Home Blog Page 1768

Limiting global warming to 1.50C necessary, possible, urgent – Activists

0

Civil society groups on Monday, October 8, 2018 have welcomed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) latest scientific assessment on global warming, which calls for full decarbonisation latest by 2050. The details will serve as a key input for the Talanoa Dialogue at COP24 in Katowice, Poland in December 2018, as well as influence a political outcome committing to increased Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) by 2020.

IPCC Report
Limiting warming to 1.50C is necessary possible and urgent

“Science clearly shows our future is incompatible with fossil fuels. With this stark evidence at hand, governments have no excuse but to put climate action at the front and centre of their national agendas,” the activists said.

The unequivocal message from the report, based on more than 6,000 independent research papers, is that every half a degree of warming matters. Limiting warming to 1.50C is necessary possible and urgent, according to the Climate Action International (CAN), saying that it is the only option for a prosperous, just and safe future, especially for those most vulnerable at the frontlines of impacts.

The report, adds CAN, points to a radical shift to decarbonisation by 2050, but preferably earlier by 2040 given rising impacts even at one-degree Celsius warming.

“This assessment must spur the rapid switch to renewables across all sectors in the next decade driven by advances already underway in the real economy. The political will to heed the science and lead this transformational change towards 100% renewables will determine which side of history today’s leaders will stand on.”

 

Reactions from CAN members and partners

Caroline Kende-Robb, Secretary General, CARE International: “The IPCC report makes it clear: the world must come together now to take serious action to stop global warming. Developing countries are already disproportionately affected by climate change – it deprives the most vulnerable groups, particularly women and girls, from basic universal rights. CARE calls on governments, in particular, from developed countries and emerging economies, to accelerate climate action to reduce emissions now, not in 10 years. Ignoring the necessities for action that the IPCC report spells out is unacceptable.”

Moussa Elimane Sall, Executive Director of Plateforme Mauritanienne du Climat, and Board Member & Regional Coordinator of CAN-ARAB-World: “I fully understand the impressive needs for our countries and leaders to work towards a flourishing future, but to make sure that this future is as flourishing as we expect, we need to bear in mind that the earth has limited resources. Brothers in humanity, the Earth no longer has the time to see us negotiating indefinitely, it’s time to be attentive to its complaints and act accordingly. This Special IPCC report, entitled ‘Global Warming of 1.5ºC’ will provide important information about the current status of climate change, as well as what the future might hold if our governments, businesses, and communities do not start implementing real climate solutions.  It’s definitely a reminder or even a distress signal for humankind survival.”

Catherine Abreu, Executive Director, Climate Action Network Canada: “No more excuses, no more delay. That is the message this report has for the world. If we want to continue living on a planet that resembles the paradise we inhabit now, we must act immediately and without relent. Importantly, this report also tells us that we have the time and we have the means. 1.5°C is possible. So, what’s holding us back from taking the action demanded of us? Short-sighted politics and the reckless self-interest of polluting industries. The science is clear, and it has handed us a way forward: all of us must do all we can, all at the same time.”

Raijeli Nicole, Regional Director for Oxfam in the Pacific: “Climate change has set our planet on fire, millions are already feeling the impacts, and the IPCC just showed that things can get much worse. The faster governments embrace the renewable energy revolution and move to protect communities at risk, the more lives and livelihoods will be spared.

“Every tenth of a degree of warming is a choice between life or death. We’re already witnessing the beginnings of massive displacement and a shocking rise in hunger, with women living in poverty suffering the most. It only gets worse from here.”

Peter Frumhoff, Director of science and policy, Union of Concerned Scientists and a Former Lead Author, IPCC: “Many extreme weather events in the U.S. and across the globe have been intensifying after just a one-degree Celsius increase in the global average temperature. As the latest IPCC report shows us, at 1.5 degrees of warming further climate impacts will be devastating and at 2 degrees they would be calamitous. Every fraction of a degree of warming we can avoid matters.”

Wendel Trio, Director of Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe: “Science has given us a message of both urgency and hope. It has made it crystal clear that warming of more than 1.5°C would result in ever wilder extreme weather events. These in turn would expose us to greater drought, food shortages and economic devastation. The silver lining to the report is that we still have a chance to stay below 1.5°C, that solutions are within our reach and that it will help us build a safer, more prosperous Europe.

“The IPCC scientists are sending this message ahead of the all-important COP24 summit in Katowice this year, where governments are expected to commit to step up their climate targets. All eyes are on EU environment ministers now, who need to act on the IPCC warnings and commit to significantly increase the EU’s targets in line with a 1.5°C pathway. Staying below 1.5°C means Europe needs to drastically reduce emissions to reach net-zero by 2040 and this needs to be reflected in the new long-term climate strategy.”

Fiona Armstrong, Founder and Executive Director, Climate and Health Alliance – Australia (CAHA): “This IPCC report makes clear the world’s current trajectory of global warming due to continuously rising greenhouse gas emissions is putting us on track for a rise of 3-4 degrees or more.

“Australia’s health professionals are declaring this report a public health warning. With just one degree of global warming we are already seeing devastating impacts. People are dying in extreme heatwaves, food production is threatened, massive ecosystems are breaking down. Continuing our current pathway will bring further catastrophic impacts for human populations, and dramatic losses of other species.

“Collectively, we need to more than double the efforts being made globally to avoid a ‘hothouse Earth’ that will be incompatible with human civilisation. The stakes could not be higher.

“Limiting global warming is hard, but achievable. The sobering reality however is that even 1.5 degrees is too hot. Every fraction of a degree matter. We must cut emissions to zero and draw down carbon from the atmosphere. This report emphasises this needs to happen now – not in 10, 20 or 30 years – but right now.”

Nouhad Awwad, National Coordinator, Arab Youth Climate Movement-Lebanon and Board Member, Mediterranean Youth Climate Network: “The Special IPCC report, entitled “Global Warming of 1.5ºC” alert us on the importance of keeping the temperature rise below 1.5ºC. The adverse effects of climate change that range from the Arctic ice melt to the natural habitat destruction and the increase of disease burden won’t be confined to a certain country or region; it affects the world as a whole. Natural disasters and health problems severity increase with the temp increase.

“Therefore, the difference between warming of 1.5ºC and 2ºC has devastating effects on coral reefs, water availability, sea level rise and the intensity of extreme weather conditions. World leaders should collaborate with civil society, businesses and scientists to increase intentional cohesiveness, lowering their emission, raising their ambitions, increasing their climate target and reviewing their NDCs.”

Hala Murad, President, Dibeen for Environmental Development, Jordan, Member of Arab CAN-Network: The day may come when the great title is “Save people from extinction” because the whole vital system is going to the abyss, if governments and local authorities all over the world do not do everything, they can for the planet that is our home.

“To this day, in our country, we see great words and plans on paper, but we are not actually doing the role that is imposed on us so that we do not exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius, which is also dangerous, specifically government and supporting agencies they must work with the most vulnerable communities in rural and remote areas, with the poor, women, refugees and others, and should listen to more realistic programs drawn from the harmony between these communities and groups with their environment and climate.

“Talanoa dialogue is an important tool and event to observe and measure the abilities, the capacities and the main challenges that face those people to work with them closely in the future. This is an important for the biosphere to maintain its different characteristics and recover.”

Carol Gribnau, Program Director Green department, Hivos: “0.5 degree seems small but will have a tremendous impact, especially on the lives of vulnerable people in low- and middle-income countries. These countries are already being hit by the consequences of climate change and lack the means to adapt. Whether people there live on an island or in (semi-)arid areas, climate change has already affected their lives severely.

“The report shows it is still doable, but the time to act decisively and together is now. And it will take a joint effort from governments, businesses, financial institutions and citizens to make the transition to a sustainable, low-carbon, and inclusive economy. Therefore we call for an unprecedented shift in these systems by speeding up our adoption of renewable energy solutions and promoting food systems built on diversity, soil health and zero-waste.

“Even if we manage to halt climate change at the 1.5°C threshold, change is already happening. That’s why we need to support local communities to adapt to climate change and to become more resilient. Governments must live up to their commitment to balance climate finance and deliver adaptation support to developing countries. Now is the time to be better safe than sorry!”

Hamzeh Bany Yasin, Climate and Energy Policy Program Manager, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung: The IPCC has warned in all its reports that climate change will lead to adverse impacts on natural and human systems. IPCC Special Report “Global Warming of 1.5°C” gives strong insights why the 1.5°C aspirational target of the Paris Agreement should be taken very seriously; as climate threshold concludes that the risks for human well-being and livelihoods, ecosystem, food and water security, which are already serious today, will be critically higher at 1.5°C, and projected for further increase with every level of additional emission.

“For the Arab Countries, despite the variation in climate action, but none of them adequately prepares for 1.5°C-consistent pathways and its associated risks. The key message for now is the urgent need of scaling-up NDC. Yes, there are institutional and procedural challenges, but there is also a hope a close this gap. In our region, climate change agenda hasn’t yet become the priority to bring the country on track of a 1.5°C-consistent pathway, including managing the climate risks. The majority of policy-makers still doesn’t see climate change as a threat, and most of them are not well aware of its consequences. The concept of sectoral interdependence should be mainstreamed when designing policies for mutually interdependent sectors.”

Jagoda Munić, Director of Friends of the Earth Europe: “The fossil fuel age has to end: that’s the message of today’s report. To have any chance of avoiding the chaos, droughts and rising tides of 1.5 degrees or more of global warming, we must massively and speedily transform our society to kick our fossil fuel addiction.

“The EU must do its fair share, beginning with completely stopping funding for fossil fuels and switching to 100% renewables by 2030. Currently Europe is far off track.

“A safer, fairer and cleaner fossil-free Europe is possible, and communities are showing us the way – from resisting dirty energy projects everywhere, to installing community owned renewable energy schemes.

“This is a climate emergency – for many around the world preventing climate catastrophe and temperature rises exceeding 1.5 degrees is a matter of life and death. Only radical system change offers a pathway towards hope and out of despair. We want a just transition to a clean energy system that benefits people, not corporations.”

Manfred Treber, Climate and Transport Adviser, Germanwatch: “Based on the results of excellent scientific work in the last years the IPCC shows in its Special Report on 1.5°C that and how the ambitious 1.5°C-goal of the Paris Agreement can be achieved.

“To arrive at the necessary net zero emissions before 2050, the IPCC scenarios show that strong emission reductions until 2030 are needed. This means that NDCs have to be strengthened and that industrialised countries like Germany must decide soon to phase out coal until 2030.”

Yunus Arikan, Head of Global Policy and Advocacy at ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability: “We are living in an urban era, and the 1.5-degree target can only be reached if local and regional leaders work with citizens to adopt sustainable lifestyles and build robust frameworks to ensure city efforts are supported and coordinated across all levels of government.

“The release of the IPCC report coincides with the adoption of the Global Research and Action Agenda on Cities and Climate Change Science and a year in which all levels of government and climate stakeholders are coming together through Talanoa Dialogues to shape climate policy. This moves us in the right direction. With this, urban climate science will play an increasingly important role in shaping climate action, integrating sustainable urban and territorial development into climate policy and supporting a global transformation to achieve the 1.5-degree target.”

Farhana Yamin, CEO, Track 0: “While nations offered plans in Paris to reduce their emissions, current pledges are nowhere near enough to meet the Paris Agreement’s principal goal. Even if nations live up to their commitments, the planet will still be on a path to warm about 3 degrees Celsius. This is unacceptable. If this report doesn’t convince each nation that their prosperity and security require making transformational scientific, technological, political, social and economic changes to reach this monumental goal of staving off some of the worst climate change impacts, then I don’t know what will.

“Nations must now respond to the report by signalling their intention to increase their national emission reduction pledges under the Paris Agreement. At the annual UN climate talks in Poland this December, countries should commit to strengthen policies that cut global warming emissions, invest in measures to limit future climate risks, and do more to help communities cope with the climate impacts that are now unavoidable. In addition, wealthier nations that bear greater responsibility for the global warming problem need to ramp up financial and technology support for actions by developing nations, to help create a better world for all of us.

“The IPCC Report underlines the need for all governments to step up the climate ambition of existing targets, so they align with the Paris Agreement and support the achievement of the SDGs. Every country must put a date on phasing out fossil fuel emissions and subsidies so that we can achieve net zero emissions not later than 2050.”

Anne Stauffer, Director for Strategy and Campaigns at the Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL): “Climate action is all about opportunities for health: decarbonising our lives is entirely possible and will make this world a healthier, more prosperous and sustainable place. Ensuring a limit of 1.5 degree Celsius instead of 2 would mean less health-threatening extreme weather events, chronically ill people, less hospital admissions, less deaths and less financial burden on our societies.”

Kat Kramer, Christian Aid’s Global Lead, Climate Change: “The IPCC report clearly demonstrates that we can still limit temperature increases to 1.5°C and thereby avoid entering a climate era unprecedented in human experience. To do so, we must act with urgency to bring about deep emissions cuts. Governments at this December’s UN climate negotiations must sign up to increasing their climate ambition by 2020: to not do so would be a dereliction of duty towards all humanity, especially the poorest and most vulnerable, and to all life on earth. Not every pathway to achieve the goal is sustainable, however: governments must also choose to avoid false solutions, like geoengineering, to the climate threat and instead promote approaches that safeguard and promote a better quality of life for all.”

Mattias Söderberg, Senior Advocacy Advisor, DanChurchAid (Denmark): “The report highlights the urgent need for support to poor and vulnerable countries. The EU and its member states must live up to the promises about climate finance, and especially scale up the support to adaptation, which until now has not been prioritised. There is no time to waste!”

Giulia Bondi, Climate Justice and Energy Officer, CIDSE: “Limiting global warming to 1.5°C requires a radical change that we must undertake soon. We must completely shift to renewable energies following the principles of equity and sufficiency. The food sector needs to move towards agroecology and guarantee the right to food for all. The whole economy should embrace a post-growth model and Europe should lead the way in this, if wanting to prove climate leadership in meeting its international commitments.”

Sofia Kabbej, Advocacy Director, CliMates (youth network): “The new IPCC report reaffirms the need to step-up climate action if we are to cap the global temperature rise under 1.5°C. The consequences of a 1.5°C warming would still be significant and will impact millions of lives. The successful fulfilment of this commitment relies on us, as a collective, to take the appropriate decisions and translate those into action as soon as we can. Let’s also not forget that effective climate action brings about positive spill-overs to efforts aiming to reduce inequalities worldwide. Youth will be bearing most of the consequences of inaction. Now is the time to act!”

Stephen Cornelius, WWF Chief Adviser on climate change: “Every half-a-degree matter to people and nature – this is the reality of our warming world. The report is a call to action to accelerate the low-carbon transition needed across all sectors such as energy, transport, and food. Without rapid and deep cuts to global carbon emissions we face more severe impacts to ecosystems, from coral reefs to Arctic sea ice, putting more vulnerable communities and wildlife at risk. We expected tough negotiations on this landmark report and we are happy that governments have delivered a good reflection of the underlying science. Current country pledges to cut emissions are insufficient to limit global warming to 1.5°C and you can’t negotiate with science.”

Kelly Stone, Senior Policy Analyst, ActionAid USA: “The Special Report clearly shows the urgency of the Paris Agreement’s goal to limit global warming to 1.5°C. We’re already seeing serious impacts at 1°C. The science is clear that 1.5°C degrees will mean more droughts, floods and other extreme weather, and that the impacts will be even more catastrophic at 2°C degrees.

“The good news is that 1.5°C is still achievable, but only if we acknowledge that business as usual is no longer acceptable.

“Next week ActionAid, along with colleagues in the CLARA network, will release a report showing the huge potential for the right kind of action in the land sector to help meet the 1.5°C goal. Transforming to sustainable production methods, changing diets, protecting forests and safeguarding the rights of indigenous peoples would make a much greater contribution to the 1.5°C goal than has previously been recognised. Addressing harmful consumption patterns must be a key part of the picture.

“The barriers to staying under 1.5°C are not technical, but political. Governments of polluting countries must take home the message that they need to re-order their priorities and take much more action if they are going to keep their citizens and planet safe.

“Relying on large-scale negative emission technologies would be a dangerous gamble we must not take.  While some negative emissions are needed, betting on unproven and harmful technologies to remove huge amounts of emissions from the atmosphere in the future. If these technologies do not work at the hoped-for scale, it will be too late to undo the damage. The world will have locked in additional warming and related impacts.

“We strongly oppose the use of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage, or BECCS. This technology is both unproven to work at scale and relies on the myth that bioenergy is carbon neutral, meaning it won’t offer any real climate benefit.

A climate pathway that puts land needed for food and forests over to BECCS would mean betting on unproven and harmful technologies to remove emissions from the atmosphere in the future, sacrificing the very people the 1.5°C goal was supposed to protect. That BECCS remains one of the main negative emissions technologies considered in climate pathways is unacceptable.

“We’ll have a far better chance of making the 1.5°C goal if we take action to avoid emissions now by pursuing solutions that we already know can work, such as transforming our food systems and diets, and halting deforestation.”

Will McGoldrick, Global Climate Strategy Director, The Nature Conservancy: “The IPCC report is a sobering reminder that we’re still not on track to achieve the goals outlined in the Paris Agreement.  If we’re serious about keeping global warming well below 2 degrees and striving for no more than 1.5 degrees, we cannot afford further delay.

“In addition to making deep cuts to global emissions, we need to increase efforts to remove carbon from the atmosphere. The best way to do that is to protect, restore and sustainably manage our forests, grasslands and wetlands.”

Nathaniel Keohane, Senior Vice President for Climate at Environmental Defense Fund: “This new report makes it clearer than ever that we’re in the race of our lives. Our fate – and the fate of our children – is in our hands. We can make decisions that protect our communities, our children, and future generations, or we can pass on a world far different and more damaged than the one we inherited.

“It’s time to cut climate pollution, make clean energy abundant and accessible to all, and protect the world’s tropical forests that store enormous amounts of carbon. As the report makes clear, the stakes could not be higher. Even as President Trump seeks to take the U.S. backward, the rest of America – and the rest of the world – is moving ahead. The clear benefits of limiting global warming laid out in this report should inspire us to double down on our fight to provide a safe planet for our children and future generations.”

1.5°C Report: Global warming threatens Africa with poverty, hunger – Oxfam

0

As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a report detailing progress and pathways to liming global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius on Monday, October 8, 2018, Oxfam International has expressed fears that rising temperatures will push millions of people in Africa into poverty and hunger unless governments take swift action.

Apollos Nwafor
Apollos Nwafor, Pan Africa Director of Oxfam

Responding to the report, Mr. Apollos Nwafor, Pan Africa Director of Oxfam, said: “Climate change has set our planet on fire, millions are already feeling the impacts, and the IPCC just showed that things can get much worse. Settling for 2 degrees would be a death sentence for people in many parts of Africa. The faster governments embrace the renewable energy revolution and move to protect communities at risk, the more lives and livelihoods that will be spared.

“A hotter Africa is a hungrier Africa. Today at only 1.1 degrees of warming globally, crops and livestock across the region are being hit and hunger is rising, with poor small-scale women farmers, living in rural areas suffering the most. It only gets worse from here.

“To do nothing more and simply follow the commitments made in the Paris Agreement condemns the world to 3 degrees of warming. The damage to our planet and humanity would be exponentially worse and irreparable.

“None of this is inevitable. What gives us hope is that some of the poorest and lowest emitting countries are now leading the climate fight. We’ve moved from an era of ‘you first’ to ‘follow me’ – it’s time for the rich world to do just that.

“Oxfam calls for increased, responsible and accountable climate finance from rich countries that supports small scale farmers, especially women to realize their right to food security and climate justice.

“While time is short, there is still a chance of keeping to 1.5 degrees of warming. We must reject any false solution like Large Scale Land Based Investments that means kicking small scale farmers off their land to make way for carbon farming and focus instead on stopping our use of fossil fuels, starting with an end to building new coal power stations worldwide.”

According to Oxfam, natural disasters such as droughts and floods have been thwarting development on the African continent.

The group adds: “Fluctuations in agricultural production due to climate variations along with inefficient agricultural systems cause food insecurity, one of the most obvious indicators of poverty. The 2016 El Niño phenomenon, which was super charged by the effects of climate change, crippled rain-fed agricultural production and left over 40 million people foods insecure in Africa. Without urgent action to reduce global emissions, the occurrence of climate shocks and stresses in the Africa region are expected to get much worse.”

Report confirms need to keep oil in soil to achieve 1.5ºC, says 350.org

0

One month after hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets to demand real climate action as part of the Rise for Climate Mobilisation, the world’s scientists have issued their clearest call for avoiding the worst impacts of a warming world.

Payal Parekh
Payal Parekh, Programme Director, 350.org

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), UN-backed body of scientists, on Monday, October 8, 2018 released its special report on Global Warming of 1.5 ºC. The study confirms that limiting the rise in global temperatures to 1.5°C would be significantly better than breaching the 2°C threshold, supporting calls for a definitive stop to fossil fuel use and a rapid transition to energy systems based on 100% renewable energy.

Payal Parekh, Programme Director of climate change-focused non-governmental organisation, 350.org, commented: “The science in the IPCC report on 1.5°C speaks for itself. Staying under 1.5ºC is now a matter of political will. Burying our heads in the sand cannot be contemplated as an option any longer. The climate crisis is here and already impacting the most vulnerable and the least responsible for creating it. The only way to achieve it is to stop all fossil fuel extraction and redirect the massive resources currently spent on the fossil fuel economy towards the renewable energy transition.”

According to 350.org, communities worldwide are already resisting fossil fuel development and calling for a deep transformation of our energy systems and economies. Some of these stories of resistance can be found in the newly released People’s Dossier on 1.5°C, it adds, pointing out that the Dossier puts faces and voices onto the facts and data provided by the IPCC special report.

“It contains the stories of 13 communities fighting on the frontlines of climate change: from young Pacific Islanders trying to stop the Adani mega-mine to fishermen communities in Africa battling against new coal plants; from the struggle to stop a gigantic gas pipeline among the olive groves of Southern Italy to the landowners and Native Americans putting solar panels on the route of the Keystone XL pipeline.”

Over the next days, 350.org activists will also launch a globally coordinated delivery of copies of the IPCC report, demanding that all institutions withdraw their support from the fossil fuel industry and stand up to them before it’s too late.

The IPCC report explores in detail the impacts of a world 1.5°C warmer than pre-industrial levels and the feasibility of avoiding greater increases in temperature, while current national plans – if implemented – are only consistent with a world over 3°C warmer.

The key takeaways of the report are that:

Keeping the world from warming over 1.5°C will prevent considerable disruption to all of the Earth’s systems and allow for some ecosystems to partially recover from climate change after 2100, knowing that 20% to 30% of emitted CO2 will remain in the atmosphere for a time ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand years.

The 1.5°C target is feasible, provided enough economic resources are invested early enough to dramatically accelerate the phase-out of fossil fuels and the uptake of renewable energy and energy saving technologies across the board. Within the next decade or so, we will need to radically change the way we build our houses, move from one place to another and grow our food.

Delegates of national governments met in Incheon, Korea, over the course of last week, to negotiate line-by-line the so-called Summary for Policymakers (SPM), the executive summary of the report which is supposed to inform policies. Despite attempts to water down some critical language in the SPM by key countries such as the US, the underlying science in the roughly 1000-page long report doesn’t allow any national government to downplay the magnitude of the document’s findings and the need for a rapid phase-out of fossil fuels.

World must reset goal to limit global warming to 1.5°C from 2.0°C – CSE

0

“Even at a little over 1.0°C warming, India is being battered by the worst climate extremes – it is clear that the situation at 1.5°C is going to worsen. The new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has served us a final warning that we must get our act together – now and quickly,” says Sunita Narain, director general, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), in response to the release of the Panel’s latest study.

Sunita Narain
Sunita Narain, director general, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE)

The IPCC, the biggest scientific body feeding climate science to policy-makers, released on Monday, October 8, 2018 its Special Report on impacts of global warming at 1.5°C. The report documents glaring evidence of the devastating impacts of climate change on the poor and on developing countries.

Says Chandra Bhushan, deputy director general of CSE and head of its climate change unit: “The report makes it clear that the impact of 1.5°C warming is greater than what was anticipated earlier. Accordingly, the world would witness greater sea level rise, increased precipitation and higher frequency of droughts and floods, hotter days and heatwaves, more intense tropical cyclones, and increased ocean acidification and salinity. Countries like India, with large populations dependent on the agricultural and fishery sectors, would be highly impacted.”

While a 1.5°C rise in global temperatures will be precarious, a 2°C rise would be catastrophic. The report points out that the risk transition from 1.5°C to 2°C is very high and that the effects at 2°C will be more devastating than what IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report had indicated. Coastal nations and agricultural economies like India would be the worst affected. Decline in crop yields, unprecedented climate extremes and increased susceptibility could push poverty by several million by 2050.

Considering the grim warning of the IPCC Report, CSE has appealed to the world to focus exclusively on limiting warming to 1.5°C instead of 2°C, which is the upper limit of the temperature goal mentioned under Paris Agreement.

Says Bhushan: “The world cannot afford a warming of 2°C above the pre-industrial era. A 2°C warmer world will devastate economies and ecosystems and push hundreds of millions of people back into poverty. The goal of climate change now must be firmly fixed to 1.5°C to give the communities and nations a fighting chance to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. India must take the lead in creating a global coalition in this endeavor.”

The report also makes it clear that the current level of climate ambition, as set out under the Paris Agreement, will lead to disastrous effects on the planet as it is not in line with limiting warming to even 2.0°C. With inadequate climate efforts, global warming is likely to reach 1.5°C between 2030 and 2052. If global emissions continue as per the commitments made under Paris Agreement, the carbon budget (the amount of CO2 that the world can emit) for 1.5°C warming will be exhausted by 2030. In order to limit warming at 1.5°C, the world will have to reduce CO2 emissions by 45 per cent by 2030 from the 2010 levels and reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

“Though it will be very difficult in the current global economic system to limit warming to 1.5°C, but it is not impossible. This will require acting on all fronts to rapidly reduce emissions by 2030. Without an active participation of the US, this will be impossible. In totality, how the rest of the world handles the climate rogue behavior of the Trump administration will decide whether the world meets the 1.5°C goal or not,” adds Bhushan.

By refusing to endorse the findings of the IPCC’s 1.5°C Report, the US has again given a clear signal that it would continue with its climate regressive agenda, which includes obstructing the work of the UNFCCC and promoting fossil fuels like coal and gas.

 

The way ahead

“Considering the urgency to rapidly decarbonise, the world needs a ‘Plan B’, as the Plan A – the Paris Agreement – will push the world towards catastrophic warming. India must take the lead in forming a global coalition for a 1.5°C world to save poor and vulnerable populations across the world including its own,” adds Bhushan.

“The focus must now be on how the world can build a coalition to support the massive transformation required to achieve the 1.5°C target. The developed countries must take the lead by rapidly de-carbonising their economies as well as by reducing consumption. The developing countries will have to pursue low-carbon pathways more vigorously and should limit the addition of fossil fuel assets,” adds Sunita Narain.

CSE has recommended the following urgent action to limit warming to 1.5°C:

  • Keeping global warming within 1.5°C is very difficult — still the world must set its goal to limit warming to 1.5°C and not 2.0°C: There will be an inclination among countries to reject the 1.5°C target as impractical and instead, keep the focus on 2.0°C. But this would be disastrous for the poor and for developing countries. If the world insists on sticking to the 2.0°C target, in all probability it will overshoot it. However, if the world agrees to keep warming within 1.5°C, it can contain it well within 2.0°C.
  • Require a UNFCCC-plus approach: Climate efforts cannot be restrictive to the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement. The world needs to think and devise more forums and venues to address climate change.
  • Equity is essential and must be re-visited: The Summary for Policy Makers points out that “social justice and equity are core aspects of climate-resilient development pathways that aim to limit global warming to 1.5°C”. The world, however, requires a new formulation of equity in which every country must act now and actively raise its level of ambition. The developed countries must take the lead by rapidly de-carbonising their economies as well as reducing consumption. Developing countries will have to pursue low-carbon pathways more vigorously and should limit addition of fossil fuel assets going ahead.
  • Enhancing sinks in natural ecosystems is key to limiting warming to 1.5°C: All pathways to reduce emissions, to keep the warming within 1.5°C require Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) in the Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector in varying degree. Sequestering CO2 in AFOLU sector will require incentivising billions of farmers and forest-dwellers to pursue sustainable practices that enhance carbon sinks. The world must come together to devise a mechanism to do this.
  • Acting on all fossil fuels is must: The IPCC report emphasises the need to reduce coal consumption rapidly, though it allows for the use of gas with carbon capture and storage. CSE disagrees with this formulation. The world needs to act on all fossil fuels simultaneously.
  • Ultimately, rapid de-carbonisation and reducing consumption levels is the key: The 1.5°C report states that the final energy demand in 2100 will be 20-60 per cent higher relative to the 2014 levels across available 1.5°C scenarios. Addressing this in a sustainable manner implies de-carbonising existing consumption, as well as drastically reducing consumption going forward, especially in the developed world.  In the developing world, the focus must be more on rapid adoption of low carbon growth. A fossil fuel-free energy system and investments in energy efficiency will help grow the economy in most scenarios. Developing countries must seize this opportunity.

1.5°C Report: LDCs urge nations to grow climate action, be ambitious

0

Against the backdrop of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C released on Monday, October 8, 2018, countries have been told to immediately intensify climate action and be more ambitious for the future.

Gebru Jember Endalew
Chair of the Least Developed Countries (LDC) group, Gebru Jember Endalew

Chair of the Least Developed Countries Group, Gebru Jember Endalew, made the submission in a response to the report and the accompanying summary for policy makers.

Endalew said: “The report provides concrete scientific evidence that confirms the importance of limiting global warming to 1.5°C as opposed to 2°C. Communities across the world are already experiencing the devastating impacts of 1°C global warming. Each fraction of a degree that global temperatures rise is extremely dangerous.

“Limiting global temperature increases to 1.5°C means significantly decreased levels of food insecurity, water shortages, destruction of infrastructure, and displacement from sea level rise and other impacts. To the lives and livelihoods of billions, that half a degree is everything.

“The science makes clear that there is an urgent need to accelerate the global response to climate change to avoid exceeding the 1.5°C limit. Governments must increase climate action now and submit more ambitious plans for the future. This includes increasing the level of support to developing countries to enable them to develop and lift their people out of poverty without going down a traditional, unsustainable development pathway.”

On the issue of loss and damage, he commented: “This IPCC report confirms that loss and damage resulting from climate change will only worsen with further warming with much greater losses at 2°C than at 1.5°C. It is particularly vulnerable countries like the least developed countries that are worst affected by the devastating impacts of climate change and bear the greatest cost from the damage it causes, despite contributing the least to the problem. This injustice must be addressed by the international community through the provision of support for dealing with loss and damage.

“The most important message of this IPCC report is that achieving the 1.5°C is necessary, achievable, and urgent. A safer more prosperous future is possible with immediate action to implement transformative change across societies. There is a need to take advantage of the increasing availability of affordable, renewable and efficient energy solutions, rapidly reduce the use of fossil fuels, with coal phased out by mid-century, preserve and restore forests and soils, promote sustainable agriculture and implement other real climate solutions that together can bring about a zero-carbon economy.”

On the implementation guidelines for the Paris Agreement that are due at COP24 in December 2018, he noted: “The IPCC report has made even clearer the need for the Paris Rulebook to properly reflect the breadth of action required by all countries to achieve the Agreement’s 1.5°C goal. Countries must deliver a robust Rulebook that will ensure adequate action is taken to cut emissions, adapt to climate change and address loss and damage, and that support is provided to enable poorer countries to do the same.”

Unique changes needed to stem catastrophic global warming, warns IPCC

0

Limiting global warming to 1.5ºC would require rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society, the IPCC said in a new assessment. With clear benefits to people and natural ecosystems, limiting global warming to 1.5ºC compared to 2ºC could go hand in hand with ensuring a more sustainable and equitable society, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said on Monday, October 8, 2018.

IPCC 48th session
Opening ceremony of IPCC 48th session in the Republic of Korea

The Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5ºC was approved by the IPCC on Saturday in Incheon, Republic of Korea. It will be a key scientific input into the Katowice Climate Change Conference in Poland in December, when governments review the Paris Agreement to tackle climate change.

“With more than 6,000 scientific references cited and the dedicated contribution of thousands of expert and government reviewers worldwide, this important report testifies to the breadth and policy relevance of the IPCC,” said Hoesung Lee, Chair of the IPCC.

Ninety-one authors and review editors from 40 countries prepared the IPCC report in response to an invitation from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) when it adopted the Paris Agreement in 2015.

The report’s full name is “Global Warming of 1.5°C, an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty”.

“One of the key messages that comes out very strongly from this report is that we are already seeing the consequences of 1°C of global warming through more extreme weather, rising sea levels and diminishing Arctic sea ice, among other changes,” said Panmao Zhai, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group I.

The report highlights a number of climate change impacts that could be avoided by limiting global warming to 1.5ºC compared to 2ºC, or more. For instance, by 2100, global sea level rise would be 10 cm lower with global warming of 1.5°C compared with 2°C. The likelihood of an Arctic Ocean free of sea ice in summer would be once per century with global warming of 1.5°C, compared with at least once per decade with 2°C. Coral reefs would decline by 70-90 percent with global warming of 1.5°C, whereas virtually all (> 99 percent) would be lost with 2ºC.

“Every extra bit of warming matters, especially since warming of 1.5ºC or higher increases the risk associated with long-lasting or irreversible changes, such as the loss of some ecosystems,” said Hans-Otto Pörtner, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group II.

Limiting global warming would also give people and ecosystems more room to adapt and remain below relevant risk thresholds, added Pörtner. The report also examines pathways available to limit warming to 1.5ºC, what it would take to achieve them and what the consequences could be.

“The good news is that some of the kinds of actions that would be needed to limit global warming to 1.5ºC are already underway around the world, but they would need to accelerate,” said Valerie Masson-Delmotte, Co-Chair of Working Group I.

The report finds that limiting global warming to 1.5°C would require “rapid and far-reaching” transitions in land, energy, industry, buildings, transport, and cities. Global net human-caused emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) would need to fall by about 45 percent from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching “net zero” around 2050. This means that any remaining emissions would need to be balanced by removing CO2 from the air.

“Limiting warming to 1.5ºC is possible within the laws of chemistry and physics but doing so would require unprecedented changes,” said Jim Skea, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group III.

Allowing the global temperature to temporarily exceed or ‘overshoot’ 1.5ºC would mean a greater reliance on techniques that remove CO2 from the air to return global temperature to below 1.5ºC by 2100. The effectiveness of such techniques are unproven at large scale and some may carry significant risks for sustainable development, the report notes.

“Limiting global warming to 1.5°C compared with 2°C would reduce challenging impacts on ecosystems, human health and well-being, making it easier to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals,” said Priyardarshi Shukla, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group III.

The decisions we make today are critical in ensuring a safe and sustainable world for everyone, both now and in the future, said Debra Roberts, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group II.

“This report gives policymakers and practitioners the information they need to make decisions that tackle climate change while considering local context and people’s needs. The next few years are probably the most important in our history,” she said.

The IPCC is the leading world body for assessing the science related to climate change, its impacts and potential future risks, and possible response options.

The report was prepared under the scientific leadership of all three IPCC working groups. Working Group I assesses the physical science basis of climate change; Working Group II addresses impacts, adaptation and vulnerability; and Working Group III deals with the mitigation of climate change.

The Paris Agreement adopted by 195 nations at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC in December 2015 included the aim of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change by “holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.”

As part of the decision to adopt the Paris Agreement, the IPCC was invited to produce, in 2018, a Special Report on global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways. The IPCC accepted the invitation, adding that the Special Report would look at these issues in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.

“Global Warming of 1.5ºC” is the first in a series of Special Reports to be produced in the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Cycle. Next year, the IPCC will release the “Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, and Climate Change and Land”, which looks at how climate change affects land use.

The Summary for Policymakers (SPM) presents the key findings of the Special Report, based on the assessment of the available scientific, technical and socio-economic literature relevant to global warming of 1.5°C.

The Summary for Policymakers of the Special Report on “Global Warming of 1.5ºC” (SR15) is available at http://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15/ or www.ipcc.ch.

Nations agree to ban fishing in Arctic Ocean

0

A new landmark global agreement has resulted in a fishing ban in the Arctic Ocean.

Fish ban
Fishing in the Arctic Ocean

The European Union, Canada, the People’s Republic of China, Denmark, Iceland, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Norway, the Russian Federation and the United States on Thursday, October 4, 2018 agreed to the deal. Collectively, they make up 75 per cent of global GDP.

The agreement, signed in Greenland, states that commercial fishing in the high seas portion of the Central Arctic Ocean will be banned, until scientists can confirm that it can be done sustainably.

The agreement will enter into force when all 10 Parties have ratified the agreement.

Karmenu Vella, Commissioner for the Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, said: “This historic agreement was only possible thanks to the strong commitment and leadership shown by all Parties. It shows what multilateralism can achieve, when there is a strong sense of common purpose.”

The Artic region is warming at almost three times the global average rate, this causes a change in the size and distribution of fish stocks. In turn, the Arctic high seas could become more attractive to commercial fisheries in the medium to long term.

Karmenu Vella added: “Protection of the Arctic was a significant gap in international ocean governance. Today, we have all committed to safeguarding this fragile marine ecosystem for future generations. I call upon all Parties to swiftly proceed to the ratification of this important agreement.”

This agreement is said to be the first step in ensuring that future fishing is carried out sustainably.

In mid-September the United Nations concluded its first session on creating an intergovernmental legally binding treaty to protect marine biodiversity in ocean waters. The second session is scheduled for March 2019.

Recently, the UK government has announced its support to protect 30 per cent of global oceans in a bid to protect marine life.

Courtesy: Climate Action

Governments wary of new products as tobacco talks close

0

At the end of the eighth session of the global tobacco treaty (WHO- FCTC) negotiations on Saturday, October 6, 2018, governments unanimously adopted policies that eliminate loopholes Big Tobacco allegedly use to gain access to the talks, redouble defenses against evolving industry tactics, and mandate a study on new tobacco products, which are said to pose a threat to public health – particularly to children.

Cigarettes
Cigarettes are said to have a significant impact on the environment, not just health

Big Tobacco allegedly attempted to undermine negotiations by stacking government delegations, commandeering industry front groups, lobbying Parties, posing as the public and employing other means to interfere with policies that would save lives and reduce tobacco consumption.

Parties however adopted a good governance policy that eliminates the loopholes, shutting out the industry and protecting the treaty from interference.

“The tobacco industry is the single largest barrier to tobacco control policies globally – and these negotiations were no exception,” said Michel Legendre, associate campaign director at Corporate Accountability. “We applaud the delegates that stood up to the industry and staunchly rejected their rhetoric. It is thanks to them that governments have now adopted precedent-setting measures that will protect millions of people’s lives.”

Parties were said to have eliminated Big Tobacco’s last entryways into the talks, as well as expanded the treaty’s firewall policies that protect public health policy making from the influence of emerging industry tactics. The adopted policy includes specific language to expose and counteract tactics like the Philip Morris International-funded foundation, and it called on all institutions to reject any proposed partnership, among other measures.

“This industry may claim it’s turning a new leaf, but we aren’t falling for its latest scam,” said Akinbode Oluwafemi, Deputy Executive Director of Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria (ERA/FoEN). “Big Tobacco tries to confuse, sow doubt, and derail policy with its PR stunts, but governments around the world are rejecting its attempts.”

“Big Tobacco will stop at nothing to try to undermine the lifesaving measures of the treaty,” said Dr. Nuntavarn Vichit-Vadakan, a delegate for Thailand. “Today, we made great strides to keep the industry where it belongs: outside of the talks and away from public health policy.”

Parties also called on the Secretariat to fulfill its commitment and provide governments with the necessary resources to hold the tobacco industry civilly and criminally liable for its abuses – potentially unveiling a new frontier of tobacco control.

“Soon, Parties will have the tools they need to make Big Tobacco pay,” said Dr. Reina Roa, Panama Ministry of Health. “Liability actions will unlock unlimited potential to transform the way this industry, and other corporations operate globally.”

Casting out the tobacco industry could provide precedent for insulating other policy making spaces, say observers, saying it includes corporations that drive environmental and public health harms.

They believe that decisions adopted by Parties will shape the implementation of the FCTC for the next two years and beyond. The treaty, which entered into force in 2005, contains the world’s most effective tobacco control and corporate accountability measures – estimated to save more than 200 million lives by 2050 if fully implemented.

Key outcomes from the talks included:

  • Eliminating public badge and delegate loophole exploited by the industry.
  • Reaffirming Article 5.3 guidelines, safeguarding the treaty from emerging industry tactics and calling for all institutions to reject partnerships with industry-funded groups.
  • Calling for the advancement of liability in Article 19.
  • Recommending a study on heat-not-burn products and declaring that the FCTC guidelines apply to these novel and emerging products.
  • Adopting a global strategy for tobacco reduction.

Why government lays emphasis on EIA for project implementation

0

Useful modification of industrial process designs to achieve better efficiency, improved capacity utilisation and sustainable use of natural resources have been identified as major reasons why the government emphasises the need for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) reports.

Energy EIA
Participants at the Stakeholders’ Interactive Forum on Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) For Renewable Energy (RE) Development in Nigeria

Permanent Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Environment, Mr Aliboh Leon Lawrence, made the submission in Port Harcourt, Rivers State on Tuesday, September 25, 2018 during the opening of a three-day “Stakeholders’ Interactive Forum on Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) For Renewable Energy (RE) Development in Nigeria”.

The forum held courtesy of the UNDP-GEF (United Nations Development Programme – Global Environment Facility) De-risking Renewable Energy NAMA (Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Action) for the Power Sector Project that aims to ensure effectiveness and sustainability of investment in the RE Sector.

One of the objectives of the initiative, according to the project promoters, is to achieve a transformation in the electricity mix such that at least 20GW of Nigeria’s electricity is generated from solar PV by 2030 – albeit in an environmentally and socially sustainable manner.

Lawrence, who was represented by the Director, Environmental Assessment Department in the ministry, Mr John Alonge, disclosed that the ministry had received and evaluated over 4,000 different categories of EIA reports for projects in various sectors of the economy including renewable energy, oil and gas infrastructure, incineration, ginnery, manufacturing, waste management and agriculture, among others.

The EIA process in Nigeria as in many other countries of the world recognises the importance of the views and concerns of stakeholders in the successful implementation of development projects, added Lawrence, pointing out that public consultation and participation in the EIA process are key components of the EIA law in country.

He stressed that, by providing the affected people with the mechanism for presenting their range of social, economic and political problems, public participation not only helps in enriching EIA process but serves to stem agitation and lack of cooperation from host communities and other interested parties and thus create an enabling environment for projects to be successfully implemented.

His words: “Our experience in stakeholders’ participation in the EIA process for renewable energy projects in the last five years shows increasing understanding by our people of the importance of EIA as a tool for environmental management. However, if the full objectives of EIA are to be met, stakeholders must move from mere criticism of EIA studies and the demand for monetary compensations alone to a more constructive evaluation of EIA reports based on sound knowledge of local environment in which the project is situation.”

Pproject team leader, Okon Ekpenyong, said the overall objective of the forum is to support the implementation of the EIA Act towards enhancing sustainability and ease of access to finance, with the specific objectives being to discuss and sensitise stakeholders on key elements of EIA Act vis-à-vis sustainability principles and requirements of international financiers.

Ekpenyong, an engineer, also listed the objectives to include: carrying out rapid assessment and identifying gaps; reviewing existing accredited environmental assessment of consultants and modalities for feedback and sanctions; establishing appropriate framework for baseline data collection; and identifying challenges and recommending measures for addressing them.

Delivering a paper on “Environmental implications of large-scale renewable energy projects”, the Managing Director, Environmental Accord Limited, Ibrahim Salau, identified two major risks to be addressed in the sector as building local capacity across sectors and de-risking the risk of lengthy and expensive permitting process.

He said: “De-risking the large-scale renewable energy sector is important because we need electricity, and not just because we need electricity, but we need clean electricity which large-scale electricity project will deliver but we also need to address these risks. So, the first risk relates to the quality of the environmental and social impact reports that are prepared in Nigeria. So, that relates to increased cost to investors because they need to bring in foreign experts because most local consultants are not able to deliver the required quality. So, they then need to bring in international consultants who are expensive. This relates to cost. This can be addressed by building the capacity of local consultants, and also of different stakeholders.

“There is also the permitting process, there’s a risk that the permitting process can be lengthy and very costly. So, the duration of the permitting process is determined by the Nigerian EIA process which the federal ministry of environment oversees. So, that’s why the FME needs to be a bit more flexible to see how it can work with developers to make things happen more quickly and reduce cost.

“They can reduce cost if one season baseline studies is approved compared to a two-season, that saves cost for the developer. They can also save cost by looking at the rate, the fees that are charged along the entire permitting process. It can also reduce cost and duration by coming up with an abridged version of the process as it has been doing with other sectors, for instance, the mini-grid sector.”

A participant from Akwa Ibom State Ministry of Environment in Uyo, Emem Umoette, highlighted the importance of renewable energy sector in power generation, saying that, apart from ensuring environmentally-friendly low carbon emission, readily accessible and inexhaustible, they are relatively economical and easier to maintain at the long-run.

Mrs Donna Aimiuwu of the Federal Ministry of Environment underscored the importance of the meeting, saying it sensitised stakeholders of emerging trends in the sector for better knowledge and enhanced regulatory process.

She said: “The private sector and other practitioners are here and along the line every stakeholder will come in and that will help to ensure the goals for this particular programme is achieved. So, this is a step towards the wholesome goal.

“You can see that along the line a lot of us got better educated about the prevailing trends and emergent issues that have come in the line of environmental issues. The issue of environment concerns everybody and we’re talking of large-scale project here and assessing funds from international organisations, hence the concern. The private sector and other practitioners are here and along the line every stakeholder will come in and that will help to ensure the goals for this particular programme is achieved. So, this is a step towards the wholesome goal,” she added.

UN seeks closer collaboration to address humanitarian crisis in Nigeria

0

The United Nations (UN) on Friday, October 5, 2018 called for stronger partnership with stakeholders to address humanitarian crisis caused by Boko Haram insurgency in the North-East region.

UNDP Nigeria
Achim Steiner, the UN Development Administrator (right); Mark Lowcock, UN Emergency Relief Coordinator (second left); Edward Kallon, Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator & UNDP Nigeria Resident Representative (left); and Zainab Ahmed, Finance Minister, launching the National Human Development Report 2018 in Abuja

Achim Steiner, the UN Development Administrator and Mark Lowcock, UN Emergency Relief Coordinator, made the call at a joint press conference in Maiduguri, Borno State.

Steiner stressed the need for national and international partners to reinforce efforts toward addressing dire humanitarian needs in the conflict-ravaged states of Borno, Adamawa and Yobe.

He noted that such partnership between humanitarian and development organisations was imperative to tackle humanitarian needs and root cause of the crisis.

Steiner said: “We have a unique opportunity to make real difference to communities across the North-East.

“Helping communities affected by the crisis requires us to work together; humanitarian and development organisations alike, to tackle immediate humanitarian needs and the root causes of the crisis.

“The government of Nigeria has launched recovery initiatives and efforts in the North-East aimed at rapid stabilisation.

“Early recovery and livelihoods activities implemented by UN agencies, international and local organisations seek to address the underlying causes of the conflict, lay foundation for sustainable development and prevent aid dependency.’’

Steiner expressed satisfaction with rebuilding and resettlement of displaced communities in Borno, adding that proactive activities are necessary to ensure sustainability of the programme.

Also commenting, Lowcock said they were on a two-day official visit to Nigeria to appraise the humanitarian situation in North-East and Lake Chad region.

Lowcock reiterated UN commitments to support Nigeria to address humanitarian crisis, fast track recovery and stabilisation of communities affected by the conflict.

“We are committed to Nigeria and to the people of Nigeria.

“We are here to support the government’s leadership towards solutions in the North-East as humanitarian intervention can only be a temporary solution.

“I am pleased to be here with the UNDP administrator to help join up humanitarian and development efforts to save lives; help stabilise the situation, rebuild lives and communities for the future.

“We must do everything we can to prevent this crisis from continuing for years,” he added.

According to the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN-OCHA), the visit was sequel to an international donor conference held in Berlin in September, during which donors pledged $2.5 billion for humanitarian, stabilisation and recovery projects in Lake Chad region.

The UN agency said over 7.7 million people need humanitarian assistance, while food security and nutrition remained fragile in the war-ravaged region.

Also, an estimated three million people face critical food insecurity and about one million children between the ages of six months and five years face malnourishment while 440,000 others suffers severe acute malnutrition, it said.

By Rabiu Sani