National Parks and other protected areas. Nobody would have thought of putting a highway through the National Park if conservation had taken its rightful place in the consciousness of Nigerians.”

%d bloggers like this: