25.4 C
Lagos
Saturday, August 9, 2025
Home Blog

INC-5.2: World not on track to deliver plastic treaty, lament CSOs, urge negotiators to ‘fix the process’

Michael Simire
-
0
INC-5.2: World not on track to deliver plastic treaty, lament CSOs, urge negotiators to ‘fix the process’

Four days into the final Global Plastics Treaty negotiations in Geneva, civil society organisations (CSOs) are bothered that the world is not on track to deliver a treaty that will protect people and nature.

They are therefore demanding a change, even as they join the voices of waste pickers, frontline communities, scientists, healthcare professionals, children and youth, women, businesses, and non-governmental organisations around the world to call on governments to step up.

Plastic Treaty
Campaigners seek a strong global plastic treaty. Photo credit: Samuel Schalch / Greenpeace

“Fix the process, keep your promise, and finalise a meaningful treaty to end plastic pollution,” they insist.

In a reaction to the current state of the Plastics Treaty negotiations, Break Free From Plastic Movement submitted: “People worldwide have made it clear: they support decisive action to cut plastic production, consumption, and pollution. A majority of governments have endorsed these demands, yet negotiations are stalling with a small group of petro- and plastic-producing states deploying delay tactics, with no sign that they intend to raise ambition.

“With just days remaining, the dynamic must change. Countries must keep their commitment to end plastic pollution. They must use every tool available to deliver a strong treaty – one that includes legally binding rules on production and chemicals, uplifts real solutions, safeguards human rights and protects frontline communities. There is no room left for compromise that weakens ambition. The world is watching.”

The Business Coalition for Global Plastics Treaty is bothered that, at the midpoint of INC-5.2, negotiations are running out of time, with no clear path to an agreement. It adds that the current approach is not delivering the progress needed to reach a meaningful outcome by the end of next week.

‍The group stated: “Governments committed to leaving Geneva with a strong treaty must act decisively. They must leverage all means available and support the INC Chair to establish an effective process. The time for incremental steps has passed.

‍”Governments must be bold, guided by the clear ask from the majority of countries, businesses, and civil society to deliver a robust agreement with harmonised regulations across the full lifecycle to address plastic pollution. The Business Coalition stands ready to support negotiators in achieving this outcome.”

“Plastic pollution is a global challenge, and global regulation is needed to effectively alleviate the situation. Harmonised regulations drive consistency across borders while supporting national ambitions and provide the lowest cost option to effectively address plastic pollution,” said Tove Andersen, CEO at TOMRA and Spokesperson for a Business Coalition for Global Plastics Treaty.

“At Borealis, we’ve long championed circularity. Through innovation and partnerships, we’ve shown that sustainable plastics solutions are possible. However, to scale these solutions globally, we need a level playing field,” said Stefan Doboczky, CEO at Borealis.

“We’re at a unique moment in time where business, civil society, and a majority of countries are calling for harmonised regulation on plastic pollution. The time to act is now,” stated Jodie Roussell, Global Public Affairs Lead, Packaging and Sustainability at Nestlé and Spokesperson for a Business Coalition for Global Plastics Treaty. 

“Our economic analysis suggests that harmonised regulations could more than double global extended producer responsibility revenues to $576 billion, driving a scale up of collection and recycling,” noted Sabine Strnad, Global Lead Circular Economy and Packaging at Henkel and Spokesperson for a Business Coalition for Global Plastics Treaty.

“We want to scale solutions that tackle plastic pollution, and a treaty with harmonised regulations will make this easier for businesses to do,” said Ed Shepherd, Senior Global Sustainability Manager – Circular Economy at Unilever and Spokesperson for a Business Coalition for Global Plastics Treaty.  

“Our economic analysis shows that harmonised regulations can drive stable job creation, with 2.3 million more jobs being created, particularly in waste management,” stressed Ali Golden, Director of Strategic Relationships at TerraCycle and Spokesperson for a Business Coalition for Global Plastics Treaty 

“Our economic analysis shows that harmonised regulations on product design alone can create $50 billion per year in additional economic value for materials in the plastics recycling value chain,” said Rob Opsomer, Executive Lead Plastics & Finance, The Ellen MacArthur Foundation. 

“Business supports a treaty with harmonised regulations because it drives regulatory consistency across borders while supporting national ambitions,” said Conrick Gallagher III, VP of Partnerships at Okeanos.

The Centre for International Environmental Law stated: “After three years of trying to work by consensus, the negotiations are now at a breaking point.

“What was meant to be a global effort to solve the plastics crisis has stalled. As in the climate space, it’s the countries least responsible for the problem that are fighting hardest for an ambitious treaty, we see some of the countries least responsible for the plastics crisis holding the line for ambition while producers are in a race to the bottom, with some even questioning whether the treaty is about plastic.

“This cannot continue. Member States must use every tool of multilateralism at their disposal and move forward with solutions that aren’t hostage to those defending the status quo.

“Anything less will fall short of the ambition promised in UNEA resolution 5/14 – and fail the people and planet this treaty was meant to protect.”

“The Global Plastics Treaty must enable a process for effective decision-making,” states Merrisa Naidoo, GAIA Africa Plastics Programme Manager. “To avoid earnest negotiations amounting to nothing, negotiators must demonstrate courage, not compromise by calling for a majority vote when consensus cannot be reached.  If we continue to stall in consensus, we trade progress for paralysis.”

Rafael Eudes of Aliança Resíduo Zero Brasil states, “It is time to use decision-making tools that allow willing counties to move forward instead of letting a few run negotiations around in circles. A strong treaty with majority support beats a weak treaty that caters only to the few. Governments need to hear civil society’s urgent demand for ambition – the credibility of multilateralism and the planet’s future is on the line.”

Youth Plastic Action Network (YPAN) stated: “We are deeply concerned by the deadlock, the unwillingness to compromise, and the deliberate and malicious delays we are witnessing.

“Failing to reach an agreement at INC-5.2, failing to report back to UNEA, and failing to deliver on Resolution 5/14 is not just a procedural catastrophe. It is an acceptance that the deliberate actions to block a treaty today will have an intergenerational multiplier effect, undermining the health of present generations, degrading our shared ecosystems, and putting at risk the well-being of all future generations.

“Additionally, a failure at INC-5.2 would be yet another devastating blow to an already faltering multilateral order.

“We call upon all Member States to rise above individual interests, to demonstrate ambition, and to engage constructively in negotiations aimed at securing an outcome that advances the collective interest of all. For the sake of our futures, we need meaningful action now.”

Graham Forbes, Head of the Global Plastics Campaign for Greenpeace USA as well as the Greenpeace delegation for the treaty negotiations, commented: “In Busan and Nice, governments have shown ambition, which means reducing plastic production. A weak and effective treaty would be a betrayal that would further increase the burden on the countries of the Global South and encourage the world’s biggest polluters. All countries that have shown ambition must step up and adopt a treaty that reduces plastic production. They must have confidence because the public supports them and relies on their leadership and action.

“Multilateralism must work for those who need it most. The consensus failed because of the tyranny of a minority. Ambitious countries must deliver on their promises, or they will be remembered as those who let the world choke on plastic. Governments have promised to be ambitious. They must now deliver on their promises, without compromise.”

Erin Simon, Vice President, Plastic Waste & Business, World Wildlife Fund, said: “We’re nearly halfway through INC-5.2 and the same, tired tactics are still causing gridlock at the negotiating table. We’ve been here before, and we know the same old playbook doesn’t work.

“With so much at stake, the cost of inaction will have devastating consequences for generations to come. If we can’t turn this around, we risk leaving Geneva either empty-handed or with an empty treaty. It’s time for the majority to find their voice, choose a path and leave a legacy of progress not pollution.”

Margaret Spring, Chair, International Science Council Expert Group on Plastic Pollution, said: “Scientific evidence remains unchanged by negotiations, and provides an objective basis for sound decision-making now and in the future. This science is clear: impacts to human health and the environment from plastic pollution occur across the full life cycle of plastics.

“The International Science Council and our colleagues in the scientific community are ready to support the critical opportunity before delegates to demonstrate that multilateral cooperation informed by science can address the challenges of our time and protect human health and the environment from plastic pollution.”

Energy institute holds maiden matriculation, pioneers National Diploma in Solar Technology

Michael Simire
-
0
Energy institute holds maiden matriculation, pioneers National Diploma in Solar Technology

The Asteven Energy Institute has made history by holding its maiden matriculation ceremony for 17 pioneer students of the 2024/2025 academic session.

The students are the first in the country to undertake a National Diploma in Solar Technology and Management.

Asteven Energy Institute
Matriculating students at Asteven Energy Institute

Held on Friday, August 8, 2025, the event went beyond the traditional gowns and oaths, marking a significant step in Nigeria’s renewable energy capacity-building efforts.

For Dr  Sunny Akpoyibo, President and Founder of the Asteven Group, the ceremony was the realisation of a long-held dream.

“To see this dream come true with a generation that will transform Nigeria’s energy revolution is deeply fulfilling,” Akpoyibo said.

He recalled Nigeria’s missed opportunities in the renewable energy sector – vast sums invested in energy access projects with little to show in terms of skilled manpower development.

“In Nigeria today, billions of dollars have come in for access to energy for underserved communities,” he said, citing examples of $550 million and $750 million investments in successive years.

“But we must ask ourselves: who utilised the money? Where was the professional labour force to execute these projects?” he asked rhetorically.

He lamented that, unlike the UK and Germany, which had certified solar technology professionals, Nigeria still lacked a trained and accredited workforce.

He stressed that the Asteven Energy Institute was created to fill that void.

“This is the first in Nigeria to be approved by the National Board for Technical Education and the Ministry of Education for a National Diploma in Solar Technology,” he declared.

 “You are the future of the 2050 net-zero goals we talk about. The time will come when you won’t be looking for jobs – the jobs will look for you.”

The president revealed that the development of the curriculum took two and a half years and costs ₦35 million.

 “The curriculum we developed here in Nigeria has now been adopted in India,” he noted, underscoring its quality and relevance.

“This journey is bigger than a certificate,” Akpoyibo said.

“It’s about setting standards, creating a legacy, and powering communities with clean energy.”

Akpoyibo commended the parents, guardians, and dignitaries in attendance  for believing in the Institute’s vision.

He gave special recognition to former Senate President Bukola Saraki, who inaugurated the Institute during his tenure.

The Rector of the Institute, Prof. Magnus Onuoha, described the matriculation as a milestone that moved the institute beyond the short certificate courses it had offered since 2018.

“With this programme, we are producing graduates for the renewable energy workforce,” he said.

“Our vision is clear – to raise a generation of green professionals who are globally competitive.”

Onuoha noted that since its inception, Asteven Energy Institute had trained over 3,000 individuals in solar technology solutions across its campuses in Lagos, Abuja, and Warri.

But the introduction of the diploma programme, the rector emphasised, represented a “bold step” in Nigeria’s quest for clean energy self-sufficiency.

Addressing the 17 matriculating students, Akpoyibo and Onuoha issued a joint charge: to be focused, disciplined, and relentless in their pursuit of excellence.

The graduates of its National Diploma in Solar Technology and Management will not only meet Nigeria’s renewable energy manpower needs but will also shape the country’s contribution to the global fight against climate change.

As the applause rang out and the new students donned their matriculation gowns, one thing was clear.

These 17 young men and women are not just students – they are the torchbearers of Nigeria’s clean energy future.

Toxic pesticides: SRADev, experts urge govt to go organic

Michael Simire
-
0
Toxic pesticides: SRADev, experts urge govt to go organic

The Sustainable Research and Action for Environmental Development (SRADev Nigeria) has urged the Federal Government to prioritise investments in organic and agroecological farming as safer, sustainable alternatives to conventional agriculture.

The organisation made the call on Friday, August 8, 2025, in Abuja at a news conference themed “Stop the Spread of Highly Toxic Chemicals in Our Food: Save Our Families, Save Our Health and Future.”

Pesticides use
Pesticides use

Mr. Victor Fabunmi, an Environmental Toxicologist and Policy Advocate with SRADev Nigeria, stressed the need to intensify awareness and advocacy for organic agriculture while de-emphasising conventional practices that rely heavily on chemical inputs.

He proposed integrating organic agriculture into the nation’s educational curriculum and providing financial support to specialised training institutions.

“Our passionate call is for the Nigerian government to facilitate access to certification services. There is currently no government-approved certifying body to standardise products and ensure compliance with organic production systems.

“Nigeria must end its dependence on globally banned pesticides for health and ecological safety. The time to invest in organic, agroecological alternatives is now, ” he said.

Prof. Simon Irtwange, co-founder of the Alliance for Action on Pesticides in Nigeria (AAPN), also warned about the dangers of highly toxic chemicals to human health and the environment.

He noted that government programmes, often facilitated by legislators, ministries, and development partners, routinely distribute chemical fertilisers and pesticides to farmers.

According to him, while these products contribute to agricultural productivity, they pose significant public health, trade, and environmental challenges.

“A critical concern is that a significant portion of these pesticides fall under the category of Highly Hazardous Pesticides (HHPs),” he said,

Irtwange added that viable alternatives and innovations were  increasingly available both locally and globally.

SRADev  also called for an immediate review and strict enforcement of national pesticide regulations to stop the importation, sale, and use of HHPs.

The group also urged the review of NAFDAC’s pesticide registration regulations to ensure environmentally sound management of these chemicals at the end of their lifecycle.

HHPs are pesticides recognised internationally, including by the World Health Organisation (WHO), as posing severe acute or chronic risks to human health and the environment.

By Doris Esa

Indigenous worldviews strengthening climate resilience

Michael Simire
-
0
Indigenous worldviews strengthening climate resilience

The leadership of Indigenous Peoples is essential to a liveable, climate-resilient future. Their knowledge systems, rooted in stewardship, interdependence and care for all life, have guided – and continue to guide – communities through environmental change for millennia.

Across the world, Indigenous Peoples are responding to climate impacts with ingenuity and foresight. Grounded in lived experience and sustained through generations, Indigenous ways of living are diverse, adaptive, relational and deeply ecological, connected to land and culture. These are dynamic frameworks for resilience.

Youssef Nassef
Youssef Nassef, Director of the Adaptation Programme of the UNFCCC secretariat

As ambition under the Paris Agreement accelerates – in particular through the Global Goal on Adaptation – Indigenous Peoples are increasingly recognized not just as participants in climate policymaking, but as pathfinders. Their distinct and diverse worldviews offer valuable insights into what it truly means to be adapted: living in harmony with ecosystems, upholding intergenerational responsibility, and restoring balance.

Indigenous Climate Leadership in Action

Across diverse geographies, Indigenous Peoples are leading the way:

  • Vancouver Island, Canada: The Tla-o-qui-aht First Nation declared 100% of their territory under “Hishuk Ish Tsawaak” (ecosystem-based forest management), blending ancestral stewardship laws with modern conservation to protect salmon streams, old‐growth forests and watersheds – strengthening carbon sinks and food security.
  • Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: The Murray Lower Darling Rivers Indigenous Nations have reasserted customary governance over key river systems. Through inter-tribal cooperation, they negotiate water allocations, monitor river health, and restore wetlands to sustain ecosystems and downstream communities.
  • Highlands of Mongolia: Indigenous herder councils partnered with national meteorological services to co-design the Advanced Weather Information System, combining traditional forecasts with satellite data to issue drought and snow‐melt warnings, reducing livestock loss and economic shocks.
  • Mindanao, Philippines: Panlaoy, an Indigenous youth network, is reviving ancestral “kaingin” forestry practices, such as contour planting, sacred grove protection and community-based forest monitoring to slow erosion, recharge springs and regenerate degraded upland watersheds, securing downstream water for rice farming.

These are not isolated examples. They demonstrate that Indigenous-led climate action is happening, quietly and effectively, but is often under-recognised and under-supported. These examples reflect how place-based knowledge systems – whether managing forests, rivers, rains or soils – are being actively revitalised and scaled through partnerships with governments and research institutions. These systems are not only surviving; they are thriving and evolving.

In mitigation, too, Indigenous Peoples play a central role. Their stewardship of forests, wetlands and grasslands helps maintain vital carbon sinks and protects biodiversity. Studies show that Indigenous-managed lands have lower deforestation rates and greater ecological integrity than surrounding areas. Their contributions are not just environmental – they are critical to global sustainability.

“As UNFCCC works with countries and stakeholders to advance the Global Goal on Adaptation and long-term climate resilience, Indigenous Peoples must be at the centre, not just as stakeholders, but as partners and knowledge holders,” says Youssef Nassef, Director of Adaptation at UN Climate Change. “The Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples Platform (LCIPP) continues to drive this forward, ensuring that Indigenous voices shape climate policy and action.”

Supporting and Amplifying Indigenous Climate Leadership

On this day, and every day, UN Climate Change calls on countries, institutions and climate actors to:

  • Partner meaningfully with Indigenous Peoples.
  • Incorporate Indigenous worldviews and knowledge into national climate strategies.
  • Invest in Indigenous-led climate solutions with accessible, long-term support.

UN body adopts standard to support climate efforts in communities lacking basic needs

Michael Simire
-
0
UN body adopts standard to support climate efforts in communities lacking basic needs

A Body tasked with operationalising the UN carbon market under the Paris Agreement has adopted a new standard on “suppressed demand”, opening the door for more inclusive climate action in regions with limited access to basic services such as water and sanitation. 

Formally known as the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body, it is responsible for establishing the rules and infrastructure for the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism. This mechanism will allow countries and other actors to cooperate in reducing greenhouse gas emissions by generating high-integrity carbon credits, while also supporting sustainable development. 

Martin Hession
Martin Hession, Chair of the Supervisory Body

Supressed demand standard  

Suppressed demand refers to situations where people use very little energy or services, not because they don’t need them, but because they can’t afford them or the infrastructure doesn’t exist. The new standard allows climate projects that help meet these basic human needs to earn carbon credits, even if emissions would naturally rise as a result of improved access. 

This approach helps ensure that people in low-income communities can benefit from climate finance, by recognising the emissions that would occur if their basic needs were met and supporting projects that meet those needs in the cleanest way possible. 

The decision allows suppressed demand to be recognised in mechanism baselines to credit projects that provide essential services. These baselines reflect the expected emissions if communities had normal access to those services and enable fairer crediting for development-focused projects. 

“We’ve recognised that baselines can be established with reference to basic human needs where they aren’t being met. This approach allows the mechanism to support real development benefits, particularly in communities where access is currently limited,” said Martin Hession, Chair of the Supervisory Body.  

Upcoming work on non-permanence and reversals 

Methodological Expert Panel (MEP) has produced recommendations on non-permanence and reversals, for which public comment has just closed. The Supervisory Body is looking forward to the MEP making formal recommendations to the Body, which will be subject to a further consultation period before it is considered by the Body. 

“While there is significant work to do, we are committed to securing a non-permanence and reversals standard this year. We expect to adopt a standard at our next meeting in October once we receive the final recommendation from the MEP,” said Martin Hession, Chair of the Supervisory Body. “I know there is significant stakeholder interest in the initial drafts produced by the MEP last month, and there has been strong engagement during the MEP’s initial consultation. Of course, there will be another opportunity to comment on the final recommendation once it has been formulated by the MEP in September.” 

Other matters 

The Supervisory Body adopted its two-year business and resource allocation plan for 2026-2027, outlining the minimum capacity needed to fully operationalise the mechanism. While early implementation is progressing, revenue generation remains limited at this stage and a significant upfront investment is required to establish essential infrastructure.

To support this, the Body agreed that the Chair and Vice-Chair will lead targeted fundraising efforts, with Parties to the Paris Agreement to be invited to contribute to resource mobilisation.

Next steps 

The Supervisory Body will next meet from October 6 to 10, 2025, to continue developing other key elements of the mechanism, including a standard on reversal risk and additional tools and guidelines. 

Kenya eliminates sleeping sickness as a public health problem – WHO

Michael Simire
-
0
Kenya eliminates sleeping sickness as a public health problem – WHO

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has validated Kenya as having eliminated human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) or sleeping sickness as a public health problem, making it the 10th country to reach this important milestone. HAT is the second neglected tropical disease (NTD) to be eliminated in Kenya: the country was certified free of Guinea worm disease in 2018.

“I congratulate the government and people of Kenya on this landmark achievement,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. “Kenya joins the growing ranks of countries freeing their populations of human African trypanosomiasis. This is another step towards making Africa free of neglected tropical diseases.”

Tedros Ghebreyesus
Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General, World Health Organisation (WHO)

HAT is a vector-borne disease caused by the blood parasite Trypanosoma brucei. It is transmitted to humans through the bites of tsetse flies that have acquired the parasites from infected humans or animals. Rural populations dependent on agriculture, fishing, animal husbandry or hunting are most at risk of exposure.

As the name indicates, HAT is transmitted only on the African continent. The disease exists in two forms, gambiense and rhodesiense. The rhodesiense form (r-HAT), which is found in eastern and southern Africa, is the only one present in Kenya. It is caused by Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense and progresses rapidly, invading multiple organs including the brain. Without treatment, it is fatal within weeks.

Kenya’s progress

“This validation marks a major public health milestone for Kenya, as we celebrate the elimination of a deadly disease in our country. The achievement will not only protect our people but also pave the way for renewed economic growth and prosperity,” said Dr Aden Duale, Kenya’s Cabinet Secretary for Health. “This follows many years of dedication, hard work and collaboration”.

The first cases of HAT in Kenya were detected in the early 20th century. Since then, Kenya has engaged in consistent control activities, without indigenous new cases reported for over 10 years. The last autochthonous case was detected in 2009, and the last two exported cases, infected in the Masai Mara National Reserve, were detected in 2012.

Recently, Kenya strengthened HAT surveillance in 12 health facilities in six historically endemic counties to act as sentinel sites. They were equipped with diagnostic tools and had their clinical personnel trained on diagnostic procedures, including the most sensitive and practical tests for r-HAT.

The country also actively monitors the control and surveillance of tsetse flies and animal trypanosomiasis, both within and beyond the historical HAT endemic areas, supported by the national veterinary health authorities and the Kenya Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Eradication Council (KENTTEC). These activities and the related data provide supplementary backing to the claim of HAT elimination as a public health problem.

“This key milestone reflects Kenya’s efforts and commitment over many years, as a collaboration between national and county governments, national research institutions, development partners and affected communities,” said Dr Patrick Amoth, EBS, Director General Health, Ministry of Health, Kenya. “The country remains fully committed to sustain the quality of care and surveillance in line with WHO’s recommendations.”

Supported by WHO and partners, including FIND, Kenya’s HAT elimination programme will now implement a post-validation surveillance plan to detect any potential resurgence or reintroduction of transmission. WHO continues to support ongoing monitoring in previously affected areas and maintains a stock of medicines to ensure rapid treatment of possible future cases, thanks to donations from Bayer AG and Sanofi.

“This success was made possible by the Ministry of Health’s leadership, the dedication of health workers in areas at risk and the support from key partners,” said Dr Abdourahmane Diallo, WHO Representative to Kenya. “WHO is proud to have contributed to this achievement and encourages all stakeholders to remain involved in post-validation monitoring.”

Progress in global HAT elimination

A total of 57 countries has eliminated at least one NTD. Of these, 10 (including Kenya) have successfully eliminated HAT as a public health problem. The other countries that have reached this milestone are Benin, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Equatorial Guinea, Ghana, Guinea, Rwanda, Togo and Uganda.

Blow to land rights as Indigenous leaders sound alarm over partial veto of Brazil’s ‘Devastation Bill’ 

Michael Simire
-
0
Blow to land rights as Indigenous leaders sound alarm over partial veto of Brazil’s ‘Devastation Bill’ 

Only three months before the United Nations climate talks (COP30) take place in Belem, Brazil, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has partially passed legislation that is expected to unleash higher rates of deforestation – and greater threats to Indigenous communities living there.

The bill rolls back strict environmental licensing rules that have kept destruction of the world’s largest rainforest in check. 

Lula da Silva
Lula da Silva, President of Brazil

While Lula struck down some aspects of the bill, including stipulations that would strip Indigenous Peoples of veto power over economic activities on their lands, the overall threats to forests and Indigenous Peoples remain. 

Dinamam Tuxá, of the Tuxá Peoples from Bahia, Pernambuco, and Minas Gerais, and the Executive Coordinator of APIB and a lawyer for APOINME, said: ”At his inauguration, President Lula made a public commitment to Indigenous Peoples and to the protection of the environment. In light of that, it was essential that he fully veto the so-called ‘Devastation Bill’.

“This bill represents a serious attack from a Congress that has consistently shown itself to be hostile to the rights of Indigenous Peoples and to the environmental agenda. Now, the responsibility for this law lies with Congress, which continues to push forward measures that violate constitutional rights and put the future of the planet at risk.”

On July 17, 2024, the Chamber of Deputies approved Bill 2,159/2021, incorporating 29 Senate amendments. The bill makes it easier for companies to obtain permits to develop new projects in forested areas by creating new types of environmental licenses, such as the Special Environmental License (LAE) and the Adhesion and Commitment License (LAC), which simplifies procedures and shorter analysis deadlines. In some cases, companies simply need to fill out an online form to receive a permit that would have previously undergone scrutiny.

Starting on July 17, President Lula had 15 working days to decide whether to veto the bill, fully or in part. Reported disagreements among his ministers and advisors and strong opposition from civil society, which dubbed the legislation the “Devastation Bill” created tensions.

The initial draft of the law created a fast-track license called the Special Environmental License (LAE) for large projects, allowing approval within 12 months and lasting up to 10 years. For smaller projects, there would be a simpler license (LAC) that wouldn’t require detailed environmental due diligence. Instead, the business would promise to follow rules and would be checked annually to ensure compliance.

Agencies that normally protect Indigenous lands, cultural heritage, and nature reserves could have less power in approving licenses. If the law goes forward, these agencies will only get to comment on projects if the Indigenous land is already officially recognised. Many Indigenous lands still waiting for this recognition wouldn’t be considered. These agencies would have less time to give their opinions, and if they are late, the licensing authority could ignore their input. This means some important concerns about the environmental or human rights impact of a project might not be fully considered.

The news comes as Brazilian Indigenous leaders are calling for the creation of an Indigenous NDC (Nationally Determined Contribution) – ensuring that national climate targets include metrics for land demarcation, recognizing that their territories are critical for environmental protection and climate mitigation.  

The Articulation of Indigenous Peoples of Brazil (APIB)

APIB is the largest Indigenous organisation in Brazil and has, since its creation, fulfilled its commitment to fight for the constitutional rights of the country’s Indigenous Peoples. Whether nationally or internationally, APIB and its seven grassroots organisations are mobilised to protect territories, communities and people. The Indigenous Peoples, articulated through their regional organisations and APIB, seek in all instances the accountability of those responsible for this destruction.

APIB has historically mobilised the indigenous movement and faced the anti-indigenous policies that are being processed in the Federal Supreme Court and in the Chamber of Deputies, forming the front line of protection of Indigenous Peoples and Lands, and consequently, of the environment and the environment’s future. APIB is working on multiple fronts to stop these attacks against their rights and territories.

They are in Bonn, Germany, to raise international alerts; they are working hand-and-hand with government officials who care for the climate and human rights and organising nation-wide demonstrations.

Dangote Refinery debunks shutdown rumour, says PMS’ gantry price remains N850

Michael Simire
-
0
Dangote Refinery debunks shutdown rumour, says PMS’ gantry price remains N850

The Dangote Petroleum Refinery has dismissed recent reports alleging a shutdown of its operations, reassuring the public and market stakeholders that its activities remain fully active and stable.

In an official statement by the Group Chief Branding and Communications Officer, Anthony Chiejina, the refinery’s management categorically denied claims that truck loading has been suspended or that production has been interrupted.

Dangote Refinery
Dangote Refinery

“The Dangote Petroleum Refinery is fully operational. There has been no shutdown, nor has there been any suspension of truck loading activities,” the statement reads.

The refinery also clarified that the intermittent sale of Residual Catalytic Oil (RCO) is part of normal business operations, often involving large parcel sales, which explains the recent fuel oil tender.

According to the management, Dangote Petroleum Refinery consistently supplies over 40 million litres of PMS daily, alongside steady volumes of Automotive Gas Oil (diesel). These supplies continue unabated, despite speculation suggesting otherwise.

 “As the world’s largest single-train petroleum refinery, the facility employs advanced predictive and preventive maintenance protocols to ensure uninterrupted operations. Routine maintenance activities are standard and do not impact the overall fuel supply,” the statement further clarified.

In response to speculation about potential supply shortages and price increases, the refinery challenged those sponsoring the rumour to place orders for daily deliveries of up to 40 million litres of PMS and 15 million litres of diesel for the next 90 days.

“To those who believe this misinformation and anticipate a bullish market, we extend a challenge: We invite interested buyers to place immediate orders for up to 40 million litres of PMS daily and 15 million litres of AGO daily, for the next 90 days.”

The refinery reaffirmed its commitment to transparency and Nigeria’s energy security, urging the public to disregard unfounded rumours sponsored by unscrupulous and unpatriotic individuals seeking to undermine the country’s energy independence for their own selfish interests, including the importation of substandard fuels under the false pretext of domestic supply shortages.

INC-5.2: Fossil fuel, petrochemical lobbyists overrun plastics treaty negotiations

Michael Simire
-
0
INC-5.2: Fossil fuel, petrochemical lobbyists overrun plastics treaty negotiations

At least 234 fossil fuel and chemical industry lobbyists – a new high compared to the 221 identified by CIEL at INC-5 – have registered to participate in the fifth and final scheduled session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5.2) of the Plastics Treaty negotiations.

The strong presence of lobbyists at this stage of the negotiations raises concerns about corporate influence at a pivotal moment – when negotiators are expected to finalise the treaty text and lay the groundwork for its adoption. The negotiations are intended to provide a treaty truly capable of ending plastic pollution.

INC-5.2
Opening plenary of the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5.2 session)

The analysis, conducted by the Centre for International Environmental Law (CIEL) – supported by the International Indigenous Peoples’ Forum on Plastics (IIPFP), the International Pollutants Elimination Network (IPEN), the Break Free From Plastic movement, the Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA), Greenpeace, the Stop Tobacco Pollution Alliance (STPA), the International Alliance of Waste Pickers (IAWP), and Public Services International (PSI) – is based on the United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) provisional list of INC-5.2 participants. 

The analysis reveals that:

  • Fossil fuel and chemical industry lobbyists outnumber the combined diplomatic delegations of all 27 European Union nations and the EU combined (233). Major fossil fuel and chemical companies and their lobbyists are particularly well represented, with Dow and the American Chemistry Council each bringing seven lobbyists, while ExxonMobil has brought six.
  • Nineteen fossil fuel and chemical lobbyists have secured places in the national delegations of Egypt (6), Kazakhstan (4), China (3), Iran (3), Chile (2), and the Dominican Republic (1). 
  • Chemical and fossil fuel industry lobbyists outnumber the Scientists’ Coalition for an Effective Plastic Treaty (60) by nearly four to one, and the International Indigenous Peoples’ Forum on Plastics (36) by nearly seven to one.

CIEL’s estimate is likely to be conservative, as the methodology relies on delegates to the talks disclosing their own connections to fossil fuel or chemical industry interests, and some lobbyists may choose to obscure that link. The figure does not include lobbyists from adjacent sectors, including fast-moving consumer goods and waste management sectors, all of whom have vested interests in weakening the treaty’s ambition. 

“We have decades of evidence showing the fossil fuel and chemical industries’ playbook: deny, distract, derail. Fossil fuel companies are central to plastic production, as over 99 percent of plastics are derived from chemicals sourced from fossil fuels. Many of these companies are facing legal scrutiny over their role in the climate crisis. After decades of obstruction in the climate negotiations, why would anyone think that they would suddenly show up in good faith in the Plastics Treaty talks? Involving the very corporations that profit from harm in shaping the path forward guarantees one thing: a treaty that protects their bottom line, not the public or the planet,” says Ximena Banegas, CIEL Global Plastics and Petrochemicals Campaigner

While the analysis captures the number of participants registered to attend the negotiations, it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Industry influence extends well beyond formal participation – through lobbyists embedded within country delegations, informal advisory roles, and lobbying during intersessional periods.

These actors often apply pressure on Member States, engage in intimidation tactics, and attempt to compromise ambition in related processes, threatening the treaty’s integrity. In the lead-up to INC-5.2, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) warned that actors with vested interests have used well-documented tactics such as lobbying, strategic funding, and ghostwriting scientific studies. The OHCHR emphasised that “this can lead to misleading claims that cast doubt on scientific evidence, thereby stalling or undermining effective policy action.” 

Despite calls to protect the negotiations from the undue influence of these industries, there has been a failure to develop conflict of interest policies to protect the INC process and the future Conferences of the Parties (COPs). In this already vulnerable space, concerns over UNEP’s objectivity reached a fever pitch before the negotiations began, with The Guardian reporting of “total infiltration” of both petrostates and lobbyists throughout the Plastics Treaty negotiations. 

“The fossil fuel and petrochemicals industry lobbyists aren’t just pulling strings behind the scenes – on the first day of INC-5.2, we saw them boldly take the floor, speak in plenary, and push their agenda in plain sight. Industry isn’t just stalling progress – they’re working in lockstep with petrostates in dragging the process toward the lowest common denominator. This may also reveal something else: public outcry over the plastics crisis shows them the tide is turning, and they’re doubling down,” says Rachel Radvany, CIEL Environmental Health Campaigner.

The outcome of these negotiations will have far-reaching consequences. Plastics pollute our bodies, our air, our water, and our soil, accelerating the climate crisis and the collapse of ecosystems. Without decisive action, plastic production could triple by 2050, exacerbating these impacts unless countries act now. While industry actors are here to protect their profits and safeguard their commercial interests, the majority of stakeholders are here to protect public health, environmental integrity, and a livable planet for future generations.

“Petrostates flanked by industry have been content to run down the INC clock, counting on exhaustion and dwindling resources to deliver a hollow treaty. But civil society isn’t going anywhere. We’ll be here every step of the way – encouraging governments to do what they know is right, and what their communities both deserve, and need. We are also here to remind Member States that they hold the power and that political courage must prevail over corporate capture and petrostate power,” says Delphine Lévi Alvarès, CIEL Global Petrochemicals Campaign Manager.

Juressa Lee, Co-chair, International Indigenous Peoples Forum on Plastics (IIPFP), said: “For generations, we have witnessed the destruction wrought on our planet and communities by extractive and exploitative colonial and capitalist systems of oppression. Right now, Indigenous Peoples all around the world are dealing with hostile governments and industries that are waging wars against our communities and the environments that sustain us.

“The plastics industry and these treaty negotiations are no exception. The infiltration of these negotiations by extractive industries is a huge miscarriage of justice and is symptomatic of the structural issues behind the INC process, which devalues the voices of those bearing the brunt of the plastics crisis across its entire life cycle, from extraction to disposal. We call on Member States to do the right thing – recognise the rights of Indigenous Peoples and show courage by putting people, planet, and future generations first. Not profit and private interests.”

Daniel Bertossa, General Secretary, Public Services International (PSI) Global Union, said: “Millions of workers are exposed to chemicals of concern and toxic additives along the whole plastics life cycle, including frontline workers in municipal waste management, water and sanitation facilities, as well as health care workers and firefighters. The CIEL report exposes the reality of the corporate capture of our national and multilateral institutions, and substantiates our call for urgent change. Polluters need to be held accountable for the healthcare and environmental burden they place on societies and must pay back through fair taxation as per the implementation of the polluter pays principle.

“Those resources are urgently needed to (re)build public waste management infrastructures and water and sanitation facilities that are safe for users, workers and the environment, so we can drink water out of the tap; to fund occupational health and safety (OSH); and to fund adequate measures for a just transition for all concerned workers regardless of forms of employment. We urge UNEP and Member States to resist pressure from polluters and support an ambitious treaty that protects both workers and the environment.”

Ana Rocha, Director of Global Plastics Programme, Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA), said: “The stakes could not be higher at INC-5.2. Every day, we learn new and terrifying ways that plastic is harming us, and yet we as civil society are forced to compete for the attention of our leaders with the very companies that caused the plastic crisis in the first place. The only way for us to get a treaty strong enough to meet this existential threat is for the majority of countries to close their ears to the plastic industry, and listen to the voices of the Indigenous Peoples, independent scientists, waste pickers, and frontline leaders demanding plastic production cuts.”

Dr. Vishvaja Sambath, Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA), on behalf of the Break Free from Plastic movement, said: “Communities are suffering from the emissions of the petroleum and petrochemical industries, which supply plastics’ raw materials. Yet, at these negotiations, major oil-producing nations appear indifferent to both people and the planet. Their priority remains profit, so much so that they openly insist the treaty must only address plastic consumption and plastic waste mismanagement, while excluding any measures on production or extraction.

“This is an insult to frontline communities battling cancer and other severe health impacts. Now is the time to kick out the polluters and finalise an ambitious health- and environment-centric treaty to reduce plastic production and end plastic pollution.”

Pamela Miller, Co-Chair, International Pollutants Elimination Network (IPEN), said: “We are appalled not just by the sheer numbers of petrochemical industry lobbyists at the negotiations. Their presence represents an unbalanced power dynamic aimed at undermining the treaty and the urgent need to protect our health.”

Bethanie Carney Almroth, Professor of Ecotoxicology at the University of Gothenburg, Scientist Coalition for an Effective Plastics Treaty, said: “Robust independent science informs a clear understanding of the causes and effects of plastics pollution, and can support evidence-based decision making in developing policies to address these issues. Actors with conflicts of interest can delay or block policy by muddying the waters and creating doubt and uncertainty. While their tactics have extended to intimidating and harassing scientists, we remain committed to ensuring the best available science is accessible to negotiators and to support decision that protects humans and the environment.”

Deborah Sy, Head of Global Public Policy and Strategy at the Global Centre for Good Governance in Tobacco Control, on behalf of the Stop Tobacco Pollution Alliance (STPA), said: “This report highlights a failure to uphold basic principles of good governance. Even tobacco industry allies have been given a seat at the table in the Plastics Treaty negotiations, despite existing international rules under the WHO FCTC. It’s a sobering example of how, in the absence of clear safeguards, the environmental platform could disregard existing health obligations. A treaty process that could be shaped by those with a commercial interest in plastic pollution is not just a conflict of interest – it risks eroding public trust.”

Graham Forbes, Head of Delegation to the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations and Global Campaign Lead, Greenpeace USA, said: “The flood of fossil fuel and petrochemical lobbyists in Geneva is undermining the world’s best chance to end plastic pollution and protect human health. It is unacceptable that the industries profiting from the plastic pollution crisis are being given a front-row seat in solving it. These actors have a vested interest in a weak agreement that allows them to produce plastics without limit for eternity, condemning future generations to a toxic future. Governments must show leadership, reject fossil fuel nonsense, and deliver the effective treaty that the world desperately needs. Polluters must not be allowed to write the rules.”

Soledad Mella, waste picker leader from Chile, IAWP delegate at INC-5.2, said: “For generations, we have witnessed the destruction wrought on our planet and communities by extractive and exploitative colonial and capitalist systems of oppression. Right now, Indigenous Peoples all around the world are dealing with hostile governments and industries that are waging wars against our communities and the environments that sustain us. The plastics industry and these treaty negotiations are no exception.

“The infiltration of these negotiations by extractive industries is a huge miscarriage of justice and is symptomatic of the structural issues behind the INC process, which devalues the voices of those bearing the brunt of the plastics crisis across its entire life cycle, from extraction to disposal. We call on Member States to do the right thing – recognise the rights of Indigenous Peoples and show courage by putting people, planet, and future generations first. Not profit and private interests.”

Graham Forbes, Greenpeace Head of Delegation to the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations and Global Campaign Lead for Greenpeace USA, said: “The flood of fossil fuel and petrochemical lobbyists in Geneva is undermining the world’s best chance to end plastic pollution and protect human health.  It is unacceptable that the industries profiting from the plastic pollution crisis are being given a front-row seat in solving it.

“These actors have a vested interest in a weak agreement that allows them to produce plastics without limit for eternity, condemning future generations to a toxic future. Governments must show leadership, reject fossil fuel nonsense, and deliver the effective treaty that the world desperately needs. Polluters must not be allowed to write the rules.”

Lagos defends styrofoam ban, says for public health not politics

Michael Simire
-
0
Lagos defends styrofoam ban, says for public health not politics

The Lagos State Government has reaffirmed its stance on the ban of single-use styrofoam, describing the decision as one rooted in public health, environmental sustainability, and scientific evidence and not for political convenience.

Commissioner for the Environment and Water Resources, Mr. Tokunbo Wahab, disclosed this on his verified X handle on Thursday, August 7, 2025.

Styrofoam
Styrofoam

Wahab said the government acknowledged that the move was initially unpopular, drawing resistance from certain quarters.

He said the data the government relied on was clear and irrefutable, adding that  styrofoam clogs drainage systems, pollutes water bodies, and enters the food chain, posing significant risks to human health and the environment.

“Our decision to ban styrofoam was unpopular, but necessary. We stood on irrefutable research: this material clogs drains, contaminates our water, and poisons our food chain.

“It wasn’t politics – it was public health,” Wahab said.

He expressed appreciation to Lagosians who have adapted to the new directive by embracing environmentally friendly alternatives.

He commended their role in reducing the incidence of flooding in the state, especially during the 2025 prolonged rainy season.

“To every Lagosian who adapted: Thank you. You’ve helped reduce flooding and protect our children’s future,” Wahab said.

Wahab recognised the contribution of popular comedian @_Taaooma, who used her platform to creatively enlighten the public about the ban and its implications, blending education with humour.

“Special thanks to @_Taaooma for enlightening us with humour, as always,” he said.
Wahab emphasised that the success of environmental policies rests on collective responsibility and continued citizen engagement.

He noted that sustainable urban living is only achievable when both government and citizens work together.

“A flood-free Lagos is our collective responsibility,” Wahab said.

The ban on styrofoam and other single-use plastics in Lagos was officially announced in January 2024 following years of advocacy from environmental experts, civil society groups, and community health stakeholders.

Multiple studies by local and international bodies revealed that discarded styrofoam was one of the biggest culprits of drainage blockage across Lagos.

By Fabian Ekeruche 

123...2,290Page 1 of 2,290

TV Report

Archives

2025 EnviroNews Nigeria. All Rights Reserved.

×