26.3 C
Lagos
Sunday, May 4, 2025
Home Blog Page 2139

Combating illegal logging with smartphones, smarter shopping

0

CustomMade, an online marketplace, discloses in this treatise that though illegal logging costs the global economy an estimated $30 to $100 billion in lost revenue annually, the mass exodus of our forests has more devastating, long-lasting implications, putting the environment, politics and social stability at risk

 

illegal-logging-headerMany of us make daily choices to try to live more environmentally conscious lifestyles. But there’s an element probably present in everyone’s home that’s contributing to the destruction of the natural world: items made from illegally sourced wood. The paper sitting in your printer, the toilet paper in your bathroom, and the coffee table in your living room may all come from illegal logging operations. Each year, more than 32 million acres of forest are illegally and unsustainably logged.

Illegal logging – the harvesting, transporting, processing, buying, or selling of timber in violation of national laws – is a global issue, affecting most forested countries. The term also includes wood harvested from protected areas or threatened species of plants or trees as well as the falsification of official logging documents, breached license agreements, and corruption of government officials. Because of the natural of illegal logging, it’s also difficult to measure the scale of the devastation. “Most of it is selective logging, not big clear cuts,” says Dr. Matt Finer, Amazon Conservation Association’s research specialist. The pick-and-choose method makes it extremely difficult to spot missing trees in aerial pictures or satellite imagery.

Illegal logging runs rampant in poorer nations and is dominated by organized crime.  A 2012 U.N. report estimated organized crime groups were to blame for up to 90 percent of tropical deforestation. It takes place primarily in the tropical forests of the Amazon basin, Central Africa, and Southeast Asia. Currently, Indonesia is the hardest hit country; 40 percent of its 6.02 million forest hectares have been lost to illegal logging. Though a short-term law enforcement effort in the mid-2000s temporarily slowed the loss, illegal logging has increased in scale over the last three to five years.

The main, most obvious reason for illegal logging the high global demand for timber, paper, and other wood-derived products. But not all logged trees are turned into flooring, paper, and plywood. Around40 percent of removed wood is used as fuel for energy needs, including cooking and heating; in some tropical regions, that figure skyrockets to as high as 80 percent.

Corruption, economic and political instability, a lack of democracy, insufficient regulations, and weak governments all contribute to illegal logging. There are also insufficient penalty systems in place: A low risk coupled with high profit incentive makes illegal logging all the more enticing to those who need or want the money. Because illegal timber is generally less expensive and revenues are up to five-ten times higher, it’s hard for legal timber operations to compete.

The source of the wood is only part of the problem. Consumer countries contribute by importing wood without always knowing or checking if it’s been legally sourced. For example, the U.S. is ranked as the largest wood products market in the world. Translation? Many of us unknowingly purchase items made from illegally logged wood and keep the demand for inexpensive goods strong.

 

illegal-logging-001The Impact

Illegal logging costs the global economy an estimated $30-100 billion in lost revenue annually – 10 to 30 percent of the total global timber trade. But the mass exodus of our forests has more devastating, long-lasting implications. It puts the environment, politics, and social stability at risk.

Clearing trees haphazardly decreases the chances for ecosystems to adapt to climate change and human contact. Research shows that for every commercial tree removed, 27 other trees are damaged, 40 meters of road are created, and 600 square meters of canopy is opened. Once trees are cut down, they are transported by tractor along the newly formed roads, which double as easy-access hunting routes.

Without dense forests to filter water and hold soil in place, soil erosion increases, and rivers and streams fill with sediment and debris, which has destroyed coral reefs and other aquatic habitats. Degradation of forests also destroys wildlife habitats on land, threatens populations of some of the most endangered primates, and jeopardizes plant biodiversity.

Logged areas are also susceptible to changing weather patterns as lost forest can make rainfall more erratic and consequently lengthen dry periods. Forest fires are another known environmental effect of logging: Clearing areas emits large amounts of carbon dioxide, which in turn becomes fuel for intense blazes.  Many major forest fires worldwide were either started or worsened by logging or other agricultural development in otherwise pristine environments.

Illegal logging can also result in political conflict and clashes over land and resources. When the law is disregarded, community values are strained. “(It) undermines the entire landscape-level conservation strategy,” Finer says.

For many tropical countries, the conservation of forest cover focuses on the establishment of protected areas and indigenous territories, he explains. Once illegal logging bulldozes its way through these formerly protected areas, the system is destabilized. Local villagers and indigenous tribes are driven from their homes, face murder and violence, and are subjected to uncontrolled colonization. In July 2014, Amazon Indians – previously unconnected with the outside world – emerged from a Brazilian rainforest due to illegal logging.

For the forest-dependent locals that have thrived on tropical forestland for thousands of years, logging near and through homeland can result in scarcer quantities of food, building materials, and medicinal plants. Meat and fish have been compromised by hunting, habitat destruction, and polluted conditions. Logging companies have even bulldozed through gardens and other edible plants and trees that provide nutrients for native peoples. Oil runoff from machinery and chemicals used to treat timber also pollute the land and water supply.

 

illegal-logging-002Putting a Stop to Illegal Logging

Even if timber sports a single producer label, it’s often been traded many times during transport and could have come from an illegal location. For a logging operation to be legal, there are a number of guidelines a company must follow to cut, extract, transport, and sell timber. Along that supply chain, there are countless methods of breaking logging laws. Even timber marked as certified – and with a higher price tag – may not be.

Some laws, such as the Lacey Act, control logging in certain areas in an attempt to halt illegal trade. Unfortunately, they’re often broken. Even in countries like Peru where forests are protected by a modern forestry law as well as a free trade agreement with the U.S., some logging operations still operate illegally. “This mostly comes from providing false information in the annual management plant and claiming the presence of trees that don’t actually exist within the concession, so they can then use those permits to log timber elsewhere outside,” Finer says.

Most legal logging initiatives focus on promoting sustainable logging, with incentives for legal trade (like REDD+); they don’t address the widespread extortion, fraud, laundering, and bribery. For instance, the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Action Plan (FLEGT) was developed to reduce illegal import to the European Union. The key to the program is voluntary partnership agreements that ensure only legally sourced timber and products are imported into the EU from participating countries. Other major players in the legal logging game include the International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime (ICCWC), which helps enforcement agencies prevent and detect illegal logging and other forest offenses as well as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), with around 2,000 delegates representing more than 150 governments, indigenous peoples, non-governmental organizations and businesses. Other regional partnerships, such as the recent one between Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania, have been put in place to improve customs at borders and ports and bolster enforcement.

Smaller efforts are working to make big changes, too. Rainforest Connection, a San Francisco-based non-profit (check out the Kickstarter campaign here) converts old phones and parts of old solar panels into devices to detect illegal logging and poaching. The recycled devices pick up real-time sound of chainsaws and notify conservationists, who can then put a stop to the damage before it continues. But even with these efforts, both big and small, illegal logging continues at an alarming rate.

 

illegal-logging-003The Future of Logging

The only effective way to combat illegal logging is global collaboration. It will take more effectively monitored trade methods, harsher punishments, and smaller-scale efforts, such as consumer awareness campaigns, to hinder the exploitation of our natural resources. The U.N. says the three most important law enforcement efforts would be to “reduce profits in illegal logging,” “increase the probability of apprehending and convicting criminals at all levels involved including international networks,” and “reduce the attractiveness of investing in any part of production involving high proportions of wood with illegal origin.” But, like we’ve discussed before, it’s not just the people in charge that matter. Everyone – government, corporations, investors, and consumers – will all have to play a part in reducing the viability of the illegal timber trade.

Though it’s difficult for consumers to determine where their paper towels or kitchen cabinetry actually came from, it’s a good idea to look for products certified by the Forest Stewardship Council. The certification means the wood was sourced in compliance with local laws and with respect for the rights of indigenous peoples. It’s not fool-proof but it’s a start. And ask your go-to stores to carry FSC-certified paper goods and other wood products.

Illegal logging will not cease completely soon. “Until the legal system shifts the focus away from transit documents and toward verifying extraction of wood at the source and the subsequent chain of custody,” Finer says, “widespread illegal logging will likely persist.” The problem is too big.  But with more initiatives, tougher penalties, and stronger global collaboration, the social, environmental, and economic effects of illegal logging may slowly and steadily decline over time.

Ebola: NOA director stresses importance of high sanitary standard

0

Mr Oliver Wolugbom, Rivers State Director of the National Orientation Agency ( NOA), has stressed the need to  maintain  high sanitary standard in order to check the spread of  Ebola Virus Disease (EVD).

Wolugbom who spoke on Friday in Port Harcourt at a sensitisation programme organised by the Agency for youths, said high sanitary standard was essential in the fight against Ebola spread.

The director noted that though Ebola was not a death sentence, people should be careful in order to boost the eradication of the virus.

The  NOA boss said that there were on-going efforts to find a permanent cure for the virus but no classified vaccine had been discovered for it.

He advised people not to eat improperly cooked meat and cultivate a permanent habit of washing hands always.

Wolugbom also urged stakeholders to discard traditions that had to do with drinking of water used in the washing of dead bodies.

He called on the people to stop the habit of crying and falling on dead bodies of loved ones as a sign of affection.

The director said if people could adhere to positive norms of society relating to good sanitary conditions, Ebola would soon be a thing of the past. ( NAN)

Man, 42, jailed 12 months for stealing speaker from church

0

A 42-year-old man, Adebisi Oluranti, was sentenced to  12 months imprisonment by an Ibadan Magistrates’ Court on Friday for stealing musical instrument from a church.

The Magistrate, Mrs Munirat Giwa Babalola, said that Oluranti should serve the term with hard labour.

The convict pleaded guilty to the offence before the court.

Oluranti was arraigned on a two-count charge of unlawful breaking and stealing.

The Prosecutor, Cpl. Oluseye Akinola, said that Oluranti broke into the Victory Evangelical Ministry Church at Aroro Makinde in Ojoo, Ibadan.

Akinola said the convict stole a speaker valued at N15, 000, one Elemax generating set, valued at N30, 000 and Deck engine, valued at N25, 000.

The convict also stole a wireless engine valued at N5, 000; two wall clocks value at N1, 200, all totaling N76, 200.

Akinola said that the stolen items belonged to one Adekunle Oludele , the Pastor of Victory Evangelical Ministry Church , Ojoo.

He said the offence was committed on Sept .17, at about 9:20 p.m. at Aroro Makinde area at Ojoo in Ibadan.

The prosecutor said the offence contravened Section 415 and 416 of the Criminal Code Cap. 38, Vol. II, Laws of Oyo State, 2000. (NAN)

Nigerian Environment Centenary Symposium in photos

0

Nigeria came into being on January 1, 1914 with the formal amalgamation of the Northern and Southern Protectorates of the British Territory. The country has therefore been in a festive mood this year to celebrate 100 years of existence.

The Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, in collaboration with the Nigerian Environmental Study/Action Team (NEST), joined in observing the landmark via a stock-taking symposium on “The Nigerian Environment – Past 100 Years and the Future” that focused on the nation’s total environment.

Prof Emeritus David Okali celebrating his birthday during the symposium
Prof Emeritus David Okali celebrating his birthday during the symposium

 

Prof Margaret Okorodudu-Fubara of the Obafemi Awolowo University, le-Ife
Prof Margaret Okorodudu-Fubara of the Obafemi Awolowo University, le-Ife

 

Prof Daniel Gwary of the University of Maiduguri
Prof Daniel Gwary of the University of Maiduguri

 

Prof Adeniyi Osuntogun (right) and Prof Chinedum Nwajiuba
Prof Adeniyi Osuntogun (right) and Prof Chinedum Nwajiuba

 

Prof M. K. C. Sridhar
Prof M. K. C. Sridhar

 

Dr Gloria Ujor
Dr Gloria Ujor

 

Alade Adeleke
Alade Adeleke

 

Babatope Babalobi
Babatope Babalobi

 

Prof Chidi Ibe (standing)
Prof Chidi Ibe (standing)

 

Prof Olukayode Oladipo
Prof Olukayode Oladipo

 

Participants at the event
Participants at the event

 

Prof Okali's birthday cake
Prof Okali’s birthday cake

 

IMG00553-20140925-1358

 

Nigeria takes stock of a century of her environment

0

A two-day forum that explored environmental implications of 100 years of Nigeria’s existence came to a close on Thursday in Ibadan, Oyo State.

Conference banner
Conference banner

The Nigerian Environment Centenary Symposium (1914-2014), which had “The Nigerian Environment: Past 100 years and the future”, held at the University of Ibadan, courtesy of the institution’s Department of Environmental Health Sciences (in the Faculty of Public Health of the College of Medicine) as well as the Nigerian Environmental Study Action Team (NEST).

The symposium and book concept, chaired by Professor Emeritus Akin Mabogunje, took stock of Nigeria’s total environment as regards what has been achieved so far and the directions to move forward.

Prof Emeritus David Okali (middle) celebrates his birthday during the symposium. He is flanked by Prof Chid Ibe, Prof (Mrs.) Margaret Okorodudu-Fubara and Prof Adeniyi Osuntogun
Prof Emeritus David Okali (middle) celebrates his birthday during the symposium. He is flanked by Prof Chid Ibe, Prof (Mrs.) Margaret Okorodudu-Fubara and Prof Adeniyi Osuntogun

Speakers were invited based on their expertise, past scientific contributions and vision for the nation’s growth and development. They reviewed the trend, major developments and lapses in safeguarding the Nigerian environment over the past century, and drawing a blueprint for future development.

The papers presented will be compiled into a book that will form a standard reference point for future generations.

Prof Okali celebrating with colleagues
Prof Okali celebrating with colleagues

The thematic topics were: Land Resources, Water Resources, Atmosphere, Biosphere, Coastal and Marine Environments, Energy and Environment, Environment and Health, Urbanisation, Industry, Waste Management, Environmental Education and Awareness Raising, Environmental Disasters and Emergencies, Environmental Governance and the Economics of Managing the Nigerian Environment.

The resources persons were: Prof E. E. Okpara of NEST (Land Resources and Erosion), Prof Emeritus N. M. Gadzama and Prof H. K. Ayuba of the University of Maiduguri (Desertification), Prof Daniel Gwary of the University of Maiduguri (Land Use), Dr D. T. Gowon (Evolution of Water Resources Management and Development in Nigeria: Possible Future Trajectory), Babatope Babalobi of USAID (Water Supply), Dr Elizabeth Oloruntoba and Prof M. K. C. Sridhar of the University of Ibadan (History of Sanitation and Hygiene Practices in Nigeria), Dr Godson Ana of the University of Ibadan (Air Quality in Nigeria), Prof Olukayode Oladipo of Kado Consult and Dr Ibidun of University of Ibadan (Changing Climate in Nigeria), Prof Emeritus David Okali of NEST and Prof A. O. Isichei of Obafemi Awolowo University (The Nigerian Environment: Past 100 Years and the Future Ecosystems), Prof Labode Popoola of  the University of Ibadan and Prof E. C. Nzegbule of Michael Okpara University of Agriculture (Trends in Development of Forestry in Nigeria), Prof B. A. Ola-Adams (Biodiversity), Dr Gloria Ujor of the Federal Ministry of Environment (Historical Perspectives and Domestication of the Convention on Biological Diversity in Nigeria), Alade Adeleke of the Nigerian Conservation Foundation (Assessment of Policy and Practice of Biodiversity Conservation), Prof Chidi Ibe (The Coastal and Marine Environment), Prof Chris Ikporukpo of the University of Ibadan (The Environment of the Niger Delta), and Huzi Mshelia of Huzi & Associates (Expanding Renewable Energy Access for Environmental Sustainability).

Others included: Joanna Maduka of Friends of the Environment (Gender, Energy and Environment), Prof O. O. Kale of the University of Ibadan (The Environment and Health), Bolarinwa Olowe of Konsadem Consultants (Urbanisation, Industry and Waste Management), Prof Moses Inyang-Abia of the University of Calabar (Evolutionary Trends in Environmental Education), Michael Simire of EnviroNews Nigeria (Awareness Raising), Dr Babatunde Lawal of the Adeniran Ogunsanya College of Education (Environmental Education and Awareness Programme), Ako Amadi of the Community Conservation & Development Initiatives (Reducing the Risk of Environmental Disasters), Dr A. C. Anuforom of the Nigerian Meteorological Agency (Weather and Climate Services for Environmental Disaster Management), Dr Ngeri Benebo of the National Environmental Standards & Regulation Enforcement Agency (NESREA) (Evolving a New Institutional Mechanism for Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development in Nigeria), Prof Matt Ivbijaro of Mattivi Nigeria Limited (Environmental Governance in Nigeria), Prof Margaret Okorodudu-Fubara of the Obafemi Awolowo University and Dr Tope Ako of the University of Hull, UK (Environmental Justice, Equity and Rights in Nigeria), Prof Olanrewaju Fagbohun of the Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (Law and Ethics from Pre-Colonial to Post-Colonial Era), Prof Anthony Ikpi of the University of Ibadan, Prof Adeniyi Osuntogun of Resource Integrated Development Foundation and Prof Chinedum Nwajiuba of the Imo State University (Economics of Managing the Nigerian Environment).

Activists reject Global Alliance on Climate-Smart Agriculture

0

A team of civil society organisations is kicking against the proposed Global Alliance for Climate-Smart Agriculture, saying that it will not deliver the urgently-needed solutions

 

Climate-smart agriculture. Photo: talkvietnam.com
Climate-smart agriculture. Photo: talkvietnam.com

We, the undersigned civil society organisations, hereby manifest our rejection of the proposed Global Alliance for Climate-Smart Agriculture to be launched at the UN Secretary-General’s Climate Change Leaders’ Summit. This proposed alliance is a deceptive and deeply contradictory initiative.

Food producers and providers – farmers, fisherfolk and pastorlists – together with our food systems are on the front lines of climate change. We know that urgent action must be taken to cool the planet, to help farming systems – and particularly small-scale farmers – adapt to a changing climate, and to revive and reclaim the agroecological systems on which future sustainable food production depends.

The Global Alliance for Climate-Smart Agriculture, however, will not deliver the solutions that we so urgently need. Instead, “climate-smart” agriculture provides a dangerous platform for corporations to implement the very activities we oppose. By endorsing the activities of the planet’s worst climate offenders in agribusiness and industrial agriculture, the Alliance will undermine the very objectives that it claims to aim for.

Although some organisations have constructively engaged in good faith for several months with the Alliance to express serious concerns, the concerns have been ignored. Instead, the Alliance is clearly being structured to serve big business interests, not to address the climate crisis.

We reject “climate-smart” agriculture and the Global Alliance for a number of reasons already articulated in previous efforts to interface with the promoters, including:

1. No environmental or social criteria

The final framework of the Alliance does not contain any criteria or definitions for what can – or cannot – be considered “climate-smart agriculture.” Industrial approaches that increase greenhouse gas emissions and farmers’ vulnerability by driving deforestation, using genetically modified (GM) seeds, increasing synthetic fertiliser use or intensifying industrial livestock production, are all apparently welcome to use the “climate-smart” label to promote their practices as solutions to climate change.

2. Carbon trading

The originators of “climate-smart” agriculture – the FAO and the World Bank – have a vision that “climate-smart” projects will be funded in part by carbon offset schemes. Many of our groups question the environmental and social integrity of carbon offsetting. Carbon sequestration in soils is not permanent and is easily reversible, and should be especially excluded from schemes to offset emissions. Carbon offset schemes in agriculture will create one more driver of land dispossession of smallholder farmers, particularly in the Global South, and unfairly place the burden of mitigation on those who are most vulnerable to, but have least contributed to, the climate crisis.

3. A new space for promoting agribusiness and industrial agriculture

Companies with activities resulting in dire social impacts on farmers and communities, such as those driving land grabbing or promoting GM seeds, already claim that they are “climate-smart.”  Yara (the world’s largest fertilizer manufacturer), Syngenta (GM seeds), McDonald’s, and Walmart are all at the “climate-smart” table. Climate-smart agriculture will serve as a new promotional space for the planet’s worst social and environmental offenders in agriculture. The proposed Global Alliance on Climate-Smart Agriculture seems to be yet another strategy by powerful players to prop up industrial agriculture, which undermines the basic human right to food. It is nothing new, nothing innovative, and not what we need.

We do urgently need climate action! Unfortunately, the Alliance seriously misses the mark. Real climate solutions are already out there in farmers’ fields – based on agroecological practices and the relocalisation of food systems to effectively fight hunger. Instead of creating one more body for business-as-usual, governments, funding agencies, and international organisations should be taking bold action: committing to shift resources away from climate-damaging practices of chemical-intensive industrial agriculture and meat production and towards investment in and commitment to agroecology, food sovereignty, and support to small-scale food producers.

The International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development concluded in 2008 that business-as-usual in agriculture is not an option; instead, a thorough and radical overhaul of present international and agricultural policies is essential to meet the challenges of the future.

We reject the Global Alliance as one more step by a small percentage of the UN’s total membership to promote industrial agriculture against all the evidence of its destructive impacts on people, biodiversity, seed, water, soils, and climate. It is merely one more attempt to block the real change needed to fix our broken food systems and our broken climate, change which instead must be based on food sovereignty and agroecological approaches for agriculture and food production and the effective reduction of greenhouse gases.
International Organisations & Farmers’ Movements: ActionAid International, Centro de Estudios Internacionales y de Agricultura Internacional (CERAI), CIDSE, Coalition pour la Protection du Patrimoine Genetique African (COPAGEN), Corporate Europe Observatory, Earth in Brackets, Foro Rural Mundial (FRM), Friends of the Earth International, IBON International, Inades-Formation, International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), International-Lawyers.Org (INTLawyers), GRET, LDC Watch, Mesa de Coordinación Latinoamericana de Comercio Justo, Send a Cow, South Asia Alliance for Poverty Eradication (SAAPE), South Asia Peasants Coalition and Third World Network
National Organisations & Farmers’ Movements: Abalimi Bezekhaya (Farmers of Hope), South Africa; ACRA-CCS Foundation, Italy; Action Contre la Faim, France; Africa Europe Faith & Justice Network (AEFJN), Brussels; Agrosolidaria Federacion el Tambo Cauca, Colombia; Alliance International sur les OMD (AIOMD), Niger; All Nepal Peasants Federation (ANPFa), Nepal; Antenne Nationale du Niger (AAIOMD-Niger); Asemblea Nacional Ambiental (ANA), República Dominicana; Asociacion de Prosumidores Agroecologicos “Agrosolidaria Seccional Viani” Colombia; Asociacion Nacional de Produtores Ecologistas del Peru (ANPE); Asociacion Viva Amazonica de San Martin, Peru; Association Malienne pour la Sécurité et la Souverainté Alimentaires (AMASSA); Bangladesh NGOs Network for Radio and Communication (BNNRC); Beyond Copenhagen, India; Biofuelwatch, UK; Biowatch South Africa; Bolivian Platform on Climate Change, Bolivia; Campaign for Climate Justice Nepal (CCJN); Carbon Market Watch, Belgium; CCFD-Terre Solidaire, France; Centre for community economics and development consultants society (CECOEDECON), India; Cecosesola, Barquisimeto, Venezuela; Centre d’Actions et de Réalisations Internationales (CARI), France; Centre for Learning on Sustainable Agriculture (ILEIA), the Netherlands; Community Development Association (CDA), Bangladesh; Community Empowerment for Progress Organization (CEPO), South Sudan; CONCEPT ONG, Sénégal; EcoFrut, Colombia; EcoNexus, UK; Equity and Justice Working Group Bangladesh (EquityBD); Family Farmers’ Association, UK; Farm & Garden Trust, South Africa; Farms Not Factories, UK; Féderation des Eglises Evangéliques des Frères (FEEF), the Central African Republic; Federacion Nacional de Cooperativas Agropecuarias y Agroindustriales de Nicaragua (FENACOOP); Find Your Feet, UK; Food First Information and Action Network (FIAN) Nepal; Forum des Femmes Africaines pour l’Education (FAWECOM), Comoros; Friends of Siberian Forests, Russia; Friends of the Earth – England, Wales & Northern Ireland; Friends of the Earth – Latvia; Fundación Caminos de Indentidad (FUCAI) Colombia; Fundación Lonxanet para la Pesca Sostenible, Spain; Fundación Solidaridad, Bolivia; Harvest of Hope, South Africa; Gramya Resource Centre for Women, India; Groupe d’Action de Paix et de Formation pour la Transformation (GAPAFOT), Central African Republic; Human Rights (HR) Alliance, Nepal; Human Rights Organisation of Bhutan (HUROB); INHURED International, Nepal; Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), USA; Instituto de Cultura Popular, Argentina; Jagaran Nepal; Jubilee South Asia/Pacific Movement on Debt and Development (JSAPMDD), Philippines; Karnataka State Red Gram Growers Association, India; Labour, Health and Human Rights Development Centre, Nigeria; L’Association des Jeunes Filles Pour la Promotion de l’Espace Francophone (Membre du CNOSCG), Republic of Guinea; MADGE Australia; MASIPAG, Philippines; National Civic Forum, Sudan; National Federation of Youth Organisations in Bangladesh; National Network on Right to Food, Nepal (RtFN); Organización Casa de Semillas Criollas Atenas, Costa Rica; Pakistan Fisher Folk Forum (PFF), Pakistan; Partners for the Land & Agricultural Needs of Traditional Peoples (PLANT), USA; People’s Alliance of Central-East India (PACE-India); PHE Ethiopia Consortium; Plateforme Haïtienne de Plaidoyer pour un Développement Alternatif (PAPDA), Haïti; Plateforme pour le Commerce Equitable, France; Public Advocacy Initiatives for Rights and Values in India (PAIRVI); Red Ecologista Autónoma de la Cuenca de México; Red Nicaraguense de Comercio Comunitario (RENICC); Red Peruana de Comercio Justo y Consumo Ético, Perú; Rural Reconstruction Nepal (RRN); SADF ONG, Democratic Republic of Congo; Sanayee Development Organisation, Afghanistan; Secours Catholique (Caritas), France; SOCDA (Somali Organization for Community Development Activities); Sudan Peace and Education Development Program (SPEDP), South Sudan; Texas Drought Project, USA; Unión Nacional de Agricultores y Ganaderos de Nicaragua (UNAG); Unión LatinoAmerica de Technicos Rurales y Agrarios, Argentina; UK Food Group, UK; Vicaria del Sur, Diócesis de Florencia, Colombia; Voluntary Action for the fight against climate change and the adverse effects of Sulfur Diesel, (AVOCHACLISD), Burundi; World Development Movement, UK; and, Youth Network for MDGs, Madagascar

New York summit: Rising to a climate challenge

0

The Climate Change Summit has come and gone. The Summit was able to galvanise international action on climate change.
The UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon, told the gathering of over 120 world leaders who gathered in New York City that it has been a success. He said that event was a great and historic one, which never before had so many leaders gathered to commit to action on climate change.

Ban Ki-Moon, UN Secretary General
Ban Ki-Moon, UN Secretary General

The uniqueness of the summit is that the private sector and the civil society joined in ensuring that climate change is put at the centre stage of global discourse. It has also been said that climate change is another global terror that must be urgently addressed.

The Summit saw the launching of dozens of new initiatives including:

  • Commitments by the worldwide financial sector to mobilise $200billon for climate change in the developing countries.
  • Governments partnering with oil and gas industry to reduce methane emissions.
  • Commitment to halve deforestation by2020 and eradicate it fully the following decade.
  • A number of network initiatives by various countries and organisations.

The Summit participants were hopeful that the global Climate Conference in Paris in 2015 would agree to a binding climate deal. Ki-Moon’s post-summit comment gave hope to our future world. Let us look back on today as the day we decided – as a human family – to put our house in order to make it liveable for future generations.

The Summit in New York also witnessed other activities including the formation of Global Alliance for Agriculture of which Nigeria is actively involved.

The Summit has shown that the world can rise to what we can call a Climate Challenge.

By Prince Lekan Fadina (Centre for Investment, Sustainable Development, Management & Environment)

Parties meet on the Safe Use of Living Modified Organisms

0

Delegates from around the world will on Monday converge on Pyeongchang in South Korea for the seventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (COP MOP 7). The meeting will discuss and adopt further decisions to contribute to ensuring the safe transfer, handling and use of living modified organisms (LMOs) resulting from modern biotechnology and consider the issue of integrating biosafety into other relevant national initiatives to enhance further implementation.

Braulio Ferreira de Souza Dias, Secretary General, Convention on Biological Diversity
Braulio Ferreira de Souza Dias, Executive Secretary, Convention on Biological Diversity

The Cartagena Protocol, an additional agreement to the Convention on Biodiversity, entered into force on 11 September 2003. To date, 168 countries are Parties to the Protocol. The Supplementary Protocol, an additional agreement to the Cartagena Protocol, was adopted in Nagoya, Japan in 2010. To date, 26 countries are Parties to the Supplementary Protocol. It will enter into force 90 days after 40 Parties have acceded or ratified it. The latest country to accede to the Cartagena Protocol and the Supplementary Protocol is the United Arab Emirates on 12 September 2014.

At the end of the five-day meeting, decisions of the Parties are expected to advance the implementation of the Protocol through their 10-year Strategic Plan for the Cartagena Protocol. Among the agenda items to be discussed are: financial mechanism and resources for the Protocol’s implementation; Supplementary Protocol; risk assessment and risk management; socio-economic considerations concerning LMOs; and the assessment and review of the effectiveness of the Protocol. The Parties will also convene a special session on the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol to review integration of biosafety into relevant
national development plans, other relevant national policies in line with the Strategic Plan for the Protocol.

Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea, Yoon Sang-jick, said: “We should seize this opportunity to redouble our efforts to promote further guidance for integrating biosafety into relevant national development plans, other relevant national policies and programmes and mobilise additional resources in our effort to implement the Cartagena Protocol.”

Executive Secretary of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Braulio Ferreira de Souza Dias, said: “As we prepare towards the seventh meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, I call upon Parties to re-commit to the objectives of the Protocol as their contribution to the theme of the Pyeongchang meetings: “Biodiversity for Sustainable Development.”

UN-Habitat designates October 2014 ‘Urban October’

0

With the launch of the first ever World Cities Day on October 31, 2014, The United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) has designated the month of October as Urban October.

Joan Clos, Executive Director, UN-Habitat
Joan Clos, Executive Director, UN-Habitat

This is coming on the heels of two important milestones on the urban calendar, which coincide in the same month. On the first Monday of the month, October 6, the world will be commemorating this year’s edition of the yearly World Habitat Day. Uniquely, this year’s event will be followed by the celebration of the pioneer World Cities Day on the last day of the month, October 31. The series of celebrations, events and activities taking place in this context are all grouped together under the umbrella of Urban October.

Urban October, through the several initiatives on advocacy, outreach and communications that UN-Habitat promotes and convenes that month, will therefore present a unique platform for governments and partners to organise and promote actions and activities on sustainable urban development. Urban October is a month for raising interest on urban challenges and opportunities to the media and communications networks. It is the month for stimulating debates and moving forward commitments.

The theme for World Habitat Day (WHD) 2014 on Monday, 6 October 2014, is ‘Voices from Slums’. World Habitat Day 2014 campaigns to recognise life in slums and gives voices to slum dwellers for improving quality of living conditions in existing slums, as well as highlights the efforts done with the MDGs process. Governments, NGOs, private sector, academic and other institutions are encouraged to place current and past slum dwellers as protagonists of World Habitat Day 2014. Webstories, videos, photos, interviews and other stories will feed the campaign’s contents on social media, websites, media and other supports.

Urban Thinkers Campus will take place from 15 to 18 October 2014 in Caserta, Italy. The Campus is built on the outcomes of the deliberations of the Sixth and Seventh session of the World Urban Forum organised by UN-Habitat in Naples, Italy in 2012 and in Medellin, Colombia in April 2014. One month after the first Preparatory Committee for the Habitat III Conference, the Campus aims to gather urban thinkers and stakeholders to debate ‘The City We Need’, initiated by the World Urban Campaign.

World Cities Day (WCD) 2014, which will be commemorated on Friday, 31 October 2014, will be celebrated under the theme ‘Leading Urban Transformations’. WCD is expected to greatly promote the international community’s interest in global urbanization, push forward cooperation among countries in meeting opportunities and challenges in urbanization and contribute to urban sustainable development around the world. The city of Shanghai, China will host the main celebration of World Cities Day while there will be local events worldwide.

Nigeria holds First National Urban Forum, marks World Habitat Day 2014

1

Efforts to evolve a comprehensive but inclusive urban agenda for Nigeria will move into top gear in the federal capital Abuja next month, with the hosting of the country’s First National Urban Forum. The event is being held as part of activities commemorating World Habitat Day 2014.

Yari Kabir, National Programme Manager, Urban Development and Advocacy, UN-Habitat Programme Support Office (HAPSO) in Nigeria
Yari Kabir, National Programme Manager, Urban Development and Advocacy, UN-Habitat Programme Support Office (HAPSO) in Nigeria

The World Habitat Day is commemorated on the first Monday in October each year, in line with United Nations General Assembly Resolution 40/20A of 17th December, 1985. It is set apart for reflection on the state of cities and an assessment of progress made in efforts to ensure sustainable urbanisation and adequate shelter for all. This year’s commemoration at the federal level will however hold in Abuja on the 13th-14th October, as the first Monday coincides with a designated major public holiday.

The hosting of National Urban Forums at country level was conceived by the United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-Habitat), as a critical part of the preparatory process for the forthcoming third United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III), scheduled to take place in 2016. The Habitat III Conference is being convened as directed by United Nations General Assembly in line with the bi-decennial cycle that saw the hosting of Habitat I in Vancouver, Canada in 1976 and, Habitat II in Istanbul Turkey in 1996.

The Habitat III summit will reinvigorate the global commitment to sustainable urbanization, focus on the implementation of a “New Urban Agenda” and, build on the Habitat Agenda adopted during Habitat II in Istanbul in 1996. Already, Nigeria is supporting the preparatory process at the continental level to the tune of $3 million, through the Strengthening Partnerships for a New Africa Urban Agenda project.

Nigeria’s First National Urban Forum, which will be the highpoint of the 2014 World Habitat Day commemoration, is bringing together all key stakeholders in the housing and urban development sector to deliberate on and validate the work of consultants commissioned for the preparation of a National Habitat Report, among other activities.

The summit is coming on the heels of the inauguration of Nigeria’s National Habitat Committee by the Minister of Lands, Housing and Urban Development, Akon Eyakenyi, on 20th February, 2014 in Abuja.

The theme for World Habitat Day (WHD) 2014 is ‘Voices from Slums,’ which campaigns to recognise life in slums and gives voices to slum dwellers for improving quality of living conditions in existing informal settlements, as well as highlights the efforts made towards the MDGs process.

×